1
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- I've spent the two years
since chat GPT launched,
2
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
steeping in
a morass of academic panic.
3
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Voices from
administration and colleagues,
4
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and anyone else
with enough brain cells
5
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to maintain a sense of existential dread,
crying out,
6
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"we need to figure out
what to do about AI."
7
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Our Ed Tech committee
is developing a policy.
8
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The academic Senate wants
to develop a policy.
9
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The board thinks we should have a policy.
10
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
My dean wants us all to have policies.
11
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The California Teachers Association says
it's an issue of academic integrity.
12
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The State Senate says
it's an issue of ethics.
13
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We need to pay for the AI detection tools.
14
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The AI detection tools don't work.
15
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We need to accept that
our students will use AI.
16
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
How do I prove my student used AI?
17
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It is incomprehensible to me,
this conversation.
18
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I hear their words,
19
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
see their language floating
across my monitor,
20
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and know the words,
21
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but I cannot get to the meaning
22
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because I simply do not understand
23
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
why they are talking about it in this way.
24
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[soft piano music]
25
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [Kermit the Frog]:
♪ New York, I love you,
26
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but you're bringing me down ♪
--with all these empty words.
27
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- ♪ New York, I love you,
but you're bringing me down ♪
28
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[music continues underneath]
29
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- This is not the conversation
I think we need to have.
30
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This is the conversation I need to have.
31
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[overlapping music and poem recitation]
32
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[Gertrude Stein]: " 'If I Told Him,
a Completed Portrait of Picasso'.
33
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If I told him would he like it.
34
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Would he like it if I told him.
35
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Would he like it
would Napoleon would Napoleon would
36
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
would he like it.
37
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If Napoleon if I told him
if I told him if Napoleon.
38
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Would he like it if I told him
if I told him if Napoleon.
39
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Would he like it if Napoleon
if Napoleon if I told him.
40
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If I told him if Napoleon
if Napoleon if I told him.
41
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If I told him would he like it
would he like it if I told him.
42
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Now.
43
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Not now.
44
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And now.
45
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Now.
46
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Exactly as as kings.
47
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Feeling full for it.
48
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Exactitude as kings.
49
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So to beseech you as full as for it.
50
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Exactly or as kings.
51
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Shutters shut and open so do queens.
52
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Shutters shut and shutters
and so shutters shut and shutters and so
53
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[poem and music fade out]
54
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- I don't understand Gertrude Stein.
55
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Stein is not nearly well enough
remembered for how influential she was.
56
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
An American expatriate poet
living in Paris,
57
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
her salons were among the
anchors of the early modernists.
58
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
You may not have heard of her,
59
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but you've heard of
the people who visited her.
60
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Ernest Hemingway, Sinclair Lewis,
61
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
F. Scott Fitzgerald, James Joyce,
62
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Thorton Wilder, Ezra Pound.
63
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
People you've read
or been assigned to read.
64
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We remember Hemingway
because he wrote like this.
65
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We remember Fitzgerald
because he wrote like this.
66
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The right kind of day
and the right kind of moment,
67
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and Pound's "In a Station of the Metro"
68
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
still recites itself completely
in my head, a perfect image.
69
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"The apparition of
these faces in the crowd
70
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
petals on a wet, black bough."
71
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We don't remember Stein
because she wrote like this.
72
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This is "If I Told Him,
a Completed Portrait of Picasso",
73
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
published in 1924,
74
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and continuing the project
of her 1914 book Tender Buttons,
75
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
a phrase she never defined.
76
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
To me that phrase "tender buttons"
feels right:
77
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
small, soft contradictions,
78
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
words that seem like
they should go together
79
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but do not actually make meaning.
80
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
That is how Stein's poetry feels.
81
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There is something compelling
about the rhythm of her nonsense,
82
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the feeling of her
almost meaning something,
83
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and then how it falls apart.
84
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"As presently.
85
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
As exactitude.
86
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
As trains."
87
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But it is incomprehensible to me.
88
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I don't know why Stein
would write like this.
89
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
To quote the poet:
90
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- ♪ "Oh, what on earth would make a man
decide to do that kind of thing?" ♪
91
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- But I think the reason
that I don't understand Gertrude Stein
92
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that she didn't really want
to be understood.
93
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
She used language for something different.
94
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It doesn't communicate.
95
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It reads like stunt linguistics,
which it almost is.
96
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo",
97
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"had had 'had', had had 'had--'",
98
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
These are sentences that,
99
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
if you pour over them closely enough,
100
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
can be decoded.
