WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.905
(intro music)

00:00:05.905 --> 00:00:08.350
Hi! I'm Chris Surprenant, and I teach in


00:00:08.350 --> 00:00:11.930
the department of philosophy at
the University of New Orleans.

00:00:11.930 --> 00:00:15.030
This video is part of my series
on human well-being

00:00:15.030 --> 00:00:19.150
and the good life, and it examines the
account of well-being presented by Plato's

00:00:19.150 --> 00:00:22.150
character Socrates in
the Platonic dialogues.

00:00:22.150 --> 00:00:24.460
If you've taken an introduction
to philosophy class,

00:00:24.460 --> 00:00:28.140
it's very likely that you have
read Plato's Apology.

00:00:28.140 --> 00:00:32.619
This dialogue provides Plato's version
of a speech given by Socrates

00:00:32.619 --> 00:00:38.290
to defend himself against the charges of
corrupting the youth and impiety, charges

00:00:38.290 --> 00:00:42.350
that Socrates ultimately was convicted
of and sentenced to death.

00:00:42.350 --> 00:00:46.620
This dialogue contains one have the most
frequently cited lines in the entire

00:00:46.620 --> 00:00:48.300
history of Western thought.

00:00:48.300 --> 00:00:51.920
When speaking to the jury to
explain why he can't simply stop

00:00:51.920 --> 00:00:55.390
what he is doing, why he can't stop
annoying people by constantly

00:00:55.390 --> 00:01:00.719
questioning them about what they believe
and why, Socrates says that he can't stop

00:01:00.719 --> 00:01:07.100
examining his own life because the
unexamined life is not worth living.

00:01:07.100 --> 00:01:11.430
That statement provides tremendous
insight into Socrates's understanding

00:01:11.430 --> 00:01:13.589
as to what it means to live a good life.

00:01:13.589 --> 00:01:16.159
What Socrates is telling us is that the

00:01:16.159 --> 00:01:21.570
person who merely wakes up in the morning,
goes to work, does his job, comes home,

00:01:21.570 --> 00:01:25.110
watches television, goes to bed,
and then repeats this process,

00:01:25.110 --> 00:01:29.900
day in and day out for his entire life,
never really reflecting on what he ought

00:01:29.900 --> 00:01:35.630
to be doing or what he values and
why, that that life is not worth living.

00:01:35.630 --> 00:01:37.540
But for Socrates, participating in this

00:01:37.540 --> 00:01:41.180
type of rational reflection about
what you value and why,

00:01:41.180 --> 00:01:47.010
that is, doing philosophy, is not enough
by itself in order to live a good life.

00:01:47.010 --> 00:01:52.340
What is also needed is that an individual
becomes a master of himself, using his

00:01:52.340 --> 00:01:57.070
reason to rein in his passions, as
well as doing what he can to help

00:01:57.070 --> 00:01:59.260
promote the stability of his community.

00:01:59.260 --> 00:02:03.740
And these topics are explored directly
in Plato's dialogue Republic.

00:02:03.740 --> 00:02:06.899
While most people think
of Republic as a political

00:02:06.899 --> 00:02:11.490
dialogue that focuses on the nature of
justice, it is perhaps better understood

00:02:11.490 --> 00:02:14.170
as a dialogue focusing on virtue and the

00:02:14.170 --> 00:02:17.650
role of philosophy, community,
and the state in helping to

00:02:17.650 --> 00:02:21.380
create the conditions that
make living well possible.

00:02:21.380 --> 00:02:26.630
At the beginning of book two, Glaucon,
one of Socrates's interlocutors in the

00:02:26.630 --> 00:02:27.900
dialogue, poses a challenge to Socrates.

00:02:27.900 --> 00:02:31.840
Glaucon tells the fable
of the Ring of Gyges,

00:02:31.840 --> 00:02:35.510
which, like the One Ring in the
Lord of the Rings, has the power

00:02:35.510 --> 00:02:37.130
to make its wearer invisible.

00:02:37.130 --> 00:02:39.980
He notes that the person who
wears the ring, through

00:02:39.980 --> 00:02:43.930
various types of deception, would
be able to get anything he wanted:

00:02:43.930 --> 00:02:47.490
power, money, or even a good reputation.

00:02:47.490 --> 00:02:50.630
The moral of this story
seems to be that it's not

00:02:50.630 --> 00:02:55.550
important to actually be just, but
rather merely to appear to be just.

00:02:55.550 --> 00:02:58.230
And so his challenge to Socrates is:

00:02:58.230 --> 00:03:02.210
"Why must an individual be
just in order to live a good life?

