0:00:01.424,0:00:04.582 It was an afternoon in the fall of 2005. 0:00:05.325,0:00:08.924 I was working at the ACLU[br]as the organization's science advisor. 0:00:09.388,0:00:11.995 I really, really loved my job, 0:00:12.019,0:00:13.655 but I was having one of those days 0:00:13.679,0:00:16.248 where I was feeling[br]just a little bit discouraged. 0:00:17.265,0:00:21.369 So I wandered down the hallway[br]to my colleague Chris Hansen's office. 0:00:22.367,0:00:26.021 Chris had been at the ACLU[br]for more than 30 years, 0:00:26.045,0:00:29.120 so he had deep institutional[br]knowledge and insights. 0:00:29.640,0:00:32.613 I explained to Chris[br]that I was feeling a little bit stuck. 0:00:33.512,0:00:35.694 I had been investigating[br]a number of issues 0:00:35.718,0:00:41.019 at the intersection of science[br]and civil liberties -- super interesting. 0:00:41.043,0:00:44.953 But I wanted the ACLU to engage[br]these issues in a much bigger way, 0:00:44.977,0:00:47.222 in a way that could really[br]make a difference. 0:00:49.603,0:00:51.703 So Chris cut right[br]to the chase, and he says, 0:00:51.727,0:00:55.187 "Well, of all the issues you've been[br]looking at, what are the top five?" 0:00:55.524,0:00:58.180 "Well, there's genetic discrimination, 0:00:58.204,0:01:00.629 and reproductive technologies, 0:01:00.653,0:01:02.794 and biobanking, and ... 0:01:02.818,0:01:04.660 oh, there's this really cool issue, 0:01:04.684,0:01:07.333 functional MRI and using it[br]for lie detection, and ... 0:01:07.357,0:01:09.478 oh, and of course, there's gene patents." 0:01:09.502,0:01:11.131 "Gene patents?" 0:01:11.967,0:01:14.049 "Yes, you know, patents on human genes." 0:01:14.073,0:01:15.579 "No! 0:01:15.603,0:01:18.064 You're telling me that the US government 0:01:18.088,0:01:21.012 has been issuing patents[br]on part of the human body? 0:01:21.543,0:01:23.226 That can't be right." 0:01:23.861,0:01:27.320 I went back to my office[br]and sent Chris three articles. 0:01:27.954,0:01:31.281 And 20 minutes later,[br]he came bursting in my office. 0:01:31.305,0:01:34.921 "Oh my god! You're right! Who can we sue?" 0:01:35.330,0:01:36.839 (Laughter) 0:01:37.713,0:01:40.087 Now Chris is a really brilliant lawyer, 0:01:40.111,0:01:43.020 but he knew almost nothing[br]about patent law 0:01:43.044,0:01:45.480 and certainly nothing about genetics. 0:01:45.504,0:01:48.382 I knew something about genetics,[br]but I wasn't even a lawyer, 0:01:48.406,0:01:50.067 let alone a patent lawyer. 0:01:50.091,0:01:53.557 So clearly we had a lot to learn[br]before we could file a lawsuit. 0:01:54.036,0:01:56.894 First, we needed to understand[br]exactly what was patented 0:01:56.918,0:01:58.599 when someone patented a gene. 0:01:59.679,0:02:03.501 Gene patents typically contain[br]dozens of claims, 0:02:03.525,0:02:08.302 but the most controversial of these[br]are to so-called "isolated DNA" -- 0:02:08.699,0:02:13.140 namely, a piece of DNA[br]that has been removed from a cell. 0:02:14.073,0:02:15.372 Gene patent proponents say, 0:02:15.396,0:02:18.570 "See? We didn't patent[br]the gene in your body, 0:02:18.594,0:02:20.529 we patented an isolated gene." 0:02:21.148,0:02:22.349 And that's true, 0:02:22.373,0:02:29.106 but the problem is that any use[br]of the gene requires that it be isolated. 