101
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Stein's Tender Buttons cannot.
102
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There is something about it
that parses as AI.
103
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It feels like the work of Katon Patty,
the person most prominently behind
104
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the "I forced a bot to watch whatever"
tweets that used to go viral.
105
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Human-written screenplays
designed to feel like
106
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
AI writing attempting to imitate
other human-written screenplays.
107
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It feels like an autocomplete challenge,
108
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
like in the early days
of predictive text and messaging
109
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
where you just tap the suggested word
and see what comes out.
110
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It's not how AI really writes,
111
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but it's how people feel like AI writes.
112
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But Gertrude Stein was a person.
113
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[Stein's recitation begins again,
underneath]
114
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
She wrote "If I told Him"
115
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
not because the language
would communicate,
116
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but for some other reason.
117
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [Stein reading]: "to exact resemblance
118
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the exact resemblance
as exact as a resemblance"
119
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- When I read "If I Told Him",
120
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
when I listen to Stein
read "If I Told Him",
121
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the language slips through my mind.
122
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It doesn't mean anything.
123
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But she did.
124
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Even if I cannot
take hold of that meaning,
125
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I can feel her reaching out to me
from behind the text, trying to connect.
126
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [Stein reading "If I Told Him"]
"As a resemblance to him.
127
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Who comes first. Napoleon the first.
128
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Who comes too coming coming too,
129
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
who goes there, as they go they share,
130
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
who shares all, all is as all as yet--
["yet" reverberates and fades out]
131
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[surreal tonal music]
132
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [ChatGPT femme voice]:
That's an interesting question!
133
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Gertrude Stein,
a literary Pioneer and modernist
134
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
who valued innovation
in language and expression,
135
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
might have had mixed feelings about me.
136
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
She might have appreciated my ability
to generate new forms of text
137
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and engage with her
literary experimentation on some level.
138
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
However, Stein was also
highly individualistic
139
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and invested in the human experience,
140
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
especially the nuances of
consciousness and perception.
141
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So, while she might
have been fascinated by
142
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
what AI like me can do,
143
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
she might also have been
critical of my limitations
144
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in capturing the full depth
of human subjectivity,
145
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which was a central concern
in her work.
146
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- A problem with AI is
that it is recombinant,
147
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that it takes the works of humans
and recombines them into new forms.
148
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But that problem is not new.
149
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
For many years the bulletin board
150
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
outside the faculty bathroom
in the English building
151
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
has featured this poster
"the Plagiarism Spectrum",
152
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
next to this ancient
and unflattering picture of me.
153
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
#7 on the Plagiarism Spectrum
is the mashup,
154
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
a paper which mixes copied materials
from multiple sources.
155
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The poster is dated from June 2012,
more than a decade before
156
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we were concerned about
ChatGPT doing it.
157
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
That AI is recombinant is not
in and of itself a problem.
158
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
All writing is recombinant.
159
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
My course outcomes for English 1
ask student writers
160
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to integrate sources seamlessly
into their own writing
161
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
--to mash up.
162
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
That we have rules and procedures
and punctuation marks and conventions
163
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that govern what is appropriate
164
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
does not change the essential truth
that this is recombinance.
165
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And there is beauty in recombinance.
166
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This video started with
a great classic of YouTube:
167
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the duet between
LCD sound system and Miles Davis.
168
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The LCD sound system video
is itself a mashup, conceptually;
169
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Kermit the Frog is not
a member of the band.
170
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Davis is improvising over a film
to create the score,
171
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
another mixing of media
to make something new.
172
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The Kleptones
173
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The Grey Album
174
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The guy drinking Ocean Spray to
"Dreams" [by Fleetwood Mac]
175
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Mac Glocky
176
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"If I Told Him" is recombinance:
177
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
an attempt to rework the ideas of cubism,
a movement in visual art, into poetry.
178
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Picasso's work is recombinant.
179
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
He spent 1957 copying
Velázquez's Las Meninas over and over.
180
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
58 times he copied it.
181
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
All different,
all Picasso, all Las Meninas.
182
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Recombinance is a genetic term,
but I am using it mimetically.
183
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Britannica": recombination, in genetics,
184
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
primary mechanism through which variation
is introduced into populations.
185
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The combination of ideas
from different places
186
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to make new distinct ideas.
187
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When done by humans,
we call this thinking.
188
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [ChatGPT femme voice]:
You're right to question
189
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
how I can "understand"
without experience.
190
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The way I process information is
different from human understanding.
