0:00:00.250,0:00:01.827 Yes. We are on the bed. 0:00:01.827,0:00:04.380 You could call it an homage[br]to old YouTube. 0:00:04.380,0:00:05.234 I call it... 0:00:05.234,0:00:06.996 comfortable for my butt. 0:00:06.996,0:00:08.256 Conspiracy theories. 0:00:08.256,0:00:10.686 So as somebody who's lost many a night 0:00:10.686,0:00:12.726 tumbling down Wikipedia[br]rabbit holes, 0:00:12.726,0:00:14.956 I love a good conspiracy theory. 0:00:14.956,0:00:16.808 It's like, "Ooh, aliens!" 0:00:16.808,0:00:19.654 "Ooh, how do people make[br]such big triangles?" 0:00:19.654,0:00:21.181 I think that that it's just fun 0:00:21.181,0:00:23.351 imagining the world[br]to be more interesting 0:00:23.351,0:00:24.467 than what I was taught. 0:00:24.467,0:00:26.277 But then something weird happened? 0:00:26.277,0:00:28.467 A couple weeks ago,[br]I found myself 0:00:28.467,0:00:30.787 in the middle of[br]a conspiracy theory. 0:00:30.787,0:00:34.358 And then, all of the fun[br]was replaced with just... 0:00:34.358,0:00:35.497 pure confusion. 0:00:35.497,0:00:38.547 The conspiracy itself is, like,[br]weird and fun and innocuous. 0:00:38.547,0:00:41.410 However, what I really[br]cared about is, like, 0:00:41.410,0:00:42.558 how do you get to that point? 0:00:42.558,0:00:46.130 How do you start seeing signs[br]that were never there to begin with. 0:00:46.130,0:00:47.440 That's what I want to know. 0:00:47.440,0:00:50.600 And I also want to, like, disprove[br]this whole conspiracy theory 0:00:50.600,0:00:51.590 'cause it's whack. 0:00:51.590,0:00:53.637 However, as the person[br]in the middle of all of this, 0:00:53.637,0:00:56.639 I can imagine why I'd be[br]seen as unreliable. 0:00:56.639,0:00:57.749 So... 0:00:57.749,0:00:59.491 ...I'm calling on a friend! 0:00:59.491,0:01:02.370 Uhh, I don't know how to put this.[br]How do you put this? 0:01:02.370,0:01:06.278 People think that I am[br]part of the Illuminati. 0:01:06.278,0:01:07.862 Uh- 0:01:07.862,0:01:09.382 Well, are you? 0:01:09.382,0:01:10.543 [laughs] 0:01:10.543,0:01:12.192 This is just one of the comments, 0:01:12.192,0:01:14.365 but I think it really[br]summarizes the issue. 0:01:14.365,0:01:16.415 "I find this channel to[br]be highly disingenuous-" 0:01:16.415,0:01:18.595 "-Corporate product masked[br]to have the appearance of 0:01:18.595,0:01:21.225 an independently run YouTube channel."[br]"There's no way a single person is that skilled 0:01:21.225,0:01:25.674 at animation, editing, presenting, research-"[br]"Everything is too professional for that-" 0:01:25.674,0:01:27.974 "There's no way this girl[br]is the one who did this" 0:01:27.974,0:01:32.124 "A production company put this video[br]together with you just as a host." 0:01:32.124,0:01:35.283 So now- Now...[br]Now what? 0:01:35.283,0:01:37.139 Why am I calling you? Right? 0:01:37.139,0:01:39.893 Yeah. I'm, like, "How do you[br]want me to prove this? 0:01:39.893,0:01:46.803 I am wondering if you could explain[br]to me and the viewers of this video, 0:01:46.803,0:01:49.848 how could somebody see[br]something so mundane 0:01:49.848,0:01:52.821 that's just, like, a part[br]of my life, I guess. 0:01:52.821,0:01:56.242 How could someone see that[br]and think, like, "There must be more." 0:01:56.242,0:01:58.412 I'm interested. I'm fascinated. 0:01:58.412,0:01:59.532 'Cause I'm, like... 0:01:59.532,0:02:02.745 I'm not only interested in your[br]conspiracy, as interesting as it is. 0:02:02.745,0:02:05.905 I think conspiracies have a[br]knack for, especially nowadays, 0:02:05.905,0:02:07.155 to just.... 0:02:07.155,0:02:09.755 just ruin people's lives,[br]you know? 0:02:09.755,0:02:12.865 I'm gonna solve this mystery.[br]♪ Scooby-dooby-doo ♪ 0:02:12.865,0:02:14.797 We don't have the copyright on that. 0:02:14.797,0:02:18.797 We're going to investigate[br]this conundrum. I'm-I'm- 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 You're doubling down on it, I see. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Hello, I'm Taha. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 I'm apparently Sabrina's[br]only British friend. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 I've been given free reign[br]over this part of the video, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 so, welcome to my chaos. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Sabrina's asked me to get into[br]the mind of a Sabrina Cruz truther 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and figure out what's going on. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Okay, hold on. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 It needs pictures. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Let's read some conspiracy theories. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 "This is a fake channel 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 A propaganda channel paid by others.[br]Why the spotty uploads?" 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Maybe because it's-[br]it's just one person? 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 I love this one.[br]"Who do you work for? 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 We all know this isn't your channel.[br]Whose script are you reading?" 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 "I think she works for the government." 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Oh. This is the best one. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 "Her main channel is crash course[br]with 10 million subs." 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 John and Hank Green,[br]eat your heart out. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Okay, so basically, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 people think that Sabrina[br]doesn't make her own videos, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that she's a presenter,[br]that maybe she works for the government. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 How did people get here? 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Let's figure it out. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Okay. So, here's what I found out. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 There are loads of ways to define[br]conspiracy theories, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 but they all kind of boil down[br]to the same thing. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 It's basically the belief that[br]a group of people 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 are secretly working together[br]to do something bad. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 But here's the thing: 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 When we talk about conspiracy theories, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 we aren't talking about every time[br]everyone has gotten together 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 to secretly do bad things. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 So what are people talking about[br]when they say "conspiracy theory"? 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Or when they talk about conspiracy[br]theories on the internet? 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 They talk about a specific type[br]of conspiracy theory. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 It's the type of conspiracy theory that[br]Sabrina is in the middle of right now. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 These conspiracy theories[br]seem to be unlikely by design. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Here's the really interesting thing that I found. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 These theories have pretty distinctive[br]features that you can spot 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and these features make them[br]not only unlikely to be true 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 but also difficult to argue against. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 These features are that[br]they're speculative, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 based on educated and[br]not-so-educated guesswork 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 rather than solid evidence. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 The rationale being that[br]if a conspiracy was successful 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 then it wouldn't have left a trace. