0:00:10.267,0:00:13.868 I have been thinking a lot lately[br]about the following question: 0:00:13.881,0:00:16.794 what would happen[br]if we came to disbelieve in free will? 0:00:16.795,0:00:19.590 What would this mean[br]for our interpersonal relationships, 0:00:19.591,0:00:22.130 society, morality, meaning in the law? 0:00:22.131,0:00:25.862 For example, would giving up the belief[br]in free will have dire consequences 0:00:25.863,0:00:27.572 for society or something? 0:00:27.573,0:00:30.107 Or would it rather have[br]a humanizing effect 0:00:30.108,0:00:31.907 on our practices and polices, 0:00:31.908,0:00:34.903 freeing us from the negative effects[br]of belief in free will? 0:00:34.904,0:00:36.603 What I would like to propose today 0:00:36.604,0:00:39.558 is that the belief in free will[br]rather than being a good thing 0:00:39.559,0:00:42.646 actually has a dark side[br]and that we'd be better off without it. 0:00:42.647,0:00:44.652 I know this is counterintuitive. 0:00:44.653,0:00:47.598 Many people fear that life[br]without free will lead to nihilism, 0:00:47.599,0:00:51.368 there'd be no reason to go on,[br]or that it would undermine morality. 0:00:51.369,0:00:53.701 Or that we will just let[br]criminals run free 0:00:53.702,0:00:56.561 since there'd be no moral responsibility. 0:00:56.562,0:00:59.471 But I would like to paint[br]a different picture for you today. 0:00:59.472,0:01:01.855 It begins with the idea[br]of free will skepticism. 0:01:01.856,0:01:05.221 So I am a free will skeptic.[br]I deny the existence of free will. 0:01:05.221,0:01:08.499 Free will skeptics maintain[br]that who we are, what we do, 0:01:08.500,0:01:11.459 is ultimately the result of factors[br]beyond our control, 0:01:11.460,0:01:12.727 and because of this, 0:01:12.728,0:01:16.497 we are never morally responsible for[br]our actions in the basic desert sense 0:01:16.498,0:01:21.003 that is the sense that would make us[br]truly deserving of praise and blame. 0:01:21.004,0:01:24.836 Historically, there have been a number[br]of philosophical and scientific arguments 0:01:24.837,0:01:26.166 for free will skepticism, 0:01:26.167,0:01:29.100 and I've promoted[br]these arguments in my own work, 0:01:29.101,0:01:32.493 but I'm not here today to try[br]to convince you that you lack free will. 0:01:32.494,0:01:33.940 It's not my goal. 0:01:33.941,0:01:36.704 I'm actually interested[br]in a slightly different question: 0:01:36.705,0:01:39.369 what would happen if we came[br]to accept this perspective? 0:01:39.370,0:01:43.196 What would happen, practically speaking,[br]if we came to disbelieve in free will? 0:01:43.197,0:01:46.217 Would it be, on the whole,[br]a good thing or a bad thing? 0:01:46.218,0:01:48.391 And it's here that I'm an optimist. 0:01:48.392,0:01:51.390 I am optimistic about the prospects[br]of life without free will. 0:01:51.391,0:01:53.354 I call myself an optimistic skeptic. 0:01:53.355,0:01:55.830 As an optimistic skeptic, 0:01:55.831,0:01:57.720 I maintain that life without free will 0:01:57.721,0:01:59.951 is not only possible[br]but that it's preferable. 0:01:59.952,0:02:01.769 Prospects of finding meaning in life 0:02:01.770,0:02:04.739 and sustaining good interpersonal[br]relationships, for example, 0:02:04.740,0:02:06.179 would not be threatened. 0:02:06.180,0:02:08.107 Although certain systems of punishment 0:02:08.108,0:02:11.026 like those based on the model[br]of retribution or just deserts 0:02:11.027,0:02:12.326 would be ruled out; 0:02:12.327,0:02:15.810 preventive detention and rehabilitation[br]programs would still be justified. 0:02:15.811,0:02:18.322 I will say a little bit more[br]about these in a moment. 0:02:18.323,0:02:20.119 So as an optimistic skeptic, 0:02:20.120,0:02:24.549 I maintain that life without free will[br]may actually be good for our well being, 0:02:24.550,0:02:26.201 and our relationships with others, 0:02:26.202,0:02:29.701 since it could tend to eradicate[br]an often destructive form of moral anger, 0:02:29.702,0:02:31.274 a kind of moral anger 0:02:31.275,0:02:35.314 that's corrosive to our relationships[br]and to our social policies. 