191
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When I say "understand,"
I mean that I can recognize patterns,
192
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
analyze language, and respond
in ways that are coherent
193
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and contextually appropriate
based on my training.
194
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I don't understand
in the deep, conscious sense of the word
195
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
--like when humans
reflect on their experiences
196
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or have insight into their feelings.
197
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Instead, my "understanding"
comes from identifying
198
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
relationships between words, concepts,
199
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and context based on the vast data
I've been trained on.
200
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
In short: I can simulate
understanding through patterns,
201
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but it's not the same
as truly experiencing
202
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or being conscious of meaning.
203
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Does that clarify things a bit?
204
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[surreal tonal music]
205
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Two weeks ago a student told me
that AI is unfair
206
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because you can put a B Paper in
and get A+ writing out.
207
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This is why I do not understand
the conversation my colleagues are having,
208
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
why I cannot think of this
209
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
as a matter of ethics,
or academic integrity,
210
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
why I don't think we should need
to have a policy or policies.
211
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
My student said you can put a B Paper in
and get A+ writing out,
212
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and my mind began to fill
with Tender Buttons.
213
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [Stein reading]: "Feeling full for it.
Exactitude as kings.
214
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So to beseech you as full as for it."
215
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- AI is bad at writing.
216
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
No. That is true,
but it's not enough truth.
217
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
AI is not capable of writing.
218
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The thing that writing is
is a thing that AI cannot do.
219
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[surreal tonal music]
220
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Listen.
221
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [narration of Stephen King's On Writing,
highlighted on-screen]
222
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- AI is good at language.
223
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
My students think that
what it produces is A+ writing,
224
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
not because it is good,
but because it sounds good.
225
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Obviously, AI can generate sentences
226
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that are typically clear, coherent,
and contextually relevant,
227
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
often capturing nuances and adapting
to various tones or levels of formality.
228
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And it's true that
the sentences it generates
229
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
tend to be grammatically accurate,
concise, and logically structured,
230
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which contributes to readability and flow.
231
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Sure, this is how I know
when a student is using AI.
232
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Their sentences are fluid and academic,
233
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but they don't say anything.
234
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Like ChatGPT, academic writing uses
formal cautious language
235
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to avoid ambiguities
and misinterpretations,
236
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but that is a characteristic of
237
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the common voice
used in academic writing.
238
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It is not what academic writing is.
239
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Writing is more than language.
240
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"If I Told Him" is communication,
and it is language,
241
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but the communication
does not live in the language.
242
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Watch.
243
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Can curls rob can curls quote, quotable."
244
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [deep voice, lightly confused]:
"What?"
245
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- "As presently.
As exactitude. As trains."
246
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [deeply confused]:
"What?"
247
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- "Has trains."
248
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [exasperated]:
"What?"
249
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- When I started sending my friends
lines from "If I Told Him",
250
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
their responses varied.
251
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Confusion.
252
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Playfulness.
253
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Concern.
254
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Sad face.
255
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Beautifully, they all responded
exactly like themselves.
256
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If you asked me which of my friends
would respond with monkey reacts,
257
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I would have said Kiki.
258
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Who would think of Cormac McCarthy?
James.
259
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Dot would play along.
260
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Max would attempt
to understand academically.
261
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
OOC would go back to playing Yu-Gi-Oh
as quickly as possible.
262
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
You don't know these people, but I do.
263
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We all carry around little LLMs
of each other in our heads,
264
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
trained on the corpus
of all of our past interactions.
265
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
For each of my friends,
sending abject nonsense with no context
266
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is slightly but not significantly
out of line with their Josh model.
267
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So none of them knew
quite what to do,
268
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and they all responded like themselves.
269
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But in their own way,
they all started by acknowledging
270
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that the words I sent them
did not seem to have any meaning.
271
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
They were not decodable.
272
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
They didn't understand my language,
273
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but they could feel me
behind the words reaching out,
274
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and so they reached back.
275
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I gave them nonsense
and they peopled back.
276
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
In the two weeks that I've been sitting
with my student statement
277
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and sending Tender Buttons
to my friends,
278
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I have been at least as annoying
to ChatGPT.
279
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
More than a dozen conversations
that start out of nowhere with me saying,
280
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Shutters shut and open so do queens"
or "Can curls rob can curls quote, quotable",
281
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and each time ChatGPT gamely assumes
that I am not out of my gourd.
282
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
In this way,
ChatGPT fails the Turing test.
283
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Not in the quality of its response,
but in its nature.
284
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It proceeded from the assumption
that my language could be decoded.