0:02:30.510,0:02:34.915 And the patents weren't just[br]to a particular gene that they isolated, 0:02:34.939,0:02:37.826 but on every possible[br]version of that gene. 0:02:38.183,0:02:39.520 So what does that mean? 0:02:39.981,0:02:43.043 That means that you can't give[br]your gene to your doctor 0:02:43.067,0:02:45.363 and ask him or her to look at it, 0:02:45.387,0:02:47.487 say, to see if it has any mutations, 0:02:47.511,0:02:49.587 without permission of the patent holder. 0:02:50.363,0:02:54.556 It also means that the patent holder[br]has the right to stop anyone 0:02:54.580,0:02:58.062 from using that gene[br]in research or clinical testing. 0:02:58.871,0:03:00.569 Allowing patent holders, 0:03:00.593,0:03:01.877 often private companies, 0:03:01.901,0:03:06.387 to lock up stretches of the human genome[br]was harming patients. 0:03:06.958,0:03:08.110 Consider Abigail, 0:03:08.134,0:03:10.527 a 10-year-old with long QT syndrome, 0:03:10.551,0:03:13.975 a serious heart condition that,[br]if left untreated, 0:03:13.999,0:03:15.777 can result in sudden death. 0:03:16.911,0:03:20.833 The company that obtained a patent on two[br]genes associated with this condition 0:03:20.857,0:03:23.339 developed a test to diagnose the syndrome. 0:03:23.363,0:03:26.187 But then they went bankrupt[br]and they never offered it. 0:03:27.060,0:03:28.988 So another lab tried to offer the test, 0:03:29.012,0:03:32.000 but the company that held the patents[br]threatened to sue the lab 0:03:32.024,0:03:33.206 for patent infringement. 0:03:33.230,0:03:34.389 So as a result, 0:03:34.413,0:03:37.275 for 2 years, no test was available. 0:03:38.291,0:03:39.441 During that time, 0:03:39.465,0:03:42.715 Abigail died of undiagnosed long QT. 0:03:43.776,0:03:47.013 Gene patents clearly were a problem[br]and were harming patients. 0:03:47.467,0:03:49.873 But was there a way[br]we could challenge them? 0:03:50.266,0:03:51.998 Turns out that the Supreme Court 0:03:52.022,0:03:55.136 has made clear[br]through a long line of cases, 0:03:55.160,0:03:57.946 that certain things[br]are not patent eligible. 0:03:58.925,0:04:01.299 You can't patent products of nature -- 0:04:02.148,0:04:06.357 the air, the water, minerals,[br]elements of the periodic table. 0:04:07.170,0:04:09.282 And you can't patent laws of nature -- 0:04:10.193,0:04:12.472 the law of gravity, E = mc2. 0:04:12.909,0:04:17.715 These things are just too fundamental[br]and must remain free to all 0:04:17.739,0:04:19.562 and reserved exclusively to none. 0:04:20.348,0:04:22.495 It seemed to us that DNA, 0:04:22.519,0:04:25.035 the most fundamental structure of life, 0:04:25.059,0:04:27.715 that codes for the production[br]of all of our proteins, 0:04:27.739,0:04:30.965 is both a product of nature[br]and a law of nature, 0:04:30.989,0:04:33.691 regardless of whether it's in our bodies 0:04:33.715,0:04:35.753 or sitting in the bottom of a test tube. 0:04:36.523,0:04:37.978 As we delved into this issue, 0:04:38.002,0:04:41.910 we traveled all over the country[br]to speak with many different experts -- 0:04:42.588,0:04:46.301 scientists, medical professionals,[br]lawyers, patent lawyers. 0:04:46.753,0:04:50.663 Most of them agreed that we were right[br]as a matter of policy, 0:04:50.687,0:04:53.472 and, at least in theory,[br]as a matter of law. 0:04:54.313,0:04:55.468 All of them thought 0:04:55.492,0:04:58.062 our chances of winning[br]a gene-patent challenge 0:04:58.086,0:04:59.953 were about zero. 0:05:01.628,0:05:02.991 Why is that? 0:05:03.015,0:05:06.102 Well, the patent office[br]had been issuing these patents 0:05:06.126,0:05:07.827 for more than 20 years. 