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 They can become contrarian. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 They form in opposition to the[br]obvious or official explanation. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Conspiracy theories will dismiss[br]this explanation, citing 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 "that's what they want you to think." 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Because of this, theories[br]can become esoteric. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 If the obvious explanation isn't true,[br]then the theory is based on speculation. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 The conspiracy theory can run wild. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Explanations can become increasingly[br]detached from reality. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Theories are also amateurish. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Now, that isn't a comment on[br]a theorist's intelligence. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 That's a comment on how qualified[br]these theorists are. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 In most cases, they don't have[br]the relevant expertise 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 to be conclusively analyzing evidence. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Even when they do,[br]they're in the small minority 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and the professional consensus[br]doesn't agree with them. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And is it more likely that[br]all experts are lying 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 or that most informed and qualified people[br]are coming to the same conclusion. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Conspiracies can also become premodern. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 These conspiracies believe that[br]incredibly complex events 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 can be controlled by a small number[br]of people acting in secret. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Nothing is a coincidence[br]or a series of uncorrelated events, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 but a coordinated conspiracy. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And lastly, these conspiracies[br]are self-sealing. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 What this means is that 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 the conspiracy is difficult[br]to argue against. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 If a conspiracy is based on speculation, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 it dismisses the obvious explanation[br]in favor of a more obscure one. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 if it ignores expert consensus 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and believes that a small group of people[br]can control complex events, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 any explanation against the conspiracy[br]is just what they want you to think. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Now, that doesn't mean that every time[br]you hear the word "conspiracy theory" 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 you should just dismiss it. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 'Cause we know that throughout history,[br]there are well-documented conspiracies. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 I find this really interesting concept 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that distinguish between[br]conspiracy theory and conspiracy fact. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Essentially, when you have[br]a bunch of solid evidence 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that supports the fact[br]that a conspiracy occurred, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 you can consider it fact, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 but it isn't sensible to believe[br]conspiracy theories, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 the ones that tick all of the boxes[br]that make them unbelievable. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And not unbelievable in a way like,[br]"Oh, that's unbelievable!" 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 In a way that's like,[br]"I don't believe you." 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And even if conspiracy theories[br]aren't true, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 they still have a function. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Not a good function,[br]but still a function. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 So, what is it? 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 People believe in conspiracies 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that reinforce their[br]political or ideological bias. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Nobody's believing a conspiracy theory 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that goes against what they think[br]the world is like. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 We patterns and theories that[br]reinforce our ideology 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and we're happy to get onboard. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 In this way, conspiracy theories[br]are a type of ideological propaganda. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 By spreading the theory, you also end up[br]spreading your world view. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 In order to believe a theory, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 you have to believe that[br]the world is a certain way. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 So, by convincing people[br]of your conspiracy theory, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 you are also implicitly convincing them[br]that the world is the way 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that you believe it to be. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Okay. So, in the process of[br]researching this video, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 I ended up going down a lot[br]of conspiracy theory rabbit holes. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Some of them I obviously know were untrue,[br]but others I thought, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 "Maybe they could be true?" 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 That was kind of scary to me. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And I wanted to find out what it was[br]about conspiracy theories 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that made them so... attractive. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And that's when I got into the[br]psychology of conspiracy theories. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 There are 2 key psychological phenomenon[br]that drive a natural inclination 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 towards conspiracy theories. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 First is "pattern perception". 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 We're bad at recognizing randomness. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Instead, we are more likely to see[br]a pattern when there is none. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And, secondly, is "agency detection". 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 We tend to think that events occur[br]due to agents acting intentionally, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 rather than recognizing neutral[br]or accidental occurrences. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 These 2 phenomena are compounded[br]by cognitive biases 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that make conspiracy theories believable. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 These include "proportionality bias", 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 which leads to thinking that[br]the cause of an event 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 has to be as big as its consequences. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 When the explanation is not as grand as the event itself, people can find it difficult to believe