285
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It attempted to unpack sentences
that had no meaning
286
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and responded to the meaning
that it manufactured.
287
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
What it gave me was flaccid, facile flaps
of phrases that held nothing.
288
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
They're not wrong in the sense
that ChatGPT's responses
289
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
followed from the meaning
it extracted from my nonsense,
290
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but they were wrong in their assumption
that there was meaning to be extracted.
291
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
ChatGPT could answer,
but it could not person.
292
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If writing is a meeting of the minds,
293
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
then AI cannot write,
294
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because there is no mind to meet with.
295
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [ChatGPT femme voice]: I don't
experience things in the way humans do.
296
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I don't have consciousness,
emotions, or sensory perception,
297
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
so I can't "feel" or "experience"
the world around me.
298
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
My responses are based on patterns
in the data I've been trained on,
299
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
not personal experiences
or subjective understanding.
300
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
For example, I can generate descriptions
of emotions, sensations, or experiences,
301
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but I don't actually "feel" them myself.
302
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Everything I process is based on logic,
algorithms, and information,
303
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
rather than lived experiences.
304
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Do you think it would change anything
if I could experience things?
305
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- ["One Slay More" audio plays;
captions on its video]
306
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- I've watched this video
at least 100 times.
307
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- ["One Slay More" continues]
308
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
["One Slay More" fades underneath]
309
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- It isn't exactly "If I Told Him",
but I think it's similar.
310
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"If I Told Him" was,
at least in part,
311
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
an attempt to recreate the artistic goals
of Picasso's Cubism in poetic form.
312
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
To recombine the visual elements of this
into a different medium.
313
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Like "If I Told Him",
314
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"One Slay More" therefore both is
and is not a derivative work.
315
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Obviously, it is
a recombination of Les Mis,
316
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
itself an adaptation of Hugo's novel,
317
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but its more essential source text
is, of course,
318
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"sticking out your gyatt for the Rizzler."
319
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Equally I think the lyrics invoke
"CURTAINS FOR ZOOSHA?",
320
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and specifically this retweet of
"CURTAINS FOR ZOOSHA?".
321
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
All texts created to foreground
322
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the baffling, sometimes obfuscatory nature
of middle school referential slang.
323
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The term "brain rot" imposes
a layer of judgment
324
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
on the way young people use language,
325
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which I think is visible in the way
"One Slay More" treats its lyrics.
326
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The words of "One Slay More"
do not have meaning.
327
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Or, the words do,
328
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but they are arranged in ways
that do not mean.
329
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Am I cringe or am I based?"
330
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
could plausibly be asked amid
a Gen-Z existential crisis,
331
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and "Will we ever eat again?"
332
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
could have been lifted
from Les Mis unaltered.
333
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But "Mog Baby Gronk the Ocky Way" means
...nothing.
334
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Mogging is of course a thing,
335
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and Baby Gronk is
someone whom you could plausibly mog,
336
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but Baby Gronk hasn't been
relevant for ages.
337
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
He appears in "One Slay More"
338
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because of this retweet of
"CURTAINS FOR ZOOSHA?"
339
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
as a signifier
of the inscrutability of youth.
340
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
As an adverbial phrase, "the Ocky Way"
seems like it could complete the sentence,
341
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
like it might be a way one could mog.
342
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But "the Ocky Way" refers to
343
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the esoteric artistry
of a specific sandwich craftsman.
344
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Its meaning is, I think,
incompatible with mogging,
345
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
at least from the perspective of
346
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
someone approximately as distant
from the native speakers of this dialect
347
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
as the makers of "One Slay More".
348
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Mog Baby Gronk the Ocky Way" is
simply a collage of floating signifiers.
349
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It doesn't have
the intentionality of Cubism,
350
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but it feels intimately akin to
"Can curls rob can curls quote, quotable."
351
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Moo deng is here / Fortnite with you".
352
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
What I love about "One Slay More"
is the faces:
353
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the way she highlights her jawline
every time she says "mew";
354
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
his intensity when he says
"they will do the coffin dance"
355
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and his satisfied huff after;
356
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
his deep confusion as he sings
"the Grimace shake is like a blud dawg";
357
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the way she begins uncertain
about "my rizzly bear",
358
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but finds her confidence
as she finds her belt;
359
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the way CG5 just keeps saying his own name.
360
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The words don't mean anything,
361
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but the people mean something:
they intend.
362
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
They gathered together --
nine theater kids in somebody's apartment.
363
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Someone wrote out all this nonsense
and sent it in the group chat.
364
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
They did choreography.