0:02:35.315,0:02:39.453 So to better understand[br]the dark side of free will, 0:02:39.454,0:02:41.359 what I want to do is just talk about 0:02:41.367,0:02:44.328 some recent empirical work[br]in moral political physiology. 0:02:44.329,0:02:46.781 What this work has done has actually shown 0:02:46.782,0:02:50.581 that there is a number of interesting[br]and potentially troubling correlations 0:02:50.582,0:02:52.321 between the belief in free will 0:02:52.322,0:02:55.041 and people's other moral religious[br]and political beliefs. 0:02:55.042,0:02:58.418 In particular, what they found is[br]that free will beliefs are correlated 0:02:58.434,0:03:01.567 with higher levels[br]of religiosity, punitiveness, 0:03:01.568,0:03:04.075 and a number of conservative[br]beliefs in attitude, 0:03:04.076,0:03:06.795 such as just world belief[br]and right wing authoritarianism. 0:03:06.796,0:03:09.136 I am only going to focus on[br]two of these today, 0:03:09.137,0:03:12.555 that is the connection between the belief[br]in free will and punitiveness, 0:03:12.556,0:03:16.295 and that between the belief in free will[br]and what's called just world belief. 0:03:16.296,0:03:18.802 So we take punitiveness for example. 0:03:18.803,0:03:22.384 What this research has shown is[br]that where believe in free will is strong, 0:03:22.385,0:03:24.064 as we see increased punitiveness, 0:03:24.065,0:03:27.433 that is people are more likely to call[br]for harsher forms of punishment 0:03:27.434,0:03:29.143 in a number of different scenarios. 0:03:29.144,0:03:32.137 And this makes sense:[br]if you think people possess free will, 0:03:32.138,0:03:35.972 then you believe they justly deserve to[br]be praised and blamed for their actions. 0:03:35.973,0:03:40.028 if they engage in an immoral act, you want[br]to see them get their just deserts, right? 0:03:40.029,0:03:42.094 It's very close[br]to a notion of retribution: 0:03:42.095,0:03:45.826 you want to inflict harm on them[br]for the harm they've inflicted on others. 0:03:45.827,0:03:48.827 But the downside of this is, again,[br]you can create a moral anger 0:03:48.827,0:03:53.141 that's destructive to our relationships[br]with others and to our social policies. 0:03:53.142,0:03:55.556 So consider this on a macro level, 0:03:55.557,0:03:59.726 belief in free will is relatively strong[br]in the United States. 0:03:59.727,0:04:01.907 In fact, it's built right[br]into the mythology 0:04:01.908,0:04:05.001 of the rugged individual,[br]the self-made man, the causa Sui, 0:04:05.022,0:04:07.881 the person that can pull themselves up[br]from the bootstraps 0:04:07.882,0:04:10.041 and overcome all[br]of their life circumstances. 0:04:10.042,0:04:12.319 But because we are[br]so committed to this belief, 0:04:12.320,0:04:14.789 we are also a relatively punitive society. 0:04:14.790,0:04:16.988 Consider this one simple fact: 0:04:16.988,0:04:20.310 the United States makes up about 5%[br]of the world's population, 0:04:20.310,0:04:23.604 yet it incarcerates[br]25% of the world's prisoners. 0:04:23.605,0:04:26.654 I will say that again[br]because it's a rather startling statistic: 0:04:26.655,0:04:30.384 we make up a relatively small sliver[br]of the world's population, about 5%, 0:04:30.385,0:04:33.950 but we house and imprison[br]25% of the world's prisoners. 0:04:33.951,0:04:37.870 I don't think it's controversial to say[br]our criminal justice system is broken. 0:04:37.871,0:04:41.657 It is not working, not making us safer,[br]it's not reducing crime, 0:04:41.658,0:04:44.394 it's, by no means, achieving[br]our desired social goals, 0:04:44.395,0:04:47.798 and it is not reducing the rate[br]of recidivism, that is repeat crime. 0:04:47.799,0:04:51.463 But just perhaps, if we adopt[br]the skeptical perspective, 0:04:51.464,0:04:55.743 we might be able to adopt more effective,[br]and more humane policies. 0:04:55.744,0:04:57.804 So let me just briefly sketch quickly 0:04:57.805,0:05:00.894 how a free will skeptic[br]might address criminal behavior. 0:05:00.895,0:05:03.527 There's a professor[br]- not too far from here, 0:05:03.534,0:05:06.468 his name is Derek Pereboom,[br]he teaches at Cornell University; 0:05:06.470,0:05:08.440 he's a free will skeptic, like myself - 0:05:08.441,0:05:11.308 and he proposes a model[br]for dealing with dangerous criminals 0:05:11.309,0:05:14.098 based on analogy with quarantine. 