0:00:05.339,0:00:07.500 Hi my name is Tony and[br]this is Every Frame a Painting. 0:00:08.000,0:00:10.389 So here’s a fundamental question: 0:00:11.389,0:00:13.879 When you’re judging a shot,[br]what’s the first thing you look for? 0:00:14.879,0:00:16.000 Is it balance? 0:00:16.100,0:00:17.500 Leading lines? 0:00:17.500,0:00:19.200 Golden ratio? 0:00:19.500,0:00:21.500 Color? Light? Shapes? 0:00:21.500,0:00:24.660 I think these are all essential,[br]and they’re all part of good images. 0:00:25.000,0:00:27.300 But there’s one thing[br]I always notice first 0:00:30.100,0:00:31.900 Movement 0:00:32.299,0:00:35.440 --For me, Kurosawa is the[br]Beethoven of movie directors 0:00:35.500,0:00:40.000 --It's that recognizable full sound[br]that Beethoven had 0:00:40.000,0:00:43.940 --that is so unmistakable 0:00:44.070,0:00:46.500 A Kurosawa film moves like no one else’s 0:00:46.500,0:00:49.500 Each one is a masterclass[br]in different types of motion 0:00:49.800,0:00:51.500 and also ways to combine them. 0:00:54.500,0:00:57.940 Over a career spanning half a century[br]he made 30 films 0:00:57.940,0:01:00.510 and in all of them, the movement[br]is surprising and cinematic. 0:01:09.680,0:01:13.680 Wow. If you’d like to see the names[br]of the films, press the CC button below. 0:01:16.270,0:01:19.200 So what types of movement did he like? 0:01:19.200,0:01:21.500 First, there’s the movement of nature. 0:01:21.500,0:01:23.300 In every one of his films,[br]the background of the shot 0:01:23.300,0:01:24.500 features some kind of weather. 0:01:24.500,0:01:25.500 Wind 0:01:26.000,0:01:27.000 Water 0:01:27.200,0:01:28.200 Fire 0:01:28.500,0:01:29.500 Smoke 0:01:29.800,0:01:30.800 Snow 0:01:31.520,0:01:34.500 One advantage of this approach is that[br]shots have a lot of visual interest. 0:01:34.500,0:01:38.509 Even when people are still, there’s rain[br]in the background to draw your eye. 0:01:40.800,0:01:45.270 --Rain is a real emotional trigger[br]that works in any film. 0:01:45.270,0:01:47.509 --You know, anything that’s excessive[br]because it gives you 0:01:47.809,0:01:52.770 --another layer that the[br]audience can relate to sensually. 0:01:53.300,0:01:55.279 Second, there’s the movement of groups. 0:01:55.279,0:01:59.090 Kurosawa films usually feature large[br]groups of people who band together 0:01:59.090,0:02:00.399 or split apart. 0:02:01.899,0:02:05.520 Crowds like this are really cinematic.[br]When you put this many people in a shot, 0:02:05.520,0:02:07.340 any emotion feels big. 0:02:09.520,0:02:11.840 If you want a good reaction shot,[br]try using four people 0:02:12.580,0:02:14.380 Or twenty-five 0:02:19.180,0:02:21.000 And if you want something really big... 0:02:26.829,0:02:29.229 Which brings us to #3:[br]the movement of individuals. 0:02:29.480,0:02:31.310 One of my favorite things[br]about Kurosawa is that 0:02:31.380,0:02:33.610 that his blocking is[br]unrealistic and exaggerated. 0:02:37.000,0:02:39.500 If someone is nervous,[br]they pace left and right. 0:02:40.400,0:02:42.300 If they’re outraged, [br]they stand straight up. 0:02:44.800,0:02:45.900 And if they’re ashamed… 0:02:49.230,0:02:52.750 He would often tell his actors to pick[br]one gesture for their character 0:02:52.750,0:02:54.450 and repeat it throughout the film. 0:02:54.450,0:02:57.500 That way, the audience can quickly see[br]who’s who and how they’re feeling. 0:03:01.300,0:03:03.400 Number four: movement of the camera. 0:03:03.400,0:03:06.680 One of the hallmarks of Kurosawa’s style[br]are his fluid camera moves 0:03:09.680,0:03:14.680 that go from close-up to full shot to[br]OTS in a single unbroken take. 0:03:18.849,0:03:21.459 I did another essay about these shots,[br]called the Spielberg Oner, 0:03:21.459,0:03:24.600 but what’s important here is that[br]every camera move has a clear beginning 0:03:26.000,0:03:27.000 middle 0:03:27.500,0:03:28.500 and end. 0:03:28.900,0:03:31.300 Just by itself,[br]this camera move tells a story. 0:03:35.010,0:03:37.480 And last, there’s movement of the cut. 0:03:37.480,0:03:40.099 Kurosawa is one of the few directors[br]who worked as his own editor. 0:03:40.099,0:03:44.920 One of the reasons his movies just flow[br]is that he tends to cut on movement. 0:03:45.500,0:03:48.300 Often, you’re paying so much attention[br]to someone who's moving 0:03:49.300,0:03:51.299 that you don’t see the edit. 0:03:51.299,0:03:53.300 When he finishes the scene,[br]he switches the rhythm 0:03:53.300,0:03:55.299 usually by ending on something static. 0:03:59.999,0:04:02.180 and then cutting straight into movement. 0:04:02.180,0:04:04.400 By switching up the rhythm,[br]he keeps you on your toes, 0:04:04.400,0:04:06.300 because you can’t guess the next cut. 0:04:10.969,0:04:14.359 So with all that, let’s break down[br]one scene and study the motion. 0:04:14.800,0:04:17.600 This scene is from Seven Samurai.[br]I won't tell you what it’s about. 