1
00:00:05,650 --> 00:00:08,513
My name is Jennifer Nagel.

2
00:00:09,020 --> 00:00:11,011
I teach philosophy at the university of Toronto,

3
00:00:11,450 --> 00:00:13,692
and today I want to talk to you about knowledge.

4
00:00:13,901 --> 00:00:17,312
Knowledge is something human beings naturally crave,

5
00:00:17,312 --> 00:00:19,081
we spend a lot of time and effort

6
00:00:19,081 --> 00:00:21,252
trying to gain it, for example by

7
00:00:21,252 --> 00:00:22,801
watching videos like this one.

8
00:00:23,391 --> 00:00:25,550
We also have natural instincts to keep

9
00:00:25,550 --> 00:00:27,929
track of what other people do and don't know

10
00:00:27,930 --> 00:00:30,632
in order to make sense of what they're doing.

11
00:00:31,188 --> 00:00:33,508
But it's suprisingly difficult to give a good

12
00:00:33,512 --> 00:00:36,979
explanation of the nature of knowledge itself,

13
00:00:36,979 --> 00:00:38,919
and to say how knowing that something is

14
00:00:38,919 --> 00:00:41,837
true, differs from just thinking that it's true.

15
00:00:42,803 --> 00:00:45,028
When we try to figure out what knowledge is,

16
00:00:45,028 --> 00:00:47,474
we encounter some interesting questions

17
00:00:47,474 --> 00:00:51,333
and paradoxes. This series explores these problems,

18
00:00:51,333 --> 00:00:54,519
and explains how philosophers have tried to solve them.

19
00:00:54,958 --> 00:00:57,644
This particular video will focus on some basic

20
00:00:57,644 --> 00:01:00,074
features of knowledge, features that any good

21
00:01:00,074 --> 00:01:02,424
theory of it should try to explain.

22
00:01:02,970 --> 00:01:05,694
So, what kinds of things can you know?

23
00:01:06,463 --> 00:01:09,198
The english verb "know" is used in several ways;

24
00:01:09,509 --> 00:01:12,549
you can know a person, "Alice knows Pierre";

25
00:01:12,638 --> 00:01:15,418
a place, "Pierre knows Paris";

26
00:01:15,418 --> 00:01:17,899
or a language, "Alice knows french".

27
00:01:18,449 --> 00:01:20,744
But the most common way of using the verb

28
00:01:20,744 --> 00:01:23,409
"to know" is the way we use it when we're

29
00:01:23,419 --> 00:01:26,307
speaking of someone knowing a fact, as in

30
00:01:26,756 --> 00:01:28,979
"Alice knows that it's raining outside".

31
00:01:29,318 --> 00:01:32,621
In this series we'll be focusing on this

32
00:01:32,621 --> 00:01:36,318
knowing-a-fact sense of the verb "to know".

33
00:01:37,248 --> 00:01:39,667
Sometimes this is called "knowledge-that",

34
00:01:39,887 --> 00:01:43,299
but actually, along with "that", you can use

35
00:01:43,299 --> 00:01:45,773
question words like "where" or "when".

36
00:01:46,059 --> 00:01:49,139
"Pierre knows when the party will start"

37
00:01:49,430 --> 00:01:52,489
or "Pierre knows where the party is".

38
00:01:52,732 --> 00:01:55,666
Knowing where the party is means knowing the

39
00:01:55,666 --> 00:01:58,468
answer to the question "where's the party?",

40
00:01:58,468 --> 00:02:01,609
and that's going to be a fact, like the fact

41
00:02:01,609 --> 00:02:04,589
that the party is at Alice's place. Knowledge is

42
00:02:04,589 --> 00:02:07,358
a way of being latched on to a fact.

43
00:02:08,719 --> 00:02:10,723
It is thought that every language in the world

44
00:02:10,723 --> 00:02:13,711
has a word that works to translate this fact-grabbing

45
00:02:13,711 --> 00:02:16,153
sense of the word "to know".

46
00:02:16,313 --> 00:02:19,430
And this kind of global popularity is very rare,

47
00:02:19,454 --> 00:02:21,703
only about a hundred words are thought

48
00:02:21,703 --> 00:02:23,833
to be universal in this way.

49
00:02:24,274 --> 00:02:27,244
Around the world, words meaning "to know" are

50
00:02:27,266 --> 00:02:30,505
also very heavily used. It's one of the top ten

51
00:02:30,507 --> 00:02:33,456
most common words in english for example.

52
00:02:34,154 --> 00:02:36,803
So we often find ourselves talking about

53
00:02:36,803 --> 00:02:39,613
knowledge, but when we say someone knows

54
00:02:39,613 --> 00:02:42,019
something, what do we mean?

55
00:02:42,762 --> 00:02:45,501
It can help to compare knowing and just believing.

56
00:02:46,171 --> 00:02:48,354
Consider these two sentences:

57
00:02:48,779 --> 00:02:52,243
1. "Alice knows that it's raining outside."

58
00:02:52,662 --> 00:02:56,402
2. "Pierre believes that it's raining outside."

59
00:02:57,154 --> 00:03:00,023
We instinctively feel some difference between

60
00:03:00,024 --> 00:03:02,347
Alice and Pierre, but what is it?

61
00:03:02,687 --> 00:03:05,383
Actually, we'll see there's several possible

62
00:03:05,383 --> 00:03:07,094
points of contrast here.

