WEBVTT

00:00:01.365 --> 00:00:04.230
A briefcase full of poop changed my life.

00:00:04.810 --> 00:00:06.690
Ten years ago, I was a graduate student

00:00:06.714 --> 00:00:09.388
and I was helping judge
a genetic engineering competition

00:00:09.412 --> 00:00:10.633
for undergrads.

00:00:10.657 --> 00:00:14.598
There, I met a British artist and designer
named Alexandra Daisy Ginsberg.

00:00:14.622 --> 00:00:17.003
She was wearing the white
embroidered polo shirt

00:00:17.027 --> 00:00:18.756
of the University of Cambridge team

00:00:18.780 --> 00:00:20.360
and holding a silver briefcase,

00:00:20.384 --> 00:00:23.668
like the kind that you would imagine
is handcuffed to your wrist.

00:00:23.692 --> 00:00:25.476
She gestured over from a quiet corner

00:00:25.500 --> 00:00:27.500
and asked me if I wanted to see something.

00:00:27.803 --> 00:00:30.033
With a sneaky look,
she opened up the suitcase,

00:00:30.057 --> 00:00:35.172
and inside were six glorious,
multicolored turds.

NOTE Paragraph

00:00:35.609 --> 00:00:37.283
The Cambridge team, she explained,

00:00:37.307 --> 00:00:40.220
had spent their summer
engineering the bacteria E. coli

00:00:40.244 --> 00:00:43.006
to be able to sense different things
in the environment

00:00:43.030 --> 00:00:45.974
and produce a rainbow
of different colors in response.

00:00:45.998 --> 00:00:47.727
Arsenic in your drinking water?

00:00:47.751 --> 00:00:49.320
This strain would turn green.

00:00:49.344 --> 00:00:51.725
She and her collaborator,
the designer James King,

00:00:51.749 --> 00:00:55.042
worked with the students and imagined
the different possible scenarios

00:00:55.066 --> 00:00:56.828
of how you might use these bacteria.

00:00:56.852 --> 00:00:58.880
What if, they asked, you could use them

00:00:58.904 --> 00:01:03.190
as a living probiotic drink
and health monitor, all in one?

00:01:03.785 --> 00:01:06.553
You could drink the bacteria
and it would live in your gut,

00:01:06.577 --> 00:01:07.868
sensing what's going on,

00:01:07.892 --> 00:01:09.520
and then in response to something,

00:01:09.544 --> 00:01:11.812
it would be able to produce
a colored output.

00:01:11.836 --> 00:01:13.003
Holy shit!

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:13.027 --> 00:01:14.606
The Cambridge team went on to win

00:01:14.630 --> 00:01:17.503
the International Genetically Engineered
Machine competition,

00:01:17.527 --> 00:01:18.887
or iGEM for short.

00:01:18.911 --> 00:01:22.220
And as for me, those turds
were a turning point.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:22.744 --> 00:01:24.315
I am a synthetic biologist,

00:01:24.339 --> 00:01:27.617
which is probably a weird term
that most people aren't familiar with.

00:01:27.641 --> 00:01:29.696
It definitely sounds like an oxymoron.

00:01:29.720 --> 00:01:32.010
How can biology, something natural,

00:01:32.034 --> 00:01:33.201
be synthetic?

00:01:33.225 --> 00:01:36.280
How can something artificial be alive?

00:01:36.788 --> 00:01:38.703
Synthetic biologists sort of poke holes

00:01:38.727 --> 00:01:43.006
in that boundary that we draw between
what is natural and what's technological.

00:01:43.030 --> 00:01:45.680
And every year, iGEM students
from all over the world

00:01:45.704 --> 00:01:46.918
spend their summer

00:01:46.942 --> 00:01:50.010
trying to engineer biology
to be technology.

