0:00:02.440,0:00:07.913 This particular video is going[br]to be about of a set of curves 0:00:07.913,0:00:09.597 known as conic sections. 0:00:10.290,0:00:12.540 Here's a cone. 0:00:13.080,0:00:19.151 And conic sections are formed by[br]taking cuts in into this cone in 0:00:19.151,0:00:23.830 various ways. Now, the curves[br]that are formed by taking these 0:00:23.830,0:00:28.030 particular cuts or sections are[br]very old. They were known to the 0:00:28.030,0:00:29.780 ancient Greeks from about 3:50 0:00:29.780,0:00:35.244 BC onwards. But not only they[br]very old, but they also a very 0:00:35.244,0:00:39.709 modern. The dish aerial that's[br]outside your house that brings 0:00:39.709,0:00:44.010 in Sky Television is based upon[br]the reflective property of one 0:00:44.010,0:00:48.702 of these conic sections that[br]we're going to be having a look 0:00:48.702,0:00:52.221 at Georgia Bank Telescope, a[br]radar telescope that pierces 0:00:52.221,0:00:56.131 deep into the universe, picking[br]up signals, recording them for 0:00:56.131,0:01:00.432 us again, is based upon a[br]reflective property of one of 0:01:00.432,0:01:03.951 these conic sections. So[br]although they are ancient, even 0:01:03.951,0:01:06.297 though they are, they have very, 0:01:06.297,0:01:08.418 very. Important modern uses. 0:01:09.070,0:01:13.246 So let's have a look at our[br]coal. Let's begin by describing 0:01:13.246,0:01:17.074 some features about the cone[br]itself, which I'll need in order 0:01:17.074,0:01:21.250 to describe the sections and the[br]curves that we're going to see. 0:01:21.250,0:01:25.426 First of all, let's think about[br]the axis of the cone. Now, 0:01:25.426,0:01:29.254 that's the line that runs from[br]the point down through the 0:01:29.254,0:01:32.734 center of the basin out there.[br]So that's the axis. 0:01:33.360,0:01:37.824 The generator of the comb. Well,[br]that's any line that runs down 0:01:37.824,0:01:42.660 the side of the cone like that[br]and the generator. Think of it 0:01:42.660,0:01:47.124 as being a pendulum, a piece of[br]string tight there. Its wings 0:01:47.124,0:01:51.588 round here and it Maps out this[br]curved surface of the cone. 0:01:52.480,0:01:57.745 So let's begin by looking at the[br]cuts or sections that we can 0:01:57.745,0:02:02.606 make. One of the simplest[br]sections that we can make is to 0:02:02.606,0:02:06.878 cut across and perpendicular to[br]the axis of the cone. And what 0:02:06.878,0:02:10.438 do we get? We get that well[br]known curve circle. 0:02:11.550,0:02:17.100 OK, let's not now cut[br]perpendicular. Let's cut at an 0:02:17.100,0:02:20.960 angle. So we're going to cut at[br]an angle to the. 0:02:21.780,0:02:23.468 Access of the cone. 0:02:23.990,0:02:27.640 We're going to keep the cut[br]within the physical dimensions 0:02:27.640,0:02:32.385 of the cone. And what do we get?[br]We get a curved surface. 0:02:33.120,0:02:37.509 A closed curve again, this time[br]it's an ellipse, kind of 0:02:37.509,0:02:41.898 flattened circle if you like,[br]but its name is an ellipse. 0:02:42.800,0:02:44.210 Let's put that back on. 0:02:44.790,0:02:51.126 And now let's take a cut[br]which is parallel till the 0:02:51.126,0:02:54.006 generator parallel to the edge 0:02:54.006,0:02:59.386 of the. Curved surface, so[br]there's our edge. 0:03:00.400,0:03:05.639 Of the curve surface, and this[br]is the cut that we're going to 0:03:05.639,0:03:09.669 take parallel to that edge. So[br]we make the cut. 0:03:10.300,0:03:14.452 And there we've got an open[br]curve, this time, not a closed 0:03:14.452,0:03:17.912 one. It's an open curve and it's[br]called the parabola. 