0:04:18.300,0:04:20.940 See how long it takes you[br]to figure it out. Ready? 0:04:21.940,0:04:25.000 The first shot shows the whole village,[br]then just the important characters 0:04:25.000,0:04:26.300 then just the samurai. 0:04:26.690,0:04:27.500 Right about here... 0:04:31.000,0:04:32.150 most people get what’s happening. 0:04:32.700,0:04:36.400 As Kikuchiyo sits down his mood ripples[br]outwards to affect the whole village. 0:04:37.699,0:04:41.110 Notice how much the wind adds to the[br]scene. Even when people are still 0:04:41.110,0:04:43.300 there’s that little bit of wind[br]to spice up the frame. 0:04:45.990,0:04:47.650 So that’s pretty straightforward. 0:04:47.650,0:04:51.370 Now let’s jump 60 years into the future.[br]This is The Avengers. 0:04:51.370,0:04:54.770 Here, we start with a camera move into[br]an establishing shot. But this time... 0:04:55.770,0:04:57.770 --These were in Phil Coulson's jacket. 0:04:59.550,0:05:01.630 We get dialogue right away. 0:05:01.630,0:05:05.090 Throughout this scene, the only things[br]that move are the camera and Nick Fury. 0:05:05.090,0:05:07.500 Even though we have weather outside and[br]actors in the background 0:05:07.500,0:05:08.800 none of them are used. 0:05:09.500,0:05:11.800 Notice that the camera movement doesn’t[br]have a beginning or an end. 0:05:12.620,0:05:17.280 And there’s no variation. Each shot[br]goes in the exact same direction 0:05:17.280,0:05:18.500 --Maybe I had that coming. 0:05:19.280,0:05:21.250 But in Seven Samurai... 0:05:21.250,0:05:24.500 The camera moves have a distinct[br]beginning middle and end. 0:05:25.000,0:05:28.000 And each shot changes [br]direction from the previous one. 0:05:28.000,0:05:30.500 As he climbs up, Kurosawa uses[br]the movement of the flag 0:05:31.500,0:05:34.129 to cut smoothly into this angle: 0:05:34.129,0:05:36.800 all seven samurai and[br]their banner, together. 0:05:43.819,0:05:45.599 This scene has every type of movement 0:05:45.599,0:05:47.200 carefully pieced together[br]and spaced throughout. 0:05:47.599,0:05:48.300 The weather. 0:05:48.500,0:05:49.300 The group. 0:05:49.500,0:05:50.300 The individual. 0:05:50.500,0:05:51.300 The camera. 0:05:51.500,0:05:52.300 The cut. 0:05:54.009,0:05:56.440 But this scene tells its story[br]mostly through dialogue 0:05:57.500,0:05:59.440 --called the Avengers Initiative. 0:05:59.440,0:06:03.520 Sure, the camera moves.[br]But it’s pointless movement. 0:06:03.520,0:06:06.300 For all the money that was put into it,[br]this scene feels flat 0:06:07.000,0:06:09.200 --It's an old-fashioned notion. 0:06:09.569,0:06:12.229 But how could you improve this scene?[br]Well... 0:06:12.229,0:06:15.940 if you know what the scene’s about,[br]try to express it through movement. 0:06:16.940,0:06:19.300 Start with the character.[br]How are they feeling? 0:06:19.300,0:06:21.680 Is there any way the actor[br]can convey that by moving? 0:06:24.300,0:06:27.289 Okay, maybe that's too much.[br]Let’s be more subtle. 0:06:28.000,0:06:30.000 Take the feeling that’s[br]inside the character 0:06:30.000,0:06:31.539 and bring it out[br]through the background. 0:06:31.539,0:06:34.539 If a character is angry and menacing,[br]you can do this 0:06:38.770,0:06:40.650 Or if she's simmering[br]with resentment. 0:06:43.650,0:06:46.650 Another option is to contrast[br]one person against the group. 0:06:46.650,0:06:49.539 So if somebody suffers a very[br]public humiliation, this works. 0:06:51.539,0:06:53.190 Or if they’re looking for[br]a needle in a haystack 0:06:54.979,0:06:56.509 You can use camera movement[br]to convey excitement 0:06:57.509,0:06:59.689 You can cut on movement[br]to show surprise 0:07:03.200,0:07:06.200 And you can combine every type of motion[br]into one amazing image 0:07:09.819,0:07:13.000 By the way, you don’t need to put every[br]type of movement in every shot. 0:07:13.000,0:07:14.000 That’s just tiring. 0:07:16.680,0:07:19.419 But there’s a nice middle ground with[br]lots of variation and subtlety 0:07:19.419,0:07:22.259 and you won’t know what[br]works best until you try it. 0:07:25.259,0:07:28.259 If you combine the right motion[br]and the right emotion 0:07:28.600,0:07:30.259 you get something cinematic. 0:07:31.080,0:07:35.000 --But just for me, I look at his movies[br]two or three times a year 0:07:36.500,0:07:40.080 --just to feel, oh wow, that’s why[br]I wanted to be a filmmaker 0:07:40.080,0:07:41.800 --and look what I’m doing now. 0:07:43.900,0:07:47.300 --Special effects, and then[br]another movie about special effects 0:07:47.500,0:07:50.500 --and then a third movie[br]about special effects. 0:07:51.129,0:07:53.500 Now pick any of his films.[br]Go to any scene. 0:07:54.300,0:07:56.460 And watch how everything moves together 0:07:58.000,0:08:01.500 --You know, it’s the visual stimulation[br]that hits the audience. 0:08:02.000,0:08:04.020 That’s the reason for film. 0:08:04.020,0:08:07.000 Otherwise, we should just[br]turn the light out and call it radio.