00:01:50.034 --> 00:01:52.749
They teach bacteria how to play sudoku,

00:01:52.773 --> 00:01:55.641
they make multicolored spider silk,

00:01:55.665 --> 00:01:57.815
they make self-healing concrete

00:01:57.839 --> 00:02:01.141
and tissue printers
and plastic-eating bacteria.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:01.165 --> 00:02:02.561
Up until that moment, though,

00:02:02.585 --> 00:02:05.800
I was a little bit more concerned
with a different kind of oxymoron.

00:02:06.180 --> 00:02:08.236
Just plain old genetic engineering.

00:02:08.260 --> 00:02:10.348
The comedian Simon Munnery once wrote

00:02:10.372 --> 00:02:15.264
that genetic engineering is actually
insulting to proper engineering.

00:02:15.288 --> 00:02:19.153
Genetic engineering is more like throwing
a bunch of concrete and steel in a river

00:02:19.177 --> 00:02:21.967
and if somebody can walk across,
you call it a bridge.

00:02:22.411 --> 00:02:25.196
And so synthetic biologists
were pretty worried about this,

00:02:25.220 --> 00:02:28.910
and worried that genetic engineering
was a little bit more art that science.

00:02:29.369 --> 00:02:33.472
They wanted to turn genetic engineering
into a real engineering discipline,

00:02:33.496 --> 00:02:37.401
where we could program cells and write DNA

00:02:37.425 --> 00:02:41.093
the way that engineers write
software for computers.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:41.117 --> 00:02:45.641
That day 10 years ago started me on a path
that gets me to where I am now.

00:02:45.665 --> 00:02:47.283
Today, I'm the creative director

00:02:47.307 --> 00:02:50.131
at a synthetic biology company
called Ginkgo Bioworks.

00:02:50.433 --> 00:02:52.154
"Creative director" is a weird title

00:02:52.178 --> 00:02:54.734
for a biotech company
were people try to program life

00:02:54.758 --> 00:02:56.758
the way that we program computers.

00:02:57.165 --> 00:02:59.220
But that day when I met Daisy,

00:02:59.244 --> 00:03:01.085
I learned something about engineering.

00:03:01.109 --> 00:03:03.949
I learned that engineering
isn't really just about equations

00:03:03.973 --> 00:03:05.750
and steel and circuits,

00:03:05.774 --> 00:03:07.790
it's actually about people.

00:03:07.814 --> 00:03:10.329
It's something that people do,
and it impacts us.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:10.353 --> 00:03:11.561
So in my work,

00:03:11.585 --> 00:03:15.233
I try to open up new spaces
for different kinds of engineering.

00:03:15.633 --> 00:03:17.966
How can we ask better questions,

00:03:17.990 --> 00:03:19.721
and can we have better conversations

00:03:19.745 --> 00:03:22.188
about what we want
from the future of technology?

00:03:22.212 --> 00:03:24.783
How can we understand the technological

00:03:24.807 --> 00:03:27.664
but also social and political
and economic reasons

00:03:27.688 --> 00:03:30.458
that GMOs are so polarizing
in our society?

00:03:30.482 --> 00:03:32.482
Can we make GMOs that people love?

00:03:33.315 --> 00:03:38.939
Can we use biology to make technology
that's more expansive and regenerative?

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:38.963 --> 00:03:42.733
I think it starts by recognizing
that we, as synthetic biologists,

00:03:42.757 --> 00:03:46.680
are also shaped by a culture
that values "real engineering"

00:03:46.704 --> 00:03:48.704
more than any of the squishy stuff.

00:03:49.561 --> 00:03:53.590
We get so caught up in circuits
and what happens inside of computers,

00:03:53.614 --> 00:03:57.256
that we sometimes lose sight of the magic
that's happening inside of us.

00:03:57.280 --> 00:03:59.918
There is plenty of shitty
technology out there,

00:03:59.942 --> 00:04:04.410
but this was the first time
that I imagined poop as technology.

00:04:04.434 --> 00:04:07.966
I began to see that synthetic
biology was awesome,

00:04:07.990 --> 00:04:10.752
not because we could turn
cells into computers,

00:04:10.776 --> 00:04:13.585
but because we could bring
technology to life.

