1
00:00:00,340 --> 00:00:05,660
Nothing quite kills the mood at a dinner party
like discussions of religion, politics, abortion,

2
00:00:05,660 --> 00:00:11,530
or veganism. So I thought it would be a bang-up
idea if in THIS video, we discuss all four!

3
00:00:11,530 --> 00:00:20,300
(I don’t have much of a social life…)

4
00:00:20,300 --> 00:00:25,600
Hi it's Emily from Bite Size Vegan and welcome
to another vegan nugget. Among the litany

5
00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:31,529
of objections to and arguments against veganism,
from your standard “plants have feelings”

6
00:00:31,529 --> 00:00:37,579
and “but lions eat meat,” lies an area
of discourse not so easily answered or discounted:

7
00:00:37,579 --> 00:00:39,850
the vegan stance on abortion.

8
00:00:39,850 --> 00:00:45,440
The topics of abortion and veganism do share
common ground. Both are decidedly polarizing

9
00:00:45,440 --> 00:00:50,710
issues quick to spark heated debate, have
passionately outspoken individuals on either

10
00:00:50,710 --> 00:00:57,260
side of the issue, often utilize similar tactics
within their outreach, education, and demonstrations,

11
00:00:57,260 --> 00:01:02,300
and involve a strong focus on the concepts
of sentience, individuality, pain perception

12
00:01:02,300 --> 00:01:03,930
and consciousness.

13
00:01:03,930 --> 00:01:09,279
Before we dive into this moralistic minefield,
let me first state that I will not be settling

14
00:01:09,279 --> 00:01:15,869
the abortion debate in this video. Sorry to
disappoint. What I will do is present the

15
00:01:15,869 --> 00:01:21,639
various arguments posed, along with perceived
logical inconsistencies, and scientific insights.

16
00:01:21,639 --> 00:01:26,859
I will also be using the common terms of pro-life
and pro-choice though I realize that either

17
00:01:26,859 --> 00:01:31,649
side has issues with these and have their
own terminology. This is merely to simplify

18
00:01:31,649 --> 00:01:36,319
the rhetoric in order to address the topic
at hand. You can find complete citations and

19
00:01:36,319 --> 00:01:40,560
a full bibliography for everything discussed
today on the blog post for this video linked

20
00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:41,069
below.

21
00:01:41,069 --> 00:01:47,259
I’d like to add that there is no vegan consensus
or official doctrine on abortion. Vegans,

22
00:01:47,259 --> 00:01:51,209
like the rest of the world’s population,
hold very different beliefs outside of their

23
00:01:51,209 --> 00:01:56,579
refusal to participate in the exploitation
of non-human animals. Views on abortion are

24
00:01:56,579 --> 00:02:02,549
often, but not always, heavily influenced
by ones religious or spiritual practice and

25
00:02:02,549 --> 00:02:06,069
morals, which vary as wildly amongst vegans
as non.

26
00:02:06,069 --> 00:02:11,680
In fact the issue of whether abortion is even
relevant to veganism itself is hotly debated.

27
00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:16,200
While the abortion issue is, at least from
my personal experience, most often thrown

28
00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:21,819
out as a diversion tactic intended to invalidate
veganism as a whole, there remain a few very

29
00:02:21,819 --> 00:02:24,950
real and valid intersections to explore.

30
00:02:24,950 --> 00:02:30,129
The disconnect most often perceived within
the veganism and abortion debate is the pro-choice

31
00:02:30,129 --> 00:02:35,939
vegan. Let’s start at the surface and the
most basic argument against pro-choice veganism:

32
00:02:35,939 --> 00:02:40,680
if vegans are against killing, then we have
to be against all killing. The fallacy in

33
00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:45,909
this position is what’s called a false dilemma,
posing a black and white reality when ample

34
00:02:45,909 --> 00:02:47,540
grey exists.

35
00:02:47,540 --> 00:02:52,560
Even most peace-loving pacifists would defend
themselves against an attacker and find no

36
00:02:52,560 --> 00:02:57,989
moral fault in the death of a perpetrator
during a true kill-or-be-killed situation.

37
00:02:57,989 --> 00:03:03,290
On the other side of the coin lies the most
basic defense for pro-choice veganism: abortion

38
00:03:03,290 --> 00:03:08,060
is dealing with a fetus in utero, of which
the sentience, consciousness and pain perception

39
00:03:08,060 --> 00:03:14,060
continues to be hotly debated, while veganism
deals with beings who are undeniably sentient,

40
00:03:14,060 --> 00:03:19,189
conscious, and pain-perceiving. However, as
we will soon see, this oversimplification

41
00:03:19,189 --> 00:03:24,939
fails to account for countless complex nuances,
though it is without doubt the most striking

42
00:03:24,939 --> 00:03:27,510
divergence, and one to take into account.