0:05:08.686,0:05:11.566 There were literally thousands[br]of patents on human genes. 0:05:12.843,0:05:15.784 The patent bar was deeply[br]entrenched in the status quo, 0:05:16.581,0:05:20.204 the biotech industry had grown up[br]around this practice, 0:05:20.228,0:05:23.347 and legislation to ban gene patents[br]had been introduced 0:05:23.371,0:05:24.769 year after year in Congress, 0:05:24.793,0:05:26.584 and had gone absolutely nowhere. 0:05:27.401,0:05:28.615 So the bottom line: 0:05:29.027,0:05:32.202 courts just weren't going to be willing[br]to overturn these patents. 0:05:32.916,0:05:37.511 Now, neither Chris nor I were the type[br]to shy away from a challenge, 0:05:37.535,0:05:40.679 and hearing, "Being right[br]just isn't enough," 0:05:40.703,0:05:43.233 seemed all the more reason[br]to take on this fight. 0:05:44.311,0:05:46.246 So we set out to build our case. 0:05:47.494,0:05:50.984 Now, patent cases tend to be:[br]Company A sues Company B 0:05:51.008,0:05:54.191 over some really narrow,[br]obscure technical issue. 0:05:54.822,0:05:57.187 We weren't really interested[br]in that kind of case, 0:05:57.211,0:05:59.600 and we thought this case[br]was much bigger than that. 0:05:59.624,0:06:02.112 This was about scientific freedom,[br]medical progress, 0:06:02.136,0:06:03.595 the rights of patients. 0:06:03.619,0:06:06.722 So we decided we were going[br]to develop a case 0:06:06.746,0:06:09.264 that was not like[br]your typical patent case -- 0:06:09.645,0:06:11.527 more like a civil rights case. 0:06:12.756,0:06:15.598 We set out to identify[br]a gene-patent holder 0:06:15.622,0:06:18.407 that was vigorously enforcing its patents 0:06:18.431,0:06:21.725 and then to organize a broad coalition[br]of plaintiffs and experts 0:06:21.749,0:06:23.639 that could tell the court 0:06:23.663,0:06:28.052 about all the ways that these patents[br]were harming patients and innovation. 0:06:29.404,0:06:32.526 We found the prime candidate[br]to sue in Myriad Genetics, 0:06:32.550,0:06:35.405 a company that's based[br]in Salt Lake City, Utah. 0:06:36.718,0:06:38.968 Myriad held patents on two genes, 0:06:38.992,0:06:42.313 the BRCA1 and the BRCA2 genes. 0:06:43.150,0:06:45.884 Women with certain mutations[br]along these genes 0:06:45.908,0:06:48.534 are considered to be[br]at a significantly increased risk 0:06:48.558,0:06:50.503 of developing breast and ovarian cancer. 0:06:51.834,0:06:53.714 Myriad had used its patents to maintain 0:06:53.738,0:06:57.947 a complete monopoly on BRCA testing[br]in the United States. 0:06:58.544,0:07:02.732 It had forced multiple labs[br]that were offering BRCA testing to stop. 0:07:02.756,0:07:04.915 It charged a lot of money for its test -- 0:07:04.939,0:07:06.622 over 3,000 dollars. 0:07:07.089,0:07:09.424 It had stopped sharing its clinical data 0:07:09.448,0:07:11.735 with the international[br]scientific community. 0:07:12.522,0:07:14.425 And perhaps worst of all, 0:07:14.449,0:07:16.885 for a period of several years, 0:07:16.909,0:07:20.622 Myriad refused to update its test[br]to include additional mutations 0:07:20.646,0:07:24.267 that had been identified[br]by a team of researchers in France. 0:07:24.974,0:07:27.482 It has been estimated[br]that during that period, 0:07:27.506,0:07:28.879 for several years, 0:07:28.903,0:07:32.655 as many as 12 percent of women[br]undergoing testing 0:07:32.679,0:07:35.081 received the wrong answer -- 0:07:36.377,0:07:40.146 a negative test result[br]that should have been positive. 