WEBVTT 00:00:00.309 --> 00:00:03.309 (suspenseful music) 00:00:23.300 --> 00:00:25.139 - I think so, but what does done mean? 00:00:25.139 --> 00:00:27.806 (laughs) - Yeah. 00:00:32.170 --> 00:00:35.033 - Text has this illusion of comprehensiveness. 00:00:37.254 --> 00:00:38.320 (paper flipping) 00:00:38.320 --> 00:00:40.330 Even if you've read something once, 00:00:40.330 --> 00:00:42.633 it doesn't mean that you understand it. 00:00:46.990 --> 00:00:48.790 So I sort of like to play with language 00:00:50.400 --> 00:00:53.510 and making something either very, very legible 00:01:00.010 --> 00:01:02.093 or making something very, very opaque. 00:01:07.970 --> 00:01:10.870 And encouraging people to do the work of understanding it, 00:01:13.460 --> 00:01:14.893 it's really an invitation, 00:01:17.640 --> 00:01:18.683 come think with me. 00:01:30.603 --> 00:01:33.353 (paper rustling) - Oh yeah. 00:01:41.290 --> 00:01:42.833 Of all the family members, 00:01:44.540 --> 00:01:46.603 I'm the most organizationally inclined. 00:01:47.640 --> 00:01:50.650 So I have taken, whenever I go home, 00:01:50.650 --> 00:01:53.033 steal a few more photos each time. 00:01:58.660 --> 00:02:02.103 So my dad was converted to Islam in the early 1980s. 00:02:02.980 --> 00:02:07.980 He basically was learning Islam by typewriting these notes. 00:02:08.111 --> 00:02:12.000 (typewriter keyboard thumping) 00:02:12.000 --> 00:02:13.790 He would photocopy pieces of religious texts, 00:02:13.790 --> 00:02:15.400 and he would then paste them on a sheet of paper, 00:02:15.400 --> 00:02:17.233 and they he would annotate them. 00:02:18.210 --> 00:02:20.910 He came to make sense of things through this 00:02:20.910 --> 00:02:23.303 repeated reading and rereading process. 00:02:25.500 --> 00:02:27.320 I thought this was so lovely because I was thinking 00:02:27.320 --> 00:02:29.773 about this idea of talking back to a text. 00:02:31.520 --> 00:02:33.650 A text itself is never finished, 00:02:33.650 --> 00:02:35.360 each time we read something new, 00:02:35.360 --> 00:02:36.780 we're either annotating on the page 00:02:36.780 --> 00:02:37.960 or annotating in our brain, 00:02:37.960 --> 00:02:40.570 and we're creating what literally are new texts. 00:02:40.570 --> 00:02:45.373 This active collaboration between the reader and the writer, 00:02:46.700 --> 00:02:50.300 the text is there not to offer us a final meaning, 00:02:50.300 --> 00:02:52.140 but it's actually there as an invitation 00:02:52.140 --> 00:02:55.003 for us to actively engage with it. 00:02:56.252 --> 00:02:58.250 (papers rustling) 00:02:58.250 --> 00:03:03.250 If you look at (laughs) my dad and I's notes, 00:03:03.370 --> 00:03:07.509 what he did as a study tool is basically my art practice. 00:03:07.509 --> 00:03:11.259 (suspenseful music building) 00:03:41.196 --> 00:03:44.029 (papers rustling) 00:03:51.458 --> 00:03:55.125 Huh, that's literally exactly what I do now, I read a lot and do arts. (laughs) 00:03:59.760 --> 00:04:02.803 Feel like our young selves know exactly what we wanna do. 00:04:03.941 --> 00:04:07.340 (bright electronic music) 00:04:07.340 --> 00:04:10.420 There's nothing that I've done in my life 00:04:10.420 --> 00:04:12.513 that hasn't been focused on text. 00:04:15.030 --> 00:04:17.513 I'm really interested in what words convey, 00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:21.793 but also how they appear on the page, 00:04:25.800 --> 00:04:26.803 on walls, 00:04:33.690 --> 00:04:35.223 and public space. 