WEBVTT 00:00:00.785 --> 00:00:03.258 So I am a surgeon who studies creativity, 00:00:03.282 --> 00:00:06.110 and I have never had a patient tell me, 00:00:06.134 --> 00:00:08.976 "I really want you to be creative during surgery," 00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:12.119 and so I guess there's a little bit of irony to it. 00:00:12.143 --> 00:00:15.443 I will say though that, after having done surgery a lot, 00:00:15.467 --> 00:00:17.677 it's similar to playing a musical instrument. 00:00:17.701 --> 00:00:20.531 And for me, this deep and enduring fascination with sound 00:00:20.555 --> 00:00:22.297 is what led me to both be a surgeon 00:00:22.321 --> 00:00:24.855 and to study the science of sound, particularly music. 00:00:24.879 --> 00:00:26.928 I'm going to talk over the next few minutes 00:00:26.952 --> 00:00:28.243 about my career 00:00:28.267 --> 00:00:30.551 in terms of how I'm able to study music 00:00:30.575 --> 00:00:32.609 and try to grapple with all these questions 00:00:32.633 --> 00:00:34.976 of how the brain is able to be creative. 00:00:35.000 --> 00:00:37.630 I've done most of this work at Johns Hopkins University, 00:00:37.654 --> 00:00:40.639 and at the National Institute of Health where I was previously. 00:00:40.663 --> 00:00:44.170 I'll go over some science experiments and cover three musical experiments. NOTE Paragraph 00:00:44.194 --> 00:00:46.250 I will start off by playing a video for you. 00:00:46.274 --> 00:00:49.377 This video is of Keith Jarrett, who's a well-known jazz improviser 00:00:49.401 --> 00:00:51.845 and probably the most well-known, iconic example 00:00:51.869 --> 00:00:54.362 of someone who takes improvisation to a higher level. 00:00:54.386 --> 00:00:57.525 And he'll improvise entire concerts off the top of his head, 00:00:57.549 --> 00:00:59.954 and he'll never play it exactly the same way again, 00:00:59.978 --> 00:01:01.963 so as a form of intense creativity, 00:01:01.987 --> 00:01:03.605 I think this is a great example. 00:01:03.629 --> 00:01:05.976 And so why don't we go and click the video. NOTE Paragraph 00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:10.000 (Music) NOTE Paragraph 00:02:01.795 --> 00:02:03.796 (End of music) NOTE Paragraph 00:02:03.820 --> 00:02:06.159 It's really a remarkable thing that happens there. 00:02:06.183 --> 00:02:07.911 I've always as a listener, as a fan, 00:02:07.935 --> 00:02:09.652 I listen to that, and I'm astounded. 00:02:09.676 --> 00:02:11.412 I think -- how can this possibly be? 00:02:11.436 --> 00:02:13.727 How can the brain generate that much information, 00:02:13.751 --> 00:02:15.336 that much music, spontaneously? 00:02:15.360 --> 00:02:17.976 And so I set out with this concept, scientifically, 00:02:18.000 --> 00:02:22.351 that artistic creativity, it's magical, but it's not magic, 00:02:22.375 --> 00:02:24.382 meaning that it's a product of the brain. 00:02:24.406 --> 00:02:26.840 There's not too many brain-dead people creating art. 00:02:26.864 --> 00:02:30.495 With this notion that artistic creativity is in fact a neurologic product, 00:02:30.519 --> 00:02:32.976 I took this thesis that we could study it 00:02:33.000 --> 00:02:36.114 just like we study any other complex neurologic process, 00:02:36.138 --> 00:02:38.193 and there are subquestions that I put there. 00:02:38.217 --> 00:02:40.603 Is it possible to study creativity scientifically? 