WEBVTT

00:00:01.800 --> 00:00:04.800
Can old games have great animation?

00:00:05.400 --> 00:00:06.000
Yes!

00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:06.920
Yes, they can.

00:00:06.920 --> 00:00:09.380
But just for fun, let’s do a quick episode
about it anyway.

00:00:09.380 --> 00:00:10.389
Hi, I’m Dan.

00:00:10.389 --> 00:00:12.160
Welcome to New Frame Plus.

00:00:12.160 --> 00:00:15.760
When I made a video critiquing
Skyrim’s mining animation last year,

00:00:15.760 --> 00:00:20.060
there was one particular category of reaction in
the comments which caught my attention.

00:00:20.060 --> 00:00:24.520
The specific phrasing varied, but the 
general gist of these responses was:

00:00:29.020 --> 00:00:32.320
Now, on the one hand,
there IS some truth to this statement:

00:00:32.320 --> 00:00:36.120
you DO have to consider a game’s context
when critiquing its animation.

00:00:36.120 --> 00:00:38.980
You have to factor in the hardware limitations
of the era,

00:00:38.980 --> 00:00:42.860
as well as the game’s budget,
intended scope and genre.

00:00:42.860 --> 00:00:46.600
Like, it would be ABSURD of me
to criticize Super Mario Brothers

00:00:46.600 --> 00:00:49.260
for not looking like a 2019 AAA game.

00:00:49.260 --> 00:00:51.540
Or even a 2019 indie game!

00:00:51.540 --> 00:00:56.020
All that context I mentioned should be 
factored into any game animation analysis.

00:00:57.080 --> 00:01:01.120
dismissing criticism of Skyrim’s
mining animation due to the game’s age

00:01:01.120 --> 00:01:05.280
(or even the age of its engine) is still
a bit silly, and for a few reasons.

00:01:05.300 --> 00:01:07.880
1). 2011 wasn’t THAT long ago.

00:01:07.880 --> 00:01:12.420
2). Even if it was, you can learn a lot by
analyzing animations in older games.

00:01:12.420 --> 00:01:13.560
And most importantly,

00:01:13.560 --> 00:01:18.360
3). there are plenty of even older
games with GREAT animation in them!

00:01:18.360 --> 00:01:21.180
And I don’t expect most of you need convincing of that

00:01:21.180 --> 00:01:23.470
(if anything, I’m probably preaching to the choir)

00:01:23.470 --> 00:01:25.760
but just to prove the point and have a little fun,

00:01:25.760 --> 00:01:28.940
let’s just count backward
from the year of Skyrim’s release

00:01:28.940 --> 00:01:32.280
and list off some older games
with great animation in them.

00:01:33.680 --> 00:01:38.700
2011 -- you’ve got Uncharted 3, with some
absolutely top tier performance capture work.

00:01:39.060 --> 00:01:40.800
Look at the level of polish here!

00:01:40.800 --> 00:01:42.320
Still amazing.

00:01:44.060 --> 00:01:45.960
2010 -- you’ve got Kirby’s Epic Yarn.

00:01:45.960 --> 00:01:49.460
I don’t even 100% understand
how this animation was constructed,

00:01:49.460 --> 00:01:53.360
but the style COMPLETELY works
and looks like nothing else out there.

00:01:53.360 --> 00:01:54.400
Beautiful.

00:01:54.760 --> 00:01:56.610
2009 -- you've got Punch-Out!!

00:01:56.610 --> 00:01:59.980
Man, I made a whole video on why
that game’s animation is amazing.

00:01:59.980 --> 00:02:01.900
That game's almost 10 years old now!

00:02:01.900 --> 00:02:04.300
Looks JUST as good as the day it launched.

00:02:05.600 --> 00:02:07.360
2008 -- Prince of Persia,

00:02:07.360 --> 00:02:09.320
bringing a new level of style and polish to

00:02:09.320 --> 00:02:14.160
the climbing and traversal animation systems
Ubisoft Montreal was becoming known for.

00:02:14.920 --> 00:02:16.220
Look at that wall run!

00:02:16.460 --> 00:02:17.840
That looks nice!

00:02:18.980 --> 00:02:22.760
2007 -- Heavenly Sword comes out
with some lovely combat animation

00:02:22.760 --> 00:02:27.940
and raises the bar on motion capture performance
with some wonderfully over-the-top character acting.

00:02:27.940 --> 00:02:29.160
[Screams.]

00:02:29.160 --> 00:02:31.040
[Also screams.]