0:05:14.099,0:05:18.025 So people who contract contagious diseases[br]do so for no fault of their own, 0:05:18.026,0:05:20.883 they're not morally responsible[br]for having done so; 0:05:20.884,0:05:23.073 we don't think they[br]deserve to be punished. 0:05:23.074,0:05:24.487 But we do feel justified 0:05:24.488,0:05:27.347 in quarantining those individuals[br]for the safety of society. 0:05:27.348,0:05:29.983 Well, we can say the same thing[br]for dangerous criminals 0:05:29.984,0:05:32.936 that is even you adopted[br]the perspective that I am advocating, 0:05:32.937,0:05:35.926 and you believe that individuals[br]are not ultimately responsible 0:05:35.927,0:05:37.306 for becoming who they are, 0:05:37.307,0:05:41.013 we could still justify detaining those[br]individuals for the safety of society. 0:05:41.014,0:05:44.061 But if we did this, this would entail[br]a number of major reforms, 0:05:44.062,0:05:47.660 all of which I think are actually[br]really important and good. 0:05:47.661,0:05:49.443 For one, we'd have the duty 0:05:49.444,0:05:52.013 to the well-being[br]and rehabilitation of criminals, 0:05:52.014,0:05:53.654 just like you would have a duty 0:05:53.655,0:05:56.244 to treat the person[br]in quarantine for their disease. 0:05:56.245,0:05:59.171 Secondly, 0:06:02.731,0:06:05.930 you couldn't treat those individuals[br]cruelly while being detained, 0:06:05.931,0:06:10.262 just like you couldn't treat cruelly[br]the people we are holding in quarantine. 0:06:10.263,0:06:13.318 Thirdly, if there are less severe[br]forms of punishment available, 0:06:13.319,0:06:16.160 we'd have to opt for[br]those less severe forms of punishment 0:06:16.161,0:06:19.414 and that might entail rethinking[br]some of our harsher sentencing laws, 0:06:19.415,0:06:22.614 and some of our crueler forms[br]of punishment in super max prisons. 0:06:22.615,0:06:23.675 And lastly, 0:06:23.676,0:06:27.135 if you are someone like myself,[br]you think it's the causal circumstances 0:06:27.136,0:06:29.375 that drive these behaviors[br]in the first place, 0:06:29.376,0:06:32.545 then free will skeptics would put[br]their money, resources and focus 0:06:32.546,0:06:35.345 on addressing the systemic causes[br]that lead to criminality: 0:06:35.346,0:06:37.407 wealth, inequality, educational inequity. 0:06:37.408,0:06:39.678 So instead of blaming people[br]and punishing them, 0:06:39.679,0:06:43.488 on the tail-end, you'd try to prevent[br]the criminal behavior in the first place. 0:06:43.489,0:06:44.843 (Applause) 0:06:44.844,0:06:46.004 Thank you. 0:06:46.005,0:06:50.534 Not only do I think free will skeptics can[br]deal successfully with criminal behaviors, 0:06:50.535,0:06:53.396 I think they could do so[br]more humanely and more effectively. 0:06:53.397,0:06:55.974 So let me switch over[br]to the other belief I mentioned: 0:06:55.975,0:06:58.911 belief in free will has also been shown[br]through this research 0:06:58.912,0:07:01.469 to correlate with what is known[br]as just world belief. 0:07:01.470,0:07:02.597 So what is it? 0:07:02.598,0:07:05.340 Fundamentally, it is the belief[br]that the world is just, 0:07:05.341,0:07:08.935 good things happen to good people,[br]and bad things happen to bad people. 0:07:08.936,0:07:12.383 But also, fundamentally,[br]it's a blame-the-victim approach 0:07:12.384,0:07:15.451 since it maintains that individuals[br]justly deserve what they get, 0:07:15.452,0:07:19.206 and that those who meet misfortune[br]have often brought it them on themselves. 0:07:19.207,0:07:23.637 In the 1960s, psychologists developed[br]what is known as just world belief scale. 0:07:23.638,0:07:26.907 It was meant to design people's commitment[br]to this type of belief, 0:07:26.908,0:07:30.749 but it was also particularly designed to[br]capture the natural tendency people have 0:07:30.750,0:07:33.839 to blame those who meet misfortune[br]for their own circumstances. 0:07:33.840,0:07:38.613 Over the years, what they found[br]is that high scores on this belief, 0:07:38.614,0:07:41.903 correlate with the likelihood[br]of derogating innocent victims, 0:07:41.904,0:07:44.767 trusting current institutions[br]and authorities, 0:07:44.768,0:07:48.177 and blaming the poor and praising[br]the rich for their respective faiths. 