We are now going to discuss this issue of a New World Order.
As we saw in Revelation chapter 17, the kings of the world give
their power unto the beast. In “The Keys of this Blood”,
Malachi Martin tells us that the greatest geo-political giant of our
age is the Pope. He says, “On his trip to Poland..., barely eight
months after his election, he signalled the opening of the millennium endgame.
He became the first of the three players to enter the new
geopolitical arena.” He says that “Pope John Paul would stride now in
the area of the millennium endgame as something more
than a geopolitical giant of his age. He was, and remains, the serene and
confident servant of the grand design.” This is Masonic signal language.
Here is John Paul II with the Trilateral Commission.
And here is John Paul II with B’nai B’rith, Jewish Freemasonry.
This is a fascinating signal picture with him in the center
controlling the most powerful think tanks in the world, because
that’s what the signal tells us. We saw in Revelation chapter 17
already some pictures of the powers of the world giving
themselves over to the papacy. Lech Walesa being honored for
his work with the host in public.
“The Bush-Gorbachev summit in Malta. George Bush referred to it as:
‘A gateway to the new Millennium of Freedom’”
And it was heralded as the “Building of a New World”.
“It is a big idea: a new world order, where diverse nations are
drawn together in common cause… only the United States has both the
moral standing and the means to back it up.” – President George Bush
So they want to create this New World Order.
Revelation chapter 13 said that the beast that comes up out of the
earth would be the power that did it. Bush confirms that for us.
By 1990 a peace prize went to Gorbachev for losing his country;
The Man of the Decade he became. And the old symbols – which are
Masonic symbols, of the East German empire, were removed. The Communist
emblem leaves. Pretoria News, August 20, 1999 summit meeting in
63 countries about neoliberalism. And Fidel Castro gives a Masonic signal.
Here he is with the papacy; all these so called countries that
are against what the establishment stands for are only against in the
sense that they are playing the game of Hegelianism.
Thesis, antithesis, but behind the scenes, they all belong to the same club.
Let’s just verify that. “Fidel was significantly influenced
by [Jesuit] Father Armando Llorente and Alberto DeCastro…
DeCastro admired Franco… Fidel was very active in a Jesuit
organization similar to the Boy Scouts, the ‘Explorers.’ …”
“[Wherever] a totalitarian movement erupts, whether Communist or
Nazi [fascist], a Jesuit can be found in the role of ‘advisor’ or leader;
in Cuba [it was] Castro’s Father Armando Llorente…”
So forget about the idea that Cuba was anti-Pope; a Jesuit was behind
the scenes, they were playing the game of thesis-antithesis.
“When Tyrants Fall” in Romania, and Panama, and all these countries;
these tyrants were put in place to create a system of fear and chaos,
and then they are removed and the people are happy to give up their
civil liberties. We’ve already seen this video here of the Pope who
receives honor from Bill Clinton for his role in ending the Communist empire.
Female Reporter: “2,400 of his faithful here to welcome him.
He’s waving to the crowd.
Archbishop Regali is alongside the Pope as he shakes hands with the first lady.”
Clinton: “We honor you for helping to lead a revolution of values and
spirit in central Europe and the former Soviet Union;
freeing millions to live by conscious, not coercion, and
freeing all of us from the constant fear of nuclear war.
Your Holiness, on behalf of all of us gathered here today, indeed on
behalf of all the people of our beloved nation,
we welcome you back to America.”
Male reporter: “Ladies and gentlemen, his holiness Pope John Paul II and
the vice president of the United States and Archbishop -”
Veith: “Pope declares the European Community heaven sent”
Very fascinating, “Konrad Adenauer”
who was the German chancellor at that particular time when this
was being devised, well he is to be declared a saint,
can you believe that? He is to be declared a saint for his work,
“Pope declares EC heaven sent… Roman Catholic principles.”
They are to be declared saints.
Now to bring about the European Union, they had Maastricht,
Maastricht is a Roman Catholic - a little town in a Protestant country in the
Netherlands; and the symbolism there was also interesting, the 12 stars;
they represent also the 12 stars that you have in the book of
Revelation, which they apply to Mary rather than to the woman in white.
It is also fascinating that the European Union issued a poster
which was posted all over Europe, where they had the tower of Babel
under construction, can you see that? This was posted all over Europe,
and the stars were upside down, representing the goat of Mendez.
This is Satanism. This is the new tower of Babel;
and the high French politicians said “we are building a new Babel,”
which they emphasized with this poster, “and this time we will succeed.”
The new parliament of the European Community is built like
the tower of Babel. In fact it has a plaque on the inside –
or a poster – which says precisely this. And it has these
scaffolding to give the appearance that it is under construction.
This is rather arrogant. This is the new European identity card,
and if you look at it at the back and you turn it upside down, what do you see?
You see the goat of Mendez. The horns are slightly modified
to give another symbolism of the seat of the earth,
but the inner facial features of the goat are very clearly discernable,
and what these mean over here I would rather not say.
