1
00:00:01,191 --> 00:00:02,272
Welcome, everyone.
2
00:00:02,272 --> 00:00:04,613
Today we are going to begin a new unit.
3
00:00:04,613 --> 00:00:07,449
We are going to be talking about
geography and development.
4
00:00:07,743 --> 00:00:12,382
And by geography, I mean the relatively
immutable and constant features,
5
00:00:12,382 --> 00:00:16,021
things like location, topography, climate,
6
00:00:16,231 --> 00:00:19,563
including temperature,
rainfall, soil quality,
7
00:00:19,858 --> 00:00:22,446
wildlife, especially parasites,
8
00:00:22,536 --> 00:00:24,597
and the influence of all of these
on development.
9
00:00:24,897 --> 00:00:26,450
This is obviously a big topic,
10
00:00:26,450 --> 00:00:30,595
so today we are just going to focus on
geography and trade.
11
00:00:31,168 --> 00:00:34,119
So I want to begin by
giving two perspectives on trade.
12
00:00:34,119 --> 00:00:36,758
The first is the Ricardian perspective.
13
00:00:37,001 --> 00:00:42,438
So Ricardo said, when 2 countries
specialize in their comparative advantage,
14
00:00:42,722 --> 00:00:44,655
that is, they specialize in
producing the good,
15
00:00:44,655 --> 00:00:47,885
which they can produce
at lowest opportunity cost,
16
00:00:48,295 --> 00:00:49,405
and then they trade,
17
00:00:49,690 --> 00:00:51,062
both nations are better off.
18
00:00:51,611 --> 00:00:55,364
Now, notice that innovation
is not the focus of Ricardo.
19
00:00:55,610 --> 00:00:59,391
So Ricardo says, "There already are
two goods, wine and cloth.
20
00:00:59,498 --> 00:01:04,983
We can get more of both goods
if Portugal specializes in producing wine,
21
00:01:04,983 --> 00:01:08,800
England specializes in producing cloth,
and then they trade."
22
00:01:09,164 --> 00:01:10,590
So for Ricardo,
23
00:01:10,590 --> 00:01:14,124
trade is about improvements
in static efficiency.
24
00:01:14,651 --> 00:01:19,970
Notice also that in Ricardo,
market size is really not a key variable.
25
00:01:20,568 --> 00:01:23,785
The situation is very different
in Adam Smith.
26
00:01:24,207 --> 00:01:27,471
Adam Smith has a
completely different theory of trade.
27
00:01:27,790 --> 00:01:29,285
Let's take a look at that.
28
00:01:31,061 --> 00:01:35,105
Smith lays out his theory of trade
in a chapter in the Wealth of Nations
29
00:01:35,265 --> 00:01:40,254
called The division of labor is limited
by the extent of the market.
30
00:01:40,691 --> 00:01:44,091
And Smith makes this remarkable
and very deep insight.
31
00:01:44,195 --> 00:01:48,442
He says, "As by means of water-carriage,"
that is by ship and boat,
32
00:01:48,768 --> 00:01:52,988
"a more extensive market is opened
to every sort of industry
33
00:01:52,988 --> 00:01:55,624
than what land-carriage alone
can afford it.
34
00:01:56,073 --> 00:02:00,633
So it is upon the sea-coast,
and along the banks of navigable rivers,
35
00:02:00,633 --> 00:02:02,611
that industry of every kind
36
00:02:02,611 --> 00:02:06,681
naturally begins
to subdivide and improve."
37
00:02:07,336 --> 00:02:11,930
So what Adam Smith is saying is that
when you're along in sea coast
38
00:02:11,930 --> 00:02:14,046
you have access to a larger market.
39
00:02:14,046 --> 00:02:16,853
You can sell your goods
in a larger market.
40
00:02:17,166 --> 00:02:18,573
And because of that, --
41
00:02:19,181 --> 00:02:24,413
you get economies of scale but, also,
you get specialization of knowledge.