00:02:40.627 --> 00:02:42.664 And I think that's a good question. 00:02:42.688 --> 00:02:45.374 And I'll tell you that most scientific studies of music, 00:02:45.398 --> 00:02:46.916 they're very dense, 00:02:46.940 --> 00:02:48.335 and when you go through them, 00:02:48.359 --> 00:02:50.429 it's very hard to recognize the music in it. 00:02:50.453 --> 00:02:52.672 In fact, they seem to be unmusical entirely 00:02:52.696 --> 00:02:54.490 and to miss the point of the music. NOTE Paragraph 00:02:54.514 --> 00:02:56.070 This brings the second question: 00:02:56.094 --> 00:02:57.976 Why should scientists study creativity? 00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:00.079 Maybe we're not the right people to do it. NOTE Paragraph 00:03:00.103 --> 00:03:01.102 (Laughter) NOTE Paragraph 00:03:01.126 --> 00:03:04.578 Well it may be, but I will say that, from a scientific perspective, 00:03:04.602 --> 00:03:06.620 we talked a lot about innovation today, 00:03:06.644 --> 00:03:07.976 the science of innovation, 00:03:08.000 --> 00:03:10.953 how much we understand about how the brain is able to innovate 00:03:10.977 --> 00:03:12.221 is in its infancy, 00:03:12.245 --> 00:03:15.712 and truly, we know very little about how we are able to be creative. 00:03:15.736 --> 00:03:17.260 I think that we're going to see, 00:03:17.284 --> 00:03:18.976 over the next 10, 20, 30 years, 00:03:19.000 --> 00:03:21.171 a real science of creativity that's burgeoning 00:03:21.195 --> 00:03:22.396 and is going to flourish, 00:03:22.420 --> 00:03:24.852 Because we now have new methods that can enable us 00:03:24.876 --> 00:03:27.400 to take this process like complex jazz improvisation, 00:03:27.424 --> 00:03:28.798 and study it rigorously. 00:03:28.822 --> 00:03:30.969 So it gets down to the brain. 00:03:30.993 --> 00:03:32.787 All of us have this remarkable brain, 00:03:32.811 --> 00:03:35.266 which is poorly understood, to say the least. 00:03:35.290 --> 00:03:39.488 I think that neuroscientists have more questions than answers, 00:03:39.512 --> 00:03:41.714 and I'm not going to give you answers today, 00:03:41.738 --> 00:03:43.099 just ask a lot of questions. NOTE Paragraph 00:03:43.123 --> 00:03:44.630 And that's what I do in my lab. 00:03:44.654 --> 00:03:47.968 I ask questions about what is the brain doing to enable us to do this. 00:03:47.992 --> 00:03:50.769 This is the main method that I use. This is functional MRI. 00:03:50.793 --> 00:03:53.516 If you've been in an MRI scanner, it's very much the same, 00:03:53.540 --> 00:03:57.455 but this one is outfitted in a special way to not just take pictures of your brain, 00:03:57.479 --> 00:04:00.406 but to also take pictures of active areas of the brain. 00:04:00.430 --> 00:04:02.335 The way that's done is by the following: 00:04:02.359 --> 00:04:04.169 There's something called BOLD imaging, 00:04:04.193 --> 00:04:06.592 which is Blood Oxygen Level Dependent imaging. 00:04:07.281 --> 00:04:09.866 When you're in an fMRI scanner, you're in a big magnet 00:04:09.890 --> 00:04:12.263 that's aligning your molecules in certain areas. 00:04:12.287 --> 00:04:16.006 When an area of the brain is active, meaning a neural area is active, 00:04:16.030 --> 00:04:18.268 it gets blood flow shunted to that area. 00:04:18.292 --> 00:04:22.642 That blood flow causes an increase in local blood to that area 00:04:22.666 --> 00:04:25.649 with a deoxyhemoglobin change in concentration. 