If we look at the high politicians of Europe, those that played the
role in all of this, they are Masonic. That is a Masonic handshake between
Schroeder and Kohl, signifying the new Mason is taking over where
the old Mason is leaving. So just as we saw that Kerry is
a Skull & Bones member in America now, and the present President is
a Skull & Bones member, it doesn’t matter which one is going to win,
so here too a Mason replaces a Mason.
Fingering, the system they’re all showing that they’re all part of
the same system. When the Soviet Union fell, the new emblem that it
adopted was this one, the double headed eagle; could you guess why?
Well the double headed eagle is the symbol of Freemasonry, and it
obviously shows who is in control. The queens, the kings of the world,
as we have seen, all of them are high masons and subject to the
Roman pontiff. And Islam, we did a whole lecture to show the intrigue
of the Islamic religion and the Catholic religion that behind the
scenes, controlled by the Secret Societies, they have one aim and
one aim alone, subject to Rome. So what is all this war about with Islam?
Who are these people who are pulling the strings in the world,
and why are people being rubbed up between them? From the rock stars
of the world, the Bonos of the world, to the political leaders of the
world, everyone seems to be bowing down to the papal Caesar.
From the East to the West, the Islamic world is currently being
set up as the synthesis in the religious world, pitted against
the Judeo-Christian culture as the antithesis, and then out of
this must come a synthesis where all of them will unite.
This is a website, there is the, the actual website underneath,
and this one I believe fairly accurately says who’s who in the zoo;
Adam Weishaupt, [John Jacob] Astor, [Albert] Pike, [Andrew]
Carnegie, [Irenee] du Pont, [W.Averell] Harriman, Bertrand
Russell, Ted Kennedy. These are the Illuminatis of yesteryear and today.
George W. Bush of course, he’s a Skull & Bones member, that’s
a sub-organization of chapter 322 of a German organization,
the Illuminati therefore. [McGeorge] Bundy, [Otto of] Habsburg,
[Walter] Freeman, [Lee] Teng-hui, Hillary Clinton, Allan Greenspan,
[David] Rockefeller, [Edmund de] Rothschild, [Peter] Wallenberg,
these are the bankers in this system. The negotiators, Lord [Peter] Carrington,
Jimmy Carter, Henry Kissinger, Lord David Owen, Richard Holbrooke,
these are 33 degree Freemasons, or Knights of Malta, or Bilderbergers,
or Committee of 300, they all belong to the same club.
If we look at Franklin D. Roosevelt, Cecil Rhodes, [Frederick] Engels,
all of these; [Leon] Trotsky, [Joseph] Stalin, [Karl] Marx,
[J.Edgar] Hoover, all of their affiliations, Grand Orient Lodge for example,
Grand Orient lodge.
Lenin was Grand Orient Lodge, [Harry S.] Truman 33 degree,
Willy Brandt degree, Winston Churchill; we’ve seen many of these before.
Helmut Kohl, Committee of 300; Francois Mitterand, 33 degree
Freemason, he is not alive any more. Yitzak Rabin, [Yasser] Arafat,
33 degree Freemason, these are fascinating details.
Shimon Peres, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, Gerald Ford,
I showed you Gerald Ford’s signature where he signed for himself that he was
a 33 degree Freemason. There it is, I photographed it in the lodge.
And the Carters and these great political people in the world.
The Schroeder’s, the Netonyahu’s, the Gorbachev’s, there is Saddam
Hussein listed as a 33 degree Freemason.
Royalty: Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, Committee of 300;
and here, Princess [Rainha] Beatriz, and Prince Bertil.
The queen of course, Prince Phillip, all of them high Freemasons.
[Josef] Mengele, Walt Disney, all of these individuals.
The world is really run by these individuals. Here is the Duke of Kent
giving the Masonic handshake under the Masonic shield.
He is the current Grand Master, so he’s the highest Freemason at the
moment, if you like, because a King may not be, or a Prince, may not be
the Grand Master. He is currently the Grand Master.
So here is the highest Luciferian in the country at the moment.
Political leaders, the Bill Clintons, and all of these, we’ve
dealt with them. We don’t have to go through all of them again;
the Jesse Helms, the Goldwaters, the Al Gores, and all of these
individuals. And I’ve put the pages up there, and there are many many
books that substantiate, all of these names. So just about
everybody who is important in the world, everybody who runs in the
political sphere is involved in these clandestine operations.
We saw in the lecture on Revelation chapter 17 and 13 how
there would be a holy alliance, and how the United States would
eventually become the power house for propagating a new world order.
Gorbachev summit in Malta, referred to as
“A gateway to the Millenium of Freedom”, as you will remember.
And the initiative came for this great movement into a New World Order.
Now let us have a look at this video where George Bush has
something to say on this issue.
Bush Senior: “Our institutions of freedom have laid
dormant, the United Nations can offer them new life. These
institutions play a crucial role in our quest for a New World Order.