0:03:18.640,0:03:23.957 Putting that back together, what[br]I want you to imagine now is a 0:03:23.957,0:03:29.683 double Cole. Now what do I mean[br]by a double cone? I mean another 0:03:29.683,0:03:32.546 cone sitting on top of this one. 0:03:33.430,0:03:38.770 Point to point. So imagine we've[br]got this cone here. We've got 0:03:38.770,0:03:40.550 another cone up here. 0:03:41.110,0:03:46.318 And again, I'm going to take a[br]cut, which this time is going to 0:03:46.318,0:03:50.782 be parallel to the axis of the[br]coal coming straight down there, 0:03:50.782,0:03:55.990 and you can see the cut there[br]now. Once I make it there, I've 0:03:55.990,0:04:00.454 made the cut will actually be[br]making the cut through the cone 0:04:00.454,0:04:04.918 up here, and so they'll actually[br]be 2 pieces to the curve. 0:04:06.030,0:04:11.646 One from the upper cone and one[br]from the lower cone, and that's 0:04:11.646,0:04:15.102 a hyperbola. It's got two[br]branches to it. 0:04:15.850,0:04:20.512 So those are our three conic[br]sections, sorry, miscounted. 0:04:20.512,0:04:24.656 Those are our four conic[br]sections, the circle. 0:04:26.390,0:04:27.440 The ellipse. 0:04:28.780,0:04:35.578 The parabola.[br]On the hyperbola with 0:04:35.578,0:04:38.254 its two branches. 0:04:38.820,0:04:42.384 Now the conic sections were[br]first discovered by monarchists 0:04:42.384,0:04:47.532 in about 350 BC. Minarchist was[br]an ancient Greek. He in fact had 0:04:47.532,0:04:52.284 three different cones, but he[br]took the same cut in each cone 0:04:52.284,0:04:54.660 in order to generate three of 0:04:54.660,0:04:58.194 them. Here with disregarding the[br]circle, 'cause, That's obviously 0:04:58.194,0:04:59.809 the simplest cut to make. 0:05:00.540,0:05:05.810 Later Apollonius who was around[br]about 200 BC, generated this 0:05:05.810,0:05:11.607 idea of making the cuts all in[br]exactly the same cone. 0:05:12.340,0:05:17.715 So. We've seen what these[br]curves look like, and we've 0:05:17.715,0:05:23.110 seen how they are generated[br]now. What we want to do is to 0:05:23.110,0:05:24.770 explore their mathematical[br]equations. 0:05:25.790,0:05:28.913 If we don't explore these[br]mathematical equations, then we 0:05:28.913,0:05:33.424 won't be able to deal with these[br]curves and find out what their 0:05:33.424,0:05:37.720 properties are. So let's have a[br]look at a definition of these 0:05:37.720,0:05:40.474 curves that will actually help[br]us to calculate them. 0:05:41.010,0:05:45.300 What I want first of all is a[br]straight line. Straight line has 0:05:45.300,0:05:50.020 a name. It's called[br]the direct tricks. 0:05:51.060,0:05:58.366 And I want a fixed point. I'm[br]going to label that fixed point 0:05:58.366,0:06:01.176 F and it's F4 focus. 0:06:03.200,0:06:05.780 Take any point. 0:06:06.490,0:06:10.423 In the plane, let's call that[br]the point P. 0:06:11.600,0:06:17.723 And then we've got P must be a[br]distance away from this fix 0:06:17.723,0:06:23.375 straight line. Let's call that[br]point M and that's of course a 0:06:23.375,0:06:29.027 right angle. And it's also a[br]distance away from F. The focus. 0:06:29.600,0:06:35.324 And so the definition that we're[br]going to use is that PF. 0:06:35.870,0:06:39.176 The distance of the point from 0:06:39.176,0:06:42.909 the focus. Is equal to. 0:06:43.460,0:06:48.652 A constant multiple of the[br]distance of the point from the 0:06:48.652,0:06:54.316 straight line and that constant[br]multiple. We use the letter E to 0:06:54.316,0:07:00.390 denote. And so PF is equal[br]to E times by PM. 0:07:01.370,0:07:06.698 Now what happens? Well, this[br]point P follows what we call a 0:07:06.698,0:07:12.026 locus. Let's just write down[br]that word locus. What do we mean 0:07:12.026,0:07:18.242 by a locus? Well, it's simply a[br]path. The Point P follows a path 0:07:18.242,0:07:20.018 governed by this rule. 0:07:21.100,0:07:28.540 This letter EE is used[br]to stand for what we 0:07:28.540,0:07:30.772 call the eccentricity. 0:07:31.600,0:07:37.536 Of the curve and we[br]get our different. 0:07:38.080,0:07:43.976 Conic sections for different[br]values of E. So if E is 0:07:43.976,0:07:50.944 between North and won, the curve[br]that we get is the closed curve. 0:07:51.640,0:07:53.060 The ellipse. 0:07:54.100,0:07:58.940 If E is equal to 1, the curve[br]that we get. 0:07:59.740,0:08:01.210 Is the parabola. 