0:00:00.770,0:00:02.560 Voiceover: In this video[br]I want to clarify a little 0:00:02.560,0:00:03.743 bit about why we calculate[br]the percent changes 0:00:03.743,0:00:06.607 when we're thinking about elasticity 0:00:06.607,0:00:07.897 the way that we do. 0:00:07.897,0:00:09.495 So just to remind ourselves, 0:00:09.495,0:00:11.572 a little focus on price[br]elasticity of demand, 0:00:11.572,0:00:13.314 although we've been exposed to other 0:00:13.314,0:00:15.338 types of elasticities already. 0:00:15.338,0:00:17.079 Just as a review, price[br]elasticity of demand, 0:00:17.079,0:00:19.546 so the elasticity of demand, 0:00:19.546,0:00:23.614 is defined as the percent[br]change in quantity 0:00:23.614,0:00:29.114 demanded over the percent change in price. 0:00:29.283,0:00:31.149 So first I'll calculate[br]it the conventional way, 0:00:31.149,0:00:32.863 the way you would do it in a traditional 0:00:32.863,0:00:34.123 microeconomics class. 0:00:34.123,0:00:36.090 Then I'll calculate it the way 0:00:36.090,0:00:37.739 that you would just based on how you would 0:00:37.739,0:00:39.113 traditionally calculate percentages 0:00:39.113,0:00:41.063 and we'll see why microeconomists 0:00:41.063,0:00:43.245 like to do it the way that they do. 0:00:43.245,0:00:46.496 First we'll talk about the "correct" way. 0:00:46.496,0:00:48.408 I'll put it in quotes because correct 0:00:48.408,0:00:51.039 is by definition really[br]just by convention. 0:00:51.039,0:00:55.020 But when we first think about[br]the percent change in quantity, 0:00:55.020,0:00:57.150 percent change in quantity[br]and we're going to assume, 0:00:57.150,0:00:59.199 we're going to calculate the elasticity 0:00:59.199,0:01:00.935 of demand between point A over here, 0:01:00.935,0:01:05.239 point A and point B over here. 0:01:05.239,0:01:07.417 So what is our percent change in quantity? 0:01:07.417,0:01:10.024 Well, our absolute change in quantity 0:01:10.024,0:01:14.431 going from A to B we have increased by 2. 0:01:14.431,0:01:16.633 So we have increased by 2. 0:01:16.633,0:01:18.050 I'll write it down here. 0:01:18.050,0:01:20.461 This is going to be 2 over and then this 0:01:20.461,0:01:22.558 is kind of the slightly strange thing 0:01:22.558,0:01:24.410 that we do when we[br]calculate our percentages. 0:01:24.410,0:01:26.141 We don't say 2 over 4. 0:01:26.141,0:01:29.090 We say 2 over the average of 4 and 6. 0:01:29.090,0:01:30.612 It's 2 over the average of our starting 0:01:30.612,0:01:32.535 point and our ending point. 0:01:32.535,0:01:34.604 The average of 4 and 6 is 5. 0:01:34.604,0:01:36.170 So this is going to be ... 0:01:36.170,0:01:38.248 We have a 40% change based on how 0:01:38.248,0:01:40.562 we calculated the percentages 0:01:40.562,0:01:42.615 in our quantity demanded, 0:01:42.615,0:01:46.351 and then let's do our[br]percent change in price. 0:01:46.351,0:01:48.210 So this is all going to be over 0:01:48.210,0:01:50.138 our percent change in price. 0:01:50.138,0:01:52.508 Our absolute change in[br]price is negative 1 dollar. 0:01:52.508,0:01:56.038 Negative 1 dollar and[br]then instead of doing it 0:01:56.038,0:01:58.634 over our starting point over 2, 0:01:58.634,0:02:03.954 we do it over the average[br]of the 2, over 150. 0:02:03.954,0:02:08.143 Negative 1 over 150 is[br]negative two-thirds, 0:02:08.143,0:02:14.569 or right about negative[br]66.7% if we say roughly. 0:02:14.569,0:02:16.564 So this right over here ... 