An order in which no nation must surrender one iota of its own
sovereignty, an order characterized by the rule of law rather
than the resort to force.”
Veith: So he says all the nations don’t have to give up one iota of
their sovereignty, but we want them all in a New World Order, basically
that is what he said. Out of the horse’s mouth. And if you look at the high role
players in the United States, whether it’s Madeline Albright, or
anyone of them, they use broaches which depict Luciferian connections
like goats, and all of these. President Clinton here is
receiving the host publicly, and he claims not to be a Roman Catholic?
That is impossible. Hillary Clinton is wearing the phoenix
rising which is a Masonic symbol. Cherie Blair uses Masonic signals.
The presidents, the prime ministers of the world, whether the
Thatchers or the Carters, or the – whoever they are, all of them
seem to belong to insider organizations. Whether they are
religious leaders or political leaders or whether they are
Europeans or Americans or Eastern, all of them seem to be involved.
If we look at Africa and Rome, this will give us an idea of what
the New World Order is going to be all about. Africa and what they
have done to Africa serves as a model for what will happen in the
entire world. The great African leaders and the tyrants of the past
like the Idi Amins, these people have all received
exile and were probably high Masonics. When we look at the Southern Africa,
South Africa, situation where you had the black-white issue,
the apartheid issue, the role players again were all Masons.
This is Foster, the president, and he gives a Masonic signal, and he was a
Freemason. If we look at Nelson Mandela, he is a Prince Hall Freemason,
so again both sides are on the same side of a secret society.
If we look at DeKlerk and Nelson Mandela, we have the same situation there.
Mandela is compared to Jesus Christ. They lift him up. They have
a synthesis and an antithesis, and he receives the
host publicly, although he declines to say that he is Roman Catholic.
He says he’s not Roman Catholic. Now Roman Catholic canon law
states that you cannot receive the host if you are not a Roman
Catholic, so these people are really something else.
Here he has a Hindu marriage with the widow of Samora Machel.
Now Samora Machel is another story and his anti-Christian
statements are historic. He also had a Jewish wedding at
the same ceremony, and a Moslem, showing that all religions are one
with him. The new political face is totally Masonic, and in 1992
already it was known that Mugabe, of Zimbabwe, was going to take the
farms away from the people that lived there. This is before he
started doing this, they had already said it.
“Mugabe is going to take white farms very soon.” That was in 1992.
Today this is a fact, “Der Spiegel” published “Die Deutschen müssen rause!”
The Germans must get out, all whites must get out.
Here’s a cartoon of Kissinger pointing to the fact that the
whites must get out of Africa. Here is the current president of
South Africa, Mbeki, and Mugabe, they are hand in hand on this issue.
He refuses to rebuke Mugabe for taking the farms by force.
In South Africa itself 4000 farmers at least have died and have
been killed as they have been driven off their land.
Nobody hears about these things in the world. Zimbabwe lies in ruins,
but what do we find here? A tremendous building going up,
and what is it called? The Jesuit Province of Zimbabwe.
So the Jesuits are totally in control in that country.
Jesuit school of Philosophy and Humanity. Brand new buildings while
a country lies in ruins; they’re preparing for a final order.
And all the black leaders are in the same level as all the
European and America leaders, they all belong to the same club.
Now what is this New World Order? Here is the new South African coat
of arms where you can see the phoenix rising out of the ashes,
the crown of Mithra with the seven rays, all the symbolism points to
the same thing. I’m going to run you through the new economic order
of the New World Order. And these are now quotes from
Roman Catholic sources themselves. And I would like to tell you that
you haven’t experienced anything yet: waiting to come to you.
And I can tell you what it feels like because I have experienced it.
If you’ve ever wanted to read an interesting book, read
“Ecclesiastical Megalomania”, but I’ll be quoting from encyclicals
and all these things. “According to Canon Law, the
control of all property of the Roman Church-State belongs to the
Pope, its supreme emperor” Everything I say will have a quote now;
everything is substantiated by either a papal encyclical or any
one of these. Now Communism took all property away and made it the
state’s property. Capitalism says, “The property belongs to the individual
and nobody has the right to take it away. Now if that is thesis and antithesis,
then something in-between is what we will want.
So the Pope condemned Communism but he also condemns Capitalism.
The New World Order will be something in between in the name of fairness.
So let us have a look at these issues. The economic thought of the
Roman Catholic Church. Private Property,
“…Thomas Aquinas, wrote no treatise on economics, but his thinking,
based on that of Aristotle, is foundational for understanding the
economic thought of the Roman Catholic Church.”
Every time there is a quote. Now what did Thomas Aquinas say?