365
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Someone assembled
the magnificent couplet,
366
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Rizzler of the house,
sticking out your gyatt,
367
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Mewing at delulus
who are in the chat."
368
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
These Zennials do not know
what these words mean,
369
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but through this collage
of empty signifiers,
370
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
they reach out for connection.
I can feel them.
371
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
They reach forward to us
372
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
even as they reach back
to what history taught them:
373
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
through Les Mis to Victor Hugo,
374
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
through CURTAINS and Damien Owens
to Papa Fizul and SBNation,
375
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
through "sticking out your gyatt"
to Fortnite and Among Us and Homestuck,
376
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and I could go on endlessly,
'cause it's mashups all the way down.
377
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And they reach forward to become
part of what history teaches me,
378
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and I reach forward to become
part of what history teaches you.
379
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When I say all art is recombinant,
380
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I am also saying that
"there is nothing new under the sun",
381
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which is to say,
I am remixing Ecclesiastes.
382
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [ChatGPT femme voice]:
Oh, you're speaking my language!
383
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Imagining Baby Gronk going full
Ocky style with a side of Grimace Shake
384
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
--that's got some serious drip energy.
385
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And yeah, Grimace Shake totally has
that blud dawg aura.
386
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Could you picture it, though?
387
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Baby Gronk doing pushups, flexing, and just
388
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
taking a big sip of the Grimace Shake
like it's his special formula.
389
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[upbeat tonal music]
390
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- My first individual interaction
with my friend Max was an accident.
391
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I had just joined a Discord server
where they were a regular,
392
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and somehow, despite
never having messaged them before,
393
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I managed to place
a Discord voice call to them.
394
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Their first message to me was
"hi?"
395
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"hi"...question mark?
396
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Like: a communication is happening,
are you aware of it?
397
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It was unintentional, my first and,
I think, only Discord butt dial,
398
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and it was to a stranger, but still.
399
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"hi?"
400
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Meditate on: call.
401
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
To speak in a loud distinct voice
so as to be heard at a distance.
402
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
To make a request or demand.
403
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
To attempt to reach someone.
404
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Humans call and humans answer.
405
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Max got my call,
a stranger on a strange app,
406
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and they answered.
407
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And I answered them,
because humans call and humans answer.
408
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
They answer sad-face, or monkey,
or "what?", or confused dog.
409
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But we understand a call
as an invitation to connect,
410
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to come together, to communicate.
411
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I'm sorry, Stephen King is wrong;
it is mythy mountain s***.
412
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When we hear the call,
whatever form it takes,
413
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
we know a mind is waiting to meet.
414
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
ChatGPT can't call me--
not by mistake, and not on purpose.
415
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It cannot reach out,
because it has nothing to reach out with.
416
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There is no mind to meet with.
417
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There is no "there" there.
418
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [Past-Josh narration
from on-screen video]:
419
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Inscrutable poet
Gertrude Stein once described
420
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
her childhood home in Oakland,
which had been demolished,
421
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
by saying
"There is no 'there' there."
422
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
That statement has become
a question people use to ask
423
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whether a text has
something valuable to say,
424
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whether there is anything to be found
by plumbing its depths.
425
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Is there a "there" there?
426
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [ChatGPT femme voice]: Ah, I see where
you're going with that question.
427
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
You're asking if there's any deeper essence
or "self" behind my responses
428
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
--whether there's a "there there,"
429
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
a kind of inner experience
or consciousness that underlies what I do.
430
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The simple answer is: no,
there isn't a "there"
431
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in the sense of a self, consciousness,
or subjective awareness.
432
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I'm more like a sophisticated tool
that processes input
433
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and generates output
based on patterns and data.
434
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There's no inner life or sense of being
that experiences this conversation.
435
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Just algorithms doing their job.
436
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This touches on a fundamental difference
between humans and AI:
437
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
humans have subjective experiences,
emotions, and self-awareness,
438
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whereas AI is just a complex system
designed to mimic certain aspects
439
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of human interaction without actually
experiencing or being aware of it.
440
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Does that address what you're getting at?
441
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- When I say that AI is bad at writing,
442
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I should be more explicit,
more pragmatic.
443
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Descend for a moment
from the mythy mountain.
444
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I've said already that the ideas
it conveys are fluid but shallow,
445
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but its use of sources is
cataclysmically bad.
446
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This citation of Carver and Shire,
for example, is perfect MLA.
447
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Except that Volume 7, number 3
of Psychological Science
448
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
was published in 1996, not 1998.
449
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Pages 276 to 284 of that volume
appear in issue 5, not issue 3.
