1
00:00:09,401 --> 00:00:15,203
(Music)

2
00:01:37,936 --> 00:01:42,377
(Applause)

3
00:01:48,409 --> 00:01:51,433
Trevor Copp: When Dancing With the Stars
first hit the airwaves,

4
00:01:51,457 --> 00:01:53,536
that is not what it looked like.

5
00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:55,097
(Laughter)

6
00:01:55,121 --> 00:01:58,148
Jeff and I were full-time
ballroom dance instructors

7
00:01:58,172 --> 00:02:01,585
when the big TV ballroom revival hit,

8
00:02:01,609 --> 00:02:04,800
and this was incredible.

9
00:02:05,132 --> 00:02:07,736
I mean, one day we would say "fox-trot,"

10
00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:10,797
and people were like "Foxes trotting."

11
00:02:10,821 --> 00:02:12,550
(Laughter)

12
00:02:12,574 --> 00:02:14,529
And the next day they were telling us

13
00:02:14,553 --> 00:02:16,941
the finer points of a good feather step.

14
00:02:16,965 --> 00:02:19,318
And this blew our minds.

15
00:02:19,342 --> 00:02:24,564
I mean, all of the ballroom dance
geeking out that we had always done

16
00:02:24,588 --> 00:02:28,227
on why salsa worked differently
than the competitive rumba

17
00:02:28,251 --> 00:02:30,755
and why tango traveled unlike the waltz,

18
00:02:30,779 --> 00:02:34,796
all of that just hit
the public consciousness,

19
00:02:35,383 --> 00:02:36,899
and it changed everything.

20
00:02:37,834 --> 00:02:40,200
But running parallel to this excitement,

21
00:02:40,224 --> 00:02:44,575
the excitement that suddenly,
somehow, we were cool --

22
00:02:44,599 --> 00:02:47,020
(Laughter)

23
00:02:47,044 --> 00:02:49,057
there was also this reservation.

24
00:02:49,914 --> 00:02:52,371
Why this and why now?

25
00:02:53,556 --> 00:02:56,789
Jeff Fox: When Trevor and I
would get together for training seminars

26
00:02:56,813 --> 00:02:57,972
or just for fun,

27
00:02:57,996 --> 00:02:59,862
we'd toss each other around, mix it up,

28
00:02:59,886 --> 00:03:02,073
take a break from having
to lead all the time.

29
00:03:02,097 --> 00:03:04,867
We even came up with a system
for switching lead and follow

30
00:03:04,891 --> 00:03:06,042
while we were dancing,

31
00:03:06,066 --> 00:03:08,075
as a way of taking turns and playing fair.

32
00:03:08,099 --> 00:03:11,056
It wasn't until we used that system
as part of a performance

33
00:03:11,080 --> 00:03:12,241
in a small festival

34
00:03:12,265 --> 00:03:14,392
that we got an important tap
on the shoulder.

35
00:03:14,416 --> 00:03:17,724
Lisa O'Connell, a dramaturge
and director of a playwright center,

36
00:03:17,748 --> 00:03:19,746
pulled us aside after the show and said,

37
00:03:20,154 --> 00:03:22,834
"Do you have any idea
how political that was?"

38
00:03:22,858 --> 00:03:24,874
(Laughter)

39
00:03:24,898 --> 00:03:27,667
So that began an eight-year
collaboration to create a play

40
00:03:27,691 --> 00:03:30,452
which not only further developed
our system for switching,

41
00:03:30,476 --> 00:03:34,234
but also explored the impact
of being locked into a single role,

42
00:03:34,258 --> 00:03:35,422
and what's worse,

43
00:03:35,446 --> 00:03:37,575
being defined by that single role.

44
00:03:37,599 --> 00:03:39,492
TC: Because, of course,

45
00:03:39,968 --> 00:03:44,177
classic Latin and ballroom dancing
isn't just a system of dancing;

46
00:03:44,719 --> 00:03:47,344
it's a way of thinking, of being,

47
00:03:47,924 --> 00:03:49,547
of relating to each other

48
00:03:49,571 --> 00:03:52,162
that captured a whole period's values.

