So, we had a talk by a non-GitLab person about GitLab.
Now, we have a talk by a GitLab person on non-GtlLab.
Something like that?
The CCCHH hackerspace is now open,
from now on if you want to go there, that's the announcement.
And the next talk will be by Ben Kochie
on metrics-based monitoring with Prometheus.
Welcome.
[Applause]
Alright, so
my name is Ben Kochie
I work on DevOps features for GitLab
and apart working for GitLab, I also work on the opensource Prometheus project.
I live in Berlin and I've been using Debian since ???
yes, quite a long time.
So, what is Metrics-based Monitoring?
If you're running software in production,
you probably want to monitor it,
because if you don't monitor it, you don't know it's right.
??? break down into two categories:
there's blackbox monitoring and there's whitebox monitoring.
Blackbox monitoring is treating your software like a blackbox.
It's just checks to see, like,
is it responding, or does it ping
or ??? HTTP requests
[mic turned on]
Ah, there we go, much better.
So, blackbox monitoring is a probe,
it just kind of looks from the outside to your software
and it has no knowledge of the internals
and it's really good for end to end testing.
So if you've got a fairly complicated service,
you come in from the outside, you go through the load balancer,
you hit the API server,
the API server might hit a database,
and you go all the way through to the back of the stack
and all the way back out
so you know that everything is working end to end.
But you only know about it for that one request.
So in order to find out if your service is working,
from the end to end, for every single request,
this requires whitebox intrumentation.
So, basically, every event that happens inside your software,
inside a serving stack,
gets collected and gets counted,
so you know that every request hits the load balancer,
every request hits your application service,
every request hits the database.
You know that everything matches up
and this is called whitebox, or metrics-based monitoring.
There is different examples of, like,
the kind of software that does blackbox and whitebox monitoring.
So you have software like Nagios that you can configure checks
or pingdom,
pingdom will do ping of your website.
And then there is metrics-based monitoring,
things like Prometheus, things like the TICK stack from influx data,
New Relic and other commercial solutions
but of course I like to talk about the opensorce solutions.
We're gonna talk a little bit about Prometheus.
Prometheus came out of the idea that
we needed a monitoring system that could collect all this whitebox metric data
and do something useful with it.
Not just give us a pretty graph, but we also want to be able to
alert on it.
So we needed both
a data gathering and an analytics system in the same instance.
To do this, we built this thing and we looked at the way that
data was being generated by the applications
and there are advantages and disadvantages to this
push vs. poll model for metrics.
We decided to go with the polling model
because there is some slight advantages for polling over pushing.
With polling, you get this free blackbox check
that the application is running.
When you poll your application, you know that the process is running.
If you are doing push-based, you can't tell the difference between
your application doing no work and your application not running.
So you don't know if it's stuck,
or is it just not having to do any work.
With polling, the polling system knows the state of your network.
If you have a defined set of services,
that inventory drives what should be there.
Again, it's like, the disappearing,
is the process dead, or is it just not doing anything?
With polling, you know for a fact what processes should be there,
and it's a bit of an advantage there.
With polling, there's really easy testing.
With push-based metrics, you have to figure out
if you want to test a new version of the monitoring system or
you want to test something new,
you have to ??? a copy of the data.
With polling, you can just set up another instance of your monitoring
and just test it.
Or you don't even have,
it doesn't even have to be monitoring, you can just use curl
to poll the metrics endpoint.
It's significantly easier to test.
The other thing with the…
The other nice thing is that the client is really simple.
The client doesn't have to know where the monitoring system is.
It doesn't have to know about ???
It just has to sit and collect the data about itself.
So it doesn't have to know anything about the topology of the network.
As an application developer, if you're writing a DNS server or
some other piece of software,
you don't have to know anything about monitoring software,
you can just implement it inside your application and
the monitoring software, whether it's Prometheus or something else,
can just come and collect that data for you.
That's kind of similar to a very old monitoring system called SNMP,
but SNMP has a significantly less friendly data model for developers.
This is the basic layout of a Prometheus server.
At the core, there's a Prometheus server
and it deals with all the data collection and analytics.
Basically, this one binary, it's all written in golang.
It's a single binary.
It knows how to read from your inventory,
there's a bunch of different methods, whether you've got
a kubernetes cluster or a cloud platform
or you have your own customized thing with ansible.
Ansible can take your layout, drop that into a config file and
Prometheus can pick that up.
Once it has the layout, it goes out and collects all the data.
It has a storage and a time series database to store all that data locally.
It has a thing called PromQL, which is a query language designed
for metrics and analytics.
From that PromQL, you can add frontends that will,
whether it's a simple API client to run reports,
you can use things like Grafana for creating dashboards,
it's got a simple webUI built in.