00:04:13.609 --> 00:04:15.498
This was technology that was visceral,

00:04:15.522 --> 00:04:18.672
an unforgettable vision
of what the future might hold.

00:04:18.696 --> 00:04:21.149
But importantly, it was also
framed as the question

00:04:21.173 --> 00:04:23.577
"Is this the kind of future
that we actually want?"

00:04:23.601 --> 00:04:26.077
We've been promised a future of chrome,

00:04:26.101 --> 00:04:28.982
but what if the future is fleshy?

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:29.006 --> 00:04:31.117
Science and science fiction

00:04:31.141 --> 00:04:33.728
help us remember
that we're made of star stuff.

00:04:33.752 --> 00:04:36.426
But can it also help us remember
the wonder and weirdness

00:04:36.450 --> 00:04:38.125
of being made of flesh?

00:04:38.149 --> 00:04:39.434
Biology is us,

00:04:39.458 --> 00:04:41.664
it's our bodies, it's what we eat.

00:04:41.688 --> 00:04:45.000
What happens when biology
becomes technology?

00:04:45.709 --> 00:04:47.788
These images are questions,

00:04:47.812 --> 00:04:51.470
and they challenge what we think of
as normal and desirable.

00:04:51.796 --> 00:04:54.723
And they also show us
that the future is full of choices

00:04:54.747 --> 00:04:56.747
and that we could choose differently.

00:04:57.279 --> 00:05:00.556
What's the future of the body, of beauty?

00:05:00.580 --> 00:05:04.133
If we change the body,
will we have new kinds of awareness?

00:05:04.506 --> 00:05:07.184
And will new kinds of awareness
of the microbial world

00:05:07.208 --> 00:05:09.106
change the way that we eat?

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:09.130 --> 00:05:12.643
The last chapter of my dissertation
was all about cheese that I made

00:05:12.667 --> 00:05:15.733
using bacteria that I swabbed
from in between my toes.

00:05:16.244 --> 00:05:18.434
I told you that the poop changed my life.

00:05:18.458 --> 00:05:21.220
I worked with the smell artist
and researcher Sissel Tolaas

00:05:21.244 --> 00:05:26.288
to explore all of the ways
that our bodies and cheese are connected

00:05:26.312 --> 00:05:29.058
through smell and therefore microbes.

00:05:29.082 --> 00:05:30.518
And we created this cheese

00:05:30.542 --> 00:05:33.474
to challenge how we think
about the bacteria

00:05:33.498 --> 00:05:34.958
that's part of our lives

00:05:34.982 --> 00:05:37.458
and the bacteria
that we work with in the lab.

00:05:37.482 --> 00:05:39.704
We are, indeed, what we eat.

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:39.728 --> 00:05:41.918
The intersection of biology and technology

00:05:41.942 --> 00:05:46.029
is more often told as a story
of transcending our fleshy realities.

00:05:46.053 --> 00:05:48.086
If you can upload
your brain to a computer,

00:05:48.110 --> 00:05:50.078
you don't need to poop anymore after all.

00:05:50.102 --> 00:05:53.177
And that's usually a story
that's told as a good thing, right?

00:05:53.201 --> 00:05:58.518
Because computers are clean,
and biology is messy.

00:05:58.542 --> 00:06:01.141
Computers make sense and are rational,

00:06:01.165 --> 00:06:04.500
and biology is an unpredictable tangle.

00:06:05.331 --> 00:06:06.721
It kind of follows from there

00:06:06.745 --> 00:06:09.950
that science and technology
are supposed to be rational,

00:06:09.974 --> 00:06:11.426
objective

00:06:11.450 --> 00:06:13.403
and pure,

00:06:13.427 --> 00:06:16.048
and it's humans that are a total mess.

NOTE Paragraph

00:06:16.407 --> 00:06:18.645
But like synthetic biologists poke holes

00:06:18.669 --> 00:06:21.701
in that line between nature
and technology,

00:06:21.725 --> 00:06:24.201
artists, designers and social scientists

00:06:24.225 --> 00:06:28.498
showed me that the lines that we draw
between nature, technology and society

00:06:28.522 --> 00:06:30.895
are a little bit softer
than we might think.

