[Script Info]
Title: 
[Events]
Format: Layer, Start, End, Style, Name, MarginL, MarginR, MarginV, Effect, Text
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Khuda se Mutaliq Sawalat aur Ilm \Nal Kalam ka Jawab - PART 2
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,by Jawed Ahmad Ghamidi
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,[Hassan Ilyas] Yesterday, I asked you a \Nquestion related to hypothetical statements
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,that we use in relation to Allah, \Nnauzubillah (I seek refuge with Allah)
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,That Allah can lie, or he can make a rock\Nwhich even he can lift.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,You detailed out your views on these \Nkind of discussions.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,There is a relative aspect and doubt, I \Nwant you to explain us in detail.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,When you are in a discussion related to\Nthe existence of God,
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,the argument behind confirmation for \NGod's being,
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,or the various aspects of atheism or \Nagnosticism that are put forward.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,It is said that you logically conclude \Nthe arguments with intellectual evidence.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,And the other party to the discussion is\Npuzzled with your style.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,My question to you today is that,\NEven you include these
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,intellectual evidences and arguments in \Nyour discussions,
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,People often say that a conversation \Nwith Ghamidi Sahib is very rational,
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,logical, enlightened and intellectual.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,So, even your paradigm answers \Nthese modern suspicion or doubt
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,by way of intellectual and logical \Narguments.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Then what about simple and inherent \Narguments given by the Quran
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,as you often say?
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,[Javed Ahmad Ghamidi] Don't you consider \Nthe inherent arguments given
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,by the Quran as logical?
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,What I had earlier mentioned was that,\Nthings that evolve from a specific
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,philosophical or logical background and \Npeople present these questions just to
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,?? of the religion.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,These are the things that clearly convey \Nthat your addressee does not have that
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,perceptive attitude to understand or dive\Ninto something of this imperative nature.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,In that case you should follow ??
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,Arguments will be have there significance.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,The Quran itself is an example of \Nreasoning,
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,But what sort of argumentation?
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I had explained that reasoning only.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,I often present this reasoning, infact\NI have penned it down in my book Meezan.
Dialogue: 0,9:59:59.99,9:59:59.99,Default,,0000,0000,0000,,