1
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Khuda se Mutaliq Sawalat aur Ilm 
al Kalam ka Jawab - PART 2

2
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
by Jawed Ahmad Ghamidi

3
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[Hassan Ilyas] Yesterday, I asked you a 
question related to hypothetical statements

4
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
that we use in relation to Allah, 
nauzubillah (I seek refuge with Allah)

5
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
That Allah can lie, or he can make a rock
which even he can lift.

6
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
You detailed out your views on these 
kind of discussions.

7
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
There is a relative aspect and doubt, I 
want you to explain us in detail.

8
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
When you are in a discussion related to
the existence of God,

9
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
the argument behind confirmation for 
God's being,

10
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
or the various aspects of atheism or 
agnosticism that are put forward.

11
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
It is said that you logically conclude 
the arguments with intellectual evidence.

12
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
And the other party to the discussion is
puzzled with your style.

13
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
My question to you today is that,
Even you include these

14
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
intellectual evidences and arguments in 
your discussions,

15
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
People often say that a conversation 
with Ghamidi Sahib is very rational,

16
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
logical, enlightened and intellectual.

17
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
So, even your paradigm answers 
these modern suspicion or doubt

18
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
by way of intellectual and logical 
arguments.

19
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Then what about simple and inherent 
arguments given by the Quran

20
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
as you often say?

21
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
[Javed Ahmad Ghamidi] Don't you consider 
the inherent arguments given

22
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
by the Quran as logical?

23
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
What I had earlier mentioned was that,
things that evolve from a specific

24
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
philosophical or logical background and 
people present these questions just to

25
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
?? of the religion.

26
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
These are the things that clearly convey 
that your addressee does not have that

27
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
perceptive attitude to understand or dive
into something of this imperative nature.

28
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
In that case you should follow ??

29
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
Arguments will be have there significance.

30
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
The Quran itself is an example of 
reasoning,

31
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
But what sort of argumentation?

32
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I had explained that reasoning only.

33
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999
I often present this reasoning, infact
I have penned it down in my book Meezan.

34
99:59:59,999 --> 99:59:59,999