1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,720 2 00:00:00,720 --> 00:00:02,440 This right over here is a self-portrait 3 00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:04,520 that Rembrandt made in 1640, and what's 4 00:00:04,520 --> 00:00:07,300 really interesting about it is like other great artists 5 00:00:07,300 --> 00:00:09,370 like Leonardo da Vinci and Salvador Dali 6 00:00:09,370 --> 00:00:12,090 and many, many, many others, Rembrandt really 7 00:00:12,090 --> 00:00:15,980 cared about something called the golden ratio. 8 00:00:15,980 --> 00:00:18,320 And I've done whole videos about it. 9 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:21,440 And it's this fascinating, fascinating, fascinating number 10 00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:27,195 that's usually denoted by the Greek letter phi. 11 00:00:27,195 --> 00:00:28,570 And if you were to expand it out, 12 00:00:28,570 --> 00:00:33,990 it's an irrational number, 1.61803, 13 00:00:33,990 --> 00:00:36,290 and it just goes on and on and on forever, 14 00:00:36,290 --> 00:00:39,870 but there's some very neat mathematical properties of phi, 15 00:00:39,870 --> 00:00:41,280 or the golden ratio. 16 00:00:41,280 --> 00:00:46,440 If you start with phi, and if you were to add to that, 17 00:00:46,440 --> 00:00:47,950 or actually let's start it this way. 18 00:00:47,950 --> 00:00:54,990 If you were to start with 1 and add to that 1 over phi. 19 00:00:54,990 --> 00:00:56,970 Let me write my phi a little bit better. 20 00:00:56,970 --> 00:01:01,260 You add to that 1 over phi, that gives you phi. 21 00:01:01,260 --> 00:01:03,140 So that's kind of a neat thing. 22 00:01:03,140 --> 00:01:06,120 Now, if you were to multiply both sides of this equation 23 00:01:06,120 --> 00:01:09,740 by phi, you get that, if you start with phi, 24 00:01:09,740 --> 00:01:12,910 and then if you add 1, you get phi squared. 25 00:01:12,910 --> 00:01:15,732 So it's a number you add 1, you get its square. 26 00:01:15,732 --> 00:01:17,440 These are all really, really neat things. 27 00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:19,780 It can even be written as a continued fraction. 28 00:01:19,780 --> 00:01:29,160 Phi could be rewritten as 1 plus 1 over 1 plus 1 over 1 plus 1 29 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:31,560 over, and we just go like that forever and ever and ever. 30 00:01:31,560 --> 00:01:32,819 That also gives you phi. 31 00:01:32,819 --> 00:01:34,860 So hopefully this gives you a little appreciation 32 00:01:34,860 --> 00:01:37,110 that this is a really cool number. 33 00:01:37,110 --> 00:01:39,120 And not only is it cool mathematically, 34 00:01:39,120 --> 00:01:41,179 but it shows up throughout nature, 35 00:01:41,179 --> 00:01:43,720 and it's something that artists have cared about because they 36 00:01:43,720 --> 00:01:47,530 believe that it helps define human beauty. 37 00:01:47,530 --> 00:01:50,060 And we see that Rembrandt really cared about it 38 00:01:50,060 --> 00:01:51,250 in this painting. 39 00:01:51,250 --> 00:01:52,180 And how can we tell? 40 00:01:52,180 --> 00:01:54,346 Well that's what we're going to analyze a little bit 41 00:01:54,346 --> 00:01:55,940 through this exercise in this video. 42 00:01:55,940 --> 00:01:57,360 We can construct a triangle. 43 00:01:57,360 --> 00:01:59,985 Obviously these triangles aren't part of his original painting. 