0:08:01.830,0:08:04.756 The open curve but with a single 0:08:04.756,0:08:11.246 branch. And if he is greater[br]than one, the curve that we get 0:08:11.246,0:08:16.622 is the hyperbola. Remember that[br]was the open curve with the two 0:08:16.622,0:08:21.258 branches. Now what happens[br]in the rest of the video? 0:08:21.258,0:08:24.154 We're going to deal with[br]this particular curve. 0:08:26.060,0:08:31.182 In some detail we look at some[br]of its properties and will just 0:08:31.182,0:08:35.122 relat say what the equivalent[br]properties are in these two 0:08:35.122,0:08:40.244 curves. But this is the one that[br]we're going to deal with in 0:08:40.244,0:08:44.578 detail, and the sorts of[br]mathematics that we use and the 0:08:44.578,0:08:48.912 ways in which we work if[br]replicated will enable the same 0:08:48.912,0:08:53.246 sorts of properties to be proved[br]and established in the ellipse 0:08:53.246,0:08:55.610 and the hyperbola. So let's go 0:08:55.610,0:08:58.218 on. Have a look at the parabola. 0:08:59.520,0:09:02.288 So. Let's draw a picture. 0:09:04.820,0:09:09.960 So I'm going to set up some[br]coordinate axes X&Y. 0:09:10.650,0:09:14.410 I'm going to take my straight[br]line my direct tricks. 0:09:15.300,0:09:18.028 There, and I'm going to[br]take my focus. 0:09:19.050,0:09:25.291 There. Now I need some measure,[br]some scale, some size, so I'm 0:09:25.291,0:09:30.625 going to say I'm going to take[br]the focus at the point a nought. 0:09:31.910,0:09:37.520 Now remember that[br]4 hour parabola. 0:09:38.540,0:09:45.570 PF is equal to PM[br]be'cause E the eccentricity was 0:09:45.570,0:09:47.679 equal to 1. 0:09:48.310,0:09:52.899 So the distance of our point P[br]has to be the same from. 0:09:53.670,0:09:59.180 This line. As it is from this[br]point and of course, there's an 0:09:59.180,0:10:02.240 obvious point, namely the[br]origin, that perhaps we'd like 0:10:02.240,0:10:06.320 to be on this curve. So that[br]means that the direct tricks 0:10:06.320,0:10:09.040 here is going to be at X equals 0:10:09.040,0:10:12.108 minus a. Let's put our. 0:10:12.890,0:10:16.060 Point P. Let's say there. 0:10:17.380,0:10:18.720 There is. 0:10:19.970,0:10:27.076 PM That's our[br]point. N there is PF 0:10:27.076,0:10:31.684 will call this the point[br]XY. 0:10:33.280,0:10:38.128 So what's the locus? What path?[br]What's the equation of that path 0:10:38.128,0:10:42.976 that P is going to follow as it[br]moves according to this 0:10:42.976,0:10:47.824 definition, one of the things we[br]better do is we better write 0:10:47.824,0:10:49.844 down what are these lens? 0:10:50.600,0:10:57.838 PM equals well from M to the[br]Y axis is a distance A and 0:10:57.838,0:11:04.559 there's a further distance of X[br]to go before we get to pee. 0:11:04.559,0:11:07.661 So PM is A plus X. 0:11:08.340,0:11:11.790 What about PF? 0:11:12.900,0:11:18.204 Once we look at PF, it's the[br]hypotenuse of a right angle 0:11:18.204,0:11:22.624 triangle which we can form by[br]dropping a perpendicular down 0:11:22.624,0:11:25.718 there so we can see that PF. 0:11:27.060,0:11:31.656 Will be when we square it.[br]PF squared will be equal to 0:11:31.656,0:11:34.720 that squared, which is just[br]the height, why? 0:11:35.860,0:11:39.760 Plus that squared. 0:11:40.390,0:11:47.615 Will up to there is X and up to[br]there is a so that little bit in 0:11:47.615,0:11:49.740 there is a minus X. 0:11:50.340,0:11:51.360 Squared 0:11:54.620,0:11:58.080 So this is PF squared. 0:11:58.670,0:12:03.734 Let's just check that again, PF[br]is the hypotenuse of a right 0:12:03.734,0:12:07.532 angle triangle, so using[br]Pythagoras PF squared is that 0:12:07.532,0:12:11.752 squared plus that squared.