1 00:00:00,675 --> 00:00:04,269 Host: This morning, our first presenter is doctor Frans de Waal. 2 00:00:04,413 --> 00:00:06,507 He directs the Living Links Center 3 00:00:06,540 --> 00:00:09,000 at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center 4 00:00:09,025 --> 00:00:10,358 at Emory University. 5 00:00:10,395 --> 00:00:12,077 And his work as a primatologist 6 00:00:12,110 --> 00:00:14,894 has directed him to today's idea worth sharing 7 00:00:14,911 --> 00:00:18,029 and that is morality without religion. 8 00:00:18,133 --> 00:00:22,236 So if you will, please, join me in welcoming doctor Frans de Waal. 9 00:00:22,273 --> 00:00:29,250 (Applause) 10 00:00:29,347 --> 00:00:30,712 Frans de Waal: Good morning. 11 00:00:30,752 --> 00:00:33,616 It's a bit of a heavy topic, I think, to start a day with - 12 00:00:33,633 --> 00:00:35,233 morality and religion... 13 00:00:35,776 --> 00:00:39,712 I work with animals, and I'll give you a slightly different take. 14 00:00:39,760 --> 00:00:43,693 That could be the most appropriate talk at a zoo, I think, to give. 15 00:00:44,220 --> 00:00:47,353 So let me say first a few things about myself. 16 00:00:47,378 --> 00:00:48,990 I was born in Den Bosch, 17 00:00:49,015 --> 00:00:51,538 very close to Maastricht, which was just mentioned - 18 00:00:51,563 --> 00:00:54,900 where the painter Hieronymus Bosch named himself after. 19 00:00:54,924 --> 00:00:57,347 And I've always been very fond of this painter 20 00:00:57,371 --> 00:00:59,856 who lived and worked in the 15th century. 21 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:02,776 And what is interesting about him in relation to morality 22 00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:05,855 is that he lived at a time where religion's influence was waning, 23 00:01:05,879 --> 00:01:07,696 and he was sort of wondering, I think, 24 00:01:08,020 --> 00:01:10,610 what would happen with society if there was no religion 25 00:01:10,634 --> 00:01:12,094 or if there was less religion. 26 00:01:12,118 --> 00:01:16,280 And so he painted this famous painting, "The Garden of Earthly Delights," 27 00:01:16,496 --> 00:01:20,654 which some have interpreted as being humanity before the Fall, 28 00:01:20,679 --> 00:01:23,917 or being humanity without any Fall at all. 29 00:01:23,941 --> 00:01:25,229 And so it makes you wonder, 30 00:01:25,253 --> 00:01:28,752 what would happen if we hadn't tasted the fruit of knowledge, so to speak, 31 00:01:28,776 --> 00:01:30,976 and what kind of morality would we have. 32 00:01:32,089 --> 00:01:35,099 Much later, as a student, I went to a very different garden, 33 00:01:35,123 --> 00:01:39,791 a zoological garden in Arnhem where we keep chimpanzees. 34 00:01:39,815 --> 00:01:42,941 This is me at an early age with a baby chimpanzee. 35 00:01:42,965 --> 00:01:45,650 (Laughter) 36 00:01:45,974 --> 00:01:47,693 And I discovered there 37 00:01:47,718 --> 00:01:51,516 that the chimpanzees are very power-hungry and wrote a book about it - 38 00:01:51,521 --> 00:01:52,818 The Chimpazee Politics, 39 00:01:52,863 --> 00:01:55,530 which is still in print, 25 years later. 40 00:01:55,697 --> 00:01:58,224 And at that time the focus in a lot of animal research 41 00:01:58,248 --> 00:02:00,675 was on aggression and competition. 42 00:02:00,699 --> 00:02:02,956 I painted a whole picture of the animal kingdom 43 00:02:02,980 --> 00:02:08,178 and humanity included, was that deep down we are competitors, we are aggressive, 44 00:02:08,602 --> 00:02:11,655 we are all out for our own profit, basically. 45 00:02:11,679 --> 00:02:13,551 This is the launch of my book. 46 00:02:13,575 --> 00:02:15,959 I'm not sure how well the chimpanzees read it, 47 00:02:15,983 --> 00:02:18,654 but they surely seemed interested in the book. 48 00:02:18,678 --> 00:02:20,883 (Laughter) 49 00:02:20,907 --> 00:02:23,818 Now in the process of doing all this work 50 00:02:23,842 --> 00:02:26,742 on power and dominance and aggression and so on, 51 00:02:26,766 --> 00:02:29,949 I discovered that chimpanzees reconcile after fights. 52 00:02:29,973 --> 00:02:33,158 And so what you see here is two males who have had a fight. 