00:04:25.673 --> 00:04:27.828 Deoxyhemoglobin can be detected by MRI, 00:04:27.852 --> 00:04:29.702 whereas oxyhemoglobin can't. 00:04:29.726 --> 00:04:31.680 So through this method of inference -- 00:04:31.704 --> 00:04:34.246 and we're measuring blood flow, not neural activity -- 00:04:34.270 --> 00:04:37.006 we say that an area of the brain that's getting more blood 00:04:37.030 --> 00:04:40.572 was active during a particular task, and that's the crux of how fMRI works. 00:04:40.596 --> 00:04:44.501 And it's been used since the '90s to study really complex processes. NOTE Paragraph 00:04:44.525 --> 00:04:48.025 I'm going to review a study that I did, which was jazz in an fMRI scanner. 00:04:48.049 --> 00:04:50.552 It was done with a colleague, Alan Braun, at the NIH. 00:04:50.576 --> 00:04:52.976 This is a short video of how we did this project. NOTE Paragraph 00:04:53.000 --> 00:04:55.781 (Video) Charles Limb: This is a plastic MIDI piano keyboard 00:04:55.805 --> 00:04:57.586 that we use for the jazz experiments. 00:04:57.610 --> 00:04:59.663 And it's a 35-key keyboard 00:04:59.687 --> 00:05:02.147 designed to fit both inside the scanner, 00:05:02.171 --> 00:05:03.507 be magnetically safe, 00:05:03.531 --> 00:05:07.373 have minimal interference that would contribute to any artifact, 00:05:07.397 --> 00:05:10.317 and have this cushion so that it can rest on the players' legs 00:05:10.341 --> 00:05:13.296 while they're lying down in the scanner, playing on their back. 00:05:13.320 --> 00:05:16.349 It works like this -- this doesn't actually produce any sound. 00:05:16.373 --> 00:05:18.816 It sends out what's called a MIDI signal -- 00:05:18.840 --> 00:05:20.889 or a Musical Instrument Digital Interface -- 00:05:20.913 --> 00:05:23.574 through these wires into the box and then the computer, 00:05:23.598 --> 00:05:26.533 which then trigger high-quality piano samples like this. NOTE Paragraph 00:05:26.557 --> 00:05:29.798 (Music) NOTE Paragraph 00:05:33.049 --> 00:05:36.803 (Music) NOTE Paragraph 00:05:52.333 --> 00:05:54.308 (Music ends) NOTE Paragraph 00:05:54.332 --> 00:05:55.976 OK, so it works. 00:05:56.000 --> 00:05:57.976 And so through this piano keyboard, 00:05:58.000 --> 00:06:00.743 we have the means to take a musical process and study it. 00:06:00.767 --> 00:06:03.694 So what do you do now that you have this cool piano keyboard? 00:06:03.718 --> 00:06:06.163 You can't just say, "It's great we have a keyboard." 00:06:06.187 --> 00:06:08.511 We have to come up with a scientific experiment. 00:06:08.535 --> 00:06:10.658 The experiment really rests on the following: 00:06:10.929 --> 00:06:14.573 What happens in the brain during something that's memorized and over-learned, 00:06:14.597 --> 00:06:16.752 and what happens in the brain during something 00:06:16.776 --> 00:06:19.050 that is spontaneously generated, or improvised, 00:06:19.074 --> 00:06:20.888 in a way that's matched motorically 00:06:20.912 --> 00:06:23.757 and in terms of lower-level sensory motor features? NOTE Paragraph 00:06:23.781 --> 00:06:26.376 I have here what we call the paradigms. 00:06:26.400 --> 00:06:29.896 There's a scale paradigm, which is playing a scale up and down, memorized, 00:06:29.920 --> 00:06:31.654 then there's improvising on a scale, 00:06:31.678 --> 00:06:33.715 quarter notes, metronome, right hand -- 00:06:33.739 --> 00:06:35.310 scientifically very safe, 00:06:35.334 --> 00:06:37.207 but musically really boring. 