49
00:03:52,599 --> 00:03:54,966
There's one thing that stayed
consistent, though:

50
00:03:54,990 --> 00:03:56,316
the man leads

51
00:03:56,340 --> 00:03:57,735
and the woman follows.

52
00:03:58,126 --> 00:04:00,854
So street salsa, championship tango,
it's all the same --

53
00:04:00,878 --> 00:04:02,736
he leads, she follows.

54
00:04:03,335 --> 00:04:05,074
So this was gender training.

55
00:04:05,623 --> 00:04:07,425
You weren't just learning to dance --

56
00:04:07,449 --> 00:04:10,489
you were learning to "man" and to "woman."

57
00:04:11,813 --> 00:04:13,003
It's a relic.

58
00:04:13,590 --> 00:04:15,896
And in the way of relics,
you don't throw it out,

59
00:04:15,920 --> 00:04:18,303
but you need to know
that this is the past.

60
00:04:18,327 --> 00:04:19,707
This isn't the present.

61
00:04:20,866 --> 00:04:23,945
It's like Shakespeare:
respect it, revive it -- great!

62
00:04:23,969 --> 00:04:25,454
But know that this is history.

63
00:04:25,478 --> 00:04:28,021
This doesn't represent how we think today.

64
00:04:29,045 --> 00:04:30,585
So we asked ourselves:

65
00:04:30,609 --> 00:04:32,263
If you strip it all down,

66
00:04:32,672 --> 00:04:35,431
what is at the core of partner dancing?

67
00:04:36,094 --> 00:04:38,329
JF: Well, the core principle
of partner dancing

68
00:04:38,353 --> 00:04:40,753
is that one person leads,
the other one follows.

69
00:04:41,094 --> 00:04:44,364
The machine works the same,
regardless of who's playing which role.

70
00:04:44,388 --> 00:04:47,659
The physics of movement doesn't really
give a crap about your gender.

71
00:04:47,683 --> 00:04:48,723
(Laughter)

72
00:04:48,747 --> 00:04:50,777
So if we were to update the existing form,

73
00:04:50,801 --> 00:04:52,895
we would need to make it
more representative

74
00:04:52,919 --> 00:04:55,189
of how we interact here, now, in 2015.

75
00:04:56,031 --> 00:04:58,963
When you watch ballroom,
don't just watch what's there.

76
00:04:59,517 --> 00:05:00,699
Watch what's not.

77
00:05:01,089 --> 00:05:04,101
The couple is always
only a man and a woman.

78
00:05:04,125 --> 00:05:05,283
Together.

79
00:05:05,307 --> 00:05:06,579
Only.

80
00:05:06,603 --> 00:05:07,754
Ever.

81
00:05:07,778 --> 00:05:11,860
So, same-sex and gender nonconformist
couples just disappear.

82
00:05:11,884 --> 00:05:14,516
In most mainstream international
ballroom competitions,

83
00:05:14,540 --> 00:05:17,159
same-sex couples are rarely
recognized on the floor,

84
00:05:17,183 --> 00:05:18,367
and in many cases,

85
00:05:18,391 --> 00:05:20,128
the rules prohibit them completely.

86
00:05:20,152 --> 00:05:24,987
TC: Try this: Google-image,
"professional Latin dancer,"

87
00:05:25,504 --> 00:05:27,715
and then look for an actual Latino person.

88
00:05:27,739 --> 00:05:29,106
(Laughter)

89
00:05:29,130 --> 00:05:30,669
You'll be there for days.

90
00:05:31,145 --> 00:05:35,170
What you will get is page after page
of white, straight Russian couples

91
00:05:35,194 --> 00:05:37,159
spray-tanned to the point of mahogany.

92
00:05:37,183 --> 00:05:39,084
(Laughter)

93
00:05:39,108 --> 00:05:41,368
There are no black people,
there are no Asians,

94
00:05:41,392 --> 00:05:42,676
no mixed-race couples,

95
00:05:42,700 --> 00:05:46,228
so basically, non-white people
just disappeared.