43
00:03:27,510 --> 00:03:32,590
When we start delving deeper into the abortion
debate, the lines begin to blur even further.

44
00:03:32,590 --> 00:03:37,689
The ability of a fetus to feel pain is a primary
argument of the pro-life camp. Seeing as how

45
00:03:37,689 --> 00:03:43,019
the prevention of pain and suffering is a
pillar of vegan ethics as well, it would appear

46
00:03:43,019 --> 00:03:47,879
that pro-choice vegans are left with quite
the conundrum. If, in fact, a fetus can feel

47
00:03:47,879 --> 00:03:54,069
pain, then the born vs. unborn moral distinction
fails. The key word being “if.”

48
00:03:54,069 --> 00:03:59,019
Here’s one of the places the abortion debate
lacks the clarity of veganism. Scientists

49
00:03:59,019 --> 00:04:05,010
still do not agree on fetal pain perception.
A 2005 meta-analysis concluded that, “fetal

50
00:04:05,010 --> 00:04:09,969
perception of pain is unlikely before the
third trimester.” A 2010 review by Britain’s

51
00:04:09,969 --> 00:04:15,409
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists,
stated that, “the fetus cannot experience

52
00:04:15,409 --> 00:04:21,220
pain in any sense prior [to 24 weeks].”
The earliest estimate comes from Dr. Kanwaljeet

53
00:04:21,220 --> 00:04:26,550
S. Anand, something of an outlier in the field
and oft-quoted by the pro-life cause. Anand

54
00:04:26,550 --> 00:04:32,410
proposes a window of 18-24 weeks, though he’s
emphasized that, “fetal pain does not have

55
00:04:32,410 --> 00:04:37,750
much relevance for abortion, since most abortions
are performed before the fetus is capable

56
00:04:37,750 --> 00:04:43,160
of experiencing pain,” with only 1.5% of
abortions occurring after 20 weeks in the

57
00:04:43,160 --> 00:04:46,349
United States.
One element clouding the issue is the difference

58
00:04:46,349 --> 00:04:51,860
between nociception and pain, something I
discuss more in-depth in my video “Can Fish

59
00:04:51,860 --> 00:04:57,639
Feel Pain.” In short, there can be reaction
to potentially painful or harmful stimuli

60
00:04:57,639 --> 00:05:03,490
without the experience of pain, and nociceptors,
which appear as early as 7 weeks, are not

61
00:05:03,490 --> 00:05:08,960
in and of themselves capable of relaying pain.
Of course, this uncertainty doesn’t exactly

62
00:05:08,960 --> 00:05:14,440
place pro-choice veganism in the clear. Many
vegans believe that the ability of non-human

63
00:05:14,440 --> 00:05:18,970
animals to feel pain shouldn’t have to be
scientifically proven to our satisfaction

64
00:05:18,970 --> 00:05:24,199
before we stop abusing them. Why conduct cruel
studies when they make it glaringly obvious

65
00:05:24,199 --> 00:05:30,160
with crying out, trying to escape, flinching,
struggling, and showing indicators of psychological

66
00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:34,849
stress? We should operate on the assumption
that they can feel pain. So why then, does

67
00:05:34,849 --> 00:05:40,550
this courtesy not extend to a human fetus?
If pain alone were the issue, vegans would

68
00:05:40,550 --> 00:05:45,580
support the killing of unconscious animals
and pro-lifers wouldn’t protest the abortion

69
00:05:45,580 --> 00:05:50,660
of fetuses prior to the development of pain
perception. But both issues have additional

70
00:05:50,660 --> 00:05:55,949
layers, such as conscious awareness or sentience,
and future life interests.

71
00:05:55,949 --> 00:06:00,629
Vegans see the sentience of non-human animals,
meaning their ability to feel, perceive and

72
00:06:00,629 --> 00:06:07,400
experience life subjectively, as a solid grounds
for their protection. Often interchanged with

73
00:06:07,400 --> 00:06:12,060
“consciousness,” sentience in non-human
animals is widely accepted among scientists,

74
00:06:12,060 --> 00:06:16,940
with over 2,500 studies and the release of
an international Declaration of Consciousness

75
00:06:16,940 --> 00:06:18,849
in 2012.