00:06:37.231 --> 00:06:40.202 Then there's the bottom one, which is called the jazz paradigm. 00:06:40.226 --> 00:06:42.630 So we brought professional jazz players to the NIH, 00:06:42.654 --> 00:06:45.607 and we had them memorize this piece of music on the lower-left, 00:06:45.631 --> 00:06:47.449 which is what you heard me playing -- 00:06:47.473 --> 00:06:49.966 and we had them improvise to the same chord changes. 00:06:49.990 --> 00:06:52.198 And if you can hit that lower-right sound icon, 00:06:52.222 --> 00:06:55.050 that's an example of what was recorded in the scanner. NOTE Paragraph 00:06:55.074 --> 00:06:58.804 (Music) NOTE Paragraph 00:07:19.804 --> 00:07:21.805 (Music ends) NOTE Paragraph 00:07:21.829 --> 00:07:24.245 In the end, it's not the most natural environment, 00:07:24.269 --> 00:07:26.175 but they're able to play real music. 00:07:26.199 --> 00:07:28.170 And I've listened to that solo 200 times, 00:07:28.194 --> 00:07:29.371 and I still like it. 00:07:29.395 --> 00:07:31.782 And the musicians were comfortable in the end. 00:07:31.806 --> 00:07:33.630 We first measured the number of notes. 00:07:33.654 --> 00:07:36.311 Were they playing more notes when they were improvising? 00:07:36.335 --> 00:07:37.925 That was not what was going on. 00:07:37.949 --> 00:07:39.934 And then we looked at the brain activity. 00:07:39.958 --> 00:07:41.766 I will try to condense this for you. 00:07:41.790 --> 00:07:45.270 These are contrast maps that are showing subtractions between what changes 00:07:45.294 --> 00:07:48.390 when you're improvising vs. when you're doing something memorized. 00:07:48.414 --> 00:07:51.199 In red is an area that's active in the prefrontal cortex, 00:07:51.223 --> 00:07:52.682 the frontal lobe of the brain, 00:07:52.706 --> 00:07:54.885 and in blue is this area that was deactivated. 00:07:54.909 --> 00:07:57.785 So we had this focal area called the medial prefrontal cortex 00:07:57.809 --> 00:07:59.196 that went way up in activity. 00:07:59.220 --> 00:08:02.450 We had this broad patch of area called the lateral prefrontal cortex 00:08:02.474 --> 00:08:03.999 that went way down in activity, 00:08:04.023 --> 00:08:05.511 I'll summarize that for you. NOTE Paragraph 00:08:05.535 --> 00:08:07.643 These are multifunctional areas of the brain, 00:08:07.667 --> 00:08:09.822 these are not the jazz areas of the brain. 00:08:09.846 --> 00:08:11.774 They do a whole host of things 00:08:11.798 --> 00:08:13.657 that have to do with self-reflection, 00:08:13.681 --> 00:08:16.041 introspection, working memory etc. 00:08:16.065 --> 00:08:18.552 Really, consciousness is seated in the frontal lobe. 00:08:18.576 --> 00:08:20.610 But we have this combination 00:08:20.634 --> 00:08:24.083 of an area that's thought to be involved in self-monitoring, turning off, 00:08:24.107 --> 00:08:26.570 and this area that's thought to be autobiographical, 00:08:26.594 --> 00:08:28.129 or self-expressive, turning on. 00:08:28.153 --> 00:08:30.224 We think, at least in this preliminary -- 00:08:30.248 --> 00:08:33.001 it's one study; it's probably wrong, but it's one study -- NOTE Paragraph 00:08:33.025 --> 00:08:34.064 (Laughter) NOTE Paragraph 00:08:34.088 --> 00:08:36.819 we think that at least a reasonable hypothesis 00:08:36.843 --> 00:08:38.004 is that, to be creative, 00:08:38.028 --> 00:08:40.904 you should have this weird dissociation in your frontal lobe. 00:08:40.928 --> 00:08:43.452 One area turns on, and a big area shuts off, 00:08:43.476 --> 00:08:46.414 so that you're not inhibited, you're willing to make mistakes, 00:08:46.438 --> 00:08:48.606 so that you're not constantly shutting down 00:08:48.630 --> 00:08:50.555 all of these new generative impulses. 