0:07:41.485,0:07:43.226 This is Kathleen Maxian. 0:07:44.172,0:07:47.429 Kathleen's sister Eileen[br]developed breast cancer at age 40 0:07:47.453,0:07:49.293 and she was tested by Myriad. 0:07:50.032,0:07:51.758 The test was negative. 0:07:51.782,0:07:53.308 The family was relieved. 0:07:53.332,0:07:57.120 That meant that Eileen's cancer[br]most likely didn't run in the family, 0:07:57.144,0:08:00.159 and that other members of her family[br]didn't need to be tested. 0:08:00.843,0:08:02.073 But two years later, 0:08:02.097,0:08:06.157 Kathleen was diagnosed[br]with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. 0:08:06.927,0:08:10.799 It turned out that Kathleen's sister[br]was among the 12 percent 0:08:10.823,0:08:13.692 who received a false-negative test result. 0:08:14.347,0:08:17.436 Had Eileen received the proper result, 0:08:17.460,0:08:19.833 Kathleen would have then been tested, 0:08:19.857,0:08:22.770 and her ovarian cancer[br]could have been prevented. 0:08:24.818,0:08:26.082 Once we settled on Myriad, 0:08:26.106,0:08:29.991 we then had to form a coalition[br]of plaintiffs and experts 0:08:30.015,0:08:32.103 that could illuminate these problems. 0:08:32.127,0:08:34.699 We ended up with 20[br]highly committed plaintiffs: 0:08:35.325,0:08:36.863 genetic counselors, 0:08:36.887,0:08:40.246 geneticists who had received[br]cease and desist letters, 0:08:40.905,0:08:42.754 advocacy organizations, 0:08:43.532,0:08:46.597 four major scientific organizations[br]that collectively represented 0:08:46.621,0:08:50.151 more than 150,000 scientists[br]and medical professionals, 0:08:50.755,0:08:54.052 and individual women who either[br]couldn't afford Myriad's test, 0:08:54.076,0:08:57.080 or who wanted to obtain[br]a second opinion but could not, 0:08:57.104,0:08:58.848 as a result of the patents. 0:09:00.315,0:09:03.755 One of the major challenges[br]we had in preparing the case 0:09:03.779,0:09:06.645 was figuring out how best[br]to communicate the science. 0:09:07.079,0:09:10.910 So in order to argue that what Myriad did[br]was not an invention, 0:09:10.934,0:09:14.211 and that isolated BRCA genes[br]were products of nature, 0:09:15.124,0:09:17.837 we had to explain a couple[br]of basic concepts, like: 0:09:17.861,0:09:20.005 What's a gene? What's DNA? 0:09:20.029,0:09:23.745 How is DNA isolated,[br]and why isn't that an invention? 0:09:25.168,0:09:29.030 We spent hours and hours[br]with our plaintiffs and experts, 0:09:29.054,0:09:31.990 trying to come up with ways[br]of explaining these concepts 0:09:32.014,0:09:33.557 simply yet accurately. 0:09:34.306,0:09:37.638 And we ended up relying heavily[br]on the use of metaphors, 0:09:37.662,0:09:38.818 like gold. 0:09:39.789,0:09:42.073 So isolating DNA -- 0:09:42.097,0:09:44.597 it's like extracting gold from a mountain 0:09:45.105,0:09:47.121 or taking it out of a stream bed. 0:09:47.145,0:09:50.819 You might be able to patent[br]the process for mining the gold, 0:09:50.843,0:09:52.924 but you can't patent the gold itself. 0:09:53.929,0:09:56.672 It might've taken a lot[br]of hard work and effort 0:09:56.696,0:09:58.556 to dig the gold out of the mountain; 0:09:59.127,0:10:01.408 you still can't patent it,[br]it's still gold. 0:10:01.432,0:10:03.188 And the gold, once it's extracted, 0:10:03.212,0:10:05.300 can clearly be used[br]for all sorts of things 0:10:05.324,0:10:08.060 that it couldn't be used[br]for when it was in the mountain; 0:10:08.084,0:10:10.266 you can make jewelry[br]out of it for example -- 0:10:10.290,0:10:12.455 still can't patent the gold,[br]it's still gold. 0:10:13.364,0:10:17.218 So now it's 2009,[br]and we're ready to file our case. 0:10:18.286,0:10:21.781 We filed in federal court[br]in the Southern District of New York, 0:10:22.355,0:10:25.721 and the case was randomly assigned[br]to Judge Robert Sweet. 