“Roman Catholic economic thought, as developed by the popes in their
encyclicals and by Roman Church-State councils,
has been a contributor to… feudalism and guild socialism
in Europe during the Middle Ages; fascism in Italy, Spain, Portugal
Nazism in Germany in the twentieth century;
interventionism and the redistributive state in the West,
including the United States in the twentieth century; and
liberation theology in Latin America and Africa in the
twentieth century.” What does this mean? Thomas Aquinas said,
“… the possession of all things in common is natural law.
Thomas wrote: “…’the possession of all things in common and universal
freedom’ are said to be of the natural law because, to wit,
the distinction of possessions and slavery were not brought in by nature,
but devised by human reason for the benefit of human life”
Now what does all that mean? It simply means, property is
for common good. You may own it, but it is for common goods.
“The community of goods,” wrote Thomas, “is ascribed to the natural law,
not that the natural law dictates that all things should be possessed
in common and that nothing should be possessed as one’s own.”
So you may possess things, yes “but because the division
of possessions is not according to the natural law, but rather arose
from human agreement, which belongs to positive law…”
they talk such drivel, it’s interesting, never mind,
“… Hence the ownership of possessions is not contrary to
the natural law, but an addition thereto devised by human reason”
Let’s continue, Thomas wrote: “…Hence, whatever certain people
have in superabundance is due, by natural law, to the purpose of
succouring the poor” Ok, now we’re getting there, you
may possess things, whatever you possess, but whatever you possess
more than you need is there for the common good of those that don’t have.
Does that make sense? Now what if you create two classes
of individuals, the rich and the poor; or what if there is a
situation where you have two classes, the rich and the poor.
You can go across the world and you can look at the rich nations
and the poor nations, and you will find that the rich nations are all
the Protestant nations, have you noticed that? All the Protestant
nations are the rich. Now what if you had it planned to disinherit them all,
so that you would again be ruler and they would have to come
and beg at your feet for anything like that. Now let’s have a look at how this unfolds,
for “… the purpose of succouring the poor.”
“Because the goods of some are due to others by natural
law, there is no sin if the poor take the goods of their neighbours.
Thomas wrote: ‘In cases of need, all things are common property, so
that there would seem to be no sin in taking another’s property, for
the need has made it common.’”
Ok, now there’s the aspect of sharing. If I see my neighbour in
trouble, as a good Christian I will help him out, right?
Yes, but now we’re looking at law. So if my neighbour has need, and who
determines the need? He. He determines the need,
“I have need, I have need, I have need of a television, and I don’t
have one and you have one; and you have money and you can go
and buy yourself another one, I have need of your television,”
can he then take it without being a sinner, yes or no?
According to this yes. What if you have a car and he doesn’t have one?
He can take it without sin according to Thomas Aquinas.
Now this was a long time ago, surely this doesn’t apply today.
Well we’ll see. “Not only is such taking of another’s property not a
sin, it is not even a crime, according to Thomas: ‘…it is lawful
for a man to succour his own need by means of another’s property by
taking it either openly or secretly; nor is this, properly speaking,
theft and robbery… It is not theft, properly speaking, to take secretly
and use another’s property in a case of extreme need;
because that which he takes for the support of his life becomes his
own property by reason of that need… In a case of a like need a
man may also take secretly another’s property in order to
succour his neighbour in need.”
Oh, this gets very interesting. Now did you know that if I leave
my property unattended in South Africa, and somebody moves in,
I cannot throw him out; he’s in because he has need. That’s the law.
And do you think that is a South African law? No, that is British
law as well. That is a law virtually all over the country now,
but it’s not being implemented because the situation is not such
yet that it has to be implemented everywhere. Once you start opening
the borders, and millions of poor people start coming in, well then
there will be great need. What did they do with need
overseas? So, in South Africa, people go on holiday, they come
back, their house is occupied. And they can’t throw the people
Out. Because their property is in their name they have to pay the
bills, they have to pay the rents, they have to pay all those things,
but need made it common therefore that man can move in.
Is that the situation? Yes it is. It gets worse.
“The Roman Catholic doctrine of private property is echoed in the
nineteenth century Communist slogan, ‘From each according to his ability;
to each according to his need.’” Can you see the Roman
Catholic doctrine there? “‘Human rights are more important
than property rights.’ It was the creed of Lyndon Johnson’s Great
Society: ‘We shall take from the haves and give to the have-nots,
who need it so much.’” Lyndon Johnson said that. What
continent is that? “It appears in the literature of fascism, Nazism,
liberation theology, interventionism, and socialism.’”
“The Universal Destination of Goods”: this is John Paul II’s expression
of it in his 1987 encyclical “On Social Concern”:
“It is necessary to state once more the characteristic principle of
Christian social doctrine: the goods of this world are originally
meant for all. The right of private property is valid and necessary,
but it does not nullify the value of this principle.
Private property, in fact, is under a “social mortgage,”
which means that it has an intrinsically social function,
based upon and justified precisely by the principle of the universal
destination of goods.” Oops, what did John Paul II just say?
He said that which Thomas said is what I say. You may have private
property, the Roman Catholic Church is for private property.