00:03:02.210 --> 00:03:06.210
Isn't it simply necessary for that
person to appear to be just?

00:03:06.210 --> 00:03:08.870
In the remaining eight and
a half books of Republic,

00:03:08.870 --> 00:03:11.740
Socrates attempts to address this challenge.

00:03:11.740 --> 00:03:16.310
His solution is to see justice not
just as a political condition,

00:03:16.310 --> 00:03:19.080
but also as a state
of a person's soul.

00:03:19.080 --> 00:03:24.630
Understood politically, justice requires
each person in the city to mind his own

00:03:24.630 --> 00:03:27.030
business, doing the particular job that

00:03:27.030 --> 00:03:30.330
has been allocated to him
to the best of his abilities.

00:03:30.330 --> 00:03:34.610
Socrates claims that operating in this
manner will allow the city to thrive,

00:03:34.610 --> 00:03:36.720
which is in everyone's best interest.

00:03:36.720 --> 00:03:39.220
When the boys object
that one implication of

00:03:39.220 --> 00:03:43.380
this position is that particular
individuals or classes of individuals

00:03:43.380 --> 00:03:47.000
will not be happy with this arrangement,
Socrates responded that he is not

00:03:47.000 --> 00:03:50.430
concerned with the happiness of
particular individuals or classes of

00:03:50.430 --> 00:03:54.500
individuals, but rather with the
happiness of the city as a whole.

00:03:54.500 --> 00:03:56.250
Here, we see that, for Socrates,

00:03:56.250 --> 00:04:00.010
a well-ordered society trumps
individual freedom.

00:04:00.010 --> 00:04:04.010
In addition to understanding justice
politically, Socrates also sees

00:04:04.010 --> 00:04:06.070
it as a state of an individual's soul.

00:04:06.070 --> 00:04:08.750
He compares the soul
to a two-horse chariot.

00:04:08.750 --> 00:04:13.769
One of these horses, which he associates
with a person's appetites or desires,

00:04:13.769 --> 00:04:17.110
Socrates says, is stubborn,
and must be controlled.

00:04:17.110 --> 00:04:19.320
The other horse, which he associates with

00:04:19.320 --> 00:04:23.700
spiritedness, is noble and can
be used by reason, which he

00:04:23.700 --> 00:04:27.619
associates with the charioteer, to
help control the stubborn horse

00:04:27.619 --> 00:04:30.969
But if a person doesn't learn
how reason can make use of

00:04:30.969 --> 00:04:35.680
spiritedness in order to rein in desire,
then that person will be just as

00:04:35.680 --> 00:04:39.469
misdirected as the chariot controlled
by the stubborn horse.

00:04:39.469 --> 00:04:43.189
When understood in this way,
it seems obvious to Socrates

00:04:43.189 --> 00:04:45.449
why being just, in addition to

00:04:45.449 --> 00:04:49.179
participating in philosophical
investigation, is necessary

00:04:49.179 --> 00:04:50.889
in order to live a good life.

00:04:50.889 --> 00:04:55.330
The just person not only does his part
in order to maintain the stability of

00:04:55.330 --> 00:04:57.140
the society and the community,

00:04:57.140 --> 00:05:02.280
but is also in control of himself
and is not ruled by his desires.

00:05:02.280 --> 00:05:04.220
Is Socrates' position reasonable?

00:05:04.220 --> 00:05:06.340
While us moderns might find it odd

00:05:06.340 --> 00:05:09.930
that his conception of the good
life would be tied so closely to

00:05:09.930 --> 00:05:13.000
what appears to be a significant
restriction of individual freedom,

00:05:13.000 --> 00:05:17.629
Socrates might respond that freedom
outside of a well-ordered community or

00:05:17.629 --> 00:05:22.779
well-ordered soul is simply lawlessness,
and lawlessness is inconsistent with any

00:05:22.779 --> 00:05:26.499
conception of human well-being and
what it means to live a good life.

00:05:26.499 --> 00:05:31.650
Anyone who might want to refute Socrates's
position at the very least would need to

00:05:31.650 --> 00:05:36.719
show how an emphasis on individual freedom
does not lead to this kind of lawlessness.

00:05:36.719 --> 00:05:40.430
And so what we see in the Socratic
dialogues is a conception of human

00:05:40.430 --> 00:05:44.599
well-being and the good life that
emphasizes both the importance of

00:05:44.599 --> 00:05:49.419
rational reflection and an individual
doing his part to contribute to the

00:05:49.419 --> 00:05:52.119
stability of the community as a whole.