53 00:02:33,183 --> 00:02:36,527 They ended up in a tree, and one of them holds out a hand to the other. 54 00:02:36,551 --> 00:02:38,621 And about a second after I took the picture, 55 00:02:38,645 --> 00:02:40,706 they came together in the fork of the tree 56 00:02:40,730 --> 00:02:42,446 and kissed and embraced each other. 57 00:02:42,470 --> 00:02:43,814 And this is very interesting 58 00:02:43,838 --> 00:02:47,135 because at the time, everything was about competition and aggression, 59 00:02:47,159 --> 00:02:48,653 so it wouldn't make any sense. 60 00:02:48,677 --> 00:02:51,313 The only thing that matters is that you win or you lose. 61 00:02:51,337 --> 00:02:54,274 But why reconcile after a fight? That doesn't make any sense. 62 00:02:54,298 --> 00:02:57,296 This is the way bonobos do it. Bonobos do everything with sex. 63 00:02:57,320 --> 00:02:59,134 And so they also reconcile with sex. 64 00:02:59,158 --> 00:03:01,084 But the principle is exactly the same. 65 00:03:01,108 --> 00:03:05,083 The principle is that you have a valuable relationship 66 00:03:05,107 --> 00:03:09,197 that is damaged by conflict, so you need to do something about it. 67 00:03:09,221 --> 00:03:13,588 So my whole picture of the animal kingdom, and including humans also, 68 00:03:13,612 --> 00:03:15,191 started to change at that time. 69 00:03:16,775 --> 00:03:20,754 So we have this image in political science, economics, the humanities, 70 00:03:20,778 --> 00:03:24,636 the philosophy for that matter, that man is a wolf to man. 71 00:03:24,660 --> 00:03:27,344 And so deep down, our nature is actually nasty. 72 00:03:27,773 --> 00:03:30,691 I think it's a very unfair image for the wolf. 73 00:03:30,715 --> 00:03:34,161 The wolf is, after all, a very cooperative animal. 74 00:03:34,185 --> 00:03:36,439 And that's why many of you have a dog at home, 75 00:03:36,463 --> 00:03:38,682 which has all these characteristics also. 76 00:03:39,206 --> 00:03:41,001 And it's really unfair to humanity, 77 00:03:41,025 --> 00:03:44,276 because humanity is actually much more cooperative and empathic 78 00:03:44,300 --> 00:03:46,487 than given credit for. 79 00:03:46,511 --> 00:03:48,771 So I started getting interested in those issues 80 00:03:48,795 --> 00:03:50,580 and studying that in other animals. 81 00:03:51,130 --> 00:03:52,984 So these are the pillars of morality. 82 00:03:53,008 --> 00:03:56,560 If you ask anyone, "What is morality based on?" 83 00:03:56,584 --> 00:03:58,779 these are the two factors that always come out. 84 00:03:58,803 --> 00:04:00,510 One is reciprocity, 85 00:04:00,534 --> 00:04:04,089 and associated with it is a sense of justice and a sense of fairness. 86 00:04:04,113 --> 00:04:06,306 And the other one is empathy and compassion. 87 00:04:06,330 --> 00:04:11,480 And human morality is more than this, but if you would remove these two pillars, 88 00:04:11,505 --> 00:04:13,634 there would be not much remaining, I think. 89 00:04:13,658 --> 00:04:15,313 So they're absolutely essential. 90 00:04:15,337 --> 00:04:17,204 So let me give you a few examples here. 91 00:04:17,228 --> 00:04:19,928 This is a very old video from the Yerkes Primate Center, 92 00:04:19,952 --> 00:04:22,276 where they trained chimpanzees to cooperate. 93 00:04:22,945 --> 00:04:25,132 So this is already about a hundred years ago 94 00:04:25,157 --> 00:04:26,577 about a hundred years ago, 95 00:04:26,615 --> 00:04:29,707 that we were doing experiments on cooperation. 96 00:04:29,731 --> 00:04:33,263 What you have here is two young chimpanzees who have a box, 97 00:04:33,287 --> 00:04:36,292 and the box is too heavy for one chimp to pull in. 98 00:04:36,316 --> 00:04:38,175 And of course, there's food on the box. 99 00:04:38,199 --> 00:04:40,200 Otherwise they wouldn't be pulling so hard. 100 00:04:40,224 --> 00:04:42,337 And so they're bringing in the box. 101 00:04:42,361 --> 00:04:44,630 And you can see that they're synchronized. 102 00:04:44,654 --> 00:04:48,053 You can see that they work together, they pull at the same moment. 103 00:04:48,078 --> 00:04:50,990 It's already a big advance over many other animals 104 00:04:51,015 --> 00:04:52,653 who wouldn't be able to do that. 105 00:04:52,677 --> 00:04:55,063 Now you're going to get a more interesting picture, 106 00:04:55,087 --> 00:04:57,713 because now one of the two chimps has been fed. 107 00:04:57,737 --> 00:05:01,163 So one of the two is not really interested in the task anymore. 