That sounds very nice, but it’s never qualified that that property
is only yours for common good. So one day you wake up and in your
garden you have squatters. And you call the police and you say,
“hey” or you go out and say “get off my property,”
and they say, “let me alone or I’ll blow your head off.”
Hey, you go to the cops and you say, “cops come help here, there
are people squatting on my land.” “Sorry, they have need;
you have too much land anyway, live with it.” OK. Pope Paul VI made
the point quite clear in his 1967 encyclical On the Progress of
Peoples: “‘…Each man has therefore the right to find in the world what
is necessary for himself.” This is interesting.
“The recent Council [Vatican II] reminded us of this:
“God intended the earth and all that it contains for the use of
every human being and people. Thus, as all men follow justice
and unite in charity, created goods – created goods - should abound for
them on a reasonable basis. All other rights whatsoever,
including those of property and of free commerce, are to be
subordinate to this principle”
That means if I have need of a
manufactured good, can I take it? So now I’m driving my car – and we
have a hijacking just about every twelve minutes – and a gun comes in
and says “get out of the car” and I relinquish my car, and if I
don’t, what happens to me? I get shot. The man has need of my
car, it’s gone; finished. In my own church at home, we’ve
had hijackings after hijackings. Even the pastor, they beat him up
and tried to put him into the trunk of the car. They would have killed him.
He managed to fight himself free and off he went without his car.
Do you think there’s any big action to find these things?
No occasionally here and occasionally there. Do you think
there’s any big action when the farmers are killed and they move
onto the lands? No, a little bit here and a little bit there just to
keep people happy, but basically nothing is done.
And the police’s hands are cut off, and the law says that, there’s
nothing you can do. The other day, two cyclists were traveling along
when they were hijacked by five gunmen demanding their bikes.
So they took out, they were armed because they expect this – it’s
becoming like the wild west, and they defended themselves, injured
one, and got away. And guess what? The two cyclists are in jail, yes,
serving a sentence for injuring someone without need.
They could have given them the bicycles, that could have solved the problem.
You see how the law has turned upside down?
Gandium et Spes, the Vatican II Constitution that John Paul II
quoted, explained at greater length: “… If one is in extreme
necessity he has the right to procure for himself what he needs
out of the riches of others.” Now who defines necessity?
“Since there are so many people prostrate with hunger in the world,
this Sacred Council urges all, both individual and governments, to
remember the aphorism of the Fathers, “Feed the man dying of hunger,
because if you have not fed him, you have killed him”
“Therefore, because private property is immoral, all men –
individuals and governments – have the moral obligation to
redistribute goods held unjustly by property owners.”
Have you heard of redistribution of goods lately?
Have you heard of it many times lately? Yes, there is going to be a
redistribution. “… ‘all goods’ includes not just the goods found
in nature but manufactured goods as well. John Paul II declared that
all men must have ‘…access to those goods which are” quote “intended for common use:
both the goods of nature and manufactured goods.’”
I own nothing, only on paper do I own anything.
The state rules supreme, my life soon could be a misery.
So if you are attached to your homes here in Canada –
and this is the basis for the New World Order –
if you are attached to your cars and your televisions and all these
things, loosen yourself. Because soon they will be
redistributed, and there will be nothing that the white, or black,
or pink, Protestant can do about it. And if some other suffers in the
way, that is fair enough, the end justifies the means.
The redistribution will go as it should be. “Rerum Novarum”
who’s heard of Rerum Novarum? This is the papal encyclical that
was issued that is being quoted to this day, Pope John’s, and to this
day all of them make reference to this, including Pope John Paul II,
says this is the encyclical that forms the basis of the New World
Order. Well I thought it’s important to study it.
“One of the Roman church-State’s most influential statements on
economic matters is the encyclical Rerum Novarum, “On the
Condition of the Working Classes”. “...the Roman
Church-State allied herself with the proletariat, which in Marxism
is the great and final enemy of the capitalist order”
“…Pius, writing, declared that ‘Rerum Novarum,
however, stood out in this, that it laid down for all mankind unerring
rules for the right solution of the difficult problem of human
solidarity, called the Social Question…’”
Now let’s see. “By far the most notable evidence of this social teaching and action,
which the Church has set forth through the centuries, undoubtedly is the
Encyclical Rerum Novarum, issued seventy years ago…
The norms and recommendations contained therein were so momentous
that their memory will never fall into oblivion”
John XXIII, Mater et Magistra The papacy speaking.
“Pope Pius told us that the encyclical Rerum Novarum was
instrumental in ending laissez- faire capitalism in the twentieth
century by ushering in the era of ‘effective interference by the
government’” Have you got this? Let’s see how it ends up.
“Rerum Novarum…was the voice of moral authority needed to ensure
the development of effective interference by all governments in
the twentieth century.” How many governments?