0:10:26.599,0:10:29.799 In March 2010, Judge Sweet[br]issued his opinion -- 0:10:30.569,0:10:32.427 152 pages -- 0:10:32.834,0:10:35.086 and a complete victory for our side. 0:10:35.964,0:10:37.395 In reading the opinion, 0:10:37.419,0:10:42.134 we could not get over how eloquently[br]he described the science in the case. 0:10:42.504,0:10:45.275 I mean, our brief --[br]it was pretty good, 0:10:45.299,0:10:46.866 but not this good. 0:10:47.778,0:10:51.155 How did he develop such a deep[br]understanding of this issue 0:10:51.179,0:10:52.339 in such a short time? 0:10:52.363,0:10:55.971 We just could not comprehend[br]how this had happened. 0:10:55.995,0:10:57.259 So it turned out, 0:10:57.283,0:11:00.593 Judge Sweet's clerk[br]working for him at the time, 0:11:00.617,0:11:02.097 was not just a lawyer -- 0:11:02.121,0:11:03.835 he was a scientist. 0:11:03.859,0:11:05.457 He was not just a scientist -- 0:11:05.481,0:11:08.627 he had a PhD in molecular biology. 0:11:08.651,0:11:10.402 (Laughter) 0:11:10.426,0:11:13.001 What an incredible stroke of luck! 0:11:14.058,0:11:15.358 Myriad then appealed 0:11:15.382,0:11:17.877 to the US Court of Appeals[br]for the Federal Circuit. 0:11:18.496,0:11:20.512 And here things got really interesting. 0:11:21.465,0:11:24.525 First, in a pivotal moment of this case, 0:11:25.187,0:11:27.818 the US government switched sides. 0:11:28.739,0:11:32.488 So in the district court the government[br]submitted a brief on Myriad's side. 0:11:32.512,0:11:37.640 But now in direct opposition[br]to its own patent office, 0:11:37.664,0:11:40.372 the US government files a brief[br]that states that is has 0:11:40.396,0:11:44.084 reconsidered this issue[br]in light of the district court's opinion, 0:11:44.108,0:11:47.294 and has concluded that isolated DNA[br]is not patent eligible. 0:11:47.818,0:11:49.629 This was a really big deal, 0:11:49.653,0:11:51.215 totally unexpected. 0:11:52.773,0:11:54.853 The Court of Appeals[br]for the Federal Circuit 0:11:54.877,0:11:56.560 hears all patent cases, 0:11:56.584,0:11:59.742 and it has a reputation for being[br]very, very pro-patent. 0:12:00.305,0:12:02.731 So even with this remarkable development, 0:12:02.755,0:12:04.434 we expected to lose. 0:12:04.458,0:12:05.805 And we did. 0:12:06.389,0:12:07.541 Sort of. 0:12:08.357,0:12:10.944 Ends up split decision, 2 to 1. 0:12:11.743,0:12:14.239 But the two judges who ruled against us, 0:12:14.263,0:12:16.504 did so for completely different reasons. 0:12:17.275,0:12:19.101 The first one, Judge Lourie, 0:12:19.125,0:12:22.140 made up his own novel,[br]biological theory -- 0:12:22.164,0:12:23.332 totally wrong. 0:12:23.356,0:12:24.367 (Laughter) 0:12:24.391,0:12:26.609 He decided Myriad had created[br]a new chemical -- 0:12:26.633,0:12:28.498 made absolutely no sense. 0:12:28.522,0:12:31.308 Myriad didn't even argue this,[br]so it came out of the blue. 0:12:31.632,0:12:33.609 The other, Judge Moore, 0:12:33.633,0:12:37.511 said she basically agreed with us[br]that isolated DNA is a product of nature. 0:12:37.987,0:12:41.320 But she's like, "I don't want[br]to shake up the biotech industry." 