1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,000
How does the news shape the way we see the world?

2
00:00:04,000 --> 00:00:10,000
Here's the world based on the way it looks -- based on landmass.

3
00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:16,000
And here's how news shapes what Americans see.

4
00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:31,000
This map -- (Applause) -- this map shows the number of seconds

5
00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:36,000
that American network and cable news organizations dedicated to news stories,

6
00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:41,000
by country, in February of 2007 -- just one year ago.

7
00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:47,000
Now, this was a month when North Korea agreed to dismantle its nuclear facilities.

8
00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:51,000
There was massive flooding in Indonesia.

9
00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:59,000
And in Paris, the IPCC released its study confirming man's impact on global warming.

10
00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:04,000
The U.S. accounted for 79 percent of total news coverage.

11
00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:09,000
And when we take out the U.S. and look at the remaining 21 percent,

12
00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:16,000
we see a lot of Iraq -- that's that big green thing there -- and little else.

13
00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:24,000
The combined coverage of Russia, China and India, for example, reached just one percent.

14
00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:30,000
When we analyzed all the news stories and removed just one story,

15
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:32,000
here's how the world looked.

16
00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:38,000
What was that story? The death of Anna Nicole Smith.

17
00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:42,000
This story eclipsed every country except Iraq,

18
00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:47,000
and received 10 times the coverage of the IPCC report.

19
00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:50,000
And the cycle continues;

20
00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:53,000
as we all know, Britney has loomed pretty large lately.

21
00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:56,000
So, why don't we hear more about the world?

22
00:01:56,000 --> 00:02:02,000
One reason is that news networks have reduced the number of their foreign bureaus by half.

23
00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:11,000
Aside from one-person ABC mini-bureaus in Nairobi, New Delhi and Mumbai,

24
00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:19,000
there are no network news bureaus in all of Africa, India or South America

25
00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:24,000
-- places that are home to more than two billion people.

26
00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:30,000
The reality is that covering Britney is cheaper.

27
00:02:30,000 --> 00:02:33,000
And this lack of global coverage is all the more disturbing

28
00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:35,000
when we see where people go for news.

29
00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:40,000
Local TV news looms large,

30
00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:44,000
and unfortunately only dedicates 12 percent of its coverage to international news.

31
00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:47,000
And what about the web?

32
00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:51,000
The most popular news sites don't do much better.

33
00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:56,000
Last year, Pew and the Colombia J-School analyzed the 14,000 stories

34
00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:59,000
that appeared on Google News' front page.

35
00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:03,000
And they, in fact, covered the same 24 news events.

36
00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:08,000
Similarly, a study in e-content showed that much of global news from U.S. news creators

37
00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:12,000
is recycled stories from the AP wire services and Reuters,

38
00:03:12,000 --> 00:03:16,000
and don't put things into a context that people can understand their connection to it.

39
00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:21,000
So, if you put it all together, this could help explain why today's college graduates,

40
00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:23,000
as well as less educated Americans,

41
00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:26,000
know less about the world than their counterparts did 20 years ago.

42
00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:32,000
And if you think it's simply because we are not interested,

43
00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:34,000
you would be wrong.

44
00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:41,000
In recent years, Americans who say they closely follow global news most of the time

45
00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:43,000
grew to over 50 percent.

46
00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:51,000
The real question: is this distorted worldview what we want for Americans

47
00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:54,000
in our increasingly interconnected world?

48
00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:57,000
I know we can do better.

49
00:03:57,000 --> 00:04:00,000
And can we afford not to? Thank you.