All. “Pius XI wrote: ‘It is not surprising, therefore, that under
the teaching and guidance of the Church, many learned priests and
laymen earnestly devoted themselves to the problem of elaborating
social and economic science in accordance with the conditions of
our age… …Under the guidance and in light of Leo’s Encyclical [Rerum
Novarum] was thus evolved a truly Christian social science,
which continues to be fostered and enriched daily by the tireless labors”
all these peoples “labors” now note carefully, of
“those picked men whom we have named the auxiliaries of the Church…”
So everybody working in the secret societies, the Opus Dei,
the this, the Knights of Malta, the Knights of Columbus, all of these
people working “those picked men to bring this about.”
“Nor were these the only blessings which followed from the Encyclical.
The doctrine of Rerum Novarum began little by little to penetrate
among those who, being outside Catholic unity, do not recognize
the authority of the Church; and these Catholic principles of
sociology gradually became part of the intellectual heritage of the
whole human race…” Where are we going? I’d like to know.
“… thus too, we rejoice that the Catholic truths proclaimed so
vigorously by our illustrious Predecessor [Leo XIII], are
advanced and advocated not merely in non-Catholic books and journals,
but frequently also in legislative assembles and in courts of justice”
“… ‘those picked men
whom we have named the auxiliaries of the Church’ who have been
instrumental” this is John Robbins writing, who are they?
“Under fascism, property owners may keep their property titles and
deeds, but the use of their property is, as Leo XIII wrote,
‘common’. Fascism is a form of socialism that retains the forms
and trappings of capitalism, but not its substance.”
This is basically what it boils down to. “When we speak of the
reform of institutions, the State comes chiefly to mind, not as if
universal well being were to be expected from its activity.”
So now what is this state going to do in all of this?
“The experiment with economic freedom, Pius XI wrote, must end,
and economic life must again be subjected to planning and
government.” Who wants to control your economic life? Government.
John Paul II wrote in his Sollicitudo Rei Socialis,
“On Social Concern” , “It is necessary to state once more the
characteristic principle of Christian social doctrine: the
goods of this world are meant for all. Private property is under
‘social mortgage’.” These are the things which will be controlled.
He wrote, “a faithful echo of the centuries old tradition of the
Church regarding the ‘universal purpose of goods’…”
In today’s world, wrote the pope, “We are… faced with a serious
problem of unequal distribution of the means of subsistence originally
meant for everybody.’” Then came liberation theology,
and Pius wrote an encyclical “On Atheistic Communism” and an age like ours,
when unusual misery has resulted.” Who created the misery?
They created it so that they can create the solution which they want.
So, in Africa they elevate a few and suppress the masses.
Then they turn it round and they create the situation that they want.
They create communism, they create the chaos, out of the chaos
they create the social order which they want. So the second reign of
terror was supported by the papacy. “Father Camilo Tores, who was shot
in 1966, declared, ‘The Catholic who is not a revolutionary is
living in Mortal sin’.” Pope John Paul II wrote in 1968,
“The Church does not hesitate to defend fearlessly the just and
noble cause of human rights and to support courageous reforms, leading
to a better distribution of goods, including earthly goods such as
education, health services, housing, and so forth…”
Now we come to human rights, what did we read about in the French
Revolution? What’s going to be the standard of the world?
Human rights. You have a right to property, you have a right to
anything that you have need of. “… We are convinced that the
theology of liberation is not only timely but useful and necessary.”
That’s what the Pope says, not me, this is his words directly.
John Paul II, Letter to Brazilian Bishops, “It should constitute a
new stage of the theological reflection initiated with the
apostolic tradition” and then he refers to “Rerum Novarum.”
Franklin Roosevelt, when he was elected, he made Professor Ryan
part of his administration. Now who was he?
Ryan wrote in 1931: “The workers have a claim upon
industry for all the means of living, from the time they begin to
work until they die. When industry does not do it directly… then it is
the business of government to enforce it upon industry”
O’Brien, Public Catholicism, 171. See how it starts?
Right, now let’s look at some of the human rights.
You have a right to freely founding unions for working people.
You have a right to culture A right to emigrate
A right to immigrate A right to food
A right to clothing, a right to rest A right to medical care
A right to a just wage A right to life
A right to a safe environment A right to personal
security of workers A right to family life
A right to private property (highly qualified of course)
A right to common use of all goods (it’s just thereafter, so that means nothing)
A right to work A right to a pension
A right to insurance for old age A right of association
A right to security A right to bodily integrity
A right to necessary social services A right to strike
A right to choose a state of life freely A right to found a family
A right to education … employment
… good reputation … respect
… appropriate information A right for
the upright norm blah blah blah … protection of privacy
Right to rightful freedom … professional training
… quality education Right to adequate health care.
Ah, it’s laborious. How do you control that? How do you control it? If you are going to
control every aspect of that, then you must control every aspect of a
person’s life, you will not be able to go to the toilet in future
without making a triple application to the Vatican.