00:08:50.579 --> 00:08:54.024 Now a lot of people know that music is not always a solo activity -- 00:08:54.048 --> 00:08:55.768 sometimes it's done communicatively. NOTE Paragraph 00:08:55.792 --> 00:08:56.976 The next question was: 00:08:57.000 --> 00:08:59.572 What happens when musicians are trading back and forth, 00:08:59.596 --> 00:09:01.209 something called "trading fours," 00:09:01.233 --> 00:09:04.056 which is something they do normally in a jazz experiment. 00:09:04.080 --> 00:09:05.493 So this is a 12-bar blues, 00:09:05.517 --> 00:09:07.626 and I've broken it down into four-bar groups, 00:09:07.650 --> 00:09:09.462 so you would know how you would trade. 00:09:09.486 --> 00:09:11.772 We brought a musician into the scanner, same way, 00:09:11.796 --> 00:09:13.208 had them memorize this melody 00:09:13.232 --> 00:09:15.798 then had another musician out in the control room 00:09:15.822 --> 00:09:17.791 trading back and forth interactively. NOTE Paragraph 00:09:17.815 --> 00:09:20.439 So this is a musician, Mike Pope, 00:09:20.463 --> 00:09:23.549 one of the world's best bassists and a fantastic piano player. NOTE Paragraph 00:09:23.573 --> 00:09:29.832 (Music) NOTE Paragraph 00:09:29.856 --> 00:09:32.222 He's now playing the piece that we just saw 00:09:32.246 --> 00:09:33.976 a little better than I wrote it. NOTE Paragraph 00:09:34.000 --> 00:09:35.766 (Video) CL: Mike, come on in. NOTE Paragraph 00:09:35.790 --> 00:09:37.560 Mike Pope: May the force be with you. NOTE Paragraph 00:09:37.584 --> 00:09:39.350 Nurse: Nothing in your pockets, Mike? NOTE Paragraph 00:09:39.374 --> 00:09:40.917 MP: No. Nothing's in my pockets. NOTE Paragraph 00:09:50.577 --> 00:09:53.355 CL: You have to have the right attitude to agree to do it. NOTE Paragraph 00:09:53.379 --> 00:09:54.635 (Laughter) NOTE Paragraph 00:09:54.659 --> 00:09:56.474 It's kind of fun, actually. NOTE Paragraph 00:09:56.498 --> 00:09:58.097 (Music) NOTE Paragraph 00:09:58.121 --> 00:09:59.820 Now we're playing back and forth. 00:09:59.844 --> 00:10:02.056 He's in there. You can see his legs up there. NOTE Paragraph 00:10:02.080 --> 00:10:03.422 (Music) NOTE Paragraph 00:10:03.446 --> 00:10:06.636 And then I'm in the control room here, playing back and forth. NOTE Paragraph 00:10:06.660 --> 00:10:13.660 (Music) NOTE Paragraph 00:10:16.130 --> 00:10:17.280 (Music ends) NOTE Paragraph 00:10:18.000 --> 00:10:21.344 (Video) Mike Pope: This is a pretty good representation 00:10:21.368 --> 00:10:23.152 of what it's like. 00:10:23.176 --> 00:10:25.176 And it's good that it's not too quick. 00:10:25.200 --> 00:10:27.779 The fact that we do it over and over again 00:10:27.803 --> 00:10:31.073 lets you acclimate to your surroundings. 00:10:32.033 --> 00:10:34.691 So the hardest thing for me was the kinesthetic thing, 00:10:34.715 --> 00:10:37.976 looking at my hands through two mirrors, 00:10:38.000 --> 00:10:39.976 laying on my back, 00:10:40.000 --> 00:10:42.678 and not able to move at all except for my hand. 00:10:42.702 --> 00:10:44.574 That was challenging. 