0:00:01.863,0:00:05.905 What does it mean to spend our time well? 0:00:08.326,0:00:10.677 I spend a lot of my time 0:00:10.677,0:00:13.830 thinking about how to spend my time. 0:00:15.091,0:00:16.088 Probably too much. 0:00:16.088,0:00:17.521 I probably obsess over it -- 0:00:17.521,0:00:18.941 my friends think I do. 0:00:18.941,0:00:22.202 But I feel like I kind of have to, 0:00:22.202,0:00:23.205 because these days, 0:00:23.205,0:00:27.216 it feels like little bits of my time[br]kind of slip away from me, 0:00:27.216,0:00:28.265 and when that happens, 0:00:28.265,0:00:32.131 it feels like parts of my life[br]are slipping away. 0:00:33.271,0:00:34.260 Specifically, 0:00:34.260,0:00:38.856 it feels like little bits of my time get[br]slipped away to various things like this. 0:00:38.856,0:00:39.897 Like technology -- 0:00:39.897,0:00:41.721 I check things -- 0:00:41.721,0:00:43.481 I'll give you an example. 0:00:43.825,0:00:45.908 If this email shows up -- 0:00:45.908,0:00:48.600 how many of you have gotten[br]an email like this, right? 0:00:48.600,0:00:50.898 I've been tagged in a photo. 0:00:51.867,0:00:53.762 When this appears, 0:00:53.762,0:00:56.946 I can't help but click on it right now. 0:00:56.946,0:00:57.946 Right? 0:00:57.946,0:00:59.825 Because what if it's a bad photo? 0:00:59.825,0:01:01.931 So I have to click it right now. 0:01:01.931,0:01:04.341 But I'm not just going[br]to click "See photo," 0:01:04.341,0:01:07.175 what I'm actually going to do[br]is spend the next 20 minutes. 0:01:07.175,0:01:08.177 (Laughter) 0:01:08.177,0:01:10.102 But the worst part 0:01:10.102,0:01:12.517 is that I know that this[br]is what's going to happen, 0:01:12.517,0:01:15.836 and even knowing that that's[br]what's going to happen 0:01:15.836,0:01:18.883 doesn't stop me from[br]doing it again the next time. 0:01:20.625,0:01:24.383 Or I find myself[br]in a situation like this ... 0:01:24.383,0:01:27.918 where I check my email[br]and I pull down to refresh, 0:01:27.918,0:01:28.940 right? 0:01:29.267,0:01:32.869 But the thing is that 60 seconds later, 0:01:32.869,0:01:36.246 I'll pull down to refresh again. 0:01:37.019,0:01:40.337 Like, why am I doing this? 0:01:40.337,0:01:42.283 This doesn't make any sense. 0:01:43.225,0:01:46.723 But I'll give you a hint[br]why this is happening. 0:01:48.565,0:01:53.627 What do you think makes more[br]money in the United States 0:01:53.627,0:01:59.515 than movies, game parks[br]and baseball combined? 0:02:01.925,0:02:03.417 Slot machines. 0:02:05.426,0:02:09.029 How can slot machines make all this money 0:02:09.029,0:02:13.986 when we play with such small[br]amounts of money? 0:02:14.229,0:02:15.910 We play with coins. 0:02:15.910,0:02:17.535 How is this possible? 0:02:18.383,0:02:21.681 Well, the thing is ... 0:02:21.681,0:02:25.535 my phone is a slot machine. 0:02:25.809,0:02:27.821 Every time I check my phone, 0:02:27.821,0:02:30.162 I'm playing the slot machine to see, 0:02:30.162,0:02:31.607 what am I going to get? 0:02:32.074,0:02:33.171 What am I going to get? 0:02:33.171,0:02:35.073 Every time I check my email, 0:02:35.073,0:02:36.719 I'm playing the slot machine 0:02:36.719,0:02:38.394 [to say], "What am I going to get?" 0:02:38.394,0:02:41.413 Every time I scroll a news feed, 0:02:41.413,0:02:43.522 I'm playing the slot machine to see, 0:02:43.522,0:02:45.128 what am I going to get next? 0:02:45.128,0:02:46.127 Right? 0:02:46.520,0:02:47.520 And the thing is 0:02:47.520,0:02:49.690 that again knowing[br]exactly how this works -- 0:02:49.690,0:02:50.741 and I'm a designer, 0:02:50.741,0:02:53.100 I know exactly how[br]the psychology of this works, 0:02:53.100,0:02:55.062 I know exactly what's going on -- 0:02:55.062,0:02:57.327 but it doesn't leave me with any choice, 0:02:57.327,0:02:59.608 I still just get sucked into it. 0:03:00.372,0:03:02.645 So what are we going to do? 0:03:03.082,0:03:04.165 Because it leaves us 0:03:04.165,0:03:07.806 with this all or nothing relationship[br]with technology, right? 