0:00:00.000,0:00:04.611
I read Heart of Darkness, an amazing book

0:00:04.611,0:00:08.186
and one passage in particular just lept out and smacked me between the eyes

0:00:08.186,0:00:11.274
and I can't remember it all by myself so I'll just read it to you

0:00:11.274,0:00:16.274
"It is impossible to convey the life sensation of any given epoch of one's existence.

0:00:16.274,0:00:21.746
That which makes its truth, its meaning, its subtle and penetrating essence.

0:00:21.746,0:00:27.474
It is impossible. We live as we dream: alone."

0:00:27.474,0:00:30.743
And that's haunted me since the age of 18.

0:00:30.743,0:00:35.295
I don't know what it was in my 18-year-old mind that resonated with that passage,

0:00:35.295,0:00:38.692
but I think you know perhaps it's just the resonance of any

0:00:38.692,0:00:44.244
strongly articulated existentialist loneliness.

0:00:44.244,0:00:50.698
But I wondered, you know, Can we really be that alone? All of us? Together?

0:00:50.698,0:00:53.185
It didn't make sense. We'll come back to that.

0:00:53.185,0:00:56.750
So, on the plane on the way here, I was listening to an audio book

0:00:56.750,0:00:59.486
of Arthur C. Clarke's: Childhoods' End.

0:00:59.486,0:01:03.805
It's the first Arthur C. Clarke's book I have actually read.

0:01:03.820,0:01:06.513
It's an amazing work, but of course I don't need to labour this point with this audience,

0:01:06.513,0:01:11.324
that there's nothing so characteristic of an age's thinking as its science fiction

0:01:11.324,0:01:17.464
and, I mean, of all the science fiction writers, Clarke is remarkable

0:01:17.464,0:01:22.194
for the extent to which his imagination was able to sort of achieve an escape velocity

0:01:22.194,0:01:27.052
from the culture of is time, to really think way ahead into different times and places

0:01:27.052,0:01:28.797
and to take us there.

0:01:28.797,0:01:33.017
But I it got me thinking about the fact of imagination

0:01:33.017,0:01:38.940
and that our brains are, our brains are not [temporaly bound?]

0:01:38.940,0:01:41.934
It's what we scaffold them with that limits us.

0:01:41.934,0:01:45.611
In other words, to the extent that we are able to imagine the present that we live in,

0:01:45.611,0:01:50.320
which Clarke and others of his age couldn't foresee,

0:01:50.320,0:01:54.359
we are capable of imagining entirely different worlds in the future

0:01:54.359,0:01:56.291
that we just don't at the moment.

0:01:56.291,0:01:58.122
And I find that an interesting contradiction.

0:01:58.122,0:02:00.733
So what's the relevance of all that for governance futures?

0:02:00.733,0:02:05.833
Well, the relevance is that basically I think this is a massively missing piece

0:02:05.833,0:02:07.788
from our public culture,

0:02:07.788,0:02:12.884
that there is essentially no public culture of imagination.

0:02:12.884,0:02:15.797
Yes, there's Dick Tracy, and there's Star Trek, and there's Arthur C. Clarke,

0:02:15.797,0:02:18.671
and there's plenty of stuff since all of that.

0:02:18.671,0:02:21.836
But our conversations about the future, and about the future of governance,

0:02:21.836,0:02:23.951
and about the worlds we could be choosing among,

0:02:23.951,0:02:26.885
we do not have a culture of imagining those in any concrete way

0:02:26.885,0:02:29.028
and then choosing among them wisely.

0:02:29.028,0:02:31.383
We agonize over procedural details like

0:02:31.383,0:02:34.965
deliberation (the weighing of alternatives)

0:02:34.965,0:02:38.018
and decision (which is the killing of alternatives)

0:02:38.018,0:02:39.889
when we make a choice.

0:02:39.889,0:02:44.538
But where in that, I mean, that essentially becomes meaningless

0:02:44.538,0:02:48.375
or close to meaningless, when the alternatives are underimagined

0:02:48.375,0:02:54.098
or drab or cliched or simply absent from the picture overall.

0:02:54.098,0:02:58.502
And so my friend Natalie German Janko, who is an engineer and an artist

0:02:58.502,0:03:02.553
has a wonderful phrase which I learned from her a couple of years ago:

0:03:02.553,0:03:04.192
"structures of participation".

0:03:04.192,0:03:07.150
[Her] art is about creating structures of participation for people.

0:03:07.150,0:03:09.778
And I love this frace because I think it summarizes to me

0:03:09.778,0:03:14.937
what good futures' work does: create structure of participation for co-imagining.

0:03:14.937,0:03:18.615
And so, as I see it, governance (at least the design side of it) is about

0:03:18.615,0:03:24.177
designing structures of participation for collectively shaping the common good.

0:03:24.177,0:03:27.742
And that can look like the design of an event like this one,

0:03:27.742,0:03:30.188
or the design of a system like the United States of America,

0:03:30.188,0:03:34.889
or the design of an intervention like the one that I'm about to describe.

0:03:34.889,0:03:40.296
Because my favorite experiential futures intervention is a perfect instance

0:03:40.296,0:03:44.643
of the kind of collective imagination that I'm describing,

0:03:44.643,0:03:46.470
and it comes from the Arab Spring.

0:03:46.470,0:03:49.965
So, in January 2011, Tunisia ousted its dictator

0:03:49.965,0:03:53.451
somebody [rather] Ben Ali.

0:03:53.451,0:03:54.912
And the economy started tanking.

0:03:54.912,0:03:56.893
The revolutionaries hadn't expected to succeed,

0:03:56.893,0:04:01.770
they didn't know what was gonna succeed [as in "go after"] the overthrow.

0:04:01.770,0:04:06.372
And what may ensued could have been actually much worse

0:04:06.372,0:04:08.031
than what had been there before.

0:04:08.031,0:04:10.994
You know in these kinds of political vacuums anything can happen.

0:04:10.994,0:04:15.824
But a month later, on the 16th of February 2011, for a day,

0:04:15.824,0:04:20.115
on newspapers, television and radio,

0:04:20.115,0:04:24.442
they reported from the 14th June 2014: 3 years and 3 months into the future.

0:04:24.442,0:04:28.773
By the end of the day that was the number one hashtag, [something in French]

0:04:28.773,0:04:30.961
in Twitter was beginning to trend in France,

0:04:30.961,0:04:35.345
and it began to change the public conversation to make a future for Tunisia imaginable,

0:04:35.345,0:04:40.072
which catalysed an actual change and a recovery in the wake of that revolution.

0:04:40.072,0:04:44.434
So, to bring it back to our starting point,

0:04:44.434,0:04:49.662
I'm I no longer believe that we are condemned to dream alone.

0:04:49.662,0:04:53.001
I think that we can dream together.

0:04:53.001,0:04:55.612
And to the extent the 21st century government succeeds

0:04:55.612,0:04:59.000
that's what we'll be doing on a regular basis.