00:10:44.598 --> 00:10:45.748 But again -- 00:10:46.952 --> 00:10:49.738 there were moments, for sure -- NOTE Paragraph 00:10:49.762 --> 00:10:50.763 (Laughter) NOTE Paragraph 00:10:50.787 --> 00:10:55.150 there were moments of real, honest-to-God musical interplay, for sure. NOTE Paragraph 00:10:55.786 --> 00:10:57.788 CL: At this point, I'll take a few moments. 00:10:57.812 --> 00:10:59.693 So what you're seeing here -- 00:10:59.717 --> 00:11:01.794 and I'm doing a cardinal sin in science, 00:11:01.818 --> 00:11:03.628 which is to show you preliminary data. 00:11:03.652 --> 00:11:05.405 This is one subject's data. 00:11:05.429 --> 00:11:07.176 This is, in fact, Mike Pope's data. 00:11:07.200 --> 00:11:08.676 So what am I showing you here? 00:11:08.700 --> 00:11:12.811 When he was trading fours with me, improvising vs. memorized, 00:11:12.835 --> 00:11:15.584 his language areas lit up, his Broca's area, 00:11:15.608 --> 00:11:17.670 in the inferior frontal gyrus on the left. 00:11:17.694 --> 00:11:19.603 He had it also homologous on the right. 00:11:19.627 --> 00:11:22.786 This is an area thought to be involved in expressive communication. 00:11:22.810 --> 00:11:24.938 This whole notion that music is a language -- 00:11:24.962 --> 00:11:27.261 maybe there's a neurologic basis to it after all, 00:11:27.285 --> 00:11:30.639 and we can see it when two musicians are having a musical conversation. 00:11:30.663 --> 00:11:32.636 So we've done this on eight subjects now, 00:11:32.660 --> 00:11:34.589 and we're getting all the data together, 00:11:34.613 --> 00:11:37.438 hopefully we'll have something to say about it meaningfully. NOTE Paragraph 00:11:37.462 --> 00:11:40.705 Now when I think about improvisation and the language, what's next? 00:11:40.729 --> 00:11:42.976 Rap, of course, rap -- freestyle. 00:11:43.000 --> 00:11:45.747 I've always been fascinated by freestyle. 00:11:45.771 --> 00:11:47.284 And let's play this video. NOTE Paragraph 00:11:47.308 --> 00:11:50.146 (Video) Mos Def: Brown skin I be, standing five-ten I be 00:11:50.170 --> 00:11:52.192 Rockin' it when I be, in your vicinity 00:11:52.216 --> 00:11:55.236 Whole-style synergy, recognize symmetry 00:11:55.260 --> 00:11:57.594 Go and try to injure me, broke 'em down chemically 00:11:57.618 --> 00:12:00.047 Ain't the number 10 MC, talk about how been I be 00:12:00.071 --> 00:12:02.469 Styled it like Kennedy, late like a 10 to three 00:12:02.493 --> 00:12:05.311 When I say when I be, girls say bend that key cut NOTE Paragraph 00:12:05.335 --> 00:12:07.153 CL: So there's a lot of analogy 00:12:07.177 --> 00:12:09.633 between what takes place in freestyle rap and jazz. 00:12:09.657 --> 00:12:12.574 There are a lot of correlates between the two forms of music, 00:12:12.598 --> 00:12:15.045 I think, in different time periods, in lot of ways, 00:12:15.069 --> 00:12:17.900 rap serves the same social function that jazz used to serve. 00:12:17.924 --> 00:12:19.817 So how do you study rap scientifically? 00:12:19.841 --> 00:12:22.976 And my colleagues think I'm crazy, but I think it's very viable. 00:12:23.000 --> 00:12:24.227 This is what you do: 00:12:24.251 --> 00:12:26.998 You have a freestyle artist come and memorize a rap 00:12:27.022 --> 00:12:28.243 that you write for them, 00:12:28.267 --> 00:12:31.699 that they've never heard before, and then you have them freestyle. 