WEBVTT

00:00:21.536 --> 00:00:23.475
Thank you very much!

00:00:23.475 --> 00:00:27.405
I'm Joan Roughgarden
and I'm a biologist,

00:00:27.405 --> 00:00:32.789
and I'm here to talk about the evolution
of gender and sexuality.

00:00:33.587 --> 00:00:39.968
And, the reason I'm doing this is 
that I attended my first Gay Pride Parade

00:00:40.678 --> 00:00:43.123
in San Francisco 
about 12 years ago,

00:00:43.123 --> 00:00:47.041
and when I was there I noticed
this huge number of people

00:00:47.041 --> 00:00:52.030
all of whom, biology said 
were somehow defective.

00:00:52.030 --> 00:00:57.811
I thought that maybe it's not the people 
that are defective,

00:00:58.234 --> 00:01:01.140
but is biology that's defective.

00:01:01.140 --> 00:01:05.073
And, that began an investigation

00:01:05.073 --> 00:01:08.205
into the extent of variation 
in gender and sexuality

00:01:08.205 --> 00:01:13.536
which appeared in Evolution's Rainbow
the first of the two books

00:01:14.013 --> 00:01:16.250
that are on the screen here.

00:01:16.250 --> 00:01:20.154
Now, the issue 
from a biologist point of view

00:01:20.154 --> 00:01:23.507
with the diversity
in gender and sexuality

00:01:23.507 --> 00:01:28.845
is that it leads to challenges in what 
we teach in our ordinary curriculum.

00:01:28.845 --> 00:01:32.323
And, this is a very unpleasant
development,

00:01:32.323 --> 00:01:37.039
so the existence of gender 
and sexuality variation is problematic

00:01:37.039 --> 00:01:39.656
for biology and as you know,

00:01:39.656 --> 00:01:42.273
it's also problematic
in the political sector

00:01:42.273 --> 00:01:44.890
and the religious sector as well.

00:01:44.890 --> 00:01:47.841
Now, for biology specifically,

00:01:47.841 --> 00:01:52.339
the problem concerns 
an area of evolution

00:01:52.339 --> 00:01:56.107
called Darwin's Sexual Selection Theory.

00:01:56.107 --> 00:01:58.142
And I'll tell you what that's about

00:01:58.142 --> 00:02:01.559
and then show you 
that it's pretty obviously incorrect.

00:02:01.559 --> 00:02:06.192
The first proposition
that Darwin utters is that


00:02:06.192 --> 00:02:11.105
"Males of almost all animals
have stronger passions than females"

00:02:11.105 --> 00:02:15.458
so, we have the phrase 'passionate male' 
tracing back to Darwin.

00:02:15.458 --> 00:02:19.232
And, furthermore,
he says that the female,

00:02:19.232 --> 00:02:20.926
with the rarest of exceptions,

00:02:20.926 --> 00:02:24.106
is less eager than the male, 
she is coy.

00:02:24.106 --> 00:02:27.717
So we have the phrase 'coy female'.

00:02:27.717 --> 00:02:33.027
And, in today's jargon 'passionate male' 
is replaced with 'promiscuous male'

00:02:33.027 --> 00:02:36.322
and 'coy female' 
with 'constrained female'.

00:02:36.322 --> 00:02:40.105
And the third premise from Darwin 
is the most problematic.

00:02:40.105 --> 00:02:43.565
It pertains to characters 


00:02:43.565 --> 00:02:47.025
like the peacock's tail 
and the antler on a deer,

00:02:47.025 --> 00:02:50.485
and it is that females...

00:02:50.485 --> 00:02:52.458
And so Darwin was asking

00:02:52.458 --> 00:02:57.504
why does the peacock have the tail 
and does the deer have the antler?

00:02:57.956 --> 00:03:01.243
And his answer 
is that females choose mates

00:03:01.540 --> 00:03:05.283
who are more attractive, 
vigorous and well-armed,

00:03:05.571 --> 00:03:09.652
just as men can give beauty 
to his male [unclear].

00:03:09.806 --> 00:03:13.882
So, he's invisioning that females
are breeding males

00:03:13.882 --> 00:03:15.950
to have the traits that they have.