[br]That's the height YP is above 0:12:11.752,0:12:13.018 the X axis. 0:12:13.640,0:12:19.880 Up to there is X up to. There is[br]a, so the distance between there 0:12:19.880,0:12:22.376 and there is a minus X. 0:12:22.950,0:12:28.943 So now I need to equate these[br]two expressions and first of all 0:12:28.943,0:12:35.397 that means I've got to square PM[br]because if PF is equal to PMPF 0:12:35.397,0:12:41.964 squared. Must be equal to PM[br]squared and so we can substitute 0:12:41.964,0:12:49.580 this in so instead of PF we[br]have Y squared A minus, X all 0:12:49.580,0:12:56.108 squared and instead of PM[br]squared we have a plus X all 0:12:56.108,0:13:02.732 squared. Now we need to[br]multiply out this bracket Y 0:13:02.732,0:13:08.414 squared plus. Now let's just do[br]the multiplication over here. 0:13:08.920,0:13:15.318 A minor sex, all squared is a[br]minus X times by A minus X. 0:13:15.890,0:13:20.587 So we've a Times by a that gives[br]us a squared. 0:13:21.330,0:13:27.210 With a Times by minus X and[br]minus X times by a, which gives 0:13:27.210,0:13:33.510 us minus two AX and then we have[br]minus X times Y minus X which 0:13:33.510,0:13:38.550 gives us plus X squared equals.[br]Let's have a look at this 0:13:38.550,0:13:43.590 bracket. It's a plus X all[br]squared, so it's going to be 0:13:43.590,0:13:48.630 exactly the same as this one,[br]except with plus signs in. So 0:13:48.630,0:13:51.570 we're going to get a squared +2. 0:13:51.600,0:13:55.100 X plus X squared. 0:13:56.360,0:14:00.980 Now let's have a look at this.[br]We've A plus a squared here and 0:14:00.980,0:14:05.930 a plus a squared there so we can[br]take an A squared away from each 0:14:05.930,0:14:10.220 side. We have a plus X squared[br]here under plus X squared here 0:14:10.220,0:14:12.860 so we can take an X squared away 0:14:12.860,0:14:19.276 from each side. We've minus two[br]X here and plus 2X there, so it 0:14:19.276,0:14:24.508 makes sense to get those axis[br]together by adding 2X to this 0:14:24.508,0:14:27.560 side and adding it to that side. 0:14:28.070,0:14:31.710 So if we do all that[br]we've got Y squared. 0:14:33.140,0:14:37.901 The two A squared will[br]disappear, subtracting a square 0:14:37.901,0:14:42.662 from each side. The two X[br]squared will disappear. 0:14:42.662,0:14:49.010 Subtracting X squared from each[br]side and adding the two X2 each 0:14:49.010,0:14:54.829 side, we get 4A X that is[br]the standard Cartesian equation 0:14:54.829,0:14:56.416 for a parabola. 0:14:57.500,0:14:59.040 Now. 0:15:00.400,0:15:04.274 This is a standard equation and[br]it is the equation with which we 0:15:04.274,0:15:08.826 want to work. But sometimes[br]when we're doing these 0:15:08.826,0:15:13.560 curves, it's helpful to have[br]the equation described in 0:15:13.560,0:15:15.664 terms of 1/3 variable. 0:15:17.110,0:15:22.330 Variable that's often[br]called a parameter. 0:15:23.480,0:15:28.100 And the parameter we're going to[br]have in this case is the 0:15:28.100,0:15:29.630 parameter. T. 0:15:30.840,0:15:37.880 So we've got an equation[br]Y squared equals 4A X. 0:15:38.680,0:15:43.650 And what we're looking for is a[br]way of expressing X in terms of 0:15:43.650,0:15:47.555 tea and a way of expressing Y in[br]terms of T. 0:15:48.590,0:15:54.372 When we look at this, this says[br]Y squared equals 4A X. Now Y 0:15:54.372,0:15:58.915 squared is a complete square.[br]It's a whole square an exact 0:15:58.915,0:16:03.871 square. I can take it square[br]root and I'll just get plus 0:16:03.871,0:16:09.653 online as why so? Can I do it[br]over here? Can I choose an 0:16:09.653,0:16:13.783 expression for X that will give[br]me a complete square? 0:16:14.480,0:16:18.560 On this side of the equation,[br]well, four is already a complete 0:16:18.560,0:16:23.320 square. If I want to make a a[br]complete square and have to have 0:16:23.320,0:16:27.740 a squared. So I need something[br]in X that's gotten a attached to 0:16:27.740,0:16:31.480 it. So 8 times by a would give[br]me a squared. 0:16:32.070,0:16:36.295 And then I want to be able to[br]take this exact square root. 0:16:36.295,0:16:39.545 Will the only thing if I'm[br]going to introduce this 0:16:39.545,0:16:42.795 variable T that suggests[br]itself and he sensible is T 0:16:42.795,0:16:44.420 squared? So if we put. 0:16:45.990,0:16:52.510 X equals AT squared,[br]then Y squared is 0:16:52.510,0:16:59.030 equal to four a[br]Times 80 squared, which 0:16:59.030,0:17:05.550 is 4A squared T[br]squared. And so why 0:17:05.550,0:17:08.810 is equal to two 0:17:08.810,0:17:14.350 AT? And So what I've got[br]here is what's called 0:17:14.350,0:17:15.670 the parametric equation. 