44 00:01:59,985 --> 00:02:01,460 We superimposed these. 45 00:02:01,460 --> 00:02:03,700 But if you were to put a base of a triangle right 46 00:02:03,700 --> 00:02:05,790 where his arm is resting, and then 47 00:02:05,790 --> 00:02:08,139 if you were to have the two sides of the triangle 48 00:02:08,139 --> 00:02:12,050 outline his arms and shoulders and then meet at the tip right 49 00:02:12,050 --> 00:02:16,320 at the top of this arch, you would construct triangle ABD 50 00:02:16,320 --> 00:02:17,930 just like we have here. 51 00:02:17,930 --> 00:02:19,570 And then if you were to go to his eyes, 52 00:02:19,570 --> 00:02:20,940 and you could imagine human eyes are 53 00:02:20,940 --> 00:02:23,356 what we naturally look at, whether we're looking at a face 54 00:02:23,356 --> 00:02:24,720 or a painting of a face. 55 00:02:24,720 --> 00:02:27,530 If you look at his eyes, and if you were to draw a line there 56 00:02:27,530 --> 00:02:29,930 that's parallel, well, that really connects the eyes, 57 00:02:29,930 --> 00:02:32,900 and that's parallel to the BD right over here-- so let's 58 00:02:32,900 --> 00:02:35,890 call that segment PR right over there-- 59 00:02:35,890 --> 00:02:41,710 we'll see that this ratio, the ratio between this smaller 60 00:02:41,710 --> 00:02:45,770 triangle and this larger triangle, involves phi. 61 00:02:45,770 --> 00:02:47,330 So this is what we know, what we're 62 00:02:47,330 --> 00:02:50,390 being told about this painting, and this is quite fascinating. 63 00:02:50,390 --> 00:02:55,450 The ratio between the length of segment CD and BC is phi to 1. 64 00:02:55,450 --> 00:02:58,710 So you drop an altitude from this larger triangle, 65 00:02:58,710 --> 00:03:05,390 this ratio, the ratio of CD, the length of CD to BC, that's phi. 66 00:03:05,390 --> 00:03:09,240 So clearly, Rembrandt probably thought about this. 67 00:03:09,240 --> 00:03:11,745 Even more, we know that PR is parallel to BD. 68 00:03:11,745 --> 00:03:13,370 We've actually constructed it that way. 69 00:03:13,370 --> 00:03:18,019 So that is going to be parallel to that right over there. 70 00:03:18,019 --> 00:03:19,560 And so the next clue is what tells us 71 00:03:19,560 --> 00:03:21,590 that Rembrandt really thought about this. 72 00:03:21,590 --> 00:03:23,900 The ratio of AC to AQ. 73 00:03:23,900 --> 00:03:27,670 So AC is the altitude of the larger triangle. 74 00:03:27,670 --> 00:03:31,280 The ratio of that to AQ, which is 75 00:03:31,280 --> 00:03:35,870 the altitude of this top triangle, that ratio is phi 76 00:03:35,870 --> 00:03:40,980 plus 1 to 1, or you could even say that ratio is phi plus 1. 77 00:03:40,980 --> 00:03:43,580 So clearly, Rembrandt thought a lot about this. 78 00:03:43,580 --> 00:03:45,550 Now using all that information, let's 79 00:03:45,550 --> 00:03:46,710 just explore a little bit. 80 00:03:46,710 --> 00:03:49,110 Let's see if we can come up with an expression that 81 00:03:49,110 --> 00:03:51,790 is the ratio of the area of triangle ABD, 82 00:03:51,790 --> 00:03:53,960 so the area of the larger triangle, 83 00:03:53,960 --> 00:03:57,080 to the area of triangle APR. 84 00:03:57,080 --> 00:04:00,720 So that's this smaller triangle right up here. 85 00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:04,330 So we want to find the ratio of the area of the larger triangle 86 00:04:04,330 --> 00:04:08,080 to the area of the smaller triangle, 87 00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:10,530 and I want to see if we can do it in terms of phi, 88 00:04:10,530 --> 00:04:12,760 if we can come up with some expression here that only 89 00:04:12,760 --> 00:04:17,579 involves phi, or constant numbers, 90 00:04:17,579 --> 00:04:20,250 or manipulating phi in some way. 91 00:04:20,250 --> 00:04:24,000 So I encourage you to pause the video now and try to do that. 92 00:04:24,000 --> 00:04:25,300 So let's take it step by step. 93 00:04:25,300 --> 00:04:26,610 What is the area of a triangle? 