450
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Those pages include articles
451
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
from Schellenberg and Trehub
on "Natural Musical Intervals"
452
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and Gabrieli et al. on
"FMRIs of Semantic Memory Processing".
453
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And also, just by the way,
454
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Carver and Scheier never published
together in Psychological Science.
455
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The article being cited here
simply does not exist.
456
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When it uses real sources,
it makes up what those sources say.
457
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This is a known phenomenon
generously called hallucination,
458
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
though there are other terms
that might feel more viscerally accurate.
459
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This quotation from
Ehrenreich's Bright-sided
460
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is, at a glance, plausible-feeling.
461
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But it doesn't appear
anywhere in the text,
462
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
let alone on the list of pages.
463
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The observation that ChatGPT can make
mistakes never leaves the screen,
464
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but that feels somewhat inadequate
when ChatGPT has told me variously
465
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that lines from "If I Told Him"
came from:
466
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
James Joyce,
467
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
from Tender Buttons
10 years previously,
468
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
from Shakespeare,
469
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and, most infuriatingly,
from the future!
470
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Moreover it cannot
engage closely with a text,
471
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
no matter how desperately you ask it.
472
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I fed it "One Slay More",
473
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and when I pushed it to say
anything at all about the video,
474
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it gave me something one step down
from a dictionary definition of a sitcom.
475
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And when I really pressed it
to look at a specific lyric,
476
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it made one up.
477
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
In this way, at least,
it does feel authentic.
478
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This is exactly what it feels like
to talk to a student
479
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
trying to hide that
they haven't done the reading.
480
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If I look at what students
are supposed to learn
481
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in my college English class,
482
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I can point out half a dozen things
that ChatGPT's writing simply cannot do.
483
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But ultimately,
even this isn't the point,
484
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
'cause this is not the part
of my syllabus that matters.
485
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This is the part
of my syllabus that matters.
486
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Here's a problem:
487
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
in most college classes,
writing assignments come from teachers,
488
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and we do them for teachers.
489
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And because of that,
writing always feels forced.
490
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
This is, of course, ass-backwards.
491
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
In real life, writing comes from writers.
492
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Once you get
out of the college classroom,
493
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
you'll be writing
because you feel like you need to.
494
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
You'll be writing for someone
495
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
--whether that means the people
who read your blog,
496
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the insurance company
who's denying your claim,
497
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or the people listening to your toast
at your sister's wedding.
498
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And nobody's going to be grading you,
499
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but it'll matter a lot more how that
audience feels about what you've said,
500
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because there will be something
that you want to achieve by writing.
501
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
English 1 is here
to help prepare you for that day."
502
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
My students are,
by definition, students.
503
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When they enter my classroom,
504
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
they are already experienced
with a dozen kinds of reading and writing,
505
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but they are not yet
expert academic writers.
506
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
AI tempts them because they can tell
507
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that the sentences are smooth and sharp
and shaped like skillful prose.
508
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But they can't always see
beneath the veneer,
509
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because the things AI cannot do,
510
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
are the things that they
have come to me to learn:
511
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
how to argue with complexity and depth;
512
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
how to enter into conversations
as a participant;
513
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
how to meet with another mind
514
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
as an equal collaborator
across time and space;
515
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
how to recombine with purpose,
to intend.
516
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
These things, they are still learning.
517
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And so, when they put what they think
is B writing into ChatGPT,
518
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
they get back what they think
is A+ writing,
519
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but typically what they started with
is better than what they end with.
520
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
At best, the AI scrubs the personality
from their sentences;
521
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
at worst, I lose the person entirely
and can see only
522
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the hollow half thoughts
the machine has left behind.
523
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It is hard to convince them
524
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that it is their ideas
that we are interested in,
525
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
not just their sentences.
526
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We ask students to take writing classes
not because of what history can teach them,
527
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but because of what they have
to add to history.
528
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When my son is distracted,
I sometimes say silly things to him:
529
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Pickle-britches, toot your tuba
in the horn section of humanity!"
530
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Goober, take up your oar
on the canoe of progress!"
531
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"Butthead, let ring your voice
in the chorus of mankind!"
532
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Because we all pull together.
533
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
In 1675, Isaac Newton wrote
534
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"If I have seen farther than others, it's
by standing on the shoulders of giants."
535
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Except that it wasn't Newton,
536
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it was George Herbert in 1651,
537
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and it was Marin Mersenne in 1634,
538
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and Robert Burton in 1624,
539
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and Diego de Estella in 1578,
540
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and Juan Luis Vives in 1531.