96
00:05:46,727 --> 00:05:50,739
Even within the white straight
couple only paradigm --

97
00:05:52,008 --> 00:05:53,389
she can't be taller,

98
00:05:53,413 --> 00:05:54,881
he can't be shorter,

99
00:05:54,905 --> 00:05:56,528
she can't be bolder,

100
00:05:57,025 --> 00:05:58,420
he can't be gentler --

101
00:05:59,261 --> 00:06:01,481
if you were to take a ballroom dance

102
00:06:01,505 --> 00:06:03,798
and translate that into a conversation

103
00:06:03,822 --> 00:06:05,264
and drop that into a movie,

104
00:06:05,288 --> 00:06:08,910
we, as a culture,
would never stand for this.

105
00:06:08,934 --> 00:06:11,857
He dictates, she reacts.

106
00:06:12,674 --> 00:06:15,679
No relationship -- gay,
straight or anything --

107
00:06:15,703 --> 00:06:20,110
that we would regard as remotely healthy
or functional looks like that,

108
00:06:20,134 --> 00:06:21,720
and yet somehow,

109
00:06:21,744 --> 00:06:24,358
you put it on prime time,
you slap some makeup on it,

110
00:06:24,382 --> 00:06:28,039
throw the glitter on, put it out there
as movement, not as text,

111
00:06:28,832 --> 00:06:30,950
and we, as a culture,

112
00:06:30,974 --> 00:06:32,297
tune in and clap.

113
00:06:33,805 --> 00:06:36,751
We are applauding our own absence.

114
00:06:38,130 --> 00:06:40,948
Too many people have disappeared
from partner dancing.

115
00:06:42,334 --> 00:06:46,592
(Music)

116
00:07:26,276 --> 00:07:30,915
(Applause)

117
00:07:32,957 --> 00:07:35,496
JF: Now, you just saw
two man dancing together.

118
00:07:35,520 --> 00:07:36,533
(Laughter)

119
00:07:36,557 --> 00:07:38,022
And you thought it looked ...

120
00:07:38,412 --> 00:07:39,694
a little strange.

121
00:07:40,130 --> 00:07:42,175
Interesting -- appealing, even --

122
00:07:42,199 --> 00:07:43,752
but a little bit odd.

123
00:07:44,372 --> 00:07:47,356
Even avid followers of the same-sex
ballroom circuit can attest

124
00:07:47,380 --> 00:07:51,490
that while same-sex partner dancing
can be dynamic and strong and exciting,

125
00:07:51,514 --> 00:07:53,837
it just doesn't quite seem to fit.

126
00:07:54,446 --> 00:07:55,663
Aesthetically speaking,

127
00:07:55,687 --> 00:07:59,733
if Alida and I take the classic
closed ballroom hold ...

128
00:08:01,637 --> 00:08:03,194
this is considered beautiful.

129
00:08:06,204 --> 00:08:08,392
(Laughter)

130
00:08:08,703 --> 00:08:09,961
But why not this?

131
00:08:09,985 --> 00:08:11,675
(Laughter)

132
00:08:11,699 --> 00:08:15,367
See, the standard image that the leader
must be larger and masculine

133
00:08:15,391 --> 00:08:17,485
and the follower smaller and feminine --

134
00:08:17,950 --> 00:08:19,429
this is a stumbling point.

135
00:08:19,978 --> 00:08:23,848
TC: So we wanted to look at this
from a totally different angle.

136
00:08:25,467 --> 00:08:29,035
So, what if we could keep
the idea of lead and follow

137
00:08:29,059 --> 00:08:32,255
but toss the idea that this
was connected to gender?

138
00:08:32,823 --> 00:08:37,827
Further, what if a couple
could lead and follow each other

139
00:08:37,851 --> 00:08:39,080
and then switch?

140
00:08:39,513 --> 00:08:40,746
And then switch back?

141
00:08:41,690 --> 00:08:44,139
What if it could be like a conversation,

142
00:08:44,948 --> 00:08:48,018
taking turns listening and speaking,
just like we do in life?