0:02:16.564,0:02:19.063 so based on how we calculated percentages, 0:02:19.063,0:02:20.710 and I want to make it clear, 0:02:20.710,0:02:22.703 this is kind of a strange way, 0:02:22.703,0:02:24.165 when we do it over the midpoint 0:02:24.165,0:02:25.950 of the starting and ending points, 0:02:25.950,0:02:27.544 but we're saying that our percent change 0:02:27.544,0:02:29.687 from A to B in quantity, 0:02:29.687,0:02:31.610 so our percent change in quantity, 0:02:31.610,0:02:33.885 this right over here we[br]are saying it is 40%, 0:02:34.069,0:02:37.715 and then we are saying that this percent 0:02:37.715,0:02:43.703 change in price right over[br]here is negative 66.7%. 0:02:43.703,0:02:46.074 Now, the reason why this is valuable, 0:02:46.074,0:02:48.199 and then obviously if you[br]do the math right here, 0:02:48.199,0:02:50.933 40% over negative 66.7% percent, 0:02:50.933,0:02:52.695 you're going to get some 0:02:52.695,0:02:54.180 let's see you're going to get something. 0:02:54.180,0:02:55.388 I think it's going to be in the 6s. 0:02:55.388,0:02:56.730 Point 6 something but let's actually get a 0:02:56.730,0:02:59.019 calculator out to calculate it. 0:02:59.019,0:03:04.023 It would be 40 divided by 66.7 gives you, 0:03:04.023,0:03:07.533 it's almost 60 so it's roughly point 60 0:03:07.533,0:03:09.051 if we were to round. 0:03:09.051,0:03:11.812 This is approximately 0.60. 0:03:11.812,0:03:14.401 It was 597 something. 0:03:14.401,0:03:17.173 Actually I'll just leave[br]it that way at point 60. 0:03:17.173,0:03:19.399 Now, what's cool about this 0:03:19.399,0:03:20.763 or what's useful about this, 0:03:20.763,0:03:23.335 and this is the reason why[br]we kind of mis-do it is, 0:03:23.335,0:03:25.154 you would get the same answer 0:03:25.154,0:03:26.568 whether you're going from A to B 0:03:26.568,0:03:28.532 or whether you're going from B to A. 0:03:28.532,0:03:32.174 This is the situation where[br]we're going from A to B, 0:03:32.186,0:03:34.013 but if we were to go from B to A, 0:03:34.013,0:03:37.071 if we were to go from B to[br]A it's the exact same thing. 0:03:37.071,0:03:40.311 If we go from B to A what[br]is our change in quantity? 0:03:40.311,0:03:43.220 Our change in quantity is negative 2. 0:03:43.220,0:03:45.772 It would be negative 2 over, 0:03:45.772,0:03:48.149 now you wouldn't do it[br]over your starting point. 0:03:48.149,0:03:50.170 You do it over the average. 0:03:50.170,0:03:51.868 This is why we will get the same value 0:03:51.868,0:03:54.268 regardless of what direction we go in. 0:03:54.268,0:03:57.277 We get the average of 4[br]and 6 is going to be 5. 0:03:57.277,0:03:59.207 That's going to be over. 0:03:59.207,0:04:01.604 Now going from B to A what[br]is our change in price? 0:04:01.604,0:04:04.094 Our change in price is now plus 1. 0:04:04.094,0:04:07.635 It is plus 1 over the[br]average of our starting 0:04:07.635,0:04:10.384 point and our ending point, over 150. 0:04:10.384,0:04:12.477 Now these are the exact same quantities. 0:04:12.477,0:04:14.412 Both are going to be a negative number. 0:04:14.412,0:04:16.324 Here the negative is on the bottom. 0:04:16.324,0:04:18.150 Here the negative is on top. 0:04:18.150,0:04:20.144 Either way and actually[br]this was a negative 0:04:20.144,0:04:22.158 point 60 because you have a positive 0:04:22.158,0:04:23.318 divided by a negative. 0:04:23.318,0:04:25.091 This too when you evaluate it, 0:04:25.091,0:04:26.666 is going to turn out to[br]be the exact same thing. 