63
00:03:07,632 --> 00:03:10,010
The first and easiest has to do with truth.

64
00:03:10,682 --> 00:03:13,301
If Pierre just believes that it's raining outside,

65
00:03:13,301 --> 00:03:16,281
where he is, maybe he's wrong. Maybe the

66
00:03:16,291 --> 00:03:18,211
rain has stopped, and he's fooled by the

67
00:03:18,221 --> 00:03:20,872
sound of water dripping from the trees.

68
00:03:21,541 --> 00:03:24,280
The things we believe are sometimes true

69
00:03:24,280 --> 00:03:25,681
and sometimes false.

70
00:03:26,191 --> 00:03:28,192
What we actually know on the other hand,

71
00:03:28,192 --> 00:03:33,031
has to be true, or factual. So there's no problem saying

72
00:03:33,031 --> 00:03:35,503
"Pierre believes it's raining, but it isn't."

73
00:03:35,523 --> 00:03:37,022
While it sounds weird to say

74
00:03:37,022 --> 00:03:39,501
"Alice knows it's raining, but it isn't."

75
00:03:39,501 --> 00:03:42,366
This is because attachment to the truth

76
00:03:42,366 --> 00:03:44,847
is built into the meaning of knows-that.

77
00:03:45,365 --> 00:03:47,997
Beyond truth, another key feature of

78
00:03:47,997 --> 00:03:49,776
knowledge is confidence.

79
00:03:49,826 --> 00:03:51,556
Let's suppose that Pierre is in a windowless

80
00:03:51,556 --> 00:03:54,017
room, and he's been there for an hour.

81
00:03:54,322 --> 00:03:56,481
He could suspect that it's still raining

82
00:03:56,481 --> 00:03:58,812
outside, even of he's not totally sure.

83
00:03:59,092 --> 00:04:01,881
But if Alice knows that it's raining, she has

84
00:04:01,901 --> 00:04:03,542
no doubt. She's confident.

85
00:04:04,292 --> 00:04:07,653
So, is confident belief in a truth enough

86
00:04:07,653 --> 00:04:10,041
for knowing? Apparently not.

87
00:04:10,756 --> 00:04:13,076
There's at least one more thing we need.

88
00:04:13,786 --> 00:04:17,496
Imagine that Pierre is really pessimistic,

89
00:04:17,496 --> 00:04:19,586
he's always strongly convinced that

90
00:04:19,586 --> 00:04:22,102
things will go badly. He's often wrong,

91
00:04:22,102 --> 00:04:25,746
but sometimes he's right. Today he wakes up

92
00:04:25,746 --> 00:04:28,758
in a windowless room, aware that Alice has

93
00:04:28,758 --> 00:04:31,297
planned a picnic because the forecast was

94
00:04:31,297 --> 00:04:34,616
for sunny weather. "It's going to be terrible",

95
00:04:34,616 --> 00:04:38,957
he thinks. "I'm sure it's already raining right now".

96
00:04:40,107 --> 00:04:43,277
He's entirely confident that it's raining,

97
00:04:43,297 --> 00:04:45,897
although he can't actually see or hear the rain.

98
00:04:46,268 --> 00:04:48,698
And let's say by chance it turns out he's

99
00:04:48,698 --> 00:04:51,897
right this time. Does Pierre actually know

100
00:04:51,897 --> 00:04:53,937
that it's raining outside?

101
00:04:54,132 --> 00:04:57,105
If he doesn't know, then it seems knowledge

102
00:04:57,105 --> 00:04:59,815
requires something more than confident

103
00:04:59,815 --> 00:05:03,575
belief in a truth. Feeling pessimistic isn't

104
00:05:03,575 --> 00:05:06,035
a good basis for judgements about the weather.

105
00:05:06,628 --> 00:05:08,986
Your judgement needs to have a good basis

106
00:05:08,986 --> 00:05:10,755
in order to count as knowledge.

107
00:05:11,448 --> 00:05:14,387
But what kind of basis counts as good?

108
00:05:15,154 --> 00:05:17,446
Do you have to be standing outside,

109
00:05:17,446 --> 00:05:20,268
getting wet? As you will see,

110
00:05:20,268 --> 00:05:22,527
in the upcoming videos on the analysis of

111
00:05:22,527 --> 00:05:25,179
knowledge, this is a controversial question.

112
00:05:25,876 --> 00:05:28,328
But before we get to that problem, we'll

113
00:05:28,328 --> 00:05:32,598
tackle a more basic problem: is knowledge even

114
00:05:32,703 --> 00:05:35,913
possible for us? Even in the best case

115
00:05:35,913 --> 00:05:38,318
scenario, when it feels like you're standing

116
00:05:38,318 --> 00:05:40,565
right outside, right in the rain, can you

117
00:05:40,565 --> 00:05:42,709
really know that it's raining outside?

118
00:05:43,560 --> 00:05:46,220
Could you be dreaming for example,

119
00:05:46,220 --> 00:05:47,571
on a clear night?

120
00:05:48,330 --> 00:05:50,541
This is the problem of skepticism,

121
00:05:50,541 --> 00:05:53,000
explored in the next video.

122
00:05:53,000 --> 00:05:55,690
The two following videos will explain

123
00:05:55,690 --> 00:05:58,374
possible solutions to skepticism.