WEBVTT 00:00:05.450 --> 00:00:07.160 >> Now that you've written or edited 00:00:07.160 --> 00:00:08.680 your program's SLOs, 00:00:08.680 --> 00:00:10.980 it's time to map them to the curriculum. 00:00:10.980 --> 00:00:13.820 Curriculum mapping serves two main functions. 00:00:13.820 --> 00:00:15.320 First, it helps program 00:00:15.320 --> 00:00:16.980 administrators and faculty know 00:00:16.980 --> 00:00:18.420 where the outcomes are covered 00:00:18.420 --> 00:00:20.440 or not covered in the curriculum. 00:00:20.440 --> 00:00:23.000 Second, curriculum mapping helps to define 00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:24.780 the appropriate assessment points 00:00:24.780 --> 00:00:26.330 in your assessment plan. 00:00:26.330 --> 00:00:28.420 Before beginning the process, 00:00:28.420 --> 00:00:30.400 curriculum mapping is often viewed 00:00:30.400 --> 00:00:32.700 as a heinous task by faculty. 00:00:32.700 --> 00:00:33.960 But as you read in 00:00:33.960 --> 00:00:35.940 the Uchiyama and Raiden article, 00:00:35.940 --> 00:00:37.860 creating a curriculum map is not 00:00:37.860 --> 00:00:40.100 only necessary to program assessment, 00:00:40.100 --> 00:00:41.560 it can promote unity and 00:00:41.560 --> 00:00:43.580 collaboration in the program. 00:00:43.580 --> 00:00:46.080 To create a map, you will need to 00:00:46.080 --> 00:00:47.300 first collect a list of 00:00:47.300 --> 00:00:48.940 all the programs courses. 00:00:48.940 --> 00:00:50.700 Start with required courses, 00:00:50.700 --> 00:00:53.400 but feel free to add electives if you desire. 00:00:53.400 --> 00:00:55.600 Most people prefer to collect their maps 00:00:55.600 --> 00:00:57.980 in an Excel file or in a word table. 00:00:57.980 --> 00:00:59.280 Any file type is 00:00:59.280 --> 00:01:00.980 acceptable as long as it allows for 00:01:00.980 --> 00:01:02.620 a visual representation of 00:01:02.620 --> 00:01:05.350 the outcome's relationship to the courses. 00:01:05.350 --> 00:01:08.400 Begin by titling columns as Outcome 1, 00:01:08.400 --> 00:01:10.510 Outcome 2, and so on. 00:01:10.510 --> 00:01:12.470 Each row lists the course. 00:01:12.470 --> 00:01:14.050 An Excel template has been 00:01:14.050 --> 00:01:16.250 created for your use in this process. 00:01:16.250 --> 00:01:18.130 Finally, it's time to consult 00:01:18.130 --> 00:01:19.790 with your program's faculty. 00:01:19.790 --> 00:01:21.310 The faculty that teaches 00:01:21.310 --> 00:01:22.710 the course must be a part of 00:01:22.710 --> 00:01:24.450 this process because only they 00:01:24.450 --> 00:01:27.025 know how the course aligns to the outcomes. 00:01:27.025 --> 00:01:29.560 For each course, ask faculty 00:01:29.560 --> 00:01:31.080 which outcome or outcomes 00:01:31.080 --> 00:01:32.440 their course aligns to. 00:01:32.440 --> 00:01:34.240 Once this has been completed, 00:01:34.240 --> 00:01:36.580 ask them to prove how it aligns. 00:01:36.580 --> 00:01:39.540 It is not uncommon after conversation to 00:01:39.540 --> 00:01:40.780 find that some courses do 00:01:40.780 --> 00:01:42.900 not align to outcomes as intended. 00:01:42.900 --> 00:01:45.540 Occasionally, programs may find that a course 00:01:45.540 --> 00:01:46.680 doesn't align to any of 00:01:46.680 --> 00:01:48.840 the program stated learning outcomes. 00:01:48.840 --> 00:01:50.340 Courses may have drifted 00:01:50.340 --> 00:01:51.460 over the years away from 00:01:51.460 --> 00:01:53.140 the intended outcome or 00:01:53.140 --> 00:01:54.440 the program may have drifted 00:01:54.440 --> 00:01:56.280 away from a previous outcome. 00:01:56.280 --> 00:01:57.900 It is at times like this that 00:01:57.900 --> 00:02:00.400 a program needs to make a difficult decision. 00:02:00.400 --> 00:02:02.440 Is the course worth saving? 