00:04:38.660 --> 00:04:40.020 What might it mean to see this 00:04:40.020 --> 00:04:41.963 every Tuesday when you walk by? 00:04:44.260 --> 00:04:46.760 What it means to sort of engage with the text 00:04:46.760 --> 00:04:48.303 over and over and over? 00:04:50.520 --> 00:04:52.393 Rereading as this ritual. 00:04:54.560 --> 00:04:57.680 I'm really interested in the concept of the word 00:04:59.380 --> 00:05:00.213 and what it carries, 00:05:00.213 --> 00:05:03.713 as well it's actually trying to say or do. 00:05:06.870 --> 00:05:09.703 (papers rustling) 00:05:16.350 --> 00:05:18.360 When I'm looking for texts, 00:05:18.360 --> 00:05:20.670 I'm usually not looking for a particular sentence. 00:05:20.670 --> 00:05:25.100 I'm looking for a particular shape of a letter 00:05:25.100 --> 00:05:26.130 or a shape of a word. 00:05:26.130 --> 00:05:29.315 So I'll flip through any texts on my bookshelf 00:05:29.315 --> 00:05:33.340 looking for the perfect A or the perfect B. 00:05:33.340 --> 00:05:35.588 In a lot of ways I'm trying to figure out 00:05:35.588 --> 00:05:39.340 the individual letter and then start piecing letters 00:05:39.340 --> 00:05:41.093 and words together from there. 00:05:42.080 --> 00:05:44.750 (suspenseful music) 00:05:44.750 --> 00:05:47.540 So the one that I'm writing now from all these pieces 00:05:47.540 --> 00:05:49.670 is "Should they be circling the echo mouth 00:05:49.670 --> 00:05:51.300 that's sloped upward?" 00:05:51.300 --> 00:05:52.960 Do I know what that means at this particular moment? 00:05:52.960 --> 00:05:55.640 No, but there is something interesting to me 00:05:55.640 --> 00:05:57.883 about the idea of circling an echo. 00:06:00.960 --> 00:06:03.170 How do I take something that could be said 00:06:03.170 --> 00:06:06.410 very, very plainly, and code it or use cryptography 00:06:06.410 --> 00:06:09.420 to make it harder to understand? 00:06:09.420 --> 00:06:13.003 We circle ambulate the affiliate's solution. 00:06:14.020 --> 00:06:15.860 Sort of inviting people to go slow 00:06:17.430 --> 00:06:19.580 instead of trying to rush to understanding. 00:06:22.450 --> 00:06:24.660 If you read a sentence that immediately doesn't make sense, 00:06:24.660 --> 00:06:26.253 you have two options, right? 00:06:28.020 --> 00:06:30.093 You can ignore the sentence and move on, 00:06:32.400 --> 00:06:34.600 or you can spend a bit of time unpacking it. 00:06:41.077 --> 00:06:43.660 (gentle music) 00:06:44.730 --> 00:06:46.700 It's almost a proxy for thinking 00:06:46.700 --> 00:06:49.230 about how we can move through other ways 00:06:49.230 --> 00:06:52.323 of reading the world with a bit more care and slowness. 00:06:56.320 --> 00:06:59.210 Would ask that we spend a bit more time with things 00:06:59.210 --> 00:07:01.560 that are confusing instead of writing them off. 00:07:05.540 --> 00:07:08.280 I think a lot about what it actually means 00:07:08.280 --> 00:07:11.243 to make myself legible, invisible. 00:07:14.070 --> 00:07:16.050 When am I being intentionally opaque 00:07:16.050 --> 00:07:18.713 and ensuring that not everyone can get in, 00:07:20.490 --> 00:07:22.680 and when am I being very open and wanting 00:07:22.680 --> 00:07:24.623 for more people to have access? 00:07:26.810 --> 00:07:29.550 How you present yourself to the world that's legible 00:07:29.550 --> 00:07:30.763 and appeasing to people, 00:07:33.140 --> 00:07:36.113 versus I'm not gonna make myself known until I'm ready? 00:07:37.014 --> 00:07:39.597 (gentle music)