0:04:26.666,0:04:30.286 It's going to be negative 0.60. 0:04:30.286,0:04:33.004 Now if you calculated percentages[br]in the traditional way, 0:04:33.004,0:04:35.208 you would not get the same value for the 0:04:35.208,0:04:37.263 price elasticity of demand, 0:04:37.263,0:04:39.666 whether you go from A to B and B to A. 0:04:39.666,0:04:41.792 Just to show that to you, 0:04:41.792,0:04:44.135 I will put this in quotation marks. 0:04:44.135,0:04:46.867 It's not the "wrong"[br]way to do it in general. 0:04:46.867,0:04:48.800 In fact, this is how you would calculate 0:04:48.800,0:04:50.037 price changes traditionally, 0:04:50.037,0:04:52.004 but it's not how you do it in kind of a 0:04:52.004,0:04:53.739 microeconomic sense. 0:04:53.739,0:04:56.743 If you did the wrong way[br]... If you said from A to B 0:04:56.743,0:05:05.953 your absolute change in quantity[br]is plus 2 and your base ... 0:05:05.953,0:05:08.402 Remember this is the way[br]that it's done outside 0:05:08.402,0:05:09.913 of microeconomics. 0:05:09.913,0:05:14.778 Your base is 4 and then[br]your change in price, 0:05:14.778,0:05:17.795 you went down 1 and your base, 0:05:17.795,0:05:19.715 you started at A, 0:05:19.715,0:05:22.328 so your base is 2. 0:05:22.328,0:05:24.275 This is the way you do it[br]outside of economics class. 0:05:24.428,0:05:27.208 This would be equal to 0:05:27.208,0:05:34.843 50% plus 50% over negative 50%, 0:05:34.843,0:05:37.070 over negative 50%. 0:05:37.070,0:05:39.116 You essentially get negative 1. 0:05:39.116,0:05:41.408 Going from A to B using a traditional way 0:05:41.408,0:05:43.133 of calculating percent change. 0:05:43.133,0:05:45.493 What happens if you go from B to A? 0:05:45.493,0:05:48.198 What happens if you go from B to A? 0:05:48.198,0:05:50.744 Now, all of the sudden, your[br]change in quantity is negative 2. 0:05:50.744,0:05:54.296 Your base is now ...[br]the starting point is 6. 0:05:54.296,0:05:56.803 Your starting point is 6. 0:05:56.803,0:05:58.632 Then your change in price, 0:05:58.632,0:06:00.735 once again you're increasing in price by 1 0:06:00.735,0:06:02.381 going from B to A, 0:06:02.381,0:06:04.069 so this is plus 1. 0:06:04.069,0:06:06.046 Your base is now 1. 0:06:06.046,0:06:07.824 You will get, 0:06:07.824,0:06:09.898 this is negative 33% roughly, 0:06:09.898,0:06:13.227 that's negative a third, so 33.333, 0:06:13.227,0:06:18.803 it keeps repeating over 100%. 0:06:18.803,0:06:22.716 This will be equal to negative point 33. 0:06:22.716,0:06:24.562 Notice when you calculate percentages 0:06:24.562,0:06:26.028 in the traditional way, 0:06:26.028,0:06:28.080 you get a different answer[br]whether you're going from 0:06:28.096,0:06:30.843 A to B or whether you're[br]going from B to A. 0:06:30.843,0:06:33.336 The whole reason why when[br]we take the percentages, 0:06:33.336,0:06:35.018 we take it over the average of our 0:06:35.018,0:06:36.565 starting and our ending points, 0:06:36.565,0:06:38.623 over the average of our[br]starting and ending points. 0:06:38.623,0:06:41.222 is so we get the same[br]value for the elasticity 0:06:41.222,0:06:43.195 of demand along this portion of the curve. 0:06:43.195,0:06:44.964 You can really view it as the average 0:06:44.964,0:06:47.970 elasticity of demand over[br]this portion of the curve 0:06:47.970,0:06:50.162 and if you calculate it this way, 0:06:50.162,0:06:52.160 it doesn't matter whether you're going 0:06:52.160,0:06:54.000 from A to B or B to A.