0:03:08.623,0:03:10.748 You're either on, 0:03:10.748,0:03:13.146 and your connected[br]and distracted all the time, 0:03:13.146,0:03:15.019 or you're off, 0:03:15.019,0:03:16.299 but then you're wondering, 0:03:16.299,0:03:18.631 am I missing something important? 0:03:18.631,0:03:19.649 In other words, 0:03:19.649,0:03:21.729 you're either distracted 0:03:21.729,0:03:24.578 or you have Fear of Missing Out, 0:03:24.578,0:03:25.890 right? 0:03:27.029,0:03:31.131 So we need to restore choice. 0:03:32.093,0:03:34.761 We want to have[br]a relationship with technology 0:03:34.761,0:03:38.932 that gives us back choice[br]about how we spend time with it, 0:03:38.932,0:03:42.838 and we're going to need[br]help from designers 0:03:42.838,0:03:45.666 because knowing this stuff doesn't help. 0:03:45.666,0:03:47.845 We're going to need design help, 0:03:47.845,0:03:50.228 so what would that look like? 0:03:50.832,0:03:54.074 So let's take an example that we all face: 0:03:54.074,0:03:55.067 chat -- 0:03:55.067,0:03:56.360 text messaging. 0:03:56.360,0:03:57.960 So let's say there's two people. 0:03:57.960,0:04:01.125 Nancy's on the left and she's[br]working on a document, 0:04:01.125,0:04:02.884 and John's on the right. 0:04:02.884,0:04:04.473 And John suddenly remembers, 0:04:04.473,0:04:09.009 "I need to ask Nancy for[br]that document before I forget!" 0:04:09.009,0:04:10.013 Right? 0:04:10.434,0:04:12.053 So when he sends her that message, 0:04:12.053,0:04:14.394 it blows away her attention. 0:04:14.949,0:04:15.810 Right? 0:04:15.810,0:04:17.829 And that's what we're doing all the time, 0:04:17.829,0:04:20.663 we're bulldozing each other's[br]attention left and right. 0:04:20.663,0:04:22.812 And there's serious cost to this, 0:04:22.812,0:04:27.073 because every time[br]we interrupt each other ... 0:04:27.073,0:04:30.121 it's takes us about 23 minutes on average 0:04:30.121,0:04:32.111 to refocus our attention. 0:04:32.111,0:04:35.482 We actually cycle through[br]two different projects 0:04:35.482,0:04:38.608 before we come back[br]to the original thing we were doing. 0:04:38.938,0:04:40.379 This is Gloria Mark's research 0:04:40.379,0:04:44.408 combined with Microsoft's[br]research that showed this. 0:04:44.800,0:04:48.637 And her research also shows[br]that it actually trains bad habits. 0:04:48.637,0:04:51.689 The more interruptions we get externally, 0:04:51.689,0:04:55.796 it's conditioning and training us[br]to interrupt ourselves. 0:04:56.573,0:05:00.743 We actually self-interrupt[br]every three and a half minutes. 0:05:01.295,0:05:02.296 This is crazy, 0:05:02.296,0:05:03.896 so how to fix this? 0:05:03.896,0:05:07.090 Because Nancy and John are in this[br]all-or-nothing relationship. 0:05:07.090,0:05:08.587 Nancy might want to disconnect, 0:05:08.587,0:05:09.967 but then she'd be worried -- 0:05:09.967,0:05:12.239 what if I'm missing something important? 0:05:12.542,0:05:14.808 So design can fix this problem. 0:05:15.526,0:05:17.604 Let's say you have[br]Nancy again on the left, 0:05:17.604,0:05:18.786 John on the right, 0:05:18.786,0:05:19.798 and John remembers, 0:05:19.798,0:05:21.600 "I need to send Nancy that document," 0:05:21.600,0:05:22.765 except this time, 0:05:22.765,0:05:24.677 Nancy can mark that she's focused. 0:05:24.677,0:05:26.605 Let's say she drags a slider and says, 0:05:26.605,0:05:28.655 "I want to be focused for 30 minutes," 0:05:28.655,0:05:30.341 so "bam," she's focused. 0:05:30.970,0:05:33.526 Now when John wants the message her, 0:05:33.526,0:05:35.566 he can get the thought off of his mind -- 0:05:35.566,0:05:36.953 because he has a need, right? 0:05:36.953,0:05:38.007 He has this thought 0:05:38.007,0:05:40.744 and he needs to dump it out[br]before he forgets, 0:05:40.744,0:05:42.557 except this time 0:05:42.557,0:05:46.785 it holds the messages so[br]that Nancy can still focus 0:05:46.785,0:05:50.626 but John can get the thought[br]off of his mind, right? 