WEBVTT

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Khuda se Mutaliq Sawalat aur Ilm 
al Kalam ka Jawab - PART 2

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
by Jawed Ahmad Ghamidi

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
[Hassan Ilyas] Yesterday, I asked you a 
question related to hypothetical statements

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that we use in relation to Allah, 
nauzubillah (I seek refuge with Allah)

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That Allah can lie, or he can make a rock
which even he can lift.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You detailed out your views on these 
kind of discussions.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
There is a relative aspect and doubt, I 
want you to explain us in detail.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
When you are in a discussion related to
the existence of God,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the argument behind confirmation for 
God's being,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
or the various aspects of atheism or 
agnosticism that are put forward.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It is said that you logically conclude 
the arguments with intellectual evidence.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And the other party to the discussion is
puzzled with your style.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
My question to you today is that,
Even you include these

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
intellectual evidences and arguments in 
your discussions,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
People often say that a conversation 
with Ghamidi Sahib is very rational,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
logical, enlightened and intellectual.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So, even your paradigm answers 
these modern suspicion or doubt

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
by way of intellectual and logical 
arguments.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Then what about simple and inherent 
arguments given by the Quran

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
as you often say?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
[Javed Ahmad Ghamidi] Don't you consider 
the inherent arguments given

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
by the Quran as logical?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
What I had earlier mentioned was that,
things that evolve from a specific

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
philosophical or logical background and 
people present these questions just to

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
?? of the religion.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
These are the things that clearly convey 
that your addressee does not have that

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
perceptive attitude to understand or dive
into something of this imperative nature.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
In that case you should follow ??

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Arguments will be have there significance.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The Quran itself is an example of 
reasoning,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But what sort of argumentation?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I had explained that reasoning only.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I often present this reasoning, infact
I have penned it down in my book Meezan.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999