1 00:00:30,206 --> 00:00:37,260 Hello and good evening on day two of the chaos communication Camp 2023 Translated by {Yang}{Li} (ITKST56 course assignment at JYU.FI)] 2 00:00:37,260 --> 00:00:42,187 it's late in the evening this is meleeway stage in case you're wondering 3 00:00:42,230 --> 00:00:48,176 and the next talk is going to be about incident report responses 4 00:00:48,476 --> 00:00:59,520 so if you're curious about how to even get there to have an incident response how you could prepare for an incident response and how you could support a new organization 5 00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:07,258 uh, the incident response team in doing the job and trying to fix whatever broke 6 00:01:07,258 --> 00:01:11,677 let's put it that way um we have the right talk for you 7 00:01:11,677 --> 00:01:17,352 this is stories from the life of an incident from incident responders Harry and Chris 8 00:01:17,352 --> 00:01:23,500 please a very warm Round of Applause [Applause] 9 00:01:28,925 --> 00:01:36,675 so, good evening and thank you for joining us today um we will tell you a little bit of our 10 00:01:36,675 --> 00:01:43,664 life as incident responders and I'm Chris I did my computer science 11 00:01:43,664 --> 00:01:48,784 studies at the University of alang and Nuremberg I do this security stuff for 12 00:01:48,784 --> 00:01:55,394 over 10 years now so my CV is a little bit longer at the moment I'm a detection 13 00:01:55,415 --> 00:02:01,425 engineer before that I was a long time working in dfir so digital forensic incident 14 00:02:01,425 --> 00:02:06,062 response in different organizations and 15 00:02:07,411 --> 00:02:12,388 yeah I'm Harryr I studied electrical and computer engineering at RWTH 16 00:02:12,395 --> 00:02:18,165 University and I played a lot of CTF and did some hacking stuff at chaos computer club RWTH 17 00:02:18,165 --> 00:02:24,523 during my masters I worked at x41 dsac doing pen testing patch analysis 18 00:02:24,589 --> 00:02:32,359 so I also have some kind of offensive security background on for around one year now I'm working at G data Advanced 19 00:02:32,359 --> 00:02:36,619 analytics doing digital forensics and incident handling 20 00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:45,390 first Christian will give you a short introduction and then he will tell you how a classical ransomware attack looks 21 00:02:45,390 --> 00:02:51,097 like and in the second part of the talk I will tell you how the incident 22 00:02:51,097 --> 00:02:58,167 responders work and what you can do in advance to make it go as smooth as possible and support the incident 23 00:02:58,167 --> 00:03:05,035 response team so as Harryr told you I will probably 24 00:03:05,035 --> 00:03:12,290 we'll talk about ransomware because the customers we usually have are small and 25 00:03:12,290 --> 00:03:17,543 medium-sized businesses universities and hospitals and those are regularly 26 00:03:17,543 --> 00:03:23,268 unfortunately regularly hit by um um 27 00:03:24,017 --> 00:03:29,557 ransomware gangs the main reason for this and that's if you heard the last 28 00:03:29,557 --> 00:03:35,096 talk um why they maybe not that responsive 29 00:03:35,096 --> 00:03:42,058 and are not so interested in they just lack the resources so the manpower to do 30 00:03:42,058 --> 00:03:48,424 uh proper security measurements to secure their systems especially in in erm 31 00:03:48,424 --> 00:03:53,618 situations where you are for example in a hospital have medical devices 32 00:03:53,618 --> 00:03:59,378 um which where you cannot simply install an AV on or even patch the system 33 00:03:59,378 --> 00:04:07,321 because you lose the certification as a medical device then but also in in 34 00:04:07,321 --> 00:04:12,953 companies manufacturing companies on the shop floor we're talking about systems 35 00:04:12,953 --> 00:04:21,292 that have run times of 25 plus years so if you look back now 2023 36 00:04:21,292 --> 00:04:26,823 we're talking about XP and older systems fun fact I was in a ransomware case and 37 00:04:26,823 --> 00:04:34,230 Wannacry in 2017 when I got a call from from a person from the shop floor 38 00:04:34,230 --> 00:04:38,000 asking me if we have a nt4 expert, um 39 00:04:40,200 --> 00:04:47,380 that can tell us if WannaCry is affecting nt4 of course you don't need 40 00:04:47,380 --> 00:04:54,071 to be a expert for NT-4 this one requires of course not affecting nt4 41 00:04:54,071 --> 00:04:59,602 systems so due to the time uh slot we thought 42 00:04:59,602 --> 00:05:04,915 memes are the best way to to tell you those stories and we have a lot of them 43 00:05:06,453 --> 00:05:12,822 so in the first uh um section I tell you a little bit of how an attack Works 44 00:05:12,822 --> 00:05:21,062 um there are a lot of different possibilities how you can describe and how to structure the how an attack works 45 00:05:22,257 --> 00:05:28,993 there's the miter attack framework for example there was for example a talk Yesterday by Maker Salko 46 00:05:28,993 --> 00:05:34,854 um here on the stage there's the original cyber kill chain from from Lockheed Martin you have 47 00:05:37,190 --> 00:05:42,480 stuff from from companies like Mandy and their targeted the tech life cycle but 48 00:05:42,480 --> 00:05:47,550 that's all in my opinion two two fine-grained it's that's the reason I 49 00:05:47,550 --> 00:05:53,275 just take three simple steps yeah get a foothold in the door 50 00:05:53,275 --> 00:06:00,645 look move play around and cash out those three uh I will just go over 51 00:06:03,141 --> 00:06:07,835 so start with uh get a foot in the door so normally we 52 00:06:07,835 --> 00:06:14,756 see three ways how attackers can can get into the environment in the ransomware 53 00:06:14,756 --> 00:06:20,655 cases you have vulnerabilities in uh remote uh internet facing systems you 54 00:06:20,655 --> 00:06:25,875 have the remote Services itself and you have malware 55 00:06:26,712 --> 00:06:35,507 starting with the with the the vulnerabilities and um I just looked uh up the last four 56 00:06:35,507 --> 00:06:42,060 years and maybe somebody remembers netscaler the the so-called Citrix 57 00:06:42,060 --> 00:06:49,789 vulnerability in December 2019 um it was released mid of uh 2019 uh 58 00:06:49,789 --> 00:06:55,889 December 2019 the first POC publicly available POC was in beginning of 59 00:06:55,889 --> 00:07:03,293 January and the patch was available in middle of January so there was a round one week to one and a half weeks between 60 00:07:03,293 --> 00:07:10,494 a public proof of concept for the vulnerability and uh patch for the vulnerability and what we saw 61 00:07:10,494 --> 00:07:17,194 during 2020 a lot of companies patched but the patch didn't remove the the 62 00:07:17,194 --> 00:07:25,469 compromise so they were already compromised and um yeah with it with the patch they 63 00:07:25,469 --> 00:07:31,114 didn't remove the compromise so what we found what we could provable 64 00:07:31,114 --> 00:07:36,184 see or proof evidence for uh was nine 65 00:07:36,184 --> 00:07:42,286 month uh customer was breached after nine months using this this vulnerability 66 00:07:43,176 --> 00:07:51,434 and we had other customers where we could see that the netscaler was affected after two years but we couldn't 67 00:07:51,434 --> 00:08:00,073 prove that this this compromise was the reason for the actual ransomware case 68 00:08:00,275 --> 00:08:04,914 and of course such vulnerabilities happen not that often 69 00:08:06,295 --> 00:08:10,405 yeah so 2021 gave us uh hafnium exchange