00:03:15.950 --> 00:03:18.096
Now, why, you might ask, 


00:03:18.096 --> 00:03:21.869
would females be chosing
males with ornaments?

00:03:22.142 --> 00:03:26.839
The idea is that the females 
have expensive eggs.

00:03:27.849 --> 00:03:31.799
And the males, on the other hand, 
have cheap sperm

00:03:32.030 --> 00:03:36.796
and so males are capable
in principle of ranging far and wide

00:03:38.369 --> 00:03:41.772
inseminating anything 
they come accross.

00:03:41.850 --> 00:03:45.419
And females are necessarily obligated

00:03:47.375 --> 00:03:50.943
to defend 
their expensive investment in eggs.

00:03:50.943 --> 00:03:54.084
Therefore, the female is forced 
to be coy and choosy,

00:03:54.084 --> 00:03:57.158
and the male 
passionate or promiscuous.

00:03:57.643 --> 00:03:59.688
And this is the party line

00:03:59.688 --> 00:04:03.126
that's currently taught 
in biology curricula worldwide.

00:04:03.126 --> 00:04:06.551
It's a nice story,
in a sense, at least it's a story.

00:04:06.551 --> 00:04:08.997
But the question is whether it's true.

00:04:08.997 --> 00:04:13.189
And let me show you some examples
of diversity in gender and sexuality

00:04:13.189 --> 00:04:16.986
that make these propositions 
almost useless.

00:04:16.986 --> 00:04:21.995
And one thing I need to emphasize
is that the two intial premises

00:04:21.995 --> 00:04:24.169
the passionate male 
and the coy female,

00:04:24.169 --> 00:04:27.054
are asserted as empirical generalizations.

00:04:27.054 --> 00:04:32.219
So, if you go outside and you pick up 
a random bird or a random butterfly,

00:04:32.219 --> 00:04:34.330
or any organism at random,

00:04:34.330 --> 00:04:37.260
the male is supposed to be passionate 
and the female coy,

00:04:37.260 --> 00:04:39.827
with very, very rare exceptions.

00:04:39.827 --> 00:04:43.889
And it will be obvious that the exceptions
are far from rare.

00:04:43.889 --> 00:04:46.261
The first issue is that the assignement

00:04:46.261 --> 00:04:51.526
into a sex, as male or female, 
is neither stable nor exclusive.

00:04:51.973 --> 00:04:55.322
If you go diving on a coral reef,

00:04:55.322 --> 00:04:58.206
about a third of the species 
that you see there

00:04:58.206 --> 00:05:02.184
consist of individuals
who are both sexes at the same time.

00:05:02.484 --> 00:05:05.689
Or at different times during their life.

00:05:05.689 --> 00:05:09.565
So, in the case of these species
right here,

00:05:09.565 --> 00:05:15.201
the individuals change from female
to male, that is a kind of wrasse.

00:05:15.521 --> 00:05:18.193
In the case of this species right here

00:05:18.193 --> 00:05:21.742
they change from a male to female.

00:05:22.867 --> 00:05:26.295
And as I say, 30% of the species,

00:05:26.295 --> 00:05:28.407
if you simply go snorkeling 
on a coral reef,

00:05:28.407 --> 00:05:29.933
you see this all around you.

00:05:29.933 --> 00:05:32.492
And it's just simply not true

00:05:32.492 --> 00:05:37.987
that the categories of males and females 
are stable or comprehensive.

00:05:38.492 --> 00:05:44.316
Now, another important issue is called 
'Sex-Role Reversal' by biologists.

00:05:45.492 --> 00:05:50.175
And this pertains to males 
who do all the parental care


00:05:50.530 --> 00:05:52.781
and females 
who have to hustle around

00:05:52.781 --> 00:05:55.468
and find a male 
who is interested in them.

00:05:55.468 --> 00:05:59.530
And the popular examples 
of this are the seahorses.

00:05:59.770 --> 00:06:04.593
Now, in fish, the parental care 
is usually provided by the male.