00:02:31.040 --> 00:02:32.340
"Kill her."

00:02:32.960 --> 00:02:35.280
2006 -- You got Final Fantasy XII

00:02:35.280 --> 00:02:40.280
bringing a level of character performance and cinematography that series had never seen before.

00:02:43.340 --> 00:02:45.920
2005 -- Shadow of the Colossus!

00:02:45.920 --> 00:02:50.460
That game was a huge achievement, both on
a technical level and an aesthetic one.

00:02:50.460 --> 00:02:55.740
Like, not only does the animation of all the colossi
convey this massive sense of majestic scale,

00:02:55.740 --> 00:02:59.540
but this is still some of the best-looking
horse riding animation in video games.

00:03:00.000 --> 00:03:02.680
2004 -- you got the original Monster Hunter.

00:03:02.680 --> 00:03:06.720
The creature and combat animations in
the Monster Hunter series are fantastic,

00:03:06.720 --> 00:03:08.720
and they've ALWAYS been good.

00:03:08.720 --> 00:03:12.140
Like, yeah, the newest titles may have 
smoothed over some of the rough edges,

00:03:12.140 --> 00:03:15.640
but I bet some of these animations you're
seeing on screen right now look a little familiar,

00:03:15.640 --> 00:03:19.400
and that's because they're basically
still using a lot of these same animations,

00:03:19.400 --> 00:03:21.340
because they STILL look good!

00:03:21.340 --> 00:03:23.460
15 year old game!

00:03:26.760 --> 00:03:29.260
2003 -- the year of the Wind Waker.

00:03:29.260 --> 00:03:31.080
Pure charm, this animation.

00:03:31.080 --> 00:03:35.800
And the most expressive version of Link
we’ve seen before OR SINCE.

00:03:37.480 --> 00:03:39.700
2002 -- you got Kingdom Hearts.

00:03:39.700 --> 00:03:43.040
The sequels would improve on this a lot,
but even here in the first one,

00:03:43.040 --> 00:03:47.340
you’ve got some impressive blending between
Square’s Final Fantasy animation style

00:03:47.340 --> 00:03:50.240
and Disney’s… Disney animation style.

00:03:50.240 --> 00:03:53.700
Like, Sora’s animation exists in
this perfect middle ground

00:03:53.700 --> 00:03:56.360
between 'anime' and 'Mickey Mouse cartoon'

00:03:56.360 --> 00:03:57.960
and I love it.

00:03:59.180 --> 00:04:01.500
2001 -- Metal Gear Solid 2.

00:04:01.500 --> 00:04:03.540
A HUGE leap over its predecessor

00:04:03.540 --> 00:04:07.790
AND one of the best-looking early uses of
motion capture animation in games.

00:04:07.790 --> 00:04:10.120
A lot of these cutscenes still look really cool!

00:04:12.340 --> 00:04:14.980
The year 2000 -- Marvel vs Capcom 2

00:04:14.980 --> 00:04:17.400
with some beautiful pixel animation.

00:04:17.400 --> 00:04:19.400
Just look at these poses!

00:04:19.400 --> 00:04:20.960
LOOK AT THEM.

00:04:21.280 --> 00:04:23.560
Every frame of this looks good!

00:04:26.060 --> 00:04:27.120
Speaking of fighting games...

00:04:27.120 --> 00:04:29.880
1999 -- Street Fighter III: 3rd Strike.

00:04:29.880 --> 00:04:33.660
STILL some of the best animation in the
entire Street Fighter franchise.

00:04:33.660 --> 00:04:35.700
Maybe still THE best.

00:04:36.520 --> 00:04:39.620
And even before that,
1998 -- we’ve got Soul Calibur,

00:04:39.620 --> 00:04:42.300
already in 3D and looking pretty darn good.

00:04:42.300 --> 00:04:46.220
I’m still impressed by the weapon-handling
animation in these early entries.

00:04:46.220 --> 00:04:48.360
This game is over 20 years old now!

00:04:52.520 --> 00:04:55.180
1997 -- Castlevania: Symphony of the Night,

00:04:55.180 --> 00:04:57.440
with some more lovely pixel art animation.

00:04:57.440 --> 00:05:02.720
Alucard's run is maybe a little bit floaty-feeling
for my tastes, but those sword slashes?

00:05:03.480 --> 00:05:04.280
MMM.