00:12:31.723 --> 00:12:34.141 So I told my lab members that I would rap for TED, 00:12:34.165 --> 00:12:35.807 and they said, "No, you won't." 00:12:35.831 --> 00:12:37.034 And then I thought -- NOTE Paragraph 00:12:37.058 --> 00:12:38.374 (Laughter) NOTE Paragraph 00:12:38.398 --> 00:12:44.124 (Applause) NOTE Paragraph 00:12:44.148 --> 00:12:45.428 But here's the thing. 00:12:45.452 --> 00:12:48.353 With this big screen, you can all rap with me. OK? 00:12:48.377 --> 00:12:50.221 So what we had them do 00:12:50.245 --> 00:12:52.841 was memorize this lower-left sound icon, please. 00:12:52.865 --> 00:12:55.758 This is the control condition. This is what they memorized. NOTE Paragraph 00:12:55.782 --> 00:12:57.815 Computer: Memory, thump. NOTE Paragraph 00:12:57.839 --> 00:12:59.976 CL: Thump of the beat in a known repeat 00:13:00.000 --> 00:13:02.976 Rhythm and rhyme, they make me complete 00:13:03.000 --> 00:13:05.096 The climb is sublime when I'm on the mic 00:13:05.120 --> 00:13:07.676 Spittin' rhymes that hit you like a lightning strike NOTE Paragraph 00:13:07.700 --> 00:13:08.864 Computer: Search. NOTE Paragraph 00:13:08.888 --> 00:13:11.232 CL: I search for the truth in this eternal quest 00:13:11.256 --> 00:13:13.986 My passion's not fashion, you can see how I'm dressed 00:13:14.010 --> 00:13:15.976 Psychopathic words in my head appear 00:13:16.000 --> 00:13:18.238 Whisper these lyrics only I can hear NOTE Paragraph 00:13:18.262 --> 00:13:19.434 Computer: Art. NOTE Paragraph 00:13:19.458 --> 00:13:22.088 CL: The art of discovering and that which is hovering 00:13:22.112 --> 00:13:23.976 Inside the mind of those unconfined 00:13:24.000 --> 00:13:26.976 All of these words keep pouring out like rain 00:13:27.000 --> 00:13:29.735 I need a mad scientist to check my brain NOTE Paragraph 00:13:29.759 --> 00:13:31.066 Computer: Stop. NOTE Paragraph 00:13:31.090 --> 00:13:38.090 (Applause) NOTE Paragraph 00:13:40.270 --> 00:13:42.444 I guarantee you that will never happen again. NOTE Paragraph 00:13:42.468 --> 00:13:44.409 (Laughter) NOTE Paragraph 00:13:44.433 --> 00:13:46.621 So now, what's great about these free-stylers, 00:13:46.645 --> 00:13:48.507 they will get cued different words. 00:13:48.531 --> 00:13:49.975 They don't know what's coming, 00:13:49.999 --> 00:13:51.915 but they'll hear something off the cuff. 00:13:51.939 --> 00:13:53.348 Go hit that right sound icon, 00:13:53.372 --> 00:13:56.092 there will be cued three square words: like, not and head. 00:13:56.116 --> 00:13:58.270 He doesn't know what's coming. Computer: Like. NOTE Paragraph 00:13:58.294 --> 00:14:00.064 Freestyler: I'm like some kind of 00:14:00.088 --> 00:14:02.317 extraterrestrial, celestial scene 00:14:02.341 --> 00:14:05.178 Back in the days, I used to sit in pyramids and meditate NOTE Paragraph 00:14:05.202 --> 00:14:07.375 With two microphones -- Computer: Head 00:14:07.399 --> 00:14:08.733 hovering over my head 00:14:08.757 --> 00:14:10.120 See if I could still listen, 00:14:10.144 --> 00:14:11.431 spittin' off the sound 00:14:11.455 --> 00:14:12.640 See what you grinning 00:14:12.664 --> 00:14:15.089 I teach the children in the back of the classroom 00:14:15.113 --> 00:14:17.510 About the message of apocalyptical NOTE Paragraph 00:14:17.534 --> 00:14:18.694 Computer: Not. 00:14:18.718 --> 00:14:21.346 Not really though, 'cause I've got to keep it simple 00:14:21.370 --> 00:14:22.976 instrumental 00:14:23.000 --> 00:14:25.976 Detrimental playing Super Mario 00:14:26.000 --> 00:14:29.153 boxes [unclear] hip hop NOTE Paragraph 00:14:29.177 --> 00:14:30.597 Computer: Stop. NOTE Paragraph 00:14:30.621 --> 00:14:32.932 CL: It's an incredible thing that's taking place. 