00:06:05.003 --> 00:06:08.314
And in birds, 
it's about 50/50 male and female

00:06:08.595 --> 00:06:11.985
and in mammals 
is usually initially by the female.

00:06:11.985 --> 00:06:17.470
But in fish, the style of parental care 
varies from species

00:06:17.665 --> 00:06:21.686
and in many cases the males 
will glue the eggs to their tummy.

00:06:21.686 --> 00:06:25.838
And that is true of... darn!

00:06:26.981 --> 00:06:31.787
That's true of this species
in the middle here which is a pipefish.

00:06:32.191 --> 00:06:34.956
Now, the seahorses 
are related to pipefish

00:06:34.956 --> 00:06:39.311
in that they have 
a big skin-flap on their tummy

00:06:39.510 --> 00:06:43.549
and the females deposit eggs 
into the males' tummy.

00:06:43.816 --> 00:06:46.847
So the males become, 
in a sense, pregnant.

00:06:46.847 --> 00:06:51.665
So, this is a male seahorse 
receiving eggs from that female.

00:06:52.860 --> 00:06:55.261
And what happens in this situation

00:06:55.261 --> 00:06:58.513
is that you can get more females 
hanging around

00:06:59.416 --> 00:07:02.213
looking for males to receive their eggs,

00:07:02.213 --> 00:07:06.054
and in that situation then 
the males are in the position to decide

00:07:06.054 --> 00:07:10.464
what female they want to allow 
to deposit eggs in their skin-flap.

00:07:10.464 --> 00:07:14.643
So this is the exactly the reverse 
of the Darwinian story

00:07:14.643 --> 00:07:17.323
that it's females
who are choosing males,

00:07:17.323 --> 00:07:19.772
here it's males
who are choosing females.

00:07:19.772 --> 00:07:25.869
Now, that shows that the size of the sperm
or the egg can't be important

00:07:26.120 --> 00:07:30.137
or definitive in determining 
the sex-role of the animal.

00:07:30.281 --> 00:07:33.849
Because male seahorses 
make tiny sperm

00:07:33.849 --> 00:07:39.417
but yet they are nonetheless the ones
who wind up doing all the parental care.

00:07:39.613 --> 00:07:43.492
In many species 
there are several genders of males.

00:07:43.492 --> 00:07:45.882
In this species called the ruff

00:07:45.882 --> 00:07:50.775
the one on the left 
is a male with a black collar around it

00:07:51.420 --> 00:07:53.747
the one at the top has a white collar,

00:07:53.747 --> 00:07:58.093
and the one on the far right
has no collar.

00:07:58.788 --> 00:08:01.867
Now, the black colored males,
at the time of mating,

00:08:01.867 --> 00:08:05.287
go into an area which is called a 'lek'

00:08:05.287 --> 00:08:08.742
which is basically 
a red light district of males.

00:08:08.742 --> 00:08:12.321
And, when the females 
are foraging by themselves

00:08:12.321 --> 00:08:13.708
and they want some sex,

00:08:13.708 --> 00:08:16.590
they just go and fly over to the lek

00:08:16.590 --> 00:08:18.925
where all the black colored males 
are hanging out

00:08:18.925 --> 00:08:23.557
and then the males try to attract them 
into mating with them.

00:08:23.557 --> 00:08:25.331
But the plot thickens,

00:08:25.331 --> 00:08:28.343
because this white colored male
at the top,

00:08:28.343 --> 00:08:33.085
hangs out with the females
for a little while and gets to know them,

00:08:33.085 --> 00:08:37.988
and then he leaves those females 
before they approach the lek

00:08:38.262 --> 00:08:42.501
and he goes to the lek
where the black colored males are,

00:08:42.501 --> 00:08:47.558
the black colored males court him
and ask him to join them.

00:08:48.320 --> 00:08:50.146
So, when the females arrive

00:08:50.146 --> 00:08:55.745
they find some territories
with two colors, two styles of males,

00:08:55.745 --> 00:09:01.479
and the females prefer to mate 
with the pair of males of the two colors

00:09:01.853 --> 00:09:04.800
rather than with the males 
with one color by itself.

