WEBVTT 00:00:07.419 --> 00:00:10.000 Hi my name is Tony and this is Every Frame a Painting. 00:00:10.500 --> 00:00:13.250 If you grew up like I did, you probably watched a lot of Looney Tunes. 00:00:13.500 --> 00:00:15.240 And if you paid attention to the credits 00:00:15.300 --> 00:00:16.600 then you recognize this name. 00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:19.118 -"My full name is Charles Martin Jones." 00:00:19.800 --> 00:00:22.300 -"This is not where I really belong." 00:00:22.719 --> 00:00:24.699 -"I belong behind the camera." 00:00:28.250 --> 00:00:31.070 Chuck Jones is one of the all-time masters of visual comedy. 00:00:31.070 --> 00:00:34.000 Between 1938 and 1962 he directed 00:00:34.100 --> 00:00:36.189 more than 200 cartoons for Warner Bros. 00:00:36.189 --> 00:00:38.399 Ten films a year, six minutes per film. 00:00:42.560 --> 00:00:45.230 What's astonishing is that they hold up more than 50 years later. 00:00:45.229 --> 00:00:48.308 And among them are some of the greatest short films ever made. 00:00:48.799 --> 00:00:52.049 But none of this happened overnight. It was a long process. 00:00:52.049 --> 00:00:53.799 So today, let’s take a look... 00:00:56.700 --> 00:00:58.400 at how a good artist became a great one. 00:00:59.200 --> 00:01:02.200 -"All right. Let’s get this picture started!" 00:01:04.500 --> 00:01:06.000 -"No! No!" 00:01:06.700 --> 00:01:09.240 The most famous aspect of any Chuck Jones cartoon 00:01:09.239 --> 00:01:11.399 (and the parts you probably remember) are the jokes 00:01:16.849 --> 00:01:18.769 written by Michael Maltese and Tedd Pierce. 00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:22.310 Nearly every gag here follows a classic two-part structure. 00:01:22.310 --> 00:01:23.500 The first part… 00:01:25.950 --> 00:01:27.799 leads you to make an assumption. The second part... 00:01:31.799 --> 00:01:32.799 proves it wrong. 00:01:32.900 --> 00:01:34.500 That’s it. Assumption: 00:01:39.879 --> 00:01:40.750 Reality. 00:01:41.000 --> 00:01:43.200 And in the early cartoons, the jokes are fantastic 00:01:43.299 --> 00:01:44.799 and they happen one after the other. 00:01:48.430 --> 00:01:51.470 But here’s the truth: the gags are only the surface level. 00:01:51.469 --> 00:01:53.200 What really sets these films apart 00:01:53.250 --> 00:01:55.500 is the amount of work that was put into character. 00:01:55.900 --> 00:01:57.300 And that process took a long time. 00:01:57.400 --> 00:01:59.800 -"All characters are a process of learning." 00:01:59.810 --> 00:02:03.600 -"It’s hard for people to understand who watch actors... 00:02:03.599 --> 00:02:08.109 -"...to realize that, actors come with an ability. They’ve played other parts." 00:02:08.750 --> 00:02:09.750 -"Hello." 00:02:09.800 --> 00:02:11.800 -"When you bring in a drawing, all you have is a drawing." 00:02:11.900 --> 00:02:13.599 -"And you have to put in the character." 00:02:13.699 --> 00:02:15.429 Consider the case of Daffy Duck. 00:02:15.430 --> 00:02:17.000 When he first started out… 00:02:20.460 --> 00:02:22.700 Daffy was more or less insane. 00:02:22.800 --> 00:02:25.300 -"Gosh what a screwy duck." 00:02:25.699 --> 00:02:28.239 But over the course of 15 years, he changed 00:02:28.240 --> 00:02:31.469 from being the one who laughs to being the butt of the joke. 00:02:35.770 --> 00:02:39.219 This Daffy is less crazy but it’s easier to understand what he wants. 00:02:39.219 --> 00:02:40.400 He wants money. 00:02:40.699 --> 00:02:41.889 He wants to be a star. 00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:43.199 In short, he wants glory. 00:02:43.900 --> 00:02:45.800 -"This looks like a job for... 00:02:48.030 --> 00:02:50.870 -"...The Masked Avenger!" 00:02:50.870 --> 00:02:55.000 In fact, all of Chuck Jones' characters have very clearly defined wants. 00:02:55.199 --> 00:02:56.799 This one wants a home. 00:02:57.000 --> 00:02:58.500 This one wants to daydream. 00:02:59.318 --> 00:03:01.500 And this one just wants somebody to love. 00:03:02.000 --> 00:03:06.000 -"Ah my little darling. It is love at first sight, is it not?" 00:03:06.300 --> 00:03:08.590 Notice that every desire here is very simple. 