Khuda se Mutaliq Sawalat aur Ilm
al Kalam ka Jawab - PART 2
by Jawed Ahmad Ghamidi
[Hassan Ilyas] Yesterday, I asked you a
question related to hypothetical statements
that we use in relation to Allah,
nauzubillah (I seek refuge with Allah)
That Allah can lie, or he can make a rock
which even he can lift.
You detailed out your views on these
kind of discussions.
There is a relative aspect and doubt, I
want you to explain us in detail.
When you are in a discussion related to
the existence of God,
the argument behind confirmation for
God's being,
or the various aspects of atheism or
agnosticism that are put forward.
It is said that you logically conclude
the arguments with intellectual evidence.
And the other party to the discussion is
puzzled with your style.
My question to you today is that,
Even you include these
intellectual evidences and arguments in
your discussions,
People often say that a conversation
with Ghamidi Sahib is very rational,
logical, enlightened and intellectual.
So, even your paradigm answers
these modern suspicion or doubt
by way of intellectual and logical
arguments.
Then what about simple and inherent
arguments given by the Quran
as you often say?
[Javed Ahmad Ghamidi] Don't you consider
the inherent arguments given
by the Quran as logical?
What I had earlier mentioned was that,
things that evolve from a specific
philosophical or logical background and
people present these questions just to
?? of the religion.
These are the things that clearly convey
that your addressee does not have that
perceptive attitude to understand or dive
into something of this imperative nature.
In that case you should follow ??
Arguments will be have there significance.
The Quran itself is an example of
reasoning,
But what sort of argumentation?
I had explained that reasoning only.
I often present this reasoning, infact
I have penned it down in my book Meezan.