0:00:01.800,0:00:04.800
Can old games have great animation?

0:00:05.400,0:00:06.000
Yes!

0:00:06.000,0:00:06.920
Yes, they can.

0:00:06.920,0:00:09.380
But just for fun, let’s do a quick episode[br]about it anyway.

0:00:09.380,0:00:10.389
Hi, I’m Dan.

0:00:10.389,0:00:12.160
Welcome to New Frame Plus.

0:00:12.160,0:00:15.760
When I made a video critiquing[br]Skyrim’s mining animation last year,

0:00:15.760,0:00:20.060
there was one particular category of reaction in[br]the comments which caught my attention.

0:00:20.060,0:00:24.520
The specific phrasing varied, but the [br]general gist of these responses was:

0:00:29.020,0:00:32.320
Now, on the one hand,[br]there IS some truth to this statement:

0:00:32.320,0:00:36.120
you DO have to consider a game’s context[br]when critiquing its animation.

0:00:36.120,0:00:38.980
You have to factor in the hardware limitations[br]of the era,

0:00:38.980,0:00:42.860
as well as the game’s budget,[br]intended scope and genre.

0:00:42.860,0:00:46.600
Like, it would be ABSURD of me[br]to criticize Super Mario Brothers

0:00:46.600,0:00:49.260
for not looking like a 2019 AAA game.

0:00:49.260,0:00:51.540
Or even a 2019 indie game!

0:00:51.540,0:00:56.020
All that context I mentioned should be [br]factored into any game animation analysis.

0:00:57.080,0:01:01.120
dismissing criticism of Skyrim’s[br]mining animation due to the game’s age

0:01:01.120,0:01:05.280
(or even the age of its engine) is still[br]a bit silly, and for a few reasons.

0:01:05.300,0:01:07.880
1). 2011 wasn’t THAT long ago.

0:01:07.880,0:01:12.420
2). Even if it was, you can learn a lot by[br]analyzing animations in older games.

0:01:12.420,0:01:13.560
And most importantly,

0:01:13.560,0:01:18.360
3). there are plenty of even older[br]games with GREAT animation in them!

0:01:18.360,0:01:21.180
And I don’t expect most of you need convincing of that

0:01:21.180,0:01:23.470
(if anything, I’m probably preaching to the choir)

0:01:23.470,0:01:25.760
but just to prove the point and have a little fun,

0:01:25.760,0:01:28.940
let’s just count backward[br]from the year of Skyrim’s release

0:01:28.940,0:01:32.280
and list off some older games[br]with great animation in them.

0:01:33.680,0:01:38.700
2011 -- you’ve got Uncharted 3, with some[br]absolutely top tier performance capture work.

0:01:39.060,0:01:40.800
Look at the level of polish here!

0:01:40.800,0:01:42.320
Still amazing.

0:01:44.060,0:01:45.960
2010 -- you’ve got Kirby’s Epic Yarn.

0:01:45.960,0:01:49.460
I don’t even 100% understand[br]how this animation was constructed,

0:01:49.460,0:01:53.360
but the style COMPLETELY works[br]and looks like nothing else out there.

0:01:53.360,0:01:54.400
Beautiful.

0:01:54.760,0:01:56.610
2009 -- you've got Punch-Out!!

0:01:56.610,0:01:59.980
Man, I made a whole video on why[br]that game’s animation is amazing.

0:01:59.980,0:02:01.900
That game's almost 10 years old now!

0:02:01.900,0:02:04.300
Looks JUST as good as the day it launched.

0:02:05.600,0:02:07.360
2008 -- Prince of Persia,

0:02:07.360,0:02:09.320
bringing a new level of style and polish to

0:02:09.320,0:02:14.160
the climbing and traversal animation systems[br]Ubisoft Montreal was becoming known for.

0:02:14.920,0:02:16.220
Look at that wall run!

0:02:16.460,0:02:17.840
That looks nice!

0:02:18.980,0:02:22.760
2007 -- Heavenly Sword comes out[br]with some lovely combat animation

0:02:22.760,0:02:27.940
and raises the bar on motion capture performance[br]with some wonderfully over-the-top character acting.

0:02:27.940,0:02:29.160
[Screams.]