143
00:08:48,042 --> 00:08:51,254
What if we could dance like that?

144
00:08:52,418 --> 00:08:55,059
We call it "Liquid Lead Dancing."

145
00:08:56,542 --> 00:08:58,461
JF: Let's try this with a Latin dance,

146
00:08:59,045 --> 00:09:00,199
salsa.

147
00:09:00,524 --> 00:09:04,161
In salsa, there's a key transitional step,
called the cross-body lead.

148
00:09:04,185 --> 00:09:06,945
We use it as punctuation
to break up the improvisation.

149
00:09:06,969 --> 00:09:10,339
It can be a little tricky to spot
if you're not used to looking for it,

150
00:09:10,363 --> 00:09:11,514
so here it is.

151
00:09:17,191 --> 00:09:18,845
One more time for the cheap seats.

152
00:09:18,869 --> 00:09:21,305
(Laughter)

153
00:09:24,378 --> 00:09:26,383
And here's the action one more time,

154
00:09:26,407 --> 00:09:27,766
nice and slow.

155
00:09:32,842 --> 00:09:36,929
Now, if we apply liquid-lead thinking
to this transitional step,

156
00:09:36,953 --> 00:09:38,635
the cross-body lead becomes a point

157
00:09:38,659 --> 00:09:40,644
where the lead and the follow can switch.

158
00:09:40,668 --> 00:09:43,191
The person following can elect
to take over the lead,

159
00:09:43,215 --> 00:09:45,568
or the person leading can choose
to surrender it,

160
00:09:45,592 --> 00:09:48,184
essentially making it
a counter-cross-body lead.

161
00:09:48,208 --> 00:09:50,144
Here's how that looks in slow motion.

162
00:09:57,913 --> 00:10:01,300
And here's how it looked
when we danced it in the opening dance.

163
00:10:06,789 --> 00:10:10,162
With this simple tweak,
the dance moves from being a dictation

164
00:10:10,186 --> 00:10:11,375
to a negotiation.

165
00:10:11,761 --> 00:10:14,254
Anyone can lead. Anyone can follow.

166
00:10:14,278 --> 00:10:16,761
And more importantly,
you can change your mind.

167
00:10:17,523 --> 00:10:19,889
Now, this is only one example
of how this applies,

168
00:10:19,913 --> 00:10:22,552
but once the blinkers come off,
anything can happen.

169
00:10:23,090 --> 00:10:28,273
TC: Let's look at how liquid-lead thinking
could apply to a classic waltz.

170
00:10:28,297 --> 00:10:29,525
Because, of course,

171
00:10:29,549 --> 00:10:32,140
it isn't just a system of switching leads;

172
00:10:32,164 --> 00:10:33,330
it's a way of thinking

173
00:10:33,354 --> 00:10:36,610
that can actually make
the dance itself more efficient.

174
00:10:36,981 --> 00:10:38,329
So: the waltz.

175
00:10:38,891 --> 00:10:40,563
The waltz is a turning dance.

176
00:10:40,984 --> 00:10:42,596
This means that for the lead,

177
00:10:42,620 --> 00:10:45,832
you spend half of the dance
traveling backwards,

178
00:10:45,856 --> 00:10:47,326
completely blind.

179
00:10:47,350 --> 00:10:49,899
And because of the follower's position,

180
00:10:49,923 --> 00:10:52,731
basically, no one can see
where they're going.

181
00:10:52,755 --> 00:10:54,103
(Laughter)

182
00:10:54,127 --> 00:10:56,139
So you're out here on the floor,

183
00:10:56,163 --> 00:10:58,827
and then imagine that coming right at you.

184
00:10:58,851 --> 00:11:00,200
JF: Raaaaaah!

185
00:11:00,224 --> 00:11:01,748
(Laughter)

186
00:11:01,772 --> 00:11:05,068
TC: There are actually a lot
of accidents out there

187
00:11:05,092 --> 00:11:07,334
that happen as a result
of this blind spot.