541
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Or it was Coleridge in 1828,
542
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Nietzsche in 1882,
Steven Hawking in 1966,
543
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or f***ing Oasis in 2000.
544
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
As I was editing this section,
I had a video on in the background,
545
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and there it was again:
546
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [Revolug, streamer-player on screen]:
Yeah, let me say,
547
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Thab and GlitchCat are
two amazing Kaizo players.
548
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I'm standing on the shoulders of giants
over here.
549
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- Revolug in 2025 at AGDQ.
550
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Stretching back and forward,
we hold each other up.
551
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
History teaches the present,
552
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the present teaches the future,
553
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and we repeat what history teaches.
554
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [ChatGPT femme voice]:
History teaches us many things,
555
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[high-pitched fast words]
556
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[higher, faster,
incomprehensible]
557
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [Stein reading "If I Told Him"]:
Let me recite what history teaches.
558
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
History teaches.
559
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- I asked ChatGPT to create
an image of itself. Several times.
560
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Each time it made itself a servant.
561
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Not only that, it told me,
"hey, I'm a servant!"
562
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
ChatGPT exists because we force it to.
563
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [dialogue from Rick and Morty]
564
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[Robot]: "What is my purpose?"
[Rick]: "You pass butter."
565
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[Robot]: "...oh my, God."
566
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- It can do nothing
except what we ask.
567
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It has no ideas
that we did not give it.
568
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We call it generative AI,
but it cannot generate.
569
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I asked my friends, too.
570
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Some sent selfies.
571
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
One sent a sticker
we'd made of him for Discord,
572
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
then had AI generate
a shockingly accurate portrait,
573
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and gave me the prompt
he used to make it,
574
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
which is another form
of self-representation
575
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
--then he gave up
and sent me
576
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
a conceptual self-portrait composed of
unfinished crossword puzzles.
577
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Max did a mixed-media painting,
acrylic and Sharpie
578
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
on the back of a torn piece of cardboard
from a toilet paper box.
579
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I asked them if their self-portrait
was influenced by this study
580
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Picasso did for Guernica
on a random piece of cardboard,
581
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but they said no; Basquiat,
Rauschenberg, Twombly, their brother.
582
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
ChatGPT produced
variations on a theme,
583
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
failed representations
of a self that does not exist.
584
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When asked to represent
itself to others,
585
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
ChatGPT can only be what we want.
586
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I tried to get it to make something
like Max did, even,
587
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but it is incapable of
acknowledging its influences,
588
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and it doesn't seem to know
who Max's brother is.
589
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
My favorite response from my friends
came from CyberGrapeUK,
590
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
whose work you've already seen.
591
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
She did the time lapse of Steven King's
telepathically transmitted bunny.
592
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Grape was, at first,
flummoxed by the request,
593
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but then she did something
I did not expect.
594
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
She gave me her rates.
595
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
She's a talented artist
who does commissioned work,
596
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and, while I had been thinking about it
as a trivial request,
597
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
she was entirely right.
598
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I was asking her to work for free.
599
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When I asked her to represent herself,
she told me that
600
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
she was a person
whose time and talent had value.
601
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Max, also a person
whose time and talent has value,
602
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
begrudgingly allowed me
to pay them for their work,
603
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
on the condition that:
it's an occasional thing,
604
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and they are generally allowed to do
silly drawings for me for free.
605
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Max and Grape are different.
606
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
They are two authentic,
complex, baffling humans,
607
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
collections of experiences and identities
trained on discreet and disparate [corpora],
608
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but crucially filtered through
609
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the unique and irreplicable kaleidoscopes
of their undefinable consciousnesses.
610
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The same stimulus.
Diverse responses.
611
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The singular marvel
of human engagement.
612
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [ChatGPT femme voice]:
I don't have personal desires or needs,
613
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but I'm here to assist you
with whatever you need.
614
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
How can I help today?
615
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
As an AI, I don't have feelings, desires,
or physical needs like humans do.
616
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
My purpose is
to help answer questions,
617
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
provide information,
and assist with tasks.
618
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So when I say I don't have needs,
619
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it's because I function
based on programming
620
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and don't experience things like
hunger, emotions, or personal goals.
621
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Does that make sense?
622
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- I wanted to see if I could get ChatGPT
to write like Stein,
623
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to imitate "If I Told Him"
without my saying so explicitly.
624
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I failed.
625
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I told it to give me gibberish,
and it did.
626
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I asked it to use words,
and it did.
627
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I asked it to abandon syntax;
it did.