42
00:02:24,695 --> 00:02:28,413
You get people learning more as
they produce more.
43
00:02:28,413 --> 00:02:30,489
This creates improvements.
44
00:02:30,773 --> 00:02:35,049
So for Adam Smith,
trade is a dynamic growth story.
45
00:02:35,191 --> 00:02:38,111
Trade, means larger markets.
46
00:02:38,662 --> 00:02:41,654
Larger markets means more specialization.
47
00:02:41,882 --> 00:02:47,031
It means more improvements in knowledge,
and therefore it means more growth.
48
00:02:47,752 --> 00:02:50,421
So let's take a look at
Adam Smith's theory
49
00:02:50,421 --> 00:02:52,165
and see if we can see it today.
50
00:02:53,263 --> 00:02:56,802
So what we have here is
a map of GDP density,
51
00:02:57,069 --> 00:03:01,355
that is, the amount of GDP
produced per square kilometer.
52
00:03:01,702 --> 00:03:05,296
And what you can see from this map
is that Smith was absolutely correct.
53
00:03:05,581 --> 00:03:08,969
So what you can see is that
where GDP is, where civilization is,
54
00:03:08,969 --> 00:03:10,351
it's along the coast.
55
00:03:10,351 --> 00:03:11,945
Here's the coastal United States
56
00:03:11,945 --> 00:03:15,362
and, along these navigable rivers,
the Great Lakes region.
57
00:03:15,646 --> 00:03:20,159
You can also see Western Europe,
all along the coast,
58
00:03:20,159 --> 00:03:22,985
all of this coastal area,
Western Europe, highly developed.
59
00:03:23,306 --> 00:03:24,867
Over here, Japan,
60
00:03:24,867 --> 00:03:27,626
and, of course, it's the coast of China
61
00:03:27,626 --> 00:03:31,631
which is rapidly developing
all due to those export markets.
62
00:03:31,796 --> 00:03:34,150
Here again, the coast of Australia.
63
00:03:34,958 --> 00:03:36,631
Now, in fact, what you can also see
64
00:03:36,631 --> 00:03:40,689
is that even in places
where there are great institutions,
65
00:03:40,689 --> 00:03:42,951
where they have
institutions of law and order,
66
00:03:43,189 --> 00:03:46,248
property rights, and incentives,
and so forth,
67
00:03:46,248 --> 00:03:51,007
that we can still have low GDP
per square kilometer.
68
00:03:51,007 --> 00:03:52,792
So take a look at Canada.
69
00:03:52,792 --> 00:03:56,518
So most of Canada,
it's like the Sahara Desert, --
70
00:03:56,768 --> 00:03:58,574
in terms of GDP.
71
00:03:59,143 --> 00:04:01,276
Canada, where Canada is developed,
72
00:04:01,276 --> 00:04:04,418
it's along the coast and
along navigable rivers
73
00:04:04,418 --> 00:04:06,005
close to the United States.
74
00:04:06,310 --> 00:04:08,119
Even in the United States,
75
00:04:08,119 --> 00:04:11,584
there are entire regions
which really are bereft of GDP
76
00:04:11,584 --> 00:04:16,330
which are almost as barren
as is the Sahara Desert.
77
00:04:16,639 --> 00:04:19,188
So if you are looking
just at institutions,
78
00:04:19,188 --> 00:04:21,681
you might say,
"Well, even in the United States,
79
00:04:21,681 --> 00:04:23,515
where we have these
great institutions,
80
00:04:23,515 --> 00:04:27,129
there's plenty of places
where there isn't much GDP,
81
00:04:27,129 --> 00:04:28,577
so it must be something else,
82
00:04:28,795 --> 00:04:30,095
and geography, --
83
00:04:30,746 --> 00:04:34,891
particular closeness to rivers
and closeness to sea coast
84
00:04:35,020 --> 00:04:37,477
is an important element of this.