00:02:02.440 --> 00:02:04.380 Is there value in reworking 00:02:04.380 --> 00:02:05.260 the course so that it 00:02:05.260 --> 00:02:07.100 better aligns to an outcome? 00:02:07.100 --> 00:02:09.020 Or is it better 00:02:09.020 --> 00:02:10.860 to eliminate the course altogether and 00:02:10.860 --> 00:02:12.720 offer something new that better suits 00:02:12.720 --> 00:02:13.760 the current goals and 00:02:13.760 --> 00:02:15.280 missions of the program? 00:02:15.280 --> 00:02:17.560 Once the faculty has determined exactly 00:02:17.560 --> 00:02:18.780 where the program's outcomes 00:02:18.780 --> 00:02:20.000 aligned to the curriculum, 00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:21.700 the next step is to determine 00:02:21.700 --> 00:02:22.980 the level of interaction 00:02:22.980 --> 00:02:24.560 allowed for in the course. 00:02:24.560 --> 00:02:27.160 Ask faculty to determine if each 00:02:27.160 --> 00:02:29.780 course's outcome exposure is introductory, 00:02:29.780 --> 00:02:31.880 intermediate or degree level. 00:02:31.880 --> 00:02:34.560 Each level of exposure is identified here by 00:02:34.560 --> 00:02:36.120 a circle icon with 00:02:36.120 --> 00:02:38.140 introductory being an empty circle, 00:02:38.140 --> 00:02:40.260 intermediate a half filled circle, 00:02:40.260 --> 00:02:43.255 and degree level a completely filled circle. 00:02:43.255 --> 00:02:46.510 Introductory indicates that the student 00:02:46.510 --> 00:02:48.030 has not previously had 00:02:48.030 --> 00:02:49.750 experience with the outcome. 00:02:49.750 --> 00:02:51.790 Usually courses at the beginning of 00:02:51.790 --> 00:02:54.070 a curriculum will be labeled as introductory, 00:02:54.070 --> 00:02:56.150 but that is not always the case. 00:02:56.150 --> 00:02:57.690 An outcome may be very 00:02:57.690 --> 00:02:59.250 advanced and students may need 00:02:59.250 --> 00:03:00.710 experience in other areas 00:03:00.710 --> 00:03:03.205 before being introduced to a new outcome. 00:03:03.205 --> 00:03:05.730 Graduate programs may find that they never 00:03:05.730 --> 00:03:07.650 introduce a particular outcome 00:03:07.650 --> 00:03:09.310 and this might be okay. 00:03:09.310 --> 00:03:11.650 Some programs may expect that students were 00:03:11.650 --> 00:03:12.830 introduced to an outcome in 00:03:12.830 --> 00:03:14.690 their undergraduate programs. 00:03:14.690 --> 00:03:16.570 When a program marks an outcome 00:03:16.570 --> 00:03:18.210 as degree level in a course, 00:03:18.210 --> 00:03:19.530 it is indicating that 00:03:19.530 --> 00:03:20.890 the course is one that will 00:03:20.890 --> 00:03:22.330 move students to a level of 00:03:22.330 --> 00:03:24.380 proficiency in that outcome. 00:03:24.380 --> 00:03:26.170 Capstone courses are often 00:03:26.170 --> 00:03:28.490 areas where outcomes are at degree level. 00:03:28.490 --> 00:03:30.490 If an outcome is important, 00:03:30.490 --> 00:03:33.030 one exposure is simply not enough. 00:03:33.030 --> 00:03:35.310 Exposure should occur often 00:03:35.310 --> 00:03:37.210 and ideally throughout 00:03:37.210 --> 00:03:38.710 the course of the curriculum. 00:03:38.710 --> 00:03:40.610 When determining the extent to which 00:03:40.610 --> 00:03:43.370 a course's outcome exposure is introductory, 00:03:43.370 --> 00:03:45.470 intermediate, or degree level, 00:03:45.470 --> 00:03:46.810 have faculty once 00:03:46.810 --> 00:03:48.690 again defend their opinions. 00:03:48.690 --> 00:03:50.770 The group should agree that the map 00:03:50.770 --> 00:03:51.990 accurately conveys 00:03:51.990 --> 00:03:54.090 the activities of the curriculum. 00:03:54.090 --> 00:03:56.010 Once all courses have been mapped, 00:03:56.010 --> 00:03:57.790 the curriculum should be examined for 00:03:57.790 --> 00:04:01.385 over and under-exposure, gaps and logic. 