0:00:02.660,0:00:08.323
The mainstream media is so full of right wing and

0:00:08.323,0:00:12.668
centrist news coverage that many of us who

0:00:12.668,0:00:14.707
desire social change take to the internet to find

0:00:14.707,0:00:16.245
out what's happening in the world

0:00:16.245,0:00:18.585
The Huffington Post a so called progressive

0:00:18.585,0:00:20.490
liberal newsblogs that you may have heard of

0:00:20.490,0:00:23.298
was founded in 2005 by Arianna Huffington

0:00:23.298,0:00:25.571
she wanted to create a liberal counterpoint to

0:00:25.571,0:00:27.543
right wing sites such as the Drudge Report

0:00:27.543,0:00:29.716
I'm all for liberal and progressive news blogs but

0:00:29.716,0:00:31.353
the problem with HuffPo is they are continually

0:00:31.353,0:00:32.830
throwing women under the bus

0:00:32.830,0:00:35.676
the website is dripping with sexism

0:00:35.676,0:00:38.105
Progressive politics includes issues around

0:00:38.105,0:00:41.715
racism and sexism, class, disability and

0:00:41.715,0:00:44.389
sexuality. According to Alexa.com the Huffington

0:00:44.389,0:00:47.935
Post is the 36th most viewed site in the US

0:00:47.935,0:00:50.381
It beats out the Wall Street Journal and the LA

0:00:50.381,0:00:52.713
Times. In order to entice viewers they use a tactic

0:00:52.713,0:00:55.387
called Link baiting. It's any content within a

0:00:55.387,0:00:57.693
website design specifically to gain attention.

0:00:57.693,0:00:59.765
Linkbaiting is an internet marketing strategy that

0:00:59.765,0:01:01.470
relies on sensationalism to

0:01:01.503,0:01:03.308
bring in viewers which then

0:01:03.308,0:01:05.515
generates more ad revenue. In this case they

0:01:05.515,0:01:07.587
regularly show women's nipples, cleavage and

0:01:07.587,0:01:09.760
asses in order to entice views, and they even

0:01:09.760,0:01:12.099
have a section called Celebrity Skin because

0:01:12.099,0:01:13.971
apparently they aren't shy at all about their

0:01:13.971,0:01:15.943
objectification. And let's be clear now

0:01:15.943,0:01:18.216
objectification isn't just showing women's bodies

0:01:18.216,0:01:20.489
it's using women's bodies to sell something

0:01:20.489,0:01:22.963
so in this case they're selling "real" news stories

0:01:22.963,0:01:25.236
but they are bringing people in by talking about

0:01:25.236,0:01:28.278
celebrity nipples and which female politician is

0:01:28.278,0:01:31.093
hotter. They often have images of half naked

0:01:31.093,0:01:33.519
women right next to the "legitimate" news stories

0:01:34.919,0:01:36.273
Or they will feature a popular news story like the

0:01:36.273,0:01:38.773
one about the proposed mosque in New York City

0:01:38.773,0:01:41.548
but they will use a nearly full screen image of a

0:01:41.548,0:01:43.717
woman's body stratling a stripper pole

0:01:43.717,0:01:45.659
This is fundamentally an issue about racism in

0:01:45.659,0:01:47.230
America yet they're using a woman's body to

0:01:47.230,0:01:49.770
gain attention. Since it's a powerful image to use

0:01:49.770,0:01:52.678
as linkbait, they used it repeatedly on the site

0:01:52.678,0:01:56.672
over and over and over and over again

0:01:57.057,0:01:58.826
This would of course bother me in general

0:01:58.826,0:02:01.336
but I'm specifically pissed off at this site because

0:02:01.336,0:02:03.274
they claim to be liberal and progressive

0:02:03.274,0:02:04.377
when they are clearly not when it comes to

0:02:04.377,0:02:07.419
women. They have categories like Obama, Sarah

0:02:07.419,0:02:10.093
Palin, economy, housing, Glenn Beck, the war

0:02:10.093,0:02:11.898
And then they have an Entertainment section

0:02:11.898,0:02:14.973
with categories like celebrity skin, sex tapes

0:02:14.973,0:02:17.748
Lindsay Lohan, Jersey Shore, and these are all

0:02:17.748,0:02:19.753
readily and easily available, they show up

0:02:19.753,0:02:23.330
regularly on the home page yet I have to dig

0:02:23.330,0:02:25.603
in order to find Women's Rights tucked away

0:02:25.603,0:02:27.542
in the World section, which hardly ever shows up

0:02:27.542,0:02:30.483
on the front page. Apparently women's rights

0:02:30.483,0:02:32.555
don't rise to the level of importance as naked

0:02:32.555,0:02:34.818
celebrities.

0:02:36.299,0:02:37.837
This is even more apparently on their

0:02:37.837,0:02:39.876
Activism section which is also tucked away and

0:02:39.876,0:02:41.781
hard to find because the first three featured

0:02:41.781,0:02:45.124
articles are of half naked women, you can thank

0:02:45.124,0:02:47.096
PETA for that one. Because of this it's not

0:02:47.096,0:02:49.235
surprising that women bloggers on the site are

0:02:49.235,0:02:51.642
also treated with a similar disrespect. Although

0:02:51.642,0:02:53.846
there are female and feminist bloggers on

0:02:53.846,0:02:56.154
Huffington Post they rarely get featured as

0:02:56.154,0:02:58.628
news items. So if it doesn't make it to the front

0:02:58.628,0:03:00.232
page or the front page of their respective

0:03:00.232,0:03:02.739
sections it's going to get very few views because

0:03:02.739,0:03:05.480
there is so much content filtering through HuffPo

0:03:05.480,0:03:07.419
everyday. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting

0:03:07.419,0:03:09.625
did a study that found that only 23% of featured

0:03:09.625,0:03:10.962
content was written by women.

0:03:10.962,0:03:13.402
I know what you are thinking, it was founded by

0:03:13.402,0:03:16.377
a woman, a powerful woman and yes but Sarah

0:03:16.377,0:03:18.850
Palin is also a powerful woman and look at how

0:03:18.850,0:03:21.424
disgraceful she is when it comes to women's

0:03:21.424,0:03:24.065
rights. Just because it's female fronted doesn't

0:03:24.065,0:03:25.636
change the fact that it's structurally and

0:03:25.636,0:03:28.577
institutionally excluding women from the

0:03:28.577,0:03:31.017
intellectual sphere and most often only featuring

0:03:31.017,0:03:34.560
women as linkbait. The popularity of this site

0:03:34.560,0:03:36.599
serves to define progressive politics and they're

0:03:36.599,0:03:39.106
saying that woman aren't really included in any

0:03:39.106,0:03:42.014
substantial capacity. Too often websites like the

0:03:42.014,0:03:44.254
Huffington Post gets to claim a progressive slant

0:03:44.254,0:03:46.493
while treating women in ways that liberals would

0:03:46.493,0:03:49.000
be pretty pissed off about if they saw it on Fox

0:03:49.000,0:03:51.340
News. Any progressive news site worth following

0:03:51.340,0:03:54.048
clearly and transparently includes race, gender,

0:03:54.048,0:03:56.722
sexuality, class and ability throughout the entire

0:03:56.722,0:03:58.660
site, not just when it's convenient for their

0:03:58.660,0:04:00.432
marketing strategy.