0:05:51.114,0:05:54.336 But this only works[br]if one last thing is true, 0:05:54.336,0:05:59.731 which is that Nancy needs to know[br]that if something is truly important 0:05:59.731,0:06:02.179 that John can still interrupt. 0:06:02.179,0:06:08.461 But instead of having constant[br]accidental or mindless interruptions, 0:06:08.461,0:06:11.454 we're now only creating[br]conscious interruptions, 0:06:11.454,0:06:12.488 right? 0:06:13.132,0:06:14.664 So we're doing two things here. 0:06:14.664,0:06:18.569 We're creating a new choice[br]for both Nancy and John, 0:06:18.569,0:06:21.375 but there's second, subtle thing[br]we're doing here, too. 0:06:22.174,0:06:25.779 And that's that we're changing[br]the question that we're answering. 0:06:26.113,0:06:31.344 Instead of the goal of chat[br]being let's design it 0:06:31.344,0:06:33.439 so that it's easy to send a message -- 0:06:33.439,0:06:34.731 that's the goal of chat, 0:06:34.731,0:06:38.087 it should be really easy to send[br]a message to someone -- 0:06:38.087,0:06:41.425 we change the goal to something[br]deeper and a human value, 0:06:41.425,0:06:45.393 which is let's create the highest[br]possible quality communication 0:06:45.393,0:06:47.903 and relationship between two people. 0:06:48.345,0:06:51.012 So we upgraded the goal. 0:06:52.118,0:06:54.922 Now, do designers[br]actually care about this? 0:06:54.922,0:06:59.951 Do we want to have conversations[br]about what these deeper human goals are? 0:07:00.761,0:07:02.493 Well I'll tell you one story 0:07:02.493,0:07:04.145 which is about a year ago, 0:07:04.145,0:07:05.750 a little over a year ago, 0:07:05.750,0:07:08.871 I got to help organize a meeting 0:07:08.871,0:07:13.999 between some of technology's[br]leading designers and Thich Nhat Han. 0:07:14.505,0:07:19.281 Thich Nhat Hanh is an international[br]spokesperson for mindfulness meditation, 0:07:19.281,0:07:21.020 and it was the most amazing meeting. 0:07:21.020,0:07:22.167 You have to imagine -- 0:07:22.167,0:07:23.169 picture a room -- 0:07:23.169,0:07:27.045 on one side of the room you have[br]a bunch of tech geeks; 0:07:27.045,0:07:28.603 on the other side of the room, 0:07:28.603,0:07:33.528 you have a bunch of long brown robes,[br]shaved heads, Buddhist monks. 0:07:34.688,0:07:37.942 And the questions were about[br]the deepest human values, 0:07:37.942,0:07:40.235 like what does the future[br]of technology look like 0:07:40.235,0:07:42.529 when you're designing[br]for the deepest questions 0:07:42.529,0:07:44.572 and the deepest human values? 0:07:44.572,0:07:50.350 And our conversation centered on listening[br]more deeply to what those values might be. 0:07:51.114,0:07:52.927 He joked in our conversation 0:07:52.927,0:07:55.917 that what if instead of a spell check 0:07:55.917,0:07:57.877 you had a compassion check? 0:07:57.877,0:08:02.184 Meaning you might highlight a word[br]that might be accidentally abrasive -- 0:08:02.184,0:08:04.469 perceived as abrasive by someone else. 0:08:05.067,0:08:09.061 So does this kind of conversation[br]happen in the real world, 0:08:09.061,0:08:11.217 not just in these design meetings? 0:08:12.025,0:08:13.139 Well the answer is yes, 0:08:13.139,0:08:15.821 and one of my favorites is Couchsurfing. 0:08:16.500,0:08:17.501 If you didn't know, 0:08:17.501,0:08:19.131 Couchsurfing is a website 0:08:19.131,0:08:24.019 that matches people who are looking[br]for a place to stay with a free couch, 0:08:24.019,0:08:26.134 from someone who's trying to offer it. 0:08:26.352,0:08:28.092 So, great service -- 0:08:28.092,0:08:29.772 what would there design goal be? 0:08:29.772,0:08:32.521 What are you designing for[br]if you work at Couchsurfing? 0:08:32.521,0:08:37.252 Well you would think[br]it's to match guests with hosts. 0:08:37.714,0:08:38.763 Right? 0:08:38.763,0:08:40.121 That's a pretty good goal. 0:08:40.121,0:08:43.074 But that would kind of be like[br]our goal with messaging before, 0:08:43.074,0:08:45.614 where we're just trying[br]to deliver a mesasge. 