1 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 ♪ [music] ♪ 2 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 - [Tyler] Monetarism is another framework 3 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 for thinking about business cycles. 4 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Nobel laureate Milton Friedman of the University of Chicago, 5 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 he was the most famous proponent of monetarism. 6 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 And, as the name suggests, monetarism emphasizes 7 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 the importance of the money supply, 8 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and it emphasizes the decisions central banks make 9 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 about what to do with the money supply. 10 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Now monetarism is based on something called 11 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 the quantity theory of money. 12 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 That means, in the long run, 13 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 the absolute amount of money in an economy doesn't matter, 14 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 doesn't influence real output or real employment. 15 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 But, in the short run, changes in the rate of inflation can matter. 16 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 So there are two potential dangers in monetarism: 17 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 too much inflation, and too little inflation. 18 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Let's think first about too much inflation, 19 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 because this is a big part 20 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 about how monetarism became more popular. 21 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 In the 1970s, in America, 22 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 rates of inflation were considered to be too high, 23 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and monetarism had a way to explain this. 24 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 It said the Federal Reserve was creating 25 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 too much new money for the economy, 26 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and that means prices will be rising 27 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and inflation tends to distort 28 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 the allocation of economic resources. 29 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Individuals cannot tell which prices are going up 30 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 because of the inflation, 31 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and which prices are going up 32 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 because something is more or less valuable, 33 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and that what we should do is lower the rate of inflation 34 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and bring about more economic stability. 35 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 So, at the time, a lot of Keynesian economists were accepting this higher rate of inflation, 36 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 but monetarism was saying that yes, at first more inflation is going to get you higher economic output, 37 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 but pretty quickly people figure out that there's inflation going on, 38 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and that inflation ceases to be effective 39 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 in stimulating the economy. 40 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 On the other side of the ledger, 41 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 there's the danger that monetary growth will be too low, 42 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and that means the rate of price inflation will be too low 43 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 or there may be deflation all together. 44 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 And, in that setting, according to monetarism, 45 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 aggregate demand will be too low. 46 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 In this case, monetarist and Keynesian doctrine, 47 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 they're actually pretty similar. 48 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 Monetarists, like Keynesians, 49 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 believe that a lot of nominal wages are sticky-- 50 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 that is they can't be readjusted or renegotiated all the time. 51 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 This may be a matter of contract, or a matter of law, minimum wages, 52 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 or maybe just a matter of workplace morale. 53 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 But when you have sticky wages, 54 99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999 and that flow of nominal purchasing power