00:04:01.385 --> 00:04:04.335 Ask the faculty to look at each outcome. 00:04:04.335 --> 00:04:05.880 Are there any outcomes that have 00:04:05.880 --> 00:04:08.340 too little exposure in the curriculum, 00:04:08.340 --> 00:04:09.920 outcomes that are never 00:04:09.920 --> 00:04:11.550 exposed in the curriculum? 00:04:11.550 --> 00:04:12.940 Are there outcomes that are 00:04:12.940 --> 00:04:14.540 never at degree level? 00:04:14.540 --> 00:04:16.500 Are there courses that seemingly 00:04:16.500 --> 00:04:18.100 map to every outcome? 00:04:18.100 --> 00:04:20.680 Are there courses that map to nothing? 00:04:20.680 --> 00:04:22.580 If so, should those courses 00:04:22.580 --> 00:04:24.100 remain in the curriculum? 00:04:24.100 --> 00:04:25.740 Asking questions like this 00:04:25.740 --> 00:04:27.440 will help faculty determine if 00:04:27.440 --> 00:04:29.340 the curriculum adequately fits 00:04:29.340 --> 00:04:31.355 the goals of the program. 00:04:31.355 --> 00:04:32.590 Sometimes 00:04:32.590 --> 00:04:34.890 the mapping process can be uncomfortable. 00:04:34.890 --> 00:04:36.770 No faculty member wants to 00:04:36.770 --> 00:04:38.490 hear that the course they teach doesn't 00:04:38.490 --> 00:04:40.610 map to any of the outcomes or that 00:04:40.610 --> 00:04:41.910 it introduces an outcome 00:04:41.910 --> 00:04:43.530 when it should emphasize it. 00:04:43.530 --> 00:04:46.090 If there are gaps in outcome coverage, 00:04:46.090 --> 00:04:47.590 it isn't always easy to 00:04:47.590 --> 00:04:49.910 decide if a new course should be created 00:04:49.910 --> 00:04:51.330 or if it would be better for 00:04:51.330 --> 00:04:52.550 the program to rework 00:04:52.550 --> 00:04:53.930 a current course to 00:04:53.930 --> 00:04:55.850 better meet the goals of the program. 00:04:55.850 --> 00:04:57.530 Problems like these have 00:04:57.530 --> 00:04:59.255 no clear cut answers. 00:04:59.255 --> 00:05:00.730 Each program must find 00:05:00.730 --> 00:05:01.450 their own way to 00:05:01.450 --> 00:05:03.730 deal with curriculum complications. 00:05:03.730 --> 00:05:05.950 Your assignment is to create 00:05:05.950 --> 00:05:08.290 a program curriculum map that accurately 00:05:08.290 --> 00:05:10.590 reflects the relationship between each of 00:05:10.590 --> 00:05:13.350 your program's courses and the outcomes. 00:05:13.350 --> 00:05:14.950 We encourage you to involve 00:05:14.950 --> 00:05:17.390 as many faculty as you can in this process, 00:05:17.390 --> 00:05:18.730 as it will help to ensure 00:05:18.730 --> 00:05:20.210 that your map is correct. 00:05:20.210 --> 00:05:22.650 Your map must show how each of the programs 00:05:22.650 --> 00:05:23.630 courses aligned to 00:05:23.630 --> 00:05:25.550 the programs stated outcomes. 00:05:25.550 --> 00:05:27.270 Each course should be labeled 00:05:27.270 --> 00:05:28.410 to explain the level of 00:05:28.410 --> 00:05:31.490 outcome proficiency expected in that course. 00:05:31.490 --> 00:05:33.650 Is the course introductory, 00:05:33.650 --> 00:05:36.030 intermediate or degree level? 00:05:36.030 --> 00:05:38.750 Map should be examined for gaps, 00:05:38.750 --> 00:05:41.530 logic, and issues of exposure. 00:05:41.530 --> 00:05:43.590 If there are problems with the map, 00:05:43.590 --> 00:05:45.130 as it currently stands, 00:05:45.130 --> 00:05:47.530 please create a plan for alleviating 00:05:47.530 --> 00:05:48.910 any curriculum problems 00:05:48.910 --> 00:05:50.550 made evident by the map. 00:05:50.550 --> 00:05:52.350 Once complete, send 00:05:52.350 --> 00:05:53.690 your completed curriculum map 00:05:53.690 --> 00:05:54.470 and student learning 00:05:54.470 --> 00:05:55.110 outcomes to 00:05:55.110 --> 00:05:57.210 your institution's assessment staff 00:05:57.210 --> 00:05:59.570 for review and feedback.