00:09:04.800 --> 00:09:09.452
And, I conjecture that the reason
for that is that the white colored mates

00:09:09.899 --> 00:09:11.458
get to know the females

00:09:11.458 --> 00:09:15.257
and can serve, so to speak, 
as marriage brokers,

00:09:15.257 --> 00:09:18.234
when the females
fly into the black colored males

00:09:18.234 --> 00:09:23.446
they can make introductions 
and invite specific females to join them.

00:09:24.009 --> 00:09:25.310
In any case,

00:09:25.310 --> 00:09:30.771
the existence of multiple types of males 
also contradicts the Darwinian story

00:09:31.439 --> 00:09:35.718
in which all males are of one type 
and all females another.

00:09:35.718 --> 00:09:39.482
Then, we get to the question 
of homosexuality.

00:09:39.677 --> 00:09:44.717
There's a lot of mating that takes place
between animals of the same sex.

00:09:44.717 --> 00:09:47.453
And these are elephants right here.

00:09:47.453 --> 00:09:51.610
These are big horn sheep from Montana.

00:09:52.187 --> 00:09:54.659
And these are primates, 
our closest relatives.

00:09:54.659 --> 00:09:59.513
And there's well over 300 species
of vertebrates alone

00:09:59.843 --> 00:10:03.460
in which same sex sexuality 
has been observed in nature.

00:10:03.460 --> 00:10:05.712
So, this is quite common.

00:10:05.712 --> 00:10:10.631
And officially observed
and published in the primary literature.

00:10:10.631 --> 00:10:15.959
Now, these are gorillas on the left,
which is a male-male interaction

00:10:15.959 --> 00:10:17.551
and now in the center and right

00:10:17.551 --> 00:10:21.551
we have a female-female interaction 
between bonobos.

00:10:21.551 --> 00:10:23.041
And female bonobos, well,

00:10:23.041 --> 00:10:28.446
mate with one another several times 
during the day,

00:10:29.112 --> 00:10:30.770
as a form of networking.

00:10:30.770 --> 00:10:33.470
So, what's really going on here

00:10:33.470 --> 00:10:36.479
is that there's a lot of physical intimacy
between animals,

00:10:36.479 --> 00:10:41.324
not only same sex sexuality, 
but also multiple grooming,

00:10:41.324 --> 00:10:44.338
reciprocal grooming, 
reciprocal preening.

00:10:44.338 --> 00:10:50.424
And all of these forms of behavior 
are ways of exchanging physical pleasure

00:10:50.424 --> 00:10:51.480
with one another.

00:10:51.480 --> 00:10:54.433
And I've suggested that the reason

00:10:54.433 --> 00:10:58.599
this evolves is as a mechanism 
to produce bounding

00:10:58.599 --> 00:11:02.949
and collaboration between individuals.

00:11:02.949 --> 00:11:05.866
And when individuals
are physically intimate with one another

00:11:05.866 --> 00:11:08.390
they're able to coordinate
their activities

00:11:08.390 --> 00:11:10.886
and work toward a common goal

00:11:10.886 --> 00:11:15.754
because they experience mutual pleasure 
in achieving a common goal.

00:11:16.077 --> 00:11:19.647
So, it's actually the realization 
of the common goal

00:11:19.647 --> 00:11:23.480
that is pleasurable 
in these intimate interactions.

00:11:24.698 --> 00:11:28.612
Now, in light of all of this

00:11:29.508 --> 00:11:33.110
the whole idea of sexual selection 
looks almost absurd.

00:11:33.110 --> 00:11:36.565
It's incorrect, but it also is irrelevant,

00:11:36.565 --> 00:11:41.568
it doesn't even address the degree 
of diversity that occurs in nature.

00:11:44.047 --> 00:11:47.047
The issue of collaboration 
brings us to the next issue

00:11:47.047 --> 00:11:48.675
which is the one of family.

00:11:48.675 --> 00:11:53.271
And biologists, I believe, also 
have an incorrect account of family life.

00:11:53.466 --> 00:11:57.982
This is a quotation 
from Jeff Parker in the U.K.