76
00:06:18,849 --> 00:06:23,720
Similar to the variances in pain-perception
development, the certainty of sentience is

77
00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:28,720
lacking within the abortion debate. Still,
as vegan activist Gary Yourofsky has stated,

78
00:06:28,720 --> 00:06:32,960
“sentience [isn’t] the only factor when
deciding how we should treat other beings.

79
00:06:32,960 --> 00:06:38,039
(Even though trees, mountains, air and water
are insentient life forces, I think they have

80
00:06:38,039 --> 00:06:41,090
a right NOT to be exploited and polluted and
destroyed.)”

81
00:06:41,090 --> 00:06:45,750
Where the argument against pro-choice veganism
really gains some ground is the discussion

82
00:06:45,750 --> 00:06:52,569
of life potential. Vegans, including myself,
often argue that even if we could somehow,

83
00:06:52,569 --> 00:06:59,479
someway actually kill a non-human animal without
any pain or awareness, it would still be unethical

84
00:06:59,479 --> 00:07:04,319
as we could be choosing to end their life
prematurely. We do not see such an action

85
00:07:04,319 --> 00:07:10,659
as our choice, as personal choice is no longer
personal when it involves the welfare of another.

86
00:07:10,659 --> 00:07:16,229
How, then, can a vegan possibly support the
choice to abort the potential life of a human?

87
00:07:16,229 --> 00:07:21,000
The argument that the fetus is not aware of
a future won’t stand unless vegans also

88
00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:26,629
condone the killing of animals who are unaware
or unconscious at the time of death. So have

89
00:07:26,629 --> 00:07:32,810
we circled back to the born vs. unborn divide?
Again this becomes hazy with the uncertainty

90
00:07:32,810 --> 00:07:34,970
of pain and sentience.

91
00:07:34,970 --> 00:07:40,689
There exists an element of self-defense congruent
with vegan ideals that can be applied to abortion

92
00:07:40,689 --> 00:07:45,689
in the cases of rape and incest or when the
life of the mother is at stake. But what about

93
00:07:45,689 --> 00:07:50,849
abortion out of inconvenience or financial
strain? Or sex-selective abortions wherein

94
00:07:50,849 --> 00:07:56,340
female fetuses are aborted due to male cultural
preference, a practice most often associated

95
00:07:56,340 --> 00:08:01,669
with China and India, but prevalent in many
other countries where males increasingly outnumber

96
00:08:01,669 --> 00:08:07,379
females. Is choosing to stop the potential
life of a fetus for what could be termed one’s

97
00:08:07,379 --> 00:08:12,810
own comfort a parallel to meat eaters ending
the lives of non-human animals for their own

98
00:08:12,810 --> 00:08:14,319
comfort?

99
00:08:14,319 --> 00:08:20,659
Even more direct parallels exist. In my video
“Is Lab Meat Vegan,” I discussed the harvesting

100
00:08:20,659 --> 00:08:26,810
methods for bovine fetal serum, a growth medium
used within a wide range of laboratory experiments,

101
00:08:26,810 --> 00:08:31,539
along with fetal pig and fetal sheep serums.
Bovine fetal serum is obtained by piercing

102
00:08:31,539 --> 00:08:36,660
and draining the beating heart of fetal calves
who’ve been cut from their mothers’ wombs

103
00:08:36,660 --> 00:08:37,920
in slaughterhouses.

104
00:08:37,920 --> 00:08:42,610
This practice was understandably met with
horror and disgust from vegan viewers and

105
00:08:42,610 --> 00:08:48,620
even non-vegans. Were any of these vegans
pro-choice, would this reaction be an indication

106
00:08:48,620 --> 00:08:54,390
of dissonance or hypocrisy? The study I cited
went on in length about the potential pain-perception

107
00:08:54,390 --> 00:09:00,660
of the bovine fetuses and referenced a general
acceptance of 24 weeks for human fetus pain

108
00:09:00,660 --> 00:09:05,670
perception, and presented a figure of roughly
12 weeks, or 3 months for cows, who are more

109
00:09:05,670 --> 00:09:08,400
fully developed at birth than humans.

110
00:09:08,400 --> 00:09:13,940
Again the variances in situation may create
a buffer for the pro-choice vegan given that

111
00:09:13,940 --> 00:09:20,460
bovine fetuses must be at least 3 months old
to provide enough serum and are often 6 months

112
00:09:20,460 --> 00:09:25,260
or older when put through this procedure without
any anesthesia, well beyond the point of pain

113
00:09:25,260 --> 00:09:29,960
perception. Additionally, it’s readily evident
that a human mother procuring an abortion

114
00:09:29,960 --> 00:09:35,600
differs dramatically from cutting a living
fetus from the body of a mother cow slaughtered

115
00:09:35,600 --> 00:09:39,440
against her will in order to drain the heart
for profit.