0:12:42.248,0:12:44.820 The third, Judge Bryson, 0:12:45.233,0:12:46.449 agreed with us. 0:12:47.750,0:12:50.281 So now we sought review[br]by the Supreme Court. 0:12:50.305,0:12:53.008 And when you petition the Supreme Court, 0:12:53.032,0:12:56.154 you have to present a question[br]that you want the Court to answer. 0:12:56.534,0:13:00.261 Usually these questions take the form[br]of a super-long paragraph, 0:13:00.285,0:13:03.308 like a whole page long[br]with lots and lots of clauses, 0:13:03.332,0:13:05.789 "wherein this" and "therefore that." 0:13:06.294,0:13:10.201 We submitted perhaps[br]the shortest question presented ever. 0:13:11.312,0:13:12.525 Four words: 0:13:14.220,0:13:16.271 Are human genes patentable? 0:13:16.922,0:13:19.746 Now when Chris first asked me[br]what I thought of these words, 0:13:19.770,0:13:21.144 I said, "Well, I don't know. 0:13:21.168,0:13:24.335 I think you have to say,[br]'Is isolated DNA patentable?'" 0:13:24.968,0:13:26.137 "Nope. 0:13:26.487,0:13:31.108 I want the justices to have[br]the very same reaction that I had 0:13:31.132,0:13:34.219 when you brought this issue[br]to me seven years ago." 0:13:34.896,0:13:37.053 Well, I certainly couldn't[br]argue with that. 0:13:37.981,0:13:40.864 The Supreme Court only hears[br]about one percent 0:13:40.888,0:13:42.554 of the cases that it receives, 0:13:42.578,0:13:44.169 and it agreed to hear ours. 0:13:45.772,0:13:49.899 The day of the oral argument arrives,[br]and it was really, really exciting -- 0:13:49.923,0:13:51.358 long line of people outside, 0:13:51.382,0:13:54.146 people had been standing in line[br]since 2:30 in the morning 0:13:54.170,0:13:55.904 to try to get into the courthouse. 0:13:55.928,0:13:57.899 Two breast cancer organizations, 0:13:57.923,0:13:59.591 Breast Cancer Action and FORCE, 0:13:59.615,0:14:02.316 had organized a demonstration[br]on the courthouse steps. 0:14:03.232,0:14:06.102 Chris and I sat quietly in the hallway, 0:14:06.776,0:14:09.790 moments before he was to walk in and argue 0:14:09.814,0:14:12.130 the most important case of his career. 0:14:12.765,0:14:15.144 I was clearly more nervous than he was. 0:14:16.096,0:14:20.856 But any remaining panic subsided[br]as I walked into the courtroom 0:14:20.880,0:14:23.693 and looked around[br]at a sea of friendly faces: 0:14:24.059,0:14:25.824 our individual women clients 0:14:25.848,0:14:28.289 who had shared their[br]deeply personal stories, 0:14:29.210,0:14:32.836 the geneticists who had taken huge chunks[br]of time out of their busy careers 0:14:32.860,0:14:34.685 to dedicate themselves to this fight 0:14:35.122,0:14:37.701 and representatives from a diverse array 0:14:37.725,0:14:39.612 of medical, patient advocacy, 0:14:39.636,0:14:41.712 environmental and religious organizations, 0:14:41.736,0:14:45.268 who had submitted friend of the court[br]briefs in the case. 0:14:46.609,0:14:49.634 Also in the room were three leaders[br]of the Human Genome Project, 0:14:49.658,0:14:52.330 including the co-discoverer[br]of DNA himself, 0:14:52.354,0:14:53.644 James Watson, 0:14:53.668,0:14:55.814 who had submitted a brief to the court, 0:14:55.838,0:14:59.349 where he referred[br]to gene patenting as "lunacy." 0:14:59.373,0:15:01.221 (Laughter) 0:15:01.245,0:15:04.882 The diversity of the communities[br]represented in this room 0:15:04.906,0:15:08.347 and the contributions each had made[br]to make this day a reality 0:15:08.371,0:15:10.668 spoke volumes to what was at stake. 