94 00:04:26,610 --> 00:04:29,820 Well, the area of any triangle is 1/2 times base times height. 95 00:04:29,820 --> 00:04:32,850 So the area of triangle ABD we could 96 00:04:32,850 --> 00:04:36,500 write as 1/2 times our base. 97 00:04:36,500 --> 00:04:39,240 Our base is the length of segment BD. 98 00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:41,844 So 1/2 times BD. 99 00:04:41,844 --> 00:04:42,760 And what's our height? 100 00:04:42,760 --> 00:04:45,030 Well that's the length of segment AC. 101 00:04:45,030 --> 00:04:48,067 1/2 times BD-- Maybe I'll do segment AC. 102 00:04:48,067 --> 00:04:49,650 Well, let me do it in the same color-- 103 00:04:49,650 --> 00:04:54,660 times the length of segment AC. 104 00:04:54,660 --> 00:04:55,810 Now what's the area? 105 00:04:55,810 --> 00:04:57,680 This is the area of triangle ABD. 106 00:04:57,680 --> 00:05:00,680 1/2 base times height. 107 00:05:00,680 --> 00:05:03,030 Now what's the area of triangle APR? 108 00:05:03,030 --> 00:05:07,480 Well, it's going to be 1/2 times the length of our base, which 109 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:10,960 is PR, segment PR, the length of that, 110 00:05:10,960 --> 00:05:13,690 times the height, which is, the height is segment AQ, 111 00:05:13,690 --> 00:05:15,580 so the length of segment AQ, we could just 112 00:05:15,580 --> 00:05:17,750 write it like that, times the length of segment AQ. 113 00:05:17,750 --> 00:05:20,570 So how can we simplify this a little bit? 114 00:05:20,570 --> 00:05:23,070 Well, we could divide the 1/2 by the 1/2. 115 00:05:23,070 --> 00:05:24,980 Those two cancel out. 116 00:05:24,980 --> 00:05:26,830 But what else do we know? 117 00:05:26,830 --> 00:05:29,690 Well, they gave us the ratio between AC and AQ. 118 00:05:29,690 --> 00:05:32,830 119 00:05:32,830 --> 00:05:38,700 The ratio of AC to AQ right over here is phi plus 1 to 1. 120 00:05:38,700 --> 00:05:40,820 Or we could just say this is equal to phi. 121 00:05:40,820 --> 00:05:43,250 Or we could say this is just equal to phi plus 1. 122 00:05:43,250 --> 00:05:44,532 So let me rewrite this. 123 00:05:44,532 --> 00:05:45,990 Actually, let me write it this way. 124 00:05:45,990 --> 00:05:48,580 This is going to be equal to-- So we 125 00:05:48,580 --> 00:05:54,570 have the length of segment BD over the length of segment PR, 126 00:05:54,570 --> 00:05:57,510 and then this part right over here we can rewrite, 127 00:05:57,510 --> 00:06:00,049 this is equal to phi plus 1 over 1. 128 00:06:00,049 --> 00:06:01,340 So I'll just write it that way. 129 00:06:01,340 --> 00:06:06,520 So times phi plus 1 over 1. 130 00:06:06,520 --> 00:06:08,315 So what's the ratio of BD to PR? 131 00:06:08,315 --> 00:06:12,850 132 00:06:12,850 --> 00:06:16,400 So the ratio of the base of the larger triangle to the base 133 00:06:16,400 --> 00:06:18,869 of the smaller triangle. 