0:08:45.614,0:08:47.936 So what's the deeper, human goal? 0:08:48.303,0:08:50.393 Well, they set their goal 0:08:50.393,0:08:55.949 as the need to create lasting, positive[br]experiences and relationships 0:08:55.949,0:08:58.813 between people who have never met before. 0:08:59.465,0:09:01.233 And the most amazing thing about this 0:09:01.233,0:09:02.237 was in 2007, 0:09:02.237,0:09:04.615 they introduced a way to measure this, 0:09:04.615,0:09:05.922 which is incredible. 0:09:06.206,0:09:07.529 I'll tell you how it works. 0:09:07.529,0:09:09.094 Every design goal that you have, 0:09:09.094,0:09:12.726 you have to have a corresponding[br]measurement to know how you're doing -- 0:09:12.726,0:09:14.137 a way of measuring success. 0:09:14.137,0:09:15.447 So what they do 0:09:15.447,0:09:20.120 is let's say you take[br]two people who meet up 0:09:20.120,0:09:23.945 and they take the number of days[br]those two people spent together, 0:09:23.945,0:09:24.908 right? 0:09:25.145,0:09:28.918 And then they estimate how many[br]hours were in those days. 0:09:29.438,0:09:32.191 How many hours did those two[br]people spend together? 0:09:32.191,0:09:34.225 And then after they[br]spend that time together, 0:09:34.225,0:09:35.768 they ask both of them: 0:09:35.768,0:09:37.749 how positive was your experience? 0:09:37.749,0:09:40.388 Did you have a good experience[br]with this person that you met? 0:09:41.178,0:09:44.563 And they subtract[br]form those positive hours 0:09:44.563,0:09:48.711 the amount of time[br]people spent on the website, 0:09:48.711,0:09:51.617 because that's a cost to people's lives. 0:09:51.876,0:09:53.641 Why should we value that as success? 0:09:54.241,0:09:55.861 And what you were left with 0:09:55.861,0:10:00.472 is something they refer to as net[br]"Orchestrated Conviviality," 0:10:00.472,0:10:03.522 or really just a net "Good Times" created. 0:10:03.522,0:10:08.049 The net hours that would have never[br]existed had Couchsurfing not existed. 0:10:08.950,0:10:11.457 Can you imagine how inspiring it would be 0:10:11.457,0:10:13.057 to come to work every day 0:10:13.057,0:10:17.500 and measure your success[br]in the actual net new contribution 0:10:17.500,0:10:20.314 of hours in people's lives[br]that are positive, 0:10:20.314,0:10:21.978 that would have never existed 0:10:21.978,0:10:24.979 if you didn't do what you were[br]about to do at work today? 0:10:25.915,0:10:30.895 Can you imagine a whole world[br]that worked this way? 0:10:31.859,0:10:34.637 Can you imagine a social network that -- 0:10:34.637,0:10:36.106 let's you care about cooking 0:10:36.106,0:10:39.418 and it measured its success[br]in terms of cooking nights organized 0:10:39.418,0:10:42.288 and the cooking articles[br]that you were glad you read, 0:10:42.288,0:10:44.844 and subtracted from that the articles[br]you weren't glad you read 0:10:44.844,0:10:47.403 or the time you spent scrolling[br]that you didn't like. 0:10:48.192,0:10:51.766 Imagine a professional social network, 0:10:51.766,0:10:53.598 that instead of measuring its success 0:10:53.598,0:10:57.332 in terms of connections created[br]or messages sent, 0:10:57.332,0:11:01.667 instead measured its success in terms[br]of the job offers that people got 0:11:01.667,0:11:03.520 that they were excited to get. 0:11:03.520,0:11:04.520 Right? 0:11:04.520,0:11:08.158 And subtracted the amount of time[br]people spent on the website. 0:11:08.803,0:11:11.966 Or imagine dating services, 0:11:11.966,0:11:13.808 like maybe Tinder or something, 0:11:13.808,0:11:17.277 where instead of measuring the number[br]of swipes left and right people did, 0:11:17.277,0:11:19.267 which is how they measure success today, 0:11:19.267,0:11:21.095 and instead measured 0:11:21.095,0:11:26.915 the deep, romantic, fulfilling[br]connections people created -- 0:11:26.915,0:11:29.471 whatever that was for them, by the way. 0:11:32.123,0:11:35.271 But can you imagine a whole world[br]that worked this way, 0:11:35.271,0:11:38.195 that was helping you spend your time well? 0:11:39.191,0:11:41.245 Now to do this you also need a new system, 0:11:41.245,0:11:42.946 because you're probably thinking, 0:11:42.946,0:11:44.524 today's Internet economy -- 0:11:44.524,0:11:45.954 today's economy in general -- 0:11:45.954,0:11:47.286 is measured in time spent. 