0:17:16.830,0:17:20.220 For the parabola. 0:17:22.100,0:17:24.540 Now that's our parametric 0:17:24.540,0:17:31.269 equation. And this is our[br]Cartesian Equation. One thing we 0:17:31.269,0:17:34.274 haven't done yet is sketched. 0:17:34.910,0:17:40.022 The curve itself, so just want[br]to do that. 0:17:41.890,0:17:42.919 So there's a. 0:17:43.600,0:17:45.580 X&Y axis. 0:17:46.830,0:17:50.386 There's our direct tricks[br]through minus a. 0:17:51.130,0:17:54.718 Here's our focus at a nought. 0:17:55.930,0:18:00.597 We know the curve is going to go[br]through there and it's equation 0:18:00.597,0:18:05.623 is Y squared equals 4A X. Well,[br]if we take positive values of X, 0:18:05.623,0:18:10.649 we can see we're going to get[br]that, but a positive value of X 0:18:10.649,0:18:15.675 gives us the value of Y, which[br]when we take the square root is 0:18:15.675,0:18:20.342 plus or minus. So we can see[br]we're going to have that and. 0:18:20.870,0:18:25.787 Symmetry in the X axis. Notice[br]we can't have any negative 0:18:25.787,0:18:31.598 values of X because 4A A is a[br]positive number times a negative 0:18:31.598,0:18:36.962 value of X would give us a[br]negative value for Y squared. 0:18:37.810,0:18:41.960 What about the parametric[br]equation X equals 80 squared Y 0:18:41.960,0:18:47.355 equals 280? What does this do in[br]terms of this picture? Well, if 0:18:47.355,0:18:53.165 we look at it, we can see X[br]equals 80 squared. A is a 0:18:53.165,0:18:57.315 positive number, T squared is[br]positive, so again we've only 0:18:57.315,0:19:02.295 got values of X which are[br]greater than or equal to 0. 0:19:03.470,0:19:09.630 However, values of why can range[br]from minus Infinity to plus 0:19:09.630,0:19:15.790 Infinity? And if you like tea[br]down here is minus Infinity. 0:19:16.930,0:19:22.910 Going round to T equals 0 here[br]at the origin coming round. If 0:19:22.910,0:19:26.130 you like to T is plus Infinity 0:19:26.130,0:19:33.015 there. So T is a parameter and[br]in a sense it counts is around 0:19:33.015,0:19:37.800 the curve as T increases from[br]minus Infinity to plus Infinity, 0:19:37.800,0:19:39.975 we move around the curve. 0:19:40.490,0:19:47.060 OK. What[br]about this curve? Well, one of 0:19:47.060,0:19:53.300 the things that we want to be[br]able to establish is what's the 0:19:53.300,0:19:58.580 equation of the tangent to the[br]curve at a particular point. 0:20:00.260,0:20:05.220 So again, let's draw our[br]picture of the curve, putting 0:20:05.220,0:20:10.180 in the direct tricks straight[br]line, putting in the focus 0:20:10.180,0:20:11.668 and putting in. 0:20:12.690,0:20:13.670 The curve. 0:20:15.200,0:20:20.680 Let's take any point P[br]on the curve. 0:20:21.380,0:20:27.373 And the question we are asking[br]is what is the equation of the 0:20:27.373,0:20:29.217 tangent to the curve? 0:20:30.500,0:20:37.234 What's the equation of that lie?[br]Well, I've got P is any point on 0:20:37.234,0:20:43.006 the curve. So instead of calling[br]XY, I'm going to use the 0:20:43.006,0:20:49.276 parametric equation. X is 80[br]squared, Y is 280. 0:20:50.150,0:20:56.855 So X is 80 squared,[br]Y is 2 AT. 0:20:57.750,0:21:01.996 The question we're asking what[br]is the equation of the tangent? 