116
00:09:39,440 --> 00:09:44,160
I would like to bring up another wrinkle.
While vegans believe in the rights of non-human

117
00:09:44,160 --> 00:09:48,760
animals, the majority, from what I have found,
which is by no means conclusive, do seem to

118
00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:54,090
support the spaying and neutering of companion
animals. While this is most certainly a violation

119
00:09:54,090 --> 00:09:59,290
of their rights, it is not, as Gary Yourofsky
has written, a cruel practice when performed

120
00:09:59,290 --> 00:10:04,980
properly. He, along with many activists, argues
that since the domestication of dogs and cats

121
00:10:04,980 --> 00:10:09,870
will not be undone anytime soon, spaying and
neutering is a better alternative than the

122
00:10:09,870 --> 00:10:15,650
current cruel and needless deaths of millions
of abandoned, unwanted companion animals due

123
00:10:15,650 --> 00:10:17,090
to overbreeding.

124
00:10:17,090 --> 00:10:21,580
Once again the parallel is by no means ideal,
as our animal companions have no ability to

125
00:10:21,580 --> 00:10:26,870
make this choice for themselves, and spaying
and neutering prevents a pregnancy while abortion

126
00:10:26,870 --> 00:10:32,960
ends one. I present this simply as an example
of vegans being faced with an ethical ambiguity

127
00:10:32,960 --> 00:10:36,660
and supporting the restriction of animals’
reproductive rights.

128
00:10:36,660 --> 00:10:42,690
At the more misanthropic end of the spectrum,
since humanity continues to murder trillions

129
00:10:42,690 --> 00:10:48,770
of innocent beings every year, decimate the
planet, and grow in population and demand

130
00:10:48,770 --> 00:10:53,830
for meat, could it be argued that stemming
this proliferation at its root would actually

131
00:10:53,830 --> 00:10:57,080
be perfectly inline with vegan principles?

132
00:10:57,080 --> 00:11:02,460
Any attempt to present a singular vegan view
on abortion negates the diversity and variance

133
00:11:02,460 --> 00:11:09,150
of vegans themselves. Many vegans reject the
aforementioned “animals vs. humans” dichotomy,

134
00:11:09,150 --> 00:11:15,460
seeing human and animal rights as inextricable
– to be protected and fought for concurrently.

135
00:11:15,460 --> 00:11:19,120
Something I personally find fascinating in
this whole debate is the focus on whether

136
00:11:19,120 --> 00:11:24,420
vegans can be pro-choice. With all of the
uncertainties inherent in fetal pain-perception

137
00:11:24,420 --> 00:11:29,640
and sentience and the absolute certainties
of non-human animal c pain-perception and

138
00:11:29,640 --> 00:11:35,390
sentience it’s interesting that the more
concrete question usually remains unasked:

139
00:11:35,390 --> 00:11:38,940
can someone non-vegans be pro-life?

140
00:11:38,940 --> 00:11:43,910
As I said in the opener, I’m not going to
settle the abortion debate, or even the veganism

141
00:11:43,910 --> 00:11:48,670
and abortion debate. Even with my attempts
at simplifications, it’s evident how complex

142
00:11:48,670 --> 00:11:50,910
this dialogue can easily become.

143
00:11:50,910 --> 00:11:56,260
I’d love to hear your thoughts on the debate
in the comments below. It’s gonna be fun

144
00:11:56,260 --> 00:12:00,670
down there. If you’d like to help support
Bite Size Vegan so I can keep putting in these

145
00:12:00,670 --> 00:12:05,260
long hours to bring you this educational resource,
please check out the support links in the

146
00:12:05,260 --> 00:12:09,140
video description below where you can give
a one-time donation or receive perks and rewards

147
00:12:09,140 --> 00:12:13,850
by joining the Nugget Army on Patreon. I’d
like to give a special thanks my $50 and above

148
00:12:13,850 --> 00:12:19,130
patrons and my whole Patreon family for making
this and all of my videos possible.

149
00:12:19,130 --> 00:12:22,830
If you enjoyed this video, please give it
a thumbs-up and share it around to spark debate.

150
00:12:22,830 --> 00:12:27,200
If you’re new, I’d love to have you as
a subscriber. I put out fresh vegan content

151
00:12:27,200 --> 00:12:32,250
every Monday, Wednesday, and some Fridays.
Now go live vegan, be sure to show this video

152
00:12:32,250 --> 00:12:55,920
at your next dinner party, and I’ll see
you soon.