They’re going to control every single aspect of your lives, that’s
what they’re going to control. And government is going to become
super huge. Now where’s the money going to come from?
From you.
Now when the money comes from you, what then happens to your wealth?
It gets less and less and less and Less. That means the middle class
will disappear. How many classes under Catholicism in the middle ages?
Two, there was a feudal class, the goyem, and there was the upper
class who controlled everything. Now, if we take employment--
in my country unemployment was running at almost 50%,
in Germany it was running at point something percent, and then
it went up to 2, 3, 5, 10, 20%; now, unemployment is rife in
Europe, why? Because all the east block countries are now being
incorporated into Europe and there must be redistribution of wealth.
And so, it’s coming down down, down, down, down.
The recent surveys don’t ask where you live, they say
“how many rooms have you got, how many people live there, how many
this, how many that?” When did they do that and in what country?
In Communism, and what happened if your house was bigger than your need?
The one who had the need got it, but who has to pay for it?
You, because you own it. It’s even worse now than in
Communism right? So they came to our country, now you have to
register in each individual location. And you may not vote
outside your location so that they have your location attached to your name.
And then they came to my house and they said they want to
know what is my religion. I said, “I’m a Christian.” They said,
“which denomination are you?” I said, “it’s none of your business.”
They said, “It is my business. Which denomination are you?”
I said, “it’s none of your business.”
“How many rooms have you got?” I said “enough.”
“We want to know exactly how many rooms you have.”
I said “I have enough.” “Well we want to know exactly.”
“It’s got nothing to do with you, why do you want to know exactly,
I could have another one next week, or I could put a wall in,
I could have two right? So it’s none of your business.”
You get into big trouble if you answer questions like that.
You’re not supposed to do that. “Therefore, there must be made
available to all men everything necessary for leading a life truly human.”
Did you know that living life truly human is the Catholic
acronym for salvation? And I will prove this to you in a
future lecture where they say, “to be saved means to live a life
truly human.” That means the kingdom of God, for Catholicism, is
the kingdom of Catholicism ruling the world on this earth and giving
everyone the capacity to live a life truly human.
That means enough to take care of your basic needs and nothing else.
Do you like the New World order? Do you like it?
Do you know what? The Bible calls him the man of sin.
Now there’s another word for the redistribution of wealth and I’ve
given it to you already, what is it? It’s called theft.
That’s right. The Bible says, “thou shalt not steal.”
That means thou shalt not take from one who has and give it to
someone else. That’s called theft, that’s breaking the commandments of
God. Is that correct? Yes, we will see that this system of Human
Rights breaks every single commandment of God as we go along.
When God distributed land to Israel, how was it distributed?
As an eternal inheritance, it was your land. Ahab wanted Naboth’s
vineyard, and Naboth said to him, “I will not sin against the Lord my
God because this land has been given to me as an eternal
inheritance, and to my children. God gives each one a piece that is his.
They take it and distribute it according to need, but you pay the bill, fascinating.
“The complex circumstance of our day make it
necessary for public authority to intervene more often in social,
economic and cultural matters…” The Second Vatican Council, that’s
what it said. So they’re going to intervene at every level of your life.
“Lob von Gorbatschow fuer den Papst” Gorbachev praises the Pope,
and he says, “the Pope is right in his demand for a New World Order.”
In 1991 the San Francisco Chronicle already said,
“Pope calls for a New World Order. Albert Einstein says:
“Mankind’s desire for peace can be realized only by the creation of a
world government…with all my heart I believe that the world’s present
system of sovereign nations can only lead to barbarism, war, and
inhumanity, and that only law can assure progress toward a civilized
peaceful humanity”
Interesting statement Albert Einstein. What did a – or he also
states – he says, “There is no salvation for civilization, or even
the human race, other than the creation of a world government.”
That was Albert Einstein. What did U. Thant, Former Secretary
General of the United Nations say? He said, “World federalists hold
before us the vision of a unified mankind living peace under a just
world order… The heart of their program – a world under law – is
realistic and attainable.” What did Mortimer Adler say?
“World peace is impossible without world government.”
Winston Churchill, these are big names, I’m not talking about small fry.
“The creation of an authoritative world order is the
ultimate aim toward which we must strive.” Charles De Gaulle:
“Nations must unite in a world government or perish.”
How do you do that? How about creating so much conflict that
everybody will be willing to give up their sovereignty.
Do you know what? In South Africa I give these lectures to the public.
The people are in despair. They are being robbed, driven off their land;
they are being murdered, our houses look like prisons. We cannot
go to sleep without locking everything. In my very own little
block, we’ve had murder after murder after murder, and robberies,
aggravating robberies, and nothing seems to happen.
Police don’t even care, they don’t even come out, because there is so
much turmoil all over the place that it cannot – they cannot even
cope with it. So who cares about your little problem that you’ve
just lost everything. Take it to the insurance and see if you can
get it back. Irrespective of the pain. They come in, they move in,
they take all your private papers, they burn them.