0:21:01.996,0:21:06.628 Well, it's a straight line to[br]find the equation of a straight 0:21:06.628,0:21:12.032 line, we need a point on that[br]line or we've got it 80 squared 0:21:12.032,0:21:17.436 280 and we need the gradient of[br]the line and the gradient of the 0:21:17.436,0:21:22.068 line. Of course must be the[br]gradient of the curve at that 0:21:22.068,0:21:25.156 point P, so we need DY by X. 0:21:26.680,0:21:32.359 But both X&Y are defined in[br]terms of T. 0:21:33.130,0:21:38.200 They define in terms of another[br]variable their functions of 0:21:38.200,0:21:44.791 another variable. So if I use[br]function of a function DY by DT 0:21:44.791,0:21:47.326 times DT by The X. 0:21:48.000,0:21:50.665 Then I can calculate the 0:21:50.665,0:21:57.910 gradient. Divide by DT and[br]let's remember that DT by DX 0:21:57.910,0:22:05.146 is the same as one over[br]the X by DT. In other 0:22:05.146,0:22:11.779 words, D why by DX divided[br]by the X by DT. 0:22:13.470,0:22:18.470 Divide by DT is the[br]derivative of this. 0:22:19.990,0:22:24.742 The xpi DT is going to be the[br]derivative of that. 0:22:25.760,0:22:29.546 Divide by DT is just to 0:22:29.546,0:22:36.863 A. Divided by the derivative[br]of X and the derivative 0:22:36.863,0:22:40.248 of that is 2 AT. 0:22:40.260,0:22:43.949 Which gives us a gradient of one 0:22:43.949,0:22:49.639 over T. So now we've got[br]the gradient curve at that 0:22:49.639,0:22:54.691 point, so we've got the gradient[br]of the straight line, and we've 0:22:54.691,0:23:01.427 got the point, so Y minus Y one[br]over X Minus X one is equal to 0:23:01.427,0:23:05.637 the gradient, so that's a[br]standard formula for finding the 0:23:05.637,0:23:10.689 equation of a straight line[br]given a point on the line X1Y 0:23:10.689,0:23:15.741 one and it's gradient. So let's[br]substitute in the things that we 0:23:15.741,0:23:18.514 know. This is going to be our X 0:23:18.514,0:23:23.537 one. This is going to be our why[br]one because that's the point on 0:23:23.537,0:23:28.143 the curve. This is going to be[br]our value of M our gradient, so 0:23:28.143,0:23:31.762 let's just write down that[br]information again. So X one we 0:23:31.762,0:23:36.039 said was going to be the point[br]on the curve X equals 80 0:23:36.039,0:23:43.380 squared. Our Y one was going[br]to be to AT and our gradient 0:23:43.380,0:23:50.870 M, which was the why by DX[br]was going to be one over T. 0:23:50.870,0:23:56.220 The standard equation of a[br]straight line given a point 0:23:56.220,0:24:02.105 on the line X1Y one and it's[br]gradient M. Now let's 0:24:02.105,0:24:07.455 substitute that information[br]in so we have Y minus 280. 0:24:08.780,0:24:15.836 All over X minus 8 Y[br]squared is equal to one over 0:24:15.836,0:24:21.894 T. Now we need to multiply[br]everything by T in order to get 0:24:21.894,0:24:26.206 tea out of the denominator here[br]and multiply everything by X 0:24:26.206,0:24:32.086 minus 8 Y squared in order to[br]get the X minus 8 Y squared out 0:24:32.086,0:24:36.398 of the denominator. So and[br]multiply everything by T so we 0:24:36.398,0:24:41.102 have T times Y minus 280 is[br]equal to and we multiply 0:24:41.102,0:24:45.806 everything by X minus 8 Y[br]squared and on this side it 0:24:45.806,0:24:47.374 means we're multiplying by. 0:24:47.400,0:24:54.636 One, so that's just X minus[br]8 Y squared. Multiply out this 0:24:54.636,0:25:01.872 bracket. Ty minus 280 squared is[br]equal to X minus AT squared. 0:25:02.680,0:25:09.042 Now. Here we've got 80 squared[br]term in 80 squared minus 280 0:25:09.042,0:25:13.904 squared. And here we've got[br]another term in 80 squared which 0:25:13.904,0:25:20.092 is just minus 80 squared. So if[br]I add 280 squared to each side, 0:25:20.092,0:25:25.396 I'll just have 80 squared on[br]this side and this will just 0:25:25.396,0:25:31.142 leave me with T. Why? So that's[br]Ty equals X plus 80 squared. 0:25:31.740,0:25:37.570 And that's the equation of the[br]tangent at the point P. 0:25:38.340,0:25:43.081 Now there is a reason for[br]working out this tangent. It's 0:25:43.081,0:25:47.822 not just an exercise in using[br]some calculus and using some 0:25:47.822,0:25:52.563 coordinate geometry. I've done[br]it for a purpose. I want to 0:25:52.563,0:25:55.580 explore the reflective property[br]of a parabola. 0:25:56.210,0:26:00.656 So first of all, let's[br]think what that actually 0:26:00.656,0:26:01.644 is reflection. 