0:00:00.031,0:00:01.088 - [Instructor] The graph of y 0:00:01.088,0:00:03.003 is equal to absolute value of x 0:00:03.003,0:00:04.812 is reflected across the x-axis 0:00:04.812,0:00:07.726 and then scaled vertically[br]by a factor of seven. 0:00:07.726,0:00:10.603 What is the equation of the new graph? 0:00:10.603,0:00:13.068 So pause the video and see[br]if you can figure that out. 0:00:13.068,0:00:15.254 Alright, let's work[br]through it together now. 0:00:15.254,0:00:17.508 Now, you might not need[br]to draw it visually 0:00:17.508,0:00:19.883 but I will just so that[br]we can all together 0:00:19.883,0:00:22.378 visualize what is going on. 0:00:22.378,0:00:24.879 So let's say that's my x-axis 0:00:24.879,0:00:26.712 and that is my y-axis. 0:00:29.837,0:00:32.253 y equals the absolute value of x. 0:00:32.253,0:00:35.032 So for non-negative values of x, 0:00:35.032,0:00:36.547 y is going to be equal to x. 0:00:36.547,0:00:37.858 Absolute value of zero is zero. 0:00:37.858,0:00:39.017 Absolute value of one is one. 0:00:39.017,0:00:40.730 Absolute value of two is two. 0:00:40.730,0:00:42.462 So it's gonna look like this. 0:00:42.462,0:00:44.923 It's gonna have a slope of one 0:00:44.923,0:00:46.328 and then for negative values, 0:00:46.328,0:00:47.684 when you take the absolute value, 0:00:47.684,0:00:48.583 you're gonna take the opposite. 0:00:48.583,0:00:50.062 You're gonna get the positive. 0:00:50.062,0:00:52.175 So it's gonna look like this. 0:00:52.175,0:00:55.012 Let me see if I can draw[br]that a little bit cleaner. 0:00:55.012,0:00:58.032 This is a hand drawn[br]sketch so bear with me 0:00:58.032,0:00:59.078 but hopefully this is familiar. 0:00:59.078,0:00:59.911 You've seen the graph 0:00:59.911,0:01:04.296 of y is equal to absolute[br]value of x before. 0:01:04.296,0:01:06.708 Now, let's think about the[br]different transformations. 0:01:06.708,0:01:10.875 So first, they say is[br]reflected across the x-axis. 0:01:12.349,0:01:13.599 So for example, 0:01:14.558,0:01:18.315 if I have some x value right over here, 0:01:18.315,0:01:20.242 before, I would take[br]the absolute value of x 0:01:20.242,0:01:21.878 and I would end up there 0:01:21.878,0:01:25.131 but now we wanna reflect across the x-axis 0:01:25.131,0:01:28.748 so we wanna essentially get[br]the negative of that value 0:01:28.748,0:01:32.192 associated with that corresponding x 0:01:32.192,0:01:33.705 and so for example, this x, 0:01:33.705,0:01:35.921 before, we would get[br]the absolute value of x 0:01:35.921,0:01:37.969 but now we wanna flip across the x-axis 0:01:37.969,0:01:40.512 and we wanna get the negative of it. 0:01:40.512,0:01:42.838 So in general, what we are doing 0:01:42.838,0:01:47.005 is we are getting the negative[br]of the absolute value of x. 0:01:48.843,0:01:51.743 In general, if you're[br]flipping over the x-axis, 0:01:51.743,0:01:53.093 you're getting the negative. 0:01:53.093,0:01:57.791 You're scaling the expression[br]or the function by a negative. 0:01:57.791,0:02:00.240 So this is going to be y[br]is equal to the negative 0:02:00.240,0:02:02.200 of the absolute value of x. 0:02:02.200,0:02:03.919 Once again, whatever absolute value of x 0:02:03.919,0:02:05.881 was giving you before for given x, 0:02:05.881,0:02:08.062 we now wanna get the negative of it. 0:02:08.062,0:02:11.334 We now wanna get the negative of it. 0:02:11.334,0:02:16.212 So that's what reflecting[br]across the x-axis does for us 0:02:16.212,0:02:20.379 but then they say scaled[br]vertically by a factor of seven 0:02:22.915,0:02:26.028 and the way I view that is if[br]you're scaling it vertically 0:02:26.028,0:02:27.417 by a factor of seven, 0:02:27.417,0:02:30.167 whatever y value you got for given x, 0:02:30.167,0:02:33.358 you now wanna get seven times the y value, 0:02:33.358,0:02:35.275 seven times the y value 0:02:39.450,0:02:40.617 for a given x. 0:02:43.655,0:02:45.781 And so if you think[br]about that algebraically, 0:02:45.781,0:02:48.407 well, if I want seven times the y value, 0:02:48.407,0:02:51.514 I'd have to multiply this thing by seven. 0:02:51.514,0:02:55.516 So I would get y is[br]equal to negative seven 0:02:55.516,0:02:58.292 times the absolute value of x 0:02:58.292,0:02:59.984 and that's essentially[br]what they're asking, 0:02:59.984,0:03:01.742 what is the equation of the new graph, 0:03:01.742,0:03:03.175 and so that's what it would be. 0:03:03.175,0:03:05.795 The negative flips us over the x-axis 0:03:05.795,0:03:09.027 and then the seven scales[br]vertically by a factor of seven 0:03:09.027,0:03:11.516 but just to understand[br]what this would look like, 0:03:11.516,0:03:13.695 well, you multiply zero times seven, 0:03:13.695,0:03:15.263 it doesn't change anything 0:03:15.263,0:03:17.843 but whatever x this is, 0:03:17.843,0:03:20.049 this was equal to negative x 0:03:20.049,0:03:23.079 but now we're gonna get[br]to negative seven x. 0:03:23.079,0:03:27.760 So let's see, two, three,[br]four, five, six, seven 0:03:27.760,0:03:29.972 so it'd put it something around that. 0:03:29.972,0:03:32.545 So our graph is now going to look, 0:03:32.545,0:03:34.623 is now going to look like this. 0:03:34.623,0:03:39.334 It's going to be stretched[br]along the vertical axis. 0:03:39.334,0:03:41.701 If we were scaling vertically 0:03:41.701,0:03:44.654 by something that had an[br]absolute value less than one 0:03:44.654,0:03:46.697 then it would make the graph less tall. 0:03:46.697,0:03:47.798 It would make it look, 0:03:47.798,0:03:49.552 it would make it look wider. 0:03:49.552,0:03:52.245 Let me make it at least look[br]a little bit more symmetric. 0:03:52.245,0:03:54.670 So it's gonna look something, 0:03:54.670,0:03:57.047 something like that but the key issue 0:03:57.047,0:03:58.876 and the reason why I'm[br]drawing is so you can see 0:03:58.876,0:04:00.707 that it looks like it's[br]being scaled vertically. 0:04:00.707,0:04:02.668 It's being stretched in[br]the vertical direction 0:04:02.668,0:04:06.232 by a factor of seven and the[br]way we do that algebraically 0:04:06.232,0:04:07.418 is we multiply by seven 0:04:07.418,0:04:11.585 and the negative here is what[br]flipped us over the x-axis.