In today's largest
construction sites and quarries
huge megamachines are used to dig,
cut and lift stone.
These man-made creatures dwarf their creators
and perform the work of thousands of men,
using modern hydraulic technologies.
Without such equipment
builders could never construct
modern skyscrapers
Yet thousands of years ago
ancient civilizations were accomplishing
the same work
while constructing their monuments and temples
using massive stones.
These enormous blocks,
many weighing in excess of 100 tons
would be a challenge even
for today's engineers.
Yet, thousands of years ago,
people cut them out of solid rock,
transported them for miles
and then lifted them precisely into place.
But how?
Did they cut this massive stone blocks
with hammers, chisels and copper wire,
as mainstream archeologists suggest?
Could they have lifted
and transported them
without a pulley system,
or the wheel?
Or did ancient civilizations possess
advanced technologies
that have since been lost to science?
At Giza, you just don't have the pyramids.
Linked to the pyramids are
what Egyptologists call Valley Temples.
It doesn't take a rocket engineer
that when you go there
there is something not quite right here.
Whereas the pyramids are built with blocks
of two to three tons
these temples which are minúte
compared to the pyramids,
are built with blocks of 100 tons
and some of them 200 tons
Let me tell you what a 100 ton block is,
If you take a 100 family cars and you
squeeze them together,
you get one of these blocks.
First of all,
Let alone how they moved these blocks?
Is why would they want to use
100 ton blocks?
It simply doesn't make sense.
There is no reason for them to
wanna build out of granite blocks
the size of a semitruck.
It's like, Okay,
Let's do something but lets do it
as difficult as we could possibly do it.
The reason why I am convinced that
sophisticated technology was utilized
in these ancient rocks is because
if we go to a stone guarry today
and look at the scope of machinery
required to accomplish similar things.
Those machines are huge!
(Explosion)
(Narrator) Subscribers to anchient alien theory
do not believe extra terrestrials built
these amazing monuments.
But instead provided some type of
technological know-how or tools
to our ancestors.
Engineering expert, Chris Dunn,
has spend several decades researching
the construction tools used
by the ancient Egyptians.
We're normally taught by Egyptologists
that the ancient Egyptians had
simple tools.
They went to work every day
using stone balls, copper chisels or
copper tube and sand to grind holes in,
in diorite and granite,
extremely hard rock.
From what I have actually
gathered over the years,
is information that seems to actually
argue against that notion,
that they had simple tools.
(Narrator) In Egypt,
Dunn was able to examine
ancient sights firsthand.
What he found has proved to be both
revolutionary and contraversial,
(Dunn) If you look at the Giza Plateau and
all the stones that they actually placed
in the Great Pyramid and
Khafre's Pyramid, Menkaure's Pyramid,
two and a half million blocks of stone
in the Great Piramide alone.
They had to have some efficient means
of cutting them to size
and putting them into place.
They had to have had somebody on site
Who's saying, "Okay, I need a block this size."
And then getting a block to them that size,
Stat, like immediately.
(Narrator) While searching several miles
north of Giza, at Abu Rawash,
Dunn stumbled upon a clue
when he spotted a granite block
containing a deep cut.
(Dunn) When I first saw it,
I just didn't know what to make of it.
And it was only after puzzling over it for days,
and sometimes
waking up at 3 o'clock in the morning
scratching my head, I'm thinking:
"Well, how did they make this cut?"
And finally, to realize that
the only way that
they could have actually cut that thing
was with a saw that was 35 feet in diameter.
(Narrator) The idea that ancient Egyptians
used giant saws
provoked much resistance from
mainstream archeologists.
Dunn, however, was convinced.
(Dunn) As a ex-machinist,
I look for tool marks.
I look for them everywhere I go.
And I could be accused of,
"Well, you know,
if you're gonna to look for something,
you're probably gonna find it
because you're looking at it
through a certain filter."
Accepted, I agree.
But the question is:
Why is it there?
Clearly, to me, that is a machine mark
but there were no machines back then.
So what, what do I do?
I just go looking for more machine marks
and they're all over the place.
You find them on statues,
you'll find them, particularly,
in the Luxor Museum.
There seems to be an impression
on the side of Amon's buttock where
it meets the bench
where there is an undercut,
it was a slip of a tool
and therefore, it must have been a tool
that was quite efficient.
(Narrator) Dunn also believes
that the large depressions
in the ground at Giza
is not boat pits,
as claimed by mainstream archeologists
but were actually used to hold
the 35 foot saws.
I speculate that they
were actually saw pits,
the saws were mounted in these pits
and then they ran the blocks through
the saws
before they put them in the Great Pyramid.
(Sinister music)