0:00:07.240,0:00:12.300 [Josiah McElheny: Making a Projection Painting] 0:00:25.360,0:00:26.680 Today we're at my friend's studio 0:00:26.680,0:00:30.270 and we're projecting lost footage--[br]or abandoned footage-- 0:00:30.270,0:00:33.030 by the great filmmaker, Maya Deren. 0:00:36.960,0:00:41.920 Long after Deren died, they found the[br]leftover tails of shots 0:00:41.930,0:00:44.280 and unused shots that she did complete 0:00:44.280,0:00:47.570 that were then preserved as[br]just kind of a reel 0:00:47.570,0:00:49.770 with no kind of edit to them. 0:01:00.900,0:01:05.540 And what I thought to do was to create[br]a sort of performance 0:01:05.550,0:01:07.570 in which we would project the film, 0:01:07.960,0:01:12.140 and then I invited a film crew to come and[br]film the film 0:01:12.140,0:01:14.780 as it's being projected on the screen. 0:01:20.930,0:01:24.220 And the idea was to film from the worst seats. 0:01:24.220,0:01:25.750 So imagine you're in a theater 0:01:25.750,0:01:28.950 where you're stuck five feet in front of[br]the screen, 0:01:28.950,0:01:30.679 so that when you're looking up, 0:01:30.679,0:01:33.279 you see all this, kind of, distorted vision. 0:01:37.620,0:01:42.940 One comes from an unfinished and lost film[br]called "Witch's Cradle" 0:01:42.950,0:01:46.920 in which she collaborated with Anne Matta Clark[br]and Marcel Duchamp 0:01:46.920,0:01:51.460 and was filmed at the famous[br]Art of the Twentieth Century gallery. 0:01:55.119,0:01:59.799 I'm trying to understand this relationship[br]of abstraction and the body. 0:02:00.940,0:02:06.240 She navigates this area between abstraction[br]and the body. 0:02:06.940,0:02:10.300 The body becomes almost abstract[br]in some of her works. 0:02:11.920,0:02:15.320 In the end, the film will be shown not as[br]a film, 0:02:15.330,0:02:18.819 but as a painting on a kind of structure 0:02:18.820,0:02:21.760 in which the front of the painting[br]is a piece of glass 0:02:21.770,0:02:25.710 and behind it is a kind of fractured landscape, 0:02:27.920,0:02:31.800 which will then further distort[br]on the painting itself. 0:02:32.800,0:02:36.220 When we showed narrative film on these[br]distorting sculptures, 0:02:36.230,0:02:37.519 it didn't work at all. 0:02:37.820,0:02:40.280 It just looked like we were[br]commenting on it, 0:02:40.290,0:02:45.870 or that you really felt us looking at this[br]preexisting work. 0:02:45.870,0:02:48.120 Whereas using the unfinished film, 0:02:48.120,0:02:50.200 it transformed itself much easier. 0:02:50.200,0:02:52.880 It became something new almost instantly. 0:03:03.360,0:03:05.659 That was really interesting to realize 0:03:05.659,0:03:09.030 actually how enviable, in some sense, 0:03:09.030,0:03:11.700 an original work of art can be-- 0:03:11.700,0:03:13.549 how complete it can be, 0:03:13.549,0:03:15.409 and you can't, somehow, distort it. 0:03:17.660,0:03:21.940 That the unfinished is what felt more malleable.