00:06:30.919 --> 00:06:34.399
They challenge us to reconsider
our visions for the future

00:06:34.423 --> 00:06:37.360
and our fantasies
about controlling nature.

00:06:37.384 --> 00:06:40.971
They show us how our prejudices,
our hopes and our values

00:06:40.995 --> 00:06:43.222
are embedded in science and technology

00:06:43.246 --> 00:06:46.229
through the questions that we ask
and the choices that we make.

00:06:46.253 --> 00:06:50.601
They make visible the ways
that science and technology are human

00:06:50.625 --> 00:06:52.260
and therefore political.

00:06:52.284 --> 00:06:54.768
What does it mean for us
to be able to control life

00:06:54.792 --> 00:06:56.339
for our own purposes?

NOTE Paragraph

00:06:56.363 --> 00:06:58.212
The artists Oron Catts and Ionat Zurr

00:06:58.236 --> 00:07:00.371
made a project
called "Victimless Leather,"

00:07:00.395 --> 00:07:03.283
where they engineered
a tiny leather jacket

00:07:03.307 --> 00:07:04.776
out of mouse cells.

00:07:04.800 --> 00:07:06.990
Is this jacket alive?

00:07:07.014 --> 00:07:10.291
What does it take to grow it
and keep it this way?

00:07:10.315 --> 00:07:11.910
Is it really victimless?

00:07:11.934 --> 00:07:14.545
And what does it mean
for something to be victimless?

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:15.022 --> 00:07:16.236
The choices that we make

00:07:16.260 --> 00:07:19.760
in what we show and what we hide
in our stories of progress,

00:07:19.784 --> 00:07:23.487
are often political choices
that have real consequences.

00:07:23.511 --> 00:07:27.764
How will genetic technologies
shape the way that we understand ourselves

00:07:27.788 --> 00:07:29.217
and define our bodies?

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:29.241 --> 00:07:31.839
The artist Heather Dewey-Hagborg
made these faces

00:07:31.863 --> 00:07:34.918
based on DNA sequences
she extracted from sidewalk litter,

00:07:34.942 --> 00:07:38.145
forcing us to ask questions
about genetic privacy,

00:07:38.169 --> 00:07:41.867
but also how and whether
DNA can really define us.

00:07:42.249 --> 00:07:45.387
How will we fight against
and cope with climate change?

00:07:45.411 --> 00:07:47.633
Will we change the way
that we make everything,

00:07:47.657 --> 00:07:51.760
using biological materials
that can grow and decay alongside us?

00:07:51.784 --> 00:07:54.077
Will we change our own bodies?

00:07:54.101 --> 00:07:55.942
Or nature itself?

00:07:55.966 --> 00:08:00.076
Or can we change the system
that keeps reinforcing those boundaries

00:08:00.100 --> 00:08:03.196
between science, society,
nature and technology?

00:08:03.220 --> 00:08:07.561
Relationships that today keep us
locked in these unsustainable patterns.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:07.585 --> 00:08:09.783
How we understand and respond to crises

00:08:09.807 --> 00:08:12.847
that are natural, technical
and social all at once,

00:08:12.871 --> 00:08:15.116
from coronavirus to climate change,

00:08:15.140 --> 00:08:16.847
is deeply political,

00:08:16.871 --> 00:08:19.577
and science never happens in a vacuum.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:20.165 --> 00:08:21.379
Let's go back in time

00:08:21.403 --> 00:08:23.932
to when the first European settlers
arrived in Hawaii.

00:08:24.488 --> 00:08:28.004
They eventually brought their cattle
and their scientists with them.

00:08:28.028 --> 00:08:30.203
The cattle roamed the hillsides,

00:08:30.227 --> 00:08:33.137
trampling and changing
the ecosystems as they went.