134 00:06:18,869 --> 00:06:20,410 So let's think about it a little bit. 135 00:06:20,410 --> 00:06:22,750 What might jump out at you is that the larger triangle 136 00:06:22,750 --> 00:06:25,990 and the smaller triangle, that they are similar triangles. 137 00:06:25,990 --> 00:06:30,260 They both obviously have angle A in common, 138 00:06:30,260 --> 00:06:33,640 and since PR is parallel to BD, we 139 00:06:33,640 --> 00:06:36,940 know that this angle corresponds to this angle. 140 00:06:36,940 --> 00:06:39,510 So these are going to be congruent angles. 141 00:06:39,510 --> 00:06:43,570 And we know that this angle corresponds 142 00:06:43,570 --> 00:06:45,560 to this angle right over here. 143 00:06:45,560 --> 00:06:48,190 So now we have three correspondingly angles 144 00:06:48,190 --> 00:06:49,350 are congruent. 145 00:06:49,350 --> 00:06:52,050 This is congruent to itself, which is in both triangles. 146 00:06:52,050 --> 00:06:53,427 This is congruent to this. 147 00:06:53,427 --> 00:06:54,510 This is congruent to that. 148 00:06:54,510 --> 00:06:56,135 You have three congruent angles, you're 149 00:06:56,135 --> 00:06:58,160 dealing with two similar triangles. 150 00:06:58,160 --> 00:07:00,510 And what's useful about similar triangles 151 00:07:00,510 --> 00:07:02,770 are the ratio between corresponding parts. 152 00:07:02,770 --> 00:07:04,920 Corresponding lengths of the corresponding parts 153 00:07:04,920 --> 00:07:07,860 of the similar triangles are going to be the same. 154 00:07:07,860 --> 00:07:09,950 And they gave us one of those ratios. 155 00:07:09,950 --> 00:07:15,410 They gave us the ratio of the altitude of the larger triangle 156 00:07:15,410 --> 00:07:18,240 to the altitude of the smaller triangle. 157 00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:22,860 AC to AQ is phi plus 1 to phi. 158 00:07:22,860 --> 00:07:26,375 But since this is true for one corresponding part 159 00:07:26,375 --> 00:07:27,750 of the similar triangles, this is 160 00:07:27,750 --> 00:07:30,820 true for any corresponding parts of the similar triangle, 161 00:07:30,820 --> 00:07:34,120 that the ratio is going to be phi plus 1 to 1. 162 00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:40,340 So the ratio of BD, the ratio of the base of the larger triangle 163 00:07:40,340 --> 00:07:42,230 to the base of the smaller one, that's 164 00:07:42,230 --> 00:07:44,870 also going to be phi plus 1 over 1. 165 00:07:44,870 --> 00:07:50,200 166 00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:51,450 Let me just write it this way. 167 00:07:51,450 --> 00:07:56,040 This could also be rewritten as phi plus 1 over 1. 168 00:07:56,040 --> 00:07:57,750 So what does this simplify to? 169 00:07:57,750 --> 00:08:00,740 Well, we have phi plus 1 over 1 times phi plus 1 over 1. 170 00:08:00,740 --> 00:08:02,220 Well, we could just divide by 1. 171 00:08:02,220 --> 00:08:03,470 You're not changing the value. 172 00:08:03,470 --> 00:08:04,900 This is just going to be equal to, 173 00:08:04,900 --> 00:08:06,620 and we deserve a drum roll now. 174 00:08:06,620 --> 00:08:11,250 This is equal to phi plus 1 squared. 175 00:08:11,250 --> 00:08:12,319 So that was pretty neat. 176 00:08:12,319 --> 00:08:14,610 And I encourage you to even think about this because we 177 00:08:14,610 --> 00:08:16,880 already saw that phi plus 1 is equal to phi squared, 178 00:08:16,880 --> 00:08:19,220 and there's all sorts of weird, interesting ways 179 00:08:19,220 --> 00:08:22,220 you could continue to analyze this.