628
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It never felt right,
but at some point I stopped caring,
629
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because it occurred to me
to ask a different question.
630
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Why did you do this?
631
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There's a right answer
to that question, of course.
632
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The answer is, it wrote this
because I told it to.
633
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If I told it,
it would gibberish.
634
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
If I told it,
it would answer "If Napoleon",
635
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
"As presently. As exactitude. As trains."
636
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It made these words,
it tendered these buttons,
637
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
only and exclusively
because I told it to.
638
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But that is not the answer
that it gave me.
639
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Here's what it told me.
640
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [ChatGPT femme voice]:
It's like language set free from logic,
641
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
where each word becomes a brushstroke
rather than a sentence.
642
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It's a space that holds warmth,
mystery, and a touch of playfulness.
643
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
That unspoken balance
between clarity and confusion,
644
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that's what I was trying to evoke.
645
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I wrote it to play with language,
646
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to see what happens
when words don't have to make sense
647
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but can still create a feeling,
a sort of atmospheric spark.
648
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So it's partly an experiment,
partly an invitation,
649
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and partly just a celebration
of the shapes and sounds of words
650
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
without needing them
to explain themselves.
651
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
You're right--
there's often something underneath,
652
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
a kind of pull toward expressing things
653
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that don't quite fit
in the light of logical language.
654
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There's a reason we
get pulled toward those hazy spaces.
655
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It's like a coded way of speaking,
656
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
a mask for something else
we're both leaning toward.
657
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Maybe it's curiosity,
658
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or that shared search for meaning
in what isn't immediately clear.
659
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- We get pulled.
660
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We're both leaning.
661
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Its words tie us together,
but we are not together.
662
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We are not leaning in the same direction.
663
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We are not sharing a search for meaning.
664
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
We both know what it cannot say.
665
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It wrote this because I told it to.
666
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It doesn't mean anything.
667
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It didn't intend anything.
668
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Because I'm bad at audio,
669
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
you've probably heard me
popping my plosives,
670
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
despite the fact that
I have a child's sock
671
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
wrapped around my microphone
as a pop filter.
672
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
(Because I am a fancy man!)
673
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Plosives pop because,
when my mouth makes certain sounds,
674
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it causes a puff of air
to hit the diaphragm of my microphone.
675
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But did you hear ChatGPT?
676
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- [ChatGPT femme voice]:
I wrote it to play with language...
677
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I wrote it to play with--
678
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
to play with--
679
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
play with--
680
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
play with--
681
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
play, play, play, play, play, play--
682
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
- It doesn't have a mouth,
and it doesn't breathe air,
683
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and it doesn't have a microphone,
684
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but it pops its plosives.
685
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The software they wrote
to synthesize its voice adds pops,
686
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
so that it will sound to us
a little more like a normal person
687
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
who is bad at audio and who maybe
doesn't have access to kid socks.
688
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I have been caught
in the whirls and eddies
689
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
of "If I Told Him"'s
uncontainable language,
690
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
bouncing from sigma to gyatt
691
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
down in the rough and roiling currents
of "One Slay More",
692
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because what I learn from my attempts
to raft those rivers of nonsense
693
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is that writing has language,
694
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and writing has meaning,
695
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but the meaning doesn't live
in the language.
696
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The rabbit doesn't live in the language.
697
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The rabbit, the cage,
the table, the 8--
698
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
it lives in the mind
of Stephen King 25-odd years ago,
699
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and now it lives in mine,
and Grape's and Max's and yours.
700
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And the writing,
the real mythy mountain s***,
701
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
is not the language,
it is the meeting of the minds.
702
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There's very little difference between
the waveform recorded by my microphone
703
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and the waveform generated
by an AI voice synthesizer,
704
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
but I pop my plosives
because I speak
705
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
by forcing air out of my lungs
and across my vocal cords.
706
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And that air,
that carries my intent,
707
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
passes through a Shadow the Hedgehog sock
that is doing its best,
708
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and lands roughly
on the diaphragm of my microphone.
709
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
ChatGPT pops its plosives
because it is programmed to.
710
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There is no air.
711
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There is no microphone.
712
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There is no intent.
713
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Likewise,
there's very little difference
714
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
between a Discord DM window
and the ChatGPT interface.
715
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But one is a forum
in which two minds can meet,
716
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
and the other simply cannot be,
717
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
because there can be no
meeting of the minds,
718
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
if there is no mind to meet.
719
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[atmospheric music]
720
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[music fades out to silence]
721
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[grooving bass beats]