00:05:06.500 --> 00:05:10.460
And yeah, things are starting to look
pretty primitive compared to where we are now,

00:05:10.460 --> 00:05:14.860
but you see how many of these games are still
managing to showcase some great animation

00:05:14.860 --> 00:05:17.080
even within those limitations?

00:05:17.600 --> 00:05:20.480
Like, 1996 -- Mario 64.

00:05:20.480 --> 00:05:23.180
SUPER primitive 3D animation in this game.

00:05:23.180 --> 00:05:24.180
AND YET

00:05:24.180 --> 00:05:28.200
they got so many things right on this, their first try!

00:05:28.300 --> 00:05:30.840
The way Mario leans into his turns like that?

00:05:30.840 --> 00:05:35.160
The way he briefly curls into a ball on
the second rotation of his third jump flip

00:05:35.160 --> 00:05:37.600
before stretching back out again on the descent?

00:05:37.600 --> 00:05:41.760
The way he already looks and feels 
responsive to control in 3D space.

00:05:41.760 --> 00:05:44.200
Again: on their FIRST TRY?

00:05:44.480 --> 00:05:46.840
That’s a lot better than some
other first attempts went!

00:05:47.300 --> 00:05:49.800
1995 -- you got Yoshi’s Island.

00:05:49.800 --> 00:05:55.460
Super simple sprite animation, but the posing
and the movement on Yoshi is here is cute!

00:05:56.300 --> 00:05:57.680
The floaty jumps!

00:05:59.220 --> 00:06:01.060
And his little marching in place!

00:06:01.060 --> 00:06:02.240
It looks GOOD.

00:06:04.940 --> 00:06:07.120
1994 -- Darkstalkers.

00:06:07.120 --> 00:06:12.400
I’ve seen people use this game’s sprites to
demonstrate the 12 principles of animation before.

00:06:12.400 --> 00:06:16.920
25 year old game, still has
fantastic posing and exaggeration.

00:06:19.600 --> 00:06:21.740
1993 -- Capcom’s Aladdin?

00:06:21.740 --> 00:06:22.740
Like LOOK at this.

00:06:22.740 --> 00:06:25.400
They had actual Disney artists working on this stuff.

00:06:27.920 --> 00:06:30.560
1992 - Sonic the Hedgehog 2!

00:06:30.560 --> 00:06:34.100
Early Sonic sprites have SO much personality to them.

00:06:34.100 --> 00:06:38.580
That’s one thing early hedgehog did
better than early Mario like every time.

00:06:39.720 --> 00:06:43.320
And in 1991, the original
Sonic the Hedgehog looked great too!

00:06:46.240 --> 00:06:51.460
And yes, at this point, the hardware is getting
so primitive that the ability to animate characters

00:06:51.460 --> 00:06:54.640
(or even make characters recognizable)
is pretty difficult,

00:06:54.640 --> 00:06:58.460
but if you look, there are still games in
the mix with better sprite posing,

00:06:58.460 --> 00:07:01.140
and more appealing character animation.

00:07:01.140 --> 00:07:03.500
Super Mario World in 1990.

00:07:03.500 --> 00:07:05.740
Bonk’s Adventure in 1989.

00:07:05.740 --> 00:07:07.660
Mario 3 in 1988.

00:07:07.660 --> 00:07:10.440
The original Punch-Out in 1987.

00:07:10.440 --> 00:07:12.200
Wonder Boy in 1986.

00:07:12.200 --> 00:07:13.919
Yie Ar Kung-Fu in 1985.

00:07:13.920 --> 00:07:14.980
Listen.

00:07:14.980 --> 00:07:19.040
Don’t ever let someone tell you that old
games can’t have great animation in them.

00:07:19.040 --> 00:07:23.580
Or that bad animation in an older game
is only bad because it’s old.

00:07:23.580 --> 00:07:28.040
There is a big difference between
OLD animation and BAD animation.

00:07:28.040 --> 00:07:30.660
Yes, hardware might limit your capabilities,

00:07:30.660 --> 00:07:35.320
but artists have been creating good animation
within those limitations for decades.

00:07:35.320 --> 00:07:39.180
Even if the most you can give a
character is 12 pixel-y poses,

00:07:39.180 --> 00:07:44.340
you can still do your darndest to make those
12 poses as clear and appealing as possible.

00:07:44.340 --> 00:07:46.600
Anyway! Thank you for indulging me on this.

00:07:46.600 --> 00:07:49.860
Be sure to subscribe if you want to see
more videos about game animation,

00:07:49.860 --> 00:07:51.360
and I will see you next time.