00:03:08.590 --> 00:03:11.300 And the simpler the desire, the more vivid the character. 00:03:14.500 --> 00:03:15.840 Once you know what the character wants 00:03:15.900 --> 00:03:17.300 you can figure out the next question: 00:03:17.400 --> 00:03:19.500 How does this particular individual move? 00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:23.759 -"Every action is dictated by what goes on inside of you." 00:03:23.759 --> 00:03:26.299 -"You have to be able to think the way the character thinks." 00:03:26.500 --> 00:03:29.879 -"If you can’t tell what’s happening by the way the character moves..." 00:03:29.900 --> 00:03:30.879 -"...you’re not animating." 00:03:30.879 --> 00:03:34.000 -"I am a snake and you have charmed me, no?" 00:03:34.699 --> 00:03:36.299 -"It helps to have the dialogue..." 00:03:36.300 --> 00:03:38.000 -"...but the dialogue is not the thing that makes it work." 00:03:39.000 --> 00:03:41.419 -"The story should tell itself by the way it moves." 00:03:43.000 --> 00:03:45.039 So let’s say you know what the character wants 00:03:45.039 --> 00:03:46.900 and you know how they move to get it. 00:03:47.000 --> 00:03:48.439 What about the jokes? 00:03:48.439 --> 00:03:50.099 What happens to the assumption… 00:03:52.000 --> 00:03:53.050 and the reality? 00:03:53.050 --> 00:03:56.239 Well, now the assumption includes the personality of the character. 00:03:56.239 --> 00:03:59.300 For instance, we know that Daffy will always pick a fight 00:04:01.099 --> 00:04:03.609 because it’s part of his desire for glory. 00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:06.000 -"Take over." 00:04:06.400 --> 00:04:08.300 Likewise, we know the Coyote’s device will fail 00:04:08.500 --> 00:04:10.759 so Jones can play this gag offscreen 00:04:10.759 --> 00:04:12.000 which ends up making it funnier. 00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:20.639 But there is a danger to this approach. 00:04:20.639 --> 00:04:24.219 If you just focus on great jokes with the same well-defined characters 00:04:24.220 --> 00:04:26.000 you can easily get trapped in a formula. 00:04:26.399 --> 00:04:29.319 -"Sometimes I feel very sorry for the Coyote." 00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:32.399 -"Sometimes I wish he’d catch him." 00:04:38.000 --> 00:04:40.800 -"If he caught him there wouldn’t be any more Road Runner." 00:04:41.699 --> 00:04:43.399 -"You wouldn’t like that, would you?" 00:04:43.800 --> 00:04:45.800 So to avoid this problem, Jones did something. 00:04:46.000 --> 00:04:48.629 This is one of the defining aspects of his work. 00:04:48.629 --> 00:04:51.949 It’s a word that he uses and that other people use about him. 00:04:52.600 --> 00:04:53.500 -"Beep Beep!" 00:04:53.600 --> 00:04:57.110 -"It also stands out as an example of the kind of discipline..." 00:04:57.110 --> 00:04:59.580 -"...Chuck Jones liked to set for himself." 00:04:59.579 --> 00:05:02.500 -"This is the vital factor in all comedy or all drama." 00:05:02.800 --> 00:05:04.199 -"What are your disciplines?" 00:05:04.199 --> 00:05:07.659 Discipline. The challenges and restrictions you set for yourself. 00:05:07.899 --> 00:05:10.000 Like designing a character with no mouth. 00:05:11.300 --> 00:05:12.300 Or no face. 00:05:13.529 --> 00:05:15.299 Or using no dialogue except for this. 00:05:17.000 --> 00:05:21.000 -"Hello my baby, hello my honey, hello my ragtime gal." 00:05:21.399 --> 00:05:23.679 Because animation lets you do anything 00:05:23.680 --> 00:05:25.840 you have to think about what you won't do. 00:05:26.300 --> 00:05:28.000 And in Jones’ case, there were lots of rules 00:05:28.199 --> 00:05:30.279 about the world, the characters and their behavior. 00:05:30.300 --> 00:05:33.000 For instance, Bugs Bunny never picked a fight. 00:05:33.300 --> 00:05:34.590 Somebody had to do this… 00:05:34.589 --> 00:05:39.299 -"Kill the wabbit! Kill the wabbit! Kill the wabbit!" 