0:02:29.160,0:02:31.040
[Also screams.]

0:02:31.040,0:02:32.340
"Kill her."

0:02:32.960,0:02:35.280
2006 -- You got Final Fantasy XII

0:02:35.280,0:02:40.280
bringing a level of character performance and cinematography that series had never seen before.

0:02:43.340,0:02:45.920
2005 -- Shadow of the Colossus!

0:02:45.920,0:02:50.460
That game was a huge achievement, both on[br]a technical level and an aesthetic one.

0:02:50.460,0:02:55.740
Like, not only does the animation of all the colossi[br]convey this massive sense of majestic scale,

0:02:55.740,0:02:59.540
but this is still some of the best-looking[br]horse riding animation in video games.

0:03:00.000,0:03:02.680
2004 -- you got the original Monster Hunter.

0:03:02.680,0:03:06.720
The creature and combat animations in[br]the Monster Hunter series are fantastic,

0:03:06.720,0:03:08.720
and they've ALWAYS been good.

0:03:08.720,0:03:12.140
Like, yeah, the newest titles may have [br]smoothed over some of the rough edges,

0:03:12.140,0:03:15.640
but I bet some of these animations you're[br]seeing on screen right now look a little familiar,

0:03:15.640,0:03:19.400
and that's because they're basically[br]still using a lot of these same animations,

0:03:19.400,0:03:21.340
because they STILL look good!

0:03:21.340,0:03:23.460
15 year old game!

0:03:26.760,0:03:29.260
2003 -- the year of the Wind Waker.

0:03:29.260,0:03:31.080
Pure charm, this animation.

0:03:31.080,0:03:35.800
And the most expressive version of Link[br]we’ve seen before OR SINCE.

0:03:37.480,0:03:39.700
2002 -- you got Kingdom Hearts.

0:03:39.700,0:03:43.040
The sequels would improve on this a lot,[br]but even here in the first one,

0:03:43.040,0:03:47.340
you’ve got some impressive blending between[br]Square’s Final Fantasy animation style

0:03:47.340,0:03:50.240
and Disney’s… Disney animation style.

0:03:50.240,0:03:53.700
Like, Sora’s animation exists in[br]this perfect middle ground

0:03:53.700,0:03:56.360
between 'anime' and 'Mickey Mouse cartoon'

0:03:56.360,0:03:57.960
and I love it.

0:03:59.180,0:04:01.500
2001 -- Metal Gear Solid 2.

0:04:01.500,0:04:03.540
A HUGE leap over its predecessor

0:04:03.540,0:04:07.790
AND one of the best-looking early uses of[br]motion capture animation in games.

0:04:07.790,0:04:10.120
A lot of these cutscenes still look really cool!

0:04:12.340,0:04:14.980
The year 2000 -- Marvel vs Capcom 2

0:04:14.980,0:04:17.400
with some beautiful pixel animation.

0:04:17.400,0:04:19.400
Just look at these poses!

0:04:19.400,0:04:20.960
LOOK AT THEM.

0:04:21.280,0:04:23.560
Every frame of this looks good!

0:04:26.060,0:04:27.120
Speaking of fighting games...

0:04:27.120,0:04:29.880
1999 -- Street Fighter III: 3rd Strike.

0:04:29.880,0:04:33.660
STILL some of the best animation in the[br]entire Street Fighter franchise.

0:04:33.660,0:04:35.700
Maybe still THE best.

0:04:36.520,0:04:39.620
And even before that,[br]1998 -- we’ve got Soul Calibur,

0:04:39.620,0:04:42.300
already in 3D and looking pretty darn good.

0:04:42.300,0:04:46.220
I’m still impressed by the weapon-handling[br]animation in these early entries.

0:04:46.220,0:04:48.360
This game is over 20 years old now!

0:04:52.520,0:04:55.180
1997 -- Castlevania: Symphony of the Night,

0:04:55.180,0:04:57.440
with some more lovely pixel art animation.

0:04:57.440,0:05:02.720
Alucard's run is maybe a little bit floaty-feeling[br]for my tastes, but those sword slashes?

0:05:03.480,0:05:04.280
MMM.