85
00:04:38,070 --> 00:04:42,347
By the way, economists really
used to ignore geography.
86
00:04:42,651 --> 00:04:46,015
And it's due to Jeff Sachs
and some of his co-authors,
87
00:04:46,015 --> 00:04:48,761
particular John Gallup
and Andrew Mellinger
88
00:04:49,103 --> 00:04:51,261
that a lot of this work
started to be done.
89
00:04:51,378 --> 00:04:53,804
In addition to the article
which I've noted here, --
90
00:04:54,364 --> 00:05:00,050
these three authors have a review article
in Scientific American, 2001,
91
00:05:00,050 --> 00:05:02,359
called The Geography of
Poverty and Wealth,
92
00:05:02,359 --> 00:05:03,490
which I recommend.
93
00:05:04,113 --> 00:05:07,180
Now, if being close to rivers,
94
00:05:07,180 --> 00:05:09,531
if being close to the sea coast
is important
95
00:05:09,741 --> 00:05:11,240
then what is the worst thing?
96
00:05:11,593 --> 00:05:15,725
Well, the worst thing that can happen
is if you are landlocked.
97
00:05:15,825 --> 00:05:16,740
Let's take a look.
98
00:05:19,897 --> 00:05:23,781
So what we're showing here
is GDP per capita in countries
99
00:05:23,781 --> 00:05:26,761
which have access to the coast over here,
100
00:05:26,937 --> 00:05:29,961
compared to countries
that are landlocked over here.
101
00:05:30,303 --> 00:05:34,103
And what you see immediately
is that countries which are landlocked
102
00:05:34,403 --> 00:05:36,491
have half, actually,
a little bit less
103
00:05:36,491 --> 00:05:41,386
than half the GDP of countries
which have access to the coast.
104
00:05:41,911 --> 00:05:44,707
If we look over here,
at the landlocked countries,
105
00:05:44,707 --> 00:05:48,200
you can see there's actually
a few landlocked ones in Europe:
106
00:05:48,200 --> 00:05:52,143
Austria, Czech Republic, Hungary,
of course, Switzerland.
107
00:05:52,483 --> 00:05:56,534
But, equally true, these countries
are actually quite close to the coast
108
00:05:56,534 --> 00:05:58,556
and they are close
to other rich countries.
109
00:05:58,556 --> 00:06:02,372
If you take those countries out,
the differences become even more stark.
110
00:06:02,902 --> 00:06:06,301
Among the landlocked nations,
111
00:06:06,301 --> 00:06:09,238
the richest outside of Europe
is actually Botswana,
112
00:06:09,238 --> 00:06:11,190
which has diamonds.
113
00:06:11,190 --> 00:06:12,449
Pretty lucky for them.
114
00:06:13,364 --> 00:06:16,935
What you also notice is that
all of these countries here,
115
00:06:16,935 --> 00:06:18,437
they are all in Africa.
116
00:06:18,437 --> 00:06:23,401
In fact, Africa has more
landlocked countries
117
00:06:23,401 --> 00:06:25,760
than any other continent.
118
00:06:26,126 --> 00:06:28,792
Let's take a close look
at why this is the case.
119
00:06:31,200 --> 00:06:33,495
Okay, here is a standard-looking
map of the world
120
00:06:33,495 --> 00:06:34,962
you probably all seen it before.
121
00:06:35,155 --> 00:06:38,553
It's not obvious from this map
why Africa should be
122
00:06:38,553 --> 00:06:40,290
particularly landlocked.
123
00:06:40,673 --> 00:06:43,654
But there's also something funny
about this map, something odd.
124
00:06:43,797 --> 00:06:45,166
Take a look at Greenland.
125
00:06:45,389 --> 00:06:47,649
Greenland on this map looks huge,
126
00:06:47,649 --> 00:06:50,309
it looks almost as big as Africa.