00:08:33.161 --> 00:08:36.629
The scientists catalogued the species
that they found there,

00:08:36.653 --> 00:08:39.685
often taking the last specimen
before they went extinct.

00:08:40.117 --> 00:08:42.331
This is the Maui hau kuahiwi,

00:08:42.355 --> 00:08:44.561
or the Hibiscadelphus wilderianus,

00:08:44.585 --> 00:08:46.967
so named by Gerrit Wilder in 1910.

00:08:47.276 --> 00:08:49.855
By 1912, it was extinct.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:49.879 --> 00:08:53.164
I found this specimen
in the Harvard University Herbarium,

00:08:53.188 --> 00:08:57.352
where it's housed with five million
other specimens from all over the world.

00:08:57.376 --> 00:09:00.114
I wanted to take a piece
of science's past,

00:09:00.138 --> 00:09:02.296
tied up as it was with colonialism,

00:09:02.320 --> 00:09:03.712
and all of the embedded ideas

00:09:03.736 --> 00:09:07.807
of the way that nature and science
and society should work together,

00:09:07.831 --> 00:09:10.664
and ask questions about science's future.

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:11.109 --> 00:09:13.014
Working with an awesome team at Ginkgo,

00:09:13.038 --> 00:09:14.982
and others at UC Santa Cruz,

00:09:15.006 --> 00:09:17.609
we were able to extract
a little bit of the DNA

00:09:17.633 --> 00:09:20.133
from a tiny sliver of this plant specimen

00:09:20.157 --> 00:09:22.268
and to sequence the DNA inside.

00:09:22.292 --> 00:09:25.439
And then resynthesize a possible version

00:09:25.463 --> 00:09:28.629
of the genes that made
the smell of the plant.

00:09:28.653 --> 00:09:31.026
By inserting those genes into yeast,

00:09:31.050 --> 00:09:33.563
we could produce little bits of that smell

00:09:33.587 --> 00:09:35.325
and be able to, maybe, smell

00:09:35.349 --> 00:09:37.658
a little bit of something
that's lost forever.

00:09:37.682 --> 00:09:39.705
Working again with Daisy
and Sissel Tolaas,

00:09:39.729 --> 00:09:42.218
my collaborator on the cheese project,

00:09:42.242 --> 00:09:46.276
we reconstructed and composed
a new smell of that flower,

00:09:46.300 --> 00:09:49.331
and created an installation
where people could experience it,

00:09:49.355 --> 00:09:52.751
to be part of this natural history
and synthetic future.

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:54.482 --> 00:09:56.530
Ten years ago, I was a synthetic biologist

00:09:56.554 --> 00:09:59.529
worried that genetic engineering
was more art than science

00:09:59.553 --> 00:10:01.220
and that people were too messy

00:10:01.244 --> 00:10:03.244
and biology was too complicated.

00:10:03.641 --> 00:10:06.601
Now I use genetic engineering as art

00:10:06.625 --> 00:10:09.645
to explore all the different ways
that we are entangled together

00:10:09.669 --> 00:10:11.899
and imagine different possible futures.

00:10:11.923 --> 00:10:13.622
A fleshy future

00:10:13.646 --> 00:10:16.942
is one that does recognize
all those interconnections

00:10:16.966 --> 00:10:19.624
and the human realities of technology.

00:10:19.927 --> 00:10:23.439
But it also recognizes
the incredible power of biology,

00:10:23.463 --> 00:10:25.408
its resilience and sustainability,

00:10:25.432 --> 00:10:28.431
its ability to heal and grow and adapt.

00:10:28.455 --> 00:10:30.418
Values that are so necessary

00:10:30.442 --> 00:10:33.037
for the visions of the futures
that we can have today.

00:10:33.061 --> 00:10:35.371
Technology will shape that future,

00:10:35.395 --> 00:10:37.395
but humans make technology.

00:10:37.696 --> 00:10:40.309
How we decide what that future will be

00:10:40.333 --> 00:10:41.746
is up to all of us.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:42.556 --> 00:10:43.738
Thank you.