You can plug in anything you want on that side.
And then, it also has the ability to continuously execute queries
called "recording rules"
and these recording rules have two different modes.
You can either record, you can take a query
and it will generate new data from that query
or you can take a query, and if it returns results,
it will return an alert.
That alert is a push message to the alert manager.
This allows us to separate the generating of alerts from the routing of alerts.
You can have one or hundreds of Prometheus services, all generating alerts
and it goes into an alert manager cluster and sends, does the deduplication
and the routing to the human
because, of course, the thing that we want is
we had dashboards with graphs, but in order to find out if something is broken
you had to have a human looking at the graph.
With Prometheus, we don't have to do that anymore,
we can simply let the software tell us that we need to go investigate
our problems.
We don't have to sit there and stare at dashboards all day,
because that's really boring.
What does it look like to actually get data into Prometheus?
This is a very basic output of a Prometheus metric.
This is a very simple thing.
If you know much about the linux kernel,
the linux kernel tracks ??? stats, all the state of all the CPUs
in your system
and we express this by having the name of the metric, which is
'node_cpu_seconds_total' and so this is a self-describing metric,
like you can just read the metrics name
and you understand a little bit about what's going on here.
The linux kernel and other kernels track their usage by the number of seconds
spent doing different things and
that could be, whether it's in system or user space or IRQs
or iowait or idle.
Actually, the kernel tracks how much idle time it has.
It also tracks it by the number of CPUs.
With other monitoring systems, they used to do this with a tree structure
and this caused a lot of problems, for like
How do you mix and match data so by switching from
a tree structure to a tag-based structure,
we can do some really interesting powerful data analytics.
Here's a nice example of taking those CPU seconds counters
and then converting them into a graph by using PromQL.
Now we can get into Metrics-Based Alerting.
Now we have this graph, we have this thing
we can look and see here
"Oh there is some little spike here, we might want to know about that."
Now we can get into Metrics-Based Alerting.
I used to be a site reliability engineer, I'm still a site reliability engineer at heart
and we have this concept of things that you need on a site or a service reliably
The most important thing you need is down at the bottom,
Monitoring, because if you don't have monitoring of your service,
how do you know it's even working?
There's a couple of techniques here, and we want to alert based on data
and not just those end to end tests.
There's a couple of techniques, a thing called the RED method
and there's a thing called the USE method
and there's a couple nice things to some blog posts about this
and basically it defines that, for example,
the RED method talks about the requests that your system is handling
There are three things:
There's the number of requests, there's the number of errors
and there's how long takes a duration.
With the combination of these three things
you can determine most of what your users see
"Did my request go through? Did it return an error? Was it fast?"
Most people, that's all they care about.
"I made a request to a website and it came back and it was fast."
It's a very simple method of just, like,
those are the important things to determine if your site is healthy.
But we can go back to some more traditional, sysadmin style, alerts
this is basically taking the filesystem available space,
divided by the filesystem size, that becomes the ratio of filesystem availability
from 0 to 1.
Multiply it by 100, we now have a percentage
and if it's less than or equal to 1% for 15 minutes,
this is less than 1% space, we should tell a sysadmin to go check
the ??? filesystem ???
It's super nice and simple.
We can also tag, we can include…
Every alert includes all the extraneous labels that Prometheus adds to your metrics
When you add a metric in Prometheus, if we go back and we look at this metric.
This metric only contain the information about the internals of the application
anything about, like, what server it's on, is it running in a container,
what cluster does it come from, what ??? is it on,
that's all extra annotations that are added by the Prometheus server
at discovery time.
I don't have a good example of what those labels look like
but every metric gets annotated with location information.
That location information also comes through as labels in the alert
so, if you have a message coming into your alert manager,
the alert manager can look and go
"Oh, that's coming from this datacenter"
and it can include that in the email or IRC message or SMS message.
So you can include
"Filesystem is out of space on this host from this datacenter"
All these labels get passed through and then you can append
"severity: critical" to that alert and include that in the message to the human
because of course, this is how you define…
Getting the message from the monitoring to the human.
You can even include nice things like,
if you've got documentation, you can include a link to the documentation
as an annotation
and the alert manager can take that basic url and, you know,
massaging it into whatever it needs to look like to actually get
the operator to the correct documentation.
We can also do more fun things:
since we actually are not just checking
what is the space right now, we're tracking data over time,
we can use 'predict_linear'.
'predict_linear' just takes and does a simple linear regression.
This example takes the filesystem available space over the last hour and
does a linear regression.
Prediction says "Well, it's going that way and four hours from now,
based on one hour of history, it's gonna be less than 0, which means full".