00:05:39.300 --> 00:05:41.000 ...and only then would he fight back. 00:05:41.300 --> 00:05:43.069 -"Kill the wabbit?" 00:05:44.000 --> 00:05:47.500 -"Bugs Bunny is not just an insane rabbit." 00:05:48.000 --> 00:05:51.360 -"Somebody’s always trying to get him. And he’s retaliating." 00:05:51.500 --> 00:05:53.399 -"He has to be provoked. And we learned that." 00:05:53.500 --> 00:05:55.000 -"It was very important that he be provoked." 00:05:55.199 --> 00:05:57.029 -"Because otherwise, he’d be a bully." 00:05:58.029 --> 00:06:01.599 -"Of course you realize this means war." 00:06:02.000 --> 00:06:05.139 A similar restriction happened to how the characters expressed themselves. 00:06:05.139 --> 00:06:08.199 Early on, they tended to go through a quick barrage of facial expressions. 00:06:12.300 --> 00:06:14.500 But over time, these grew less and less. 00:06:14.899 --> 00:06:18.299 -"Particularly in the later films Chuck became very fond..." 00:06:19.500 --> 00:06:23.199 -"...of using the smallest possible gestures..." 00:06:24.000 --> 00:06:26.300 -"...facial gestures to get laughs." 00:06:32.279 --> 00:06:34.449 -"Chuck’s facial expressions were the best in the business..." 00:06:34.449 --> 00:06:36.800 -"...Because he was a minimalist." 00:06:42.918 --> 00:06:44.609 -"All humor grows from two things." 00:06:44.610 --> 00:06:47.860 -"All humor, I believe, comes from human behavior and logic." 00:06:48.899 --> 00:06:50.399 -"If it’s not logical it’s not gonna be funny... 00:06:50.399 --> 00:06:51.799 -"...And if it doesn’t come from human behavior..." 00:06:51.899 --> 00:06:53.449 -"...how the hell do you know it’s funny?" 00:06:53.800 --> 00:06:56.000 Think of it this way: this is human behavior. 00:06:56.300 --> 00:06:58.000 -"Ha ha! Now!" 00:07:00.678 --> 00:07:01.799 That was logic. 00:07:02.199 --> 00:07:04.550 And the logic is something you improve at over time. 00:07:06.850 --> 00:07:08.200 But what about human behavior? 00:07:08.300 --> 00:07:10.300 How do you improve at understanding that? 00:07:11.000 --> 00:07:12.689 The truth is, there’s only one way. 00:07:12.689 --> 00:07:14.300 And it’s not by watching films. 00:07:19.000 --> 00:07:21.600 -"When you talk to Chuck, he is always encouraging you..." 00:07:21.899 --> 00:07:25.199 -...to go to the source: to study real life, to study art..." 00:07:25.399 --> 00:07:29.299 -"...and apply that to your animation. It’s not just drawing funny faces." 00:07:34.050 --> 00:07:36.619 Jones believed it wasn’t enough to just watch movies. 00:07:36.699 --> 00:07:38.500 You had to have interests outside of film. 00:07:38.699 --> 00:07:40.500 You had to study real life. 00:07:40.600 --> 00:07:42.300 Most of all, he encouraged this: 00:07:43.000 --> 00:07:45.199 -"Reading. Read Everything." 00:07:45.500 --> 00:07:47.300 -"It doesn’t do you much good to draw..." 00:07:47.399 --> 00:07:48.799 -"...unless you have something to draw..." 00:07:48.899 --> 00:07:50.500 -"...and the only place you can get anything to draw..." 00:07:50.500 --> 00:07:51.500 -"...is from out of that head." 00:07:51.509 --> 00:07:54.338 -"And the only way that you can exercise the mind..." 00:07:54.500 --> 00:07:56.100 -"...is by bringing new ideas to it..." 00:07:56.199 --> 00:07:57.500 -"...So it’ll be surprised." 00:08:01.800 --> 00:08:03.699 -"And say 'God I didn’t know that.'" 00:08:03.800 --> 00:08:05.300 -"That’s the greatest thing in the world..." 00:08:05.300 --> 00:08:08.430 -"...that 'Gee I didn’t know that.' And there you are, you know?" 00:08:09.430 --> 00:08:11.650 There you are. It’s not just about gags. 00:08:12.300 --> 00:08:13.500 Not just about characters. 00:08:13.899 --> 00:08:15.199 Not just about discipline. 00:08:15.709 --> 00:08:18.299 It’s about studying the real world and learning something new. 00:08:18.500 --> 00:08:20.600 Then putting that back into the work. 00:08:20.699 --> 00:08:22.399 In other words, inspiration. 00:08:25.939 --> 00:08:27.310 And the great thing about this kind of inspiration? 00:08:27.500 --> 00:08:31.300 -"You can find it anyplace. You can find it anyplace."