You have no record of your life, everything’s gone, they sell the
furniture they don’t want and the rest they keep for themselves and say
“get lost. It’s now time for redistribution.
You had land before, now it’s my land, that’s how it goes.”
This is the New World Order, welcome to the New World Order.
Bertrand Russell: “… the only possibilities are now world
government or death.” The Humanist Manifesto II urges us
“to move toward the building of a word community…”
Robert Muller, former Assistant Secretary General of the United
Nations, said: “We must move as quickly as possible to a one-world
government; a one-world religion; under a one-world leader.”
I wonder who that is going to be. These are big big names that I’m
putting on the screen, these aren’t speculators here and there.
I’m often accused for speculating. Well the biggest speculators are
these people themselves. Now what about this man?
We saw how peace and unity was to come about.
Man: “It was great, a great feeling, it was a great feeling of excitement -”
“of peace, unity” “of love, peace love and unity,” “unity, unity, yes.”
Choir leader: “All nations will come, and worship before you oh Lord,
and worship before you oh Lord. Music Playing: “Let thy kingdom come...”
Men’s choir: “and all the world is gathering…”
Choir: "And all the world in every corner..”
Veith: Pope calls for a New World Order, CNN, Thursday,
January 1, 2004. He made his whole New Year’s speech revolve around
the New World Order. I want to tell you today that the New World Order
is intended not just to unite the nations which God had separated,
that’s one aspect. But to eradicate Protestantism off the face of the earth.
And particularly that form of Protestantism which refuses to
bow to the Papal Caesar, that form of Protestantism will have to go;
and we will see that under the circumstances that will be created,
these conditions are all in place right now. It is all there, and I
will put it on the screen for you, so don’t miss the next lectures.
Now we’re getting into hot Territory. I’ll put the quotes on
the screen where they will tell you who the problem children are going to be.
And don’t think it’s Islam, it’s someone else. Don’t miss the
next exciting episodes. But before I go I would like to
remind you that Jesus said that this was going to happen.
And if I know, and if I understand with my whole mind and with my
whole heart, that Satan – because the dragon gave him his power and
great authority – is setting up his kingdom here upon this earth.
Then instead of becoming disillusioned, frightened,
hysterical; I know that the time must be very short, isn’t that right?
And I know that the Lord must be coming very soon.
So as far as I’m concerned, I have distanced myself from my property.
If I literally had to come home next week and found my wife
somewhere in another little room, and my house occupied by whomever,
then I will say, “tough cheese, it’s going to blow up anyway, who
Cares. It’s going to be destroyed when the Lord comes by the
brightness of his coming, why not take it now, have fun while you
can, and I’ll move on somewhere else. I don’t mind building a tree
house for a little while; that should be ok.
If they take my cars, well that’s ok too, we’ll get another one and
if we can’t afford another one we’ll we’ll walk, who cares?
I really don’t care anymore. But people who are losing things
become desperate, and what do they do? They commit suicide. By the thousands,
people are committing suicide. If they understand this
message, and they understand where we are going, would they then
commit suicide? No, they gather hope. They say,
“wow, so we’re part of a big exciting end game,”
and this is exactly what is happening, people are getting hope.
And they’re giving their lives to the Lord Jesus Christ, and they are
saying, “Lord save me, not only from my sin, but save me from this
World. I am longing for your kingdom.” Do you know what the
government policy is in the kingdom of God? I’ve already told you.
Everyone in the kingdom of God gets a dwelling place in the city built by whom?
By God, and it has your name on it, did you know that?
You have a city dwelling. In the New World what happens?
God says, “No longer will they build houses and others live in them.”
So what are you going to do? “They will build houses,”
says the Bible, “and they will plant vineyards.” And,
“no longer will you plant vineyards and others eat of them,”
what does that mean? That means you will have a country dwelling
where you will have a farm, which God will bless, and who does it
belong to? To you, for how long? For ever. For ever and ever and
ever and ever. That’s God’s policy. So who cares about what they’re
going to do? Who cares? And eye has not seen nor ear has
heard the wonders that God has prepared for them that love Him.
That does not just include the glory of seeing our King in heaven,
it includes everything that goes into making life pleasant.
And the new kingdom is worthy of waiting for, really, I look forward
to the new kingdom of God. It’ll be a great place, and we
will unfortunately see this world go from bad to worse.
And I don’t want to lie to you and say it’s going to get better.
I’m going to tell you it’s going to get worse, very much worse.
What happened in the French Revolution is the forerunner of
what will happen in the entire world. There will be anarchy like
you cannot believe, but if you are under the protection of the Most
High, nothing will happen to you. So why not accept Him, why not say
“Lord Jesus I want you to be my personal Saviour.” Why not say
“Lord, clean up my life, let’s walk together, because your government
is the only one worth having.” And imagine looking in His face
and saying, “wow, this is my God, I’ve waited for Him, He will save me.