0:15:11.386,0:15:13.599 The argument itself was riveting. 0:15:14.205,0:15:15.868 Chris argued brilliantly. 0:15:15.892,0:15:17.137 But for me, 0:15:17.161,0:15:20.925 the most thrilling aspect was watching[br]the Supreme Court justices grapple 0:15:20.949,0:15:22.518 with isolated DNA, 0:15:22.542,0:15:25.768 through a series of colorful analogies[br]and feisty exchanges, 0:15:25.792,0:15:29.132 very much the same way[br]as our legal team had done 0:15:29.156,0:15:30.846 for the past seven years. 0:15:31.666,0:15:34.322 Justice Kagan likened isolating DNA 0:15:34.346,0:15:37.122 to extracting a medicinal plant[br]from the Amazon. 0:15:38.516,0:15:42.526 Justice Roberts distinguished it[br]from carving a baseball bat from a tree. 0:15:43.995,0:15:46.477 And in one of my absolutely[br]favorite moments, 0:15:46.501,0:15:51.770 Justice Sotomayor proclaimed isolated DNA[br]to be "just nature sitting there." 0:15:51.794,0:15:52.894 (Laughter) 0:15:53.318,0:15:56.193 We felt pretty confident[br]leaving the courtroom that day, 0:15:56.217,0:15:59.223 but I could never have[br]anticipated the outcome: 0:16:00.574,0:16:02.081 nine to zero. 0:16:03.025,0:16:06.747 "A naturally occurring DNA segment[br]is a product of nature, 0:16:06.771,0:16:09.818 and not patent-eligible merely because[br]it has been isolated. 0:16:10.394,0:16:11.741 And furthermore, 0:16:11.765,0:16:14.310 Myriad did not create anything." 0:16:16.160,0:16:18.156 Within 24 hours of the decision, 0:16:18.180,0:16:19.572 five labs had announced 0:16:19.596,0:16:22.610 that they would begin to offer testing[br]for the BRCA genes. 0:16:23.149,0:16:26.632 Some of them promised to offer the tests[br]at a lower price than Myriad's. 0:16:27.142,0:16:30.062 Some promised to provide[br]a more comprehensive test 0:16:30.086,0:16:31.769 than the one Myriad was offering. 0:16:32.490,0:16:35.328 But of course the decision[br]goes far beyond Myriad. 0:16:35.352,0:16:39.748 It ends a 25-year practice[br]of allowing patents on human genes 0:16:39.772,0:16:40.979 in the United States. 0:16:41.383,0:16:46.076 It clears a significant barrier[br]to biomedical discovery and innovation. 0:16:46.484,0:16:51.385 And it helps to ensure that patients[br]like Abigail, Kathleen and Eileen 0:16:51.409,0:16:53.565 have access to the tests that they need. 0:16:54.991,0:16:58.206 A few weeks after the court[br]issued its decision, 0:16:58.230,0:17:00.490 I received a small package in the mail. 0:17:01.246,0:17:02.853 It was from Bob Cook-Deegan, 0:17:02.877,0:17:05.146 a professor at Duke University 0:17:05.170,0:17:08.394 and one the very first people[br]Chris and I went to visit 0:17:08.418,0:17:11.117 when we started to consider[br]whether to bring this case. 0:17:12.033,0:17:14.842 I opened it up to find[br]a small stuffed animal. 0:17:16.344,0:17:19.303 (Laughter) 0:17:21.568,0:17:23.896 We took a big risk in taking this case. 0:17:24.722,0:17:27.232 Part of what gave us the courage[br]to take that risk 0:17:27.256,0:17:29.694 was knowing that we were doing[br]the right thing. 0:17:30.079,0:17:33.809 The process took nearly eight years[br]from the start to finish, 0:17:33.833,0:17:36.054 with many twists and turns along the way. 0:17:36.578,0:17:38.269 A little luck certainly helped, 0:17:38.888,0:17:41.700 but it was the communities[br]that we bridged, 0:17:41.724,0:17:43.815 the alliances that we created, 0:17:43.839,0:17:45.259 that made pigs fly. 0:17:45.802,0:17:46.958 Thank you. 0:17:46.982,0:17:52.496 (Applause)