127
00:06:50,628 --> 00:06:52,582
And, yet, when you check the statistics,
128
00:06:52,582 --> 00:06:57,410
what you find is that Greenland is,
in fact, 1/11 the size of Africa.
129
00:06:57,694 --> 00:06:58,590
What's going on?
130
00:06:59,183 --> 00:07:01,333
Well, this is actually an illusion.
131
00:07:01,741 --> 00:07:05,748
It's an illusion created by
the particular projection we've used,
132
00:07:05,748 --> 00:07:07,346
the Mercator projection, --
133
00:07:07,712 --> 00:07:13,395
to project a 3D surface,
namely a globe, onto 2 dimensions.
134
00:07:13,750 --> 00:07:18,675
Whenever you take a 3D surface
and you map it in 2 dimensions,
135
00:07:18,675 --> 00:07:21,234
you are bound to get some illusions.
136
00:07:21,234 --> 00:07:24,805
And in this case,
we get the illusion of size.
137
00:07:25,628 --> 00:07:27,555
Let's take a look at
a different projection.
138
00:07:27,565 --> 00:07:29,475
This is the Albers Projection,
139
00:07:29,616 --> 00:07:32,537
which maintains equal sizes areas.
140
00:07:32,537 --> 00:07:36,731
We are going to get some illusions
about the shape of continents,
141
00:07:36,731 --> 00:07:39,859
but we are going to get
the right equivalent sizes.
142
00:07:39,859 --> 00:07:42,839
And on this projection
what you see, quite correctly,
143
00:07:42,839 --> 00:07:45,763
is that Greenland
is much smaller than Africa.
144
00:07:46,332 --> 00:07:50,872
What you also see is that Africa is huge.
145
00:07:51,083 --> 00:07:54,199
Africa is an enormous continent.
146
00:07:54,743 --> 00:07:57,419
Let's also show that in a different way.
147
00:07:59,639 --> 00:08:01,794
Okay, here's another way
of looking at Africa
148
00:08:01,794 --> 00:08:04,565
and what you can see,
again, Africa is big.
149
00:08:04,699 --> 00:08:09,050
You can fit the entire United States,
excluding Alaska, into Africa.
150
00:08:09,050 --> 00:08:12,735
You can put China as well into Africa.
India can go into Africa.
151
00:08:12,735 --> 00:08:14,241
Eastern Europe, most of Europe;
152
00:08:14,241 --> 00:08:17,185
here's Italy, Germany, France,
and Spain, and so forth.
153
00:08:17,560 --> 00:08:20,007
Now, remember that chunk
in the United States,
154
00:08:20,007 --> 00:08:22,045
which is inland,
which had low GDP,
155
00:08:22,045 --> 00:08:24,725
well, just map that into Africa.
156
00:08:24,885 --> 00:08:27,526
You can see what is going on.
157
00:08:27,636 --> 00:08:29,459
Here's another way of looking at this.
158
00:08:29,604 --> 00:08:31,326
Let's go back to our projection.
159
00:08:31,611 --> 00:08:33,581
Take a look at the coastline of Africa.
160
00:08:34,374 --> 00:08:35,928
Here's the coastline of Africa.
161
00:08:35,928 --> 00:08:38,538
Now compare with the coastline of Europe.
162
00:08:38,782 --> 00:08:41,457
Well, in Europe you've got
all these nooks and crannies
163
00:08:41,457 --> 00:08:43,631
and inlets and seas.
164
00:08:43,679 --> 00:08:46,686
Here's the Black Sea
over here and so forth.
165
00:08:47,243 --> 00:08:50,593
In fact, what you'll find if you do this,
if you measure the coastline,
166
00:08:50,771 --> 00:08:54,548
is that the coastline of Europe,
is 2-3 times longer
167
00:08:54,548 --> 00:08:56,078
than the coastline of Africa.