00:11:59.688 --> 00:12:02.942
"The family is now perceived 
as a cauldron of conflict,

00:12:02.942 --> 00:12:05.754
with each of the players 
having different interests...

00:12:05.754 --> 00:12:08.974
sexual conflict, 
parent-offspring conflict,

00:12:08.974 --> 00:12:11.525
and sib-conflict simultaneously."

00:12:11.525 --> 00:12:14.330
And this too is taught 
in the biology curricula.

00:12:14.330 --> 00:12:19.470
And, if it were true, it paints 
a bleak picture of the aspirations

00:12:19.818 --> 00:12:23.023
that we all share here 
of building a better life

00:12:23.023 --> 00:12:26.744
and founded on collaboration, 
but it may not be true.

00:12:26.744 --> 00:12:29.937
The idea of biological family

00:12:29.937 --> 00:12:33.130
that I've been suggesting
in the last year,

00:12:33.556 --> 00:12:36.325
is summarized in this diagram,

00:12:36.325 --> 00:12:40.220
in which the parent-parent relatioship 
is essentially colaborative

00:12:40.220 --> 00:12:45.026
and the collaboration is realized 
through physical intimacy

00:12:45.026 --> 00:12:49.419
that produces cooperation 
that resolves genetic conflict.

00:12:49.419 --> 00:12:51.201
Because we can't avoid the fact

00:12:51.201 --> 00:12:53.693
that there is genetic conflict 
at the beginning.

00:12:53.693 --> 00:12:56.368
But it needs to get resolved.

00:12:56.368 --> 00:12:59.131
Now, with respect
to the parent-offspring relationship,

00:12:59.131 --> 00:13:04.476
my suggestion is that there is an effect 
in auction of resources to offspring

00:13:05.531 --> 00:13:09.496
that produce an incentive 
to resolve the genetic conflict.

00:13:09.496 --> 00:13:13.542
And what I'm doing here 
is drawing on the economic theory

00:13:13.542 --> 00:13:15.839
of the firm from economics.

00:13:15.839 --> 00:13:22.109
And viewing a family as it was a firm
or a company whose products is offsprings.

00:13:22.109 --> 00:13:24.560
And asking whether 
or not the organization,

00:13:24.560 --> 00:13:26.837
the economic organization of a firm,

00:13:26.837 --> 00:13:31.252
could serve as a guide 
to understanding animal family life.

00:13:31.252 --> 00:13:35.812
And the specifics are 
that in the parent-offspring firm,

00:13:35.812 --> 00:13:40.247
the parent is in the position 
to give food to the offspring,

00:13:40.247 --> 00:13:46.198
and what the parent does is indicates 
the price of the food to the offspring

00:13:46.625 --> 00:13:49.762
and the offspring pay for this
by the quantity

00:13:49.762 --> 00:13:52.293
of begging that they carry out.

00:13:52.293 --> 00:13:57.824
And the offspring are able to communicate 
their demand curve to the parent.

00:13:58.137 --> 00:14:00.923
And if the parent knows 
the demand curve

00:14:00.923 --> 00:14:05.228
it can set the price of food 
that it charges to the offspring,

00:14:05.228 --> 00:14:09.961
so that the offspring honestly communicate
their needs to the parent.

00:14:09.961 --> 00:14:15.257
And when that happens the family functions
as a very efficient unit

00:14:15.257 --> 00:14:17.262
for the production of offspring.

00:14:17.262 --> 00:14:21.995
And therefore we get the formation 
of collaboration in two ways.

00:14:21.995 --> 00:14:26.995
Either through collaboration, 
either through physically intimacy

00:14:26.995 --> 00:14:30.646
which produces a collaboration.

00:14:30.646 --> 00:14:36.294
Or through the setting of incentives, 
and the circumstances differ.

00:14:36.588 --> 00:14:41.686
So, I've been blessed in all my work 
by the help of these collaborators,

00:14:43.908 --> 00:14:48.966
Erol Akçay, who's from Turkey, 
and Priya Iyer, who's from India.

00:14:50.323 --> 00:14:52.249
So, thank you so much.

00:14:52.249 --> 00:14:54.297
(Applause)