1
00:00:06,648 --> 00:00:09,226
You're telling a friend an amazing story,

2
00:00:09,226 --> 00:00:13,637
and you just get to the best part
when suddenly he interrupts,

3
00:00:13,637 --> 00:00:17,819
"The alien and I," not "Me and the alien."

4
00:00:17,819 --> 00:00:19,813
Most of us would probably be annoyed,

5
00:00:19,813 --> 00:00:21,907
but aside from the rude interruption,

6
00:00:21,907 --> 00:00:23,713
does your friend have a point?

7
00:00:23,713 --> 00:00:26,837
Was your sentence actually 
grammatically incorrect?

8
00:00:26,837 --> 00:00:30,867
And if he stood understood it,
why does it even matter?

9
00:00:30,867 --> 00:00:32,722
From the point of view of linguistics,

10
00:00:32,722 --> 00:00:36,547
grammar is a set of patterns 
for how words are put together

11
00:00:36,547 --> 00:00:39,096
to form phrases or clauses,

12
00:00:39,096 --> 00:00:41,905
whether spoken or in writting.

13
00:00:41,905 --> 00:00:44,090
Different languages 
have different patterns.

14
00:00:44,090 --> 00:00:47,433
In English, the subject 
normally comes first,

15
00:00:47,433 --> 00:00:48,689
followed by the verb,

16
00:00:48,689 --> 00:00:50,007
and then the object,

17
00:00:50,007 --> 00:00:52,554
while in Japanese 
and many other languages,

18
00:00:52,554 --> 00:00:55,898
the order is subject, object, verb.

19
00:00:55,898 --> 00:01:00,151
Some scholars have tried to identify
patterns common to all languages,

20
00:01:00,151 --> 00:01:02,496
but apart from some basic features,

21
00:01:02,496 --> 00:01:04,593
like having nouns or verbs,

22
00:01:04,593 --> 00:01:08,939
few of these so-called 
linguistic universals have been found.

23
00:01:08,939 --> 00:01:12,026
And while any language needs consistent
patterns to function,

24
00:01:12,026 --> 00:01:17,306
the study of these patterns opens up
an ongoing debate between two positions

25
00:01:17,306 --> 00:01:20,913
known as prescriptivism
and descriptivism.

26
00:01:20,913 --> 00:01:22,198
Grossly simplified,

27
00:01:22,198 --> 00:01:26,061
prescriptivists think a given language 
should follow consistent rules,

28
00:01:26,061 --> 00:01:30,692
while descriptivists see variation
and adaptation as a natural

29
00:01:30,692 --> 00:01:33,880
and necessary part of language.

30
00:01:33,880 --> 00:01:38,321
For much of history, the vast majority
of language was spoken.

31
00:01:38,321 --> 00:01:42,286
But as people became more interconnected
and writing gained importance,

32
00:01:42,286 --> 00:01:46,341
written language was standardized
to allow broader communication

33
00:01:46,341 --> 00:01:51,081
and ensure that people in different part
of a realm could understand eachother.

34
00:01:51,081 --> 00:01:56,741
In many languages, this standard form
came to be considered the only proper one,

35
00:01:56,741 --> 00:02:00,665
despite being derived from just one
of many spoken varieties,

36
00:02:00,665 --> 00:02:03,078
usually that of the people in power.

37
00:02:03,078 --> 00:02:07,426
Language purists worked to establish
and propogate this standard

38
00:02:07,426 --> 00:02:13,021
by detailing a set of rules that reflected
the established grammar of their times.

39
00:02:13,021 --> 00:02:17,245
And rules for written grammar were applied
to spoken language, as well.

40
00:02:17,245 --> 00:02:21,683
Speech patterns that deviated from the
written rules were considered corruptions,

41
00:02:21,683 --> 00:02:24,090
or signs of low-social status,

42
00:02:24,090 --> 00:02:26,675
and many people who had grown up
speaking in these ways

43
00:02:26,675 --> 00:02:30,570
were forced to adopt 
the standardized form.

44
00:02:30,570 --> 00:02:31,886
More recently, however,

45
00:02:31,886 --> 00:02:36,140
linguists have understood that speech
is a separate phenomenon from writing

46
00:02:36,140 --> 00:02:38,287
with its own regularities and patterns.

47
00:02:38,287 --> 00:02:42,891
Most of us learn to speak at such an early
age that we don't even remember it.

48
00:02:42,891 --> 00:02:46,468
We form our spoken repertoire through
unconscious habits,

49
00:02:46,468 --> 00:02:48,828
not memorized rules.

50
00:02:48,828 --> 00:02:52,621
And because speech also uses mood
and intonation for meaning,

51
00:02:52,621 --> 00:02:54,775
its structure is often more flexible,

52
00:02:54,775 --> 00:02:58,727
adapting to the needs of speakers
and listeners.

53
00:02:58,727 --> 00:03:03,241
This could mean avoiding complex clauses
that are hard to parse in real time,

54
00:03:03,241 --> 00:03:06,037
making changes to avoid awkward
pronounciation,

55
00:03:06,037 --> 00:03:09,388
or removing sounds to make speech faster.

56
00:03:09,388 --> 00:03:13,571
The linguistic approach that tries
to understand and map such differences

57
00:03:13,571 --> 00:03:17,945
without dictating correct ones
is known as descriptivism.

58
00:03:17,945 --> 00:03:20,301
Rather than deciding how language
should be used,

59
00:03:20,301 --> 00:03:23,131
it describes how people actually use it,

60
00:03:23,131 --> 00:03:27,259
and tracks the innovations 
they come up with in the process.

61
00:03:27,259 --> 00:03:28,878
But while the debate between

62
00:03:28,878 --> 00:03:31,175
prescriptivism 
and descriptivism continues,

63
00:03:31,175 --> 00:03:33,598
the two are not mutually exclusive.

64
00:03:33,598 --> 00:03:37,072
At its best, prescriptivism is useful
for informing people

65
00:03:37,072 --> 00:03:41,675
about the most common established
patterns at a given point in time.

66
00:03:41,675 --> 00:03:44,471
This is important, 
not only for formal contexts,

67
00:03:44,471 --> 00:03:48,432
but also makes communication easier
between non-native speakers

68
00:03:48,432 --> 00:03:50,620
from different backgrounds.

69
00:03:50,620 --> 00:03:52,194
Descriptivism, on the other hand,

70
00:03:52,194 --> 00:03:54,447
gives us insight into how our minds work

71
00:03:54,447 --> 00:03:58,855
and the instinctive ways in which we 
structure our view of the world.

72
00:03:58,855 --> 00:04:03,461
Ultimately, grammar is best thought of
as a set of linguistic habits

73
00:04:03,461 --> 00:04:06,751
that are constantly being negotiated
and reinvented

74
00:04:06,751 --> 00:04:09,966
by the entire group of language users.

75
00:04:09,966 --> 00:04:11,352
Like language itself,

76
00:04:11,352 --> 00:04:13,217
it's a wonderful and complex fabric

77
00:04:13,217 --> 00:04:17,080
woven through the contributions
of speakers and listeners,

78
00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:18,565
writers and readers,

79
00:04:18,565 --> 00:04:20,781
prescriptivists and descriptivists,

80
00:04:20,781 --> 00:04:22,663
from both near and far.