9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Khuda se Mutaliq Sawalat aur Ilm [br]al Kalam ka Jawab - PART 2

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
by Jawed Ahmad Ghamidi

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
[Hassan Ilyas] Yesterday, I asked you a [br]question related to hypothetical statements

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
that we use in relation to Allah, [br]nauzubillah (I seek refuge with Allah)

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
That Allah can lie, or he can make a rock[br]which even he can lift.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
You detailed out your views on these [br]kind of discussions.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
There is a relative aspect and doubt, I [br]want you to explain us in detail.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
When you are in a discussion related to[br]the existence of God,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
the argument behind confirmation for [br]God's being,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
or the various aspects of atheism or [br]agnosticism that are put forward.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
It is said that you logically conclude [br]the arguments with intellectual evidence.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
And the other party to the discussion is[br]puzzled with your style.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
My question to you today is that,[br]Even you include these

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
intellectual evidences and arguments in [br]your discussions,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
People often say that a conversation [br]with Ghamidi Sahib is very rational,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
logical, enlightened and intellectual.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
So, even your paradigm answers [br]these modern suspicion or doubt

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
by way of intellectual and logical [br]arguments.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Then what about simple and inherent [br]arguments given by the Quran

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
as you often say?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
[Javed Ahmad Ghamidi] Don't you consider [br]the inherent arguments given

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
by the Quran as logical?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
What I had earlier mentioned was that,[br]things that evolve from a specific

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
philosophical or logical background and [br]people present these questions just to

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
?? of the religion.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
These are the things that clearly convey [br]that your addressee does not have that

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
perceptive attitude to understand or dive[br]into something of this imperative nature.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
In that case you should follow ??

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
Arguments will be have there significance.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
The Quran itself is an example of [br]reasoning,

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
But what sort of argumentation?

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
I had explained that reasoning only.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000
I often present this reasoning, infact[br]I have penned it down in my book Meezan.

9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000