188
00:11:08,080 --> 00:11:11,322
But what if the partners
were to just allow for

189
00:11:11,346 --> 00:11:13,495
a switch of posture for a moment?

190
00:11:13,519 --> 00:11:15,798
A lot of accidents could be avoided.

191
00:11:16,253 --> 00:11:21,093
Even if one person led the whole dance
but allowed this switch to happen,

192
00:11:21,117 --> 00:11:22,503
it would be a lot safer,

193
00:11:22,527 --> 00:11:25,571
while at the same time,
offering new aesthetics into the waltz.

194
00:11:26,221 --> 00:11:29,654
Because physics doesn't give a damn
about your gender.

195
00:11:29,678 --> 00:11:30,737
(Laughter)

196
00:11:32,154 --> 00:11:35,155
JF: Now, we've danced liquid lead
in clubs, convention centers

197
00:11:35,179 --> 00:11:37,947
and as part of First Dance,
the play we created with Lisa,

198
00:11:37,971 --> 00:11:40,363
on stages in North America and in Europe.

199
00:11:40,387 --> 00:11:42,070
And it never fails to engage.

200
00:11:42,736 --> 00:11:46,217
I mean, beyond the unusual sight
of seeing two men dancing together,

201
00:11:46,241 --> 00:11:48,735
it always evokes and engages.

202
00:11:49,174 --> 00:11:50,461
But why?

203
00:11:50,485 --> 00:11:53,580
The secret lies in what made
Lisa see our initial demonstration

204
00:11:53,604 --> 00:11:54,907
as "political."

205
00:11:54,931 --> 00:11:57,506
It wasn't just that we were
switching lead and follow;

206
00:11:57,530 --> 00:12:00,587
it's that we stayed consistent
in our presence, our personality

207
00:12:00,611 --> 00:12:03,540
and our power, regardless
of which role we were playing.

208
00:12:03,564 --> 00:12:05,184
We were still us.

209
00:12:05,816 --> 00:12:07,851
And that's where the true freedom lies --

210
00:12:07,875 --> 00:12:09,864
not just the freedom to switch roles,

211
00:12:09,888 --> 00:12:13,503
but the freedom from being defined
by whichever role you're playing,

212
00:12:13,527 --> 00:12:16,083
the freedom to always remain
true to yourself.

213
00:12:16,457 --> 00:12:19,557
Forget what a lead is supposed
to look like, or a follow.

214
00:12:19,581 --> 00:12:21,136
Be a masculine follow

215
00:12:21,160 --> 00:12:22,383
or a feminine lead.

216
00:12:22,795 --> 00:12:24,065
Just be yourself.

217
00:12:24,873 --> 00:12:27,590
Obviously, this applies
off the dance floor as well,

218
00:12:27,614 --> 00:12:30,153
but on the floor, it gives us
the perfect opportunity

219
00:12:30,177 --> 00:12:33,474
to update an old paradigm,
reinvigorate an old relic

220
00:12:33,498 --> 00:12:37,687
and make it more representative
of our era and our current way of being.

221
00:12:38,630 --> 00:12:41,971
TC: Jeff and I dance partner dancing
all the time with women and men

222
00:12:41,995 --> 00:12:43,383
and we love it.

223
00:12:43,407 --> 00:12:47,970
But we dance with a consciousness
that this is a historic form

224
00:12:47,994 --> 00:12:52,304
that can produce silence
and produce invisibility

225
00:12:52,328 --> 00:12:55,022
across the spectrum of identity
that we enjoy today.

226
00:12:55,820 --> 00:12:57,314
We invented Liquid Lead

227
00:12:57,338 --> 00:13:02,503
as a way of stripping out
all the ideas that don't belong to us,

228
00:13:02,527 --> 00:13:06,822
and taking partner dancing back
to what it really always was:

229
00:13:07,830 --> 00:13:10,756
the fine art of taking care of each other.

230
00:13:12,829 --> 00:13:19,413
(Music)

231
00:15:13,070 --> 00:15:18,741
(Applause)