0:26:04.520,0:26:11.030 If we have a flat plane surface,[br]then if a beam of light comes 0:26:11.030,0:26:16.145 into that surface at an angle[br]theater, the law of reflection 0:26:16.145,0:26:21.725 tells us that it's reflected out[br]again at exactly the same angle 0:26:21.725,0:26:26.840 to the surface. So it comes in[br]it's reflected out again. 0:26:27.790,0:26:33.775 What if we had not a[br]plain flat surface? 0:26:34.290,0:26:36.018 But let's say a. 0:26:36.710,0:26:42.924 Curved surface well what the law[br]says is, I'm sorry, but a plane 0:26:42.924,0:26:48.660 for a curved surface is exactly[br]the same as a plain flat 0:26:48.660,0:26:53.918 surface, except we take the[br]tangent at the point where it's 0:26:53.918,0:27:00.132 coming in. So the Ray of light[br]is reflected out at the same 0:27:00.132,0:27:05.762 angle. To the tangent that it[br]made to the tangent when it came 0:27:05.762,0:27:09.422 in. So that's the reflective 0:27:09.422,0:27:16.060 law. How does this affect[br]a parabola? Say we had a 0:27:16.060,0:27:21.791 parabolic mirror mirror that was[br]in the shape of our parabola. 0:27:22.590,0:27:29.701 As our parabola, what happens to[br]a Ray of light that's a comes 0:27:29.701,0:27:36.812 in parallel to the X axis, and[br]it strikes the mirror when it 0:27:36.812,0:27:40.094 comes in, it must be reflected. 0:27:41.060,0:27:46.536 Question is. Where is it[br]reflected? What direction does 0:27:46.536,0:27:50.758 that going? The law of[br]reflection tells us. 0:27:52.070,0:27:55.832 That if that's the angle[br]theater that's made there, 0:27:55.832,0:28:00.012 then that must be the angle[br]theater that's made there. 0:28:01.080,0:28:04.069 So what we need to discover is. 0:28:05.430,0:28:10.260 If this is the case, where does[br]that go? Where is that Ray of 0:28:10.260,0:28:15.090 light directed? And as you can[br]see, this is all to do with the 0:28:15.090,0:28:18.885 tangent to the curve, so it's[br]quite important that we know 0:28:18.885,0:28:21.645 what the equation of that[br]particular tangent is. 0:28:22.170,0:28:23.900 OK. 0:28:24.970,0:28:28.274 Now we know what it is we're[br]trying to do. Let's set up a 0:28:28.274,0:28:32.258 diagram. And on this diagram,[br]let's put some. 0:28:33.670,0:28:39.196 Coordinates of important things,[br]so there's the direct tricks, 0:28:39.196,0:28:42.880 and there's our focus. 2 very 0:28:42.880,0:28:45.556 important points. Here's our 0:28:45.556,0:28:47.519 parabola. Whoops, a Daisy. 0:28:48.690,0:28:51.870 Better curve, here's our[br]point, P. 0:28:54.300,0:29:00.240 There and here's our tangent to[br]the point P. 0:29:00.410,0:29:05.811 I'll call that the point T there[br]an array of light. 0:29:06.670,0:29:13.432 Going to come in like so I'm[br]going to do. I'm going to join 0:29:13.432,0:29:15.364 that to the focus. 0:29:16.060,0:29:20.500 So here I've got this line here,[br]which is parallel. 0:29:23.600,0:29:29.390 To the X axis I'm going to call[br]this end, so I've got a line 0:29:29.390,0:29:34.794 here, PN. If I extend PN back in[br]a straight line, it's going to 0:29:34.794,0:29:40.198 meet the direct tricks there. At[br]the point M and there will be a 0:29:40.198,0:29:44.758 right angle. But[br]remember what the 0:29:44.758,0:29:49.300 point Pierce .80[br]squared to AT. 0:29:50.640,0:29:52.980 OK. 0:29:54.710,0:30:01.430 One of the things that we need[br]to find is this point T down 0:30:01.430,0:30:06.230 here, let's remember the[br]equation of our tangent. It's Ty 0:30:06.230,0:30:11.990 is equal to X plus 80 squared.[br]That's the equation of the 0:30:11.990,0:30:15.456 Tangent. PT. So 0:30:15.456,0:30:21.120 at T. Y is[br]equal to 0. 0:30:21.800,0:30:28.730 That implies that X is[br]equal to minus AT. 0:30:29.610,0:30:30.390 Square. 0:30:33.020,0:30:40.588 That enables us to[br]find this length here 0:30:40.588,0:30:48.030 TF. Must be that distance[br]up to the origin. Oh, which 0:30:48.030,0:30:55.169 is a distance 80 squared[br]plus that. So that's a plus 0:30:55.169,0:30:56.467 AT squared. 0:30:58.790,0:31:06.374 We know that PF[br]is equal to P. 0:31:06.910,0:31:08.940 N. 0:31:10.530,0:31:15.894 Because that comes from the[br]definition of the parabola. 