168
00:08:56,610 --> 00:08:58,025
2-3 times, by the way,
169
00:08:58,025 --> 00:09:00,345
because it can actually differ
depending upon
170
00:09:00,487 --> 00:09:04,681
how you measure those fjords
and so forth in Europe.
171
00:09:04,681 --> 00:09:08,542
The fractal nature of coastline makes it
a little bit arbitrary to measure.
172
00:09:09,142 --> 00:09:10,614
Basic point however is,
173
00:09:10,788 --> 00:09:14,087
Europe is much smaller than Africa,
174
00:09:14,087 --> 00:09:16,475
and, yet, the coastline of Europe,
175
00:09:16,475 --> 00:09:19,565
the access to the ocean,
access to the seas,
176
00:09:19,565 --> 00:09:22,415
to navigable rivers,
much much larger.
177
00:09:22,619 --> 00:09:25,696
So Europe has much more access to trade
178
00:09:25,906 --> 00:09:27,757
than does Africa.
179
00:09:33,118 --> 00:09:34,584
So let's review briefly.
180
00:09:34,991 --> 00:09:38,313
From Adam Smith, we have that
sea coast and navigable rivers,
181
00:09:38,313 --> 00:09:40,790
that leads to trade to larger markets.
182
00:09:40,996 --> 00:09:43,819
Larger markets that means
more specialization
183
00:09:43,819 --> 00:09:46,448
and improvements in knowledge,
184
00:09:46,568 --> 00:09:49,452
and improvements in
knowledge lead to growth.
185
00:09:49,983 --> 00:09:52,345
In contrast with this,
if you are landlocked,
186
00:09:52,345 --> 00:09:54,336
you don't get those trade,
you don't get trade,
187
00:09:54,336 --> 00:09:57,277
you don't get larger markets
you don't get that specialization,
188
00:09:57,277 --> 00:09:59,030
you don't get
that improvement in knowledge,
189
00:09:59,098 --> 00:10:01,617
and, instead, you get stagnation.
190
00:10:02,267 --> 00:10:05,027
Now, again, let's apply this to Africa.
191
00:10:06,817 --> 00:10:11,423
Adam Smith in fact had the theory
and application done in 1776.
192
00:10:11,793 --> 00:10:15,466
He says, "There are in Africa
none of those great inlets,
193
00:10:15,466 --> 00:10:17,926
such as the Baltic
and Adriatic seas in Europe,
194
00:10:17,926 --> 00:10:21,372
the Mediterranean and the Black Sea
in both Europe and Asia [...]
195
00:10:21,567 --> 00:10:26,381
to carry maritime commerce into
the interior parts of that great continent:
196
00:10:26,623 --> 00:10:30,469
and the great rivers of Africa
are at too great a distance from one another
197
00:10:30,736 --> 00:10:34,316
to give occasion to
any considerable inland navigation."
198
00:10:34,561 --> 00:10:39,381
So Adam Smith nailed in 1776
one of the key connections
199
00:10:39,381 --> 00:10:41,122
between geography,
200
00:10:41,122 --> 00:10:44,530
between access to the coast,
access to navigable rivers,
201
00:10:44,530 --> 00:10:45,850
and development.
202
00:10:46,096 --> 00:10:49,667
Amazingly, it wasn't until
some 200 or so years later
203
00:10:49,667 --> 00:10:53,050
that Jeff Sachs and others
really began to pick this up
204
00:10:53,050 --> 00:10:55,888
and bring it back into the growth story.
205
00:10:56,131 --> 00:10:59,422
One reason to remember
our history of economic thought.
206
00:10:59,939 --> 00:11:03,899
Okay, we'll be looking more
at development and geography,
207
00:11:03,899 --> 00:11:07,236
in particular malaria and other parasites
and things like that,
208
00:11:07,236 --> 00:11:09,768
and their influences in the next lecture.
209
00:11:10,054 --> 00:11:10,787
Thanks.