00:14:32.956 --> 00:14:35.182 It's doing something neurologically remarkable. 00:14:35.206 --> 00:14:37.522 Whether or not you like the music is irrelevant. 00:14:37.546 --> 00:14:39.947 Creatively speaking, it's just a phenomenal thing. 00:14:39.971 --> 00:14:42.487 This is a short video of how we do this in a scanner. NOTE Paragraph 00:14:42.511 --> 00:14:44.026 [fMRI of Hip-Hop Rap] NOTE Paragraph 00:14:44.050 --> 00:14:45.186 (Laughter) NOTE Paragraph 00:14:45.210 --> 00:14:46.984 (Video) CL: We're here with Emmanuel. NOTE Paragraph 00:14:47.008 --> 00:14:49.314 CL: That was recorded in the scanner, by the way. NOTE Paragraph 00:14:49.338 --> 00:14:51.447 (Video) CL: That's Emmanuel in the scanner. 00:14:52.000 --> 00:14:54.000 He's just memorized a rhyme for us. NOTE Paragraph 00:14:55.042 --> 00:14:57.725 [Control Condition Memorized Verses] NOTE Paragraph 00:14:57.749 --> 00:14:59.976 Emmanuel: Top of the beat with no repeat 00:15:00.000 --> 00:15:02.976 Rhythm and rhyme make me complete 00:15:03.000 --> 00:15:05.976 Climb is sublime when I'm on the mic 00:15:06.000 --> 00:15:08.774 Spittin' rhymes that'll hit you like a lightning strike NOTE Paragraph 00:15:08.798 --> 00:15:09.956 Computer: Search. 00:15:09.980 --> 00:15:12.240 I search for the truth in this eternal quest 00:15:12.264 --> 00:15:14.840 I'm passing on fashion; you can see how I'm dressed NOTE Paragraph 00:15:14.864 --> 00:15:17.927 CL: I'm going to stop that there; so what do we see in his brain? 00:15:17.951 --> 00:15:19.609 This is four rappers' brains. 00:15:19.633 --> 00:15:21.669 And we do see language areas lighting up, 00:15:21.693 --> 00:15:22.976 but then, eyes closed -- 00:15:23.000 --> 00:15:26.313 when you are freestyling vs. memorizing, 00:15:26.337 --> 00:15:28.491 you've got major visual areas lighting up. 00:15:28.515 --> 00:15:32.204 You've got major cerebellar activity, which is involved in motor coordination. 00:15:32.228 --> 00:15:35.584 You have heightened brain activity when you're doing a comparable task, 00:15:35.608 --> 00:15:38.566 when that one task is creative and the other task is memorized. 00:15:38.590 --> 00:15:41.374 It's very preliminary, but I think it's kind of cool. NOTE Paragraph 00:15:41.398 --> 00:15:43.706 To conclude, we've got a lot of questions to ask, 00:15:43.730 --> 00:15:46.635 and like I said, we'll ask questions here, not answer them. 00:15:46.659 --> 00:15:50.110 But we want to get at the root of what is creative genius neurologically, 00:15:50.134 --> 00:15:52.691 and I think, with these methods, we're getting close. 00:15:52.715 --> 00:15:55.018 And I think, hopefully in the next 10, 20 years, 00:15:55.042 --> 00:15:56.939 you'll see real, meaningful studies 00:15:56.963 --> 00:15:59.976 that say science has to catch up to art, 00:16:00.000 --> 00:16:02.388 and maybe we're starting now to get there. NOTE Paragraph 00:16:02.412 --> 00:16:04.410 Thank you for your time, I appreciate it. NOTE Paragraph 00:16:04.434 --> 00:16:08.442 (Applause)