0:05:06.500,0:05:10.460
And yeah, things are starting to look[br]pretty primitive compared to where we are now,

0:05:10.460,0:05:14.860
but you see how many of these games are still[br]managing to showcase some great animation

0:05:14.860,0:05:17.080
even within those limitations?

0:05:17.600,0:05:20.480
Like, 1996 -- Mario 64.

0:05:20.480,0:05:23.180
SUPER primitive 3D animation in this game.

0:05:23.180,0:05:24.180
AND YET

0:05:24.180,0:05:28.200
they got so many things right on this, their first try!

0:05:28.300,0:05:30.840
The way Mario leans into his turns like that?

0:05:30.840,0:05:35.160
The way he briefly curls into a ball on[br]the second rotation of his third jump flip

0:05:35.160,0:05:37.600
before stretching back out again on the descent?

0:05:37.600,0:05:41.760
The way he already looks and feels [br]responsive to control in 3D space.

0:05:41.760,0:05:44.200
Again: on their FIRST TRY?

0:05:44.480,0:05:46.840
That’s a lot better than some[br]other first attempts went!

0:05:47.300,0:05:49.800
1995 -- you got Yoshi’s Island.

0:05:49.800,0:05:55.460
Super simple sprite animation, but the posing[br]and the movement on Yoshi is here is cute!

0:05:56.300,0:05:57.680
The floaty jumps!

0:05:59.220,0:06:01.060
And his little marching in place!

0:06:01.060,0:06:02.240
It looks GOOD.

0:06:04.940,0:06:07.120
1994 -- Darkstalkers.

0:06:07.120,0:06:12.400
I’ve seen people use this game’s sprites to[br]demonstrate the 12 principles of animation before.

0:06:12.400,0:06:16.920
25 year old game, still has[br]fantastic posing and exaggeration.

0:06:19.600,0:06:21.740
1993 -- Capcom’s Aladdin?

0:06:21.740,0:06:22.740
Like LOOK at this.

0:06:22.740,0:06:25.400
They had actual Disney artists working on this stuff.

0:06:27.920,0:06:30.560
1992 - Sonic the Hedgehog 2!

0:06:30.560,0:06:34.100
Early Sonic sprites have SO much personality to them.

0:06:34.100,0:06:38.580
That’s one thing early hedgehog did[br]better than early Mario like every time.

0:06:39.720,0:06:43.320
And in 1991, the original[br]Sonic the Hedgehog looked great too!

0:06:46.240,0:06:51.460
And yes, at this point, the hardware is getting[br]so primitive that the ability to animate characters

0:06:51.460,0:06:54.640
(or even make characters recognizable)[br]is pretty difficult,

0:06:54.640,0:06:58.460
but if you look, there are still games in[br]the mix with better sprite posing,

0:06:58.460,0:07:01.140
and more appealing character animation.

0:07:01.140,0:07:03.500
Super Mario World in 1990.

0:07:03.500,0:07:05.740
Bonk’s Adventure in 1989.

0:07:05.740,0:07:07.660
Mario 3 in 1988.

0:07:07.660,0:07:10.440
The original Punch-Out in 1987.

0:07:10.440,0:07:12.200
Wonder Boy in 1986.

0:07:12.200,0:07:13.919
Yie Ar Kung-Fu in 1985.

0:07:13.920,0:07:14.980
Listen.

0:07:14.980,0:07:19.040
Don’t ever let someone tell you that old[br]games can’t have great animation in them.

0:07:19.040,0:07:23.580
Or that bad animation in an older game[br]is only bad because it’s old.

0:07:23.580,0:07:28.040
There is a big difference between[br]OLD animation and BAD animation.

0:07:28.040,0:07:30.660
Yes, hardware might limit your capabilities,

0:07:30.660,0:07:35.320
but artists have been creating good animation[br]within those limitations for decades.

0:07:35.320,0:07:39.180
Even if the most you can give a[br]character is 12 pixel-y poses,

0:07:39.180,0:07:44.340
you can still do your darndest to make those[br]12 poses as clear and appealing as possible.

0:07:44.340,0:07:46.600
Anyway! Thank you for indulging me on this.

0:07:46.600,0:07:49.860
Be sure to subscribe if you want to see[br]more videos about game animation,

0:07:49.860,0:07:51.360
and I will see you next time.