0:07:48.178,0:07:51.197 As I said, this is essentially[br]a blame-the-victim approach; 0:07:51.198,0:07:53.955 you can see manifestations[br]of it all throughout society. 0:07:53.956,0:07:55.271 One of the more pernicious 0:07:55.272,0:07:58.351 is the tendency, both among[br]ordinary folk and the legal system, 0:07:58.352,0:08:00.781 to blame rape victims[br]for their own circumstances. 0:08:00.782,0:08:01.942 So if the world is just, 0:08:01.943,0:08:05.622 and good things happen to good people,[br]and bad things happen to bad people, 0:08:05.623,0:08:08.391 to try to reconcile[br]such a horrific act as rape 0:08:08.392,0:08:10.773 while preserving the belief[br]that the world is just, 0:08:10.773,0:08:13.565 you turn that innocent victim[br]into somebody that's guilty. 0:08:13.566,0:08:15.305 They were dressed provocatively, 0:08:15.306,0:08:17.974 they were walking[br]where they shouldn't had been walking. 0:08:17.975,0:08:20.556 Another manifestation[br]of this blame-the-victim approach 0:08:20.557,0:08:22.206 could be seen throughout society. 0:08:22.207,0:08:25.349 For example, blaming those in poverty[br]for their own circumstances. 0:08:25.350,0:08:27.797 Claiming that those on welfare[br]are lazy or mooches. 0:08:27.798,0:08:31.347 Or blaming educational inequity on[br]the children and the parents themselves. 0:08:31.348,0:08:34.765 But we all know, at least on a more[br]rational deliberate moment, 0:08:34.765,0:08:36.385 that the world is not just, 0:08:36.385,0:08:39.107 and that the lottery of life[br]is not always fair. 0:08:39.109,0:08:42.048 We need to acknowledge the role[br]that luck plays in our lives, 0:08:42.049,0:08:44.479 who we are, and how we turn out, right? 0:08:44.480,0:08:47.063 We don't all have equal starting points. 0:08:47.064,0:08:49.434 As I said in the beginning,[br]I'm an optimist, 0:08:49.435,0:08:52.587 I am optimistic that if we could adopt[br]this skeptical perspective, 0:08:52.588,0:08:54.157 we may be able to free ourselves 0:08:54.158,0:08:56.589 from some of these beliefs[br]and harmful tendencies. 0:08:56.590,0:08:58.889 In fact, there was[br]a recent study that came out 0:08:58.890,0:09:00.835 in the Journal of Psychological Science 0:09:00.836,0:09:03.605 that found that by reducing[br]people's beliefs in free will, 0:09:03.606,0:09:05.402 it actually made them less punitive, 0:09:05.403,0:09:09.269 and call for less harsh forms of treatment[br]in a number of hypothetical scenarios. 0:09:09.270,0:09:12.622 This tells me two things: one,[br]it reaffirms what I was saying earlier, 0:09:12.623,0:09:16.150 that where believe in free will is strong[br]as we see increased punitiveness, 0:09:16.151,0:09:17.839 but it also provides hopes to me 0:09:17.840,0:09:21.598 that we can perhaps relinquish ourselves[br]on some of these more harmful beliefs 0:09:21.599,0:09:25.029 and by doing so, loose some[br]of that moral anger I've been discussing. 0:09:25.030,0:09:27.052 So my proposal is rather simple. 0:09:27.053,0:09:30.469 Let's not fear free will skepticism.[br]Let's embrace it. 0:09:30.470,0:09:32.953 Let's give up the belief[br]in free will, and with it, 0:09:32.954,0:09:36.769 the pernicious belief in just-deserts,[br]that people justly deserve what they get. 0:09:36.770,0:09:38.778 Let's leave this adequate notion behind, 0:09:38.779,0:09:41.188 lose our moral anger[br]and stop blaming the victim. 0:09:41.189,0:09:43.783 Instead, let's turn our attention[br]to the difficult task 0:09:43.784,0:09:45.543 of addressing the causes that lead 0:09:45.544,0:09:49.521 to criminality, to wealth inequity,[br]and educational inequity. 0:09:49.522,0:09:52.525 Once we relinquish the belief[br]in free will, this will allow us 0:09:52.526,0:09:55.635 to look more clearly at the causes[br]and more deeply at the systems 0:09:55.636,0:09:57.749 that shape individuals and their behavior, 0:09:57.750,0:10:01.149 and this will allow us to adopt[br]more humane and more effective policies 0:10:01.150,0:10:03.609 in education, criminal justice,[br]and social policies. 0:10:03.610,0:10:04.920 Thank you very much. 0:10:04.921,0:10:06.210 (Applause)