0:11:47.286,0:11:49.356 The more users you have, 0:11:49.356,0:11:50.757 the more usage you have, 0:11:50.757,0:11:52.047 the more time people spend, 0:11:52.047,0:11:54.214 that's how we measure success. 0:11:54.657,0:11:56.589 But we've solved this problem before. 0:11:57.534,0:12:00.242 We solved it with organic, 0:12:00.242,0:12:02.882 when we said we need[br]to value things a different way. 0:12:03.161,0:12:06.097 We said this is a different kind of food. 0:12:07.189,0:12:09.234 So we can't compare it [br]just based on price; 0:12:09.234,0:12:11.266 this is a different category of food. 0:12:11.266,0:12:14.022 We solved it with Leed Certification, 0:12:14.022,0:12:17.568 where we said this is[br]a different kind of building 0:12:17.568,0:12:21.878 that stood for different values[br]of environmental sustainability. 0:12:22.756,0:12:26.804 What if we had something [br]like that for technology? 0:12:28.042,0:12:33.262 What if we had something whose[br]entire purpose and goal 0:12:33.262,0:12:37.535 was to help create net new positive[br]contributions to human life? 0:12:39.186,0:12:42.564 And what if we could[br]value it a different way, 0:12:42.564,0:12:44.522 so it would actually work? 0:12:44.825,0:12:48.454 Imagine you gave this different[br]premium shelf space on app stores. 0:12:48.851,0:12:51.202 Imagine you had web browsers[br]that helped route you 0:12:51.202,0:12:53.700 to these kinds of design products. 0:12:53.700,0:12:54.920 Right? 0:12:55.570,0:13:00.268 Can you imagine how exciting it would be[br]to live and create that world? 0:13:01.358,0:13:04.517 We can create this world today. 0:13:05.077,0:13:06.232 Company leaders, 0:13:06.232,0:13:08.027 all you have to do -- 0:13:08.027,0:13:11.422 only you can prioritize a new metric, 0:13:11.422,0:13:15.489 which is your metric for net positive[br]contribution to human life. 0:13:15.718,0:13:17.792 And have an honest[br]conversation about that. 0:13:17.792,0:13:19.913 Maybe you're not[br]doing so well to start with, 0:13:19.913,0:13:22.047 but let's start that conversation. 0:13:23.205,0:13:24.363 Designers, 0:13:24.363,0:13:27.219 you can redefine success, 0:13:27.219,0:13:29.183 you can redefine design. 0:13:29.183,0:13:32.975 Arguably, you have more power[br]than many people in your organization 0:13:32.975,0:13:35.821 to create the choices[br]that all of us live by. 0:13:36.470,0:13:37.894 Maybe like in medicine, 0:13:37.894,0:13:39.775 where we have a Hippocratic oath 0:13:39.775,0:13:43.920 to recognize the responsibilty[br]and this higher value 0:13:43.920,0:13:45.645 that we have to treat patients, 0:13:45.645,0:13:49.853 what if designers had something like that[br]in terms of this new kind of design? 0:13:50.840,0:13:51.842 And users, 0:13:51.842,0:13:52.978 for all of us, 0:13:52.978,0:13:56.607 we can demand technology[br]that works this way. 0:13:57.373,0:13:58.585 Now it may seem hard, 0:13:58.585,0:14:03.108 but McDonald's didn't have salads[br]until the consumer demand was there. 0:14:04.797,0:14:09.048 Walmart didn't have organic food[br]until the consumer demand was there. 0:14:09.048,0:14:13.452 We have to demand[br]this new kind of technology. 0:14:14.417,0:14:16.307 And we can do that. 0:14:16.307,0:14:17.842 And doing that 0:14:17.842,0:14:19.466 would amount to shifting 0:14:19.466,0:14:25.302 from a world that's driven and run[br]entirely on time spent ... 0:14:25.302,0:14:30.241 to world that's driven by time well spent. 0:14:31.752,0:14:33.855 I want to live in this world 0:14:33.855,0:14:36.236 and I want this conversation to happen. 0:14:36.801,0:14:38.767 Let's start that conversation now. 0:14:39.774,0:14:40.771 Thank you. 0:14:40.771,0:14:41.773 (Applause)