0:31:18.160,0:31:25.870 But we also know what[br]PM actually is. PM is 0:31:25.870,0:31:33.580 this distance A plus? This[br]distance here, which is 80 0:31:33.580,0:31:39.804 squared. So if we look at the[br]argument that we've got here, 0:31:39.804,0:31:46.720 that TF is A plus 80 squared[br]PM is A plus. 8880 squared and 0:31:46.720,0:31:53.636 PM is equal to PF. And this[br]means that TF and PF have to 0:31:53.636,0:31:55.612 be the same length. 0:31:56.650,0:32:00.226 In other words, this[br]triangle here. 0:32:01.240,0:32:03.168 Is an isosceles triangle. 0:32:06.070,0:32:08.610 Triangle. 0:32:09.850,0:32:12.480 FTP 0:32:12.480,0:32:15.110 is. 0:32:15.470,0:32:22.370 Isosceles[br]OK, it's isosceles. What does 0:32:22.370,0:32:28.514 that tell us? Well, if it's[br]isosceles, it tells us that it's 0:32:28.514,0:32:34.146 two base angles are equal, so[br]that's one equal side, and 0:32:34.146,0:32:40.802 that's one equal side, so that[br]angle has to be equal to that 0:32:40.802,0:32:46.434 angle there. Therefore, the[br]angle FTP is equal to the angle 0:32:46.434,0:32:50.018 TPF. Let me just mark those that 0:32:50.018,0:32:52.870 angle there. Is Alpha. 0:32:53.880,0:32:57.186 And that angle there is Alpha. 0:32:58.720,0:33:01.080 But wait a minute. 0:33:02.240,0:33:04.862 This line and this line are 0:33:04.862,0:33:11.994 parallel. So therefore, this[br]angle NPF is equal 0:33:11.994,0:33:15.362 to this angle PF. 0:33:16.090,0:33:21.850 T. Those two angles are[br]both equal to. 0:33:22.660,0:33:23.720 Beta. 0:33:25.550,0:33:30.269 Be cause this line is parallel[br]to that one, they make a zed 0:33:30.269,0:33:35.876 angle. Now the things of this[br]triangle add up to 180 and 0:33:35.876,0:33:40.868 here is a straight line, the[br]angles of which must add up 0:33:40.868,0:33:45.028 to 180, and so this angle[br]here is also Alpha. 0:33:46.410,0:33:48.450 Hang on a minute. 0:33:49.390,0:33:53.702 What we're saying is that the[br]angle that this line makes 0:33:53.702,0:33:58.014 with the tangent is equal to[br]the angle that this line 0:33:58.014,0:33:59.582 makes with the Tangent. 0:34:01.430,0:34:06.904 In other words, if this was a[br]Ray of light coming in here, it 0:34:06.904,0:34:11.205 would be reflected according to[br]the law of reflection, and it 0:34:11.205,0:34:13.160 would pass through the focus. 0:34:14.600,0:34:21.880 So any Ray of light that comes[br]in parallel to the X axis? 0:34:22.710,0:34:26.526 Each Ray of light is reflected[br]to the focus. 0:34:27.240,0:34:32.412 Now you can see how your dish[br]aerial works. Your dish aerial 0:34:32.412,0:34:37.153 is formed by spinning a[br]parabola, so it makes a surface 0:34:37.153,0:34:42.325 a dish. The signal comes in and[br]strikes the dish and is 0:34:42.325,0:34:47.066 reflected to the receptor. That[br]little lump that stands up in 0:34:47.066,0:34:52.669 front of the disk and the whole[br]of the signal is gathered there. 0:34:53.930,0:34:59.292 How else can we might use of[br]this? What we can make use of? 0:34:59.292,0:35:04.271 Its in Searchlight 'cause we can[br]turn it around the other way. If 0:35:04.271,0:35:09.633 we put a bulb there at the focus[br]and it emits light then the 0:35:09.633,0:35:14.229 light that he meets will travel[br]to the parabolic mirror an will 0:35:14.229,0:35:18.442 be reflected outwards in a beam.[br]A concentrated beam, not one 0:35:18.442,0:35:22.655 that spreads but one that is[br]concentrated and is parallel to 0:35:22.655,0:35:24.570 the X axis to the. 0:35:24.620,0:35:25.940 Axis of the mirror. 0:35:26.630,0:35:31.869 So we see that are a property of[br]a curve discovered and known 0:35:31.869,0:35:35.899 about by the ancient Greeks has[br]some very, very modern 0:35:35.899,0:35:40.332 applications, and indeed our SOC[br]would not be the same without 0:35:40.332,0:35:44.362 the kinds of properties that[br]we're talking about now that 0:35:44.362,0:35:46.377 exist in these conic sections.