108 00:05:03,008 --> 00:05:06,008 (Laughter) 109 00:05:09,863 --> 00:05:14,673 (Laughter) 110 00:05:20,894 --> 00:05:23,830 (Laughter) 111 00:05:24,480 --> 00:05:29,182 [- and sometimes appears to convey its wishes and meanings by gestures.] 112 00:05:36,860 --> 00:05:39,270 Now look at what happens at the very end of this. 113 00:05:42,511 --> 00:05:45,055 (Laughter) 114 00:05:53,607 --> 00:05:55,496 He takes basically everything. 115 00:05:55,520 --> 00:05:58,496 (Laughter) 116 00:05:58,520 --> 00:06:00,536 There are two interesting parts about this. 117 00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:02,202 One is that the chimp on the right 118 00:06:02,226 --> 00:06:04,518 has a full understanding he needs the partner... 119 00:06:04,542 --> 00:06:06,977 So a full understanding of the need for cooperation. 120 00:06:07,001 --> 00:06:09,490 The second one is that the partner is willing to work 121 00:06:09,514 --> 00:06:11,636 even though he's not interested in the food. 122 00:06:11,660 --> 00:06:12,863 Why would that be? 123 00:06:12,887 --> 00:06:15,078 Well, that probably has to do with reciprocity. 124 00:06:15,102 --> 00:06:18,106 There's actually a lot of evidence in primates and other animals 125 00:06:18,130 --> 00:06:19,652 that they return favors. 126 00:06:19,676 --> 00:06:22,364 He will get a return favor at some point in the future. 127 00:06:22,388 --> 00:06:24,263 And so that's how this all operates. 128 00:06:25,346 --> 00:06:27,035 We do the same task with elephants. 129 00:06:27,059 --> 00:06:30,213 Now, it's very dangerous to work with elephants. 130 00:06:30,237 --> 00:06:33,394 Another problem with elephants is that you cannot make an apparatus 131 00:06:33,418 --> 00:06:35,335 that is too heavy for a single elephant. 132 00:06:35,359 --> 00:06:37,076 Now you can probably make it, 133 00:06:37,100 --> 00:06:39,861 but it's going to be a pretty clumsy apparatus, I think. 134 00:06:39,885 --> 00:06:41,527 And so what we did in that case... 135 00:06:41,551 --> 00:06:44,213 We do these studies in Thailand for Josh Plotnik... 136 00:06:44,237 --> 00:06:48,170 Is we have an apparatus around which there is a rope, a single rope. 137 00:06:48,194 --> 00:06:51,957 And if you pull on this side of the rope, the rope disappears on the other side. 138 00:06:51,981 --> 00:06:55,368 So two elephants need to pick it up at exactly the same time, and pull. 139 00:06:55,392 --> 00:06:58,439 Otherwise nothing is going to happen and the rope disappears. 140 00:06:58,463 --> 00:07:00,671 The first tape you're going to see 141 00:07:00,695 --> 00:07:04,684 is two elephants who are released together arrive at the apparatus. 142 00:07:04,708 --> 00:07:07,508 The apparatus is on the left, with food on it. 143 00:07:07,936 --> 00:07:10,958 And so they come together, they arrive together, 144 00:07:10,982 --> 00:07:13,275 they pick it up together, and they pull together. 145 00:07:13,299 --> 00:07:15,615 So it's actually fairly simple for them. 146 00:07:17,485 --> 00:07:18,635 There they are. 147 00:07:26,406 --> 00:07:27,964 So that's how they bring it in. 148 00:07:27,988 --> 00:07:30,145 But now we're going to make it more difficult. 149 00:07:30,169 --> 00:07:31,989 Because the purpose of this experiment 150 00:07:32,013 --> 00:07:34,205 is to see how well they understand cooperation. 151 00:07:34,229 --> 00:07:37,067 Do they understand that as well as the chimps, for example? 152 00:07:37,091 --> 00:07:40,569 What we do in the next step is we release one elephant before the other 153 00:07:40,593 --> 00:07:42,604 and that elephant needs to be smart enough 154 00:07:42,628 --> 00:07:45,100 to stay there and wait and not pull at the rope... 155 00:07:45,124 --> 00:07:48,605 Because if he pulls at the rope, it disappears and the whole test is over. 156 00:07:48,629 --> 00:07:51,899 Now this elephant does something illegal that we did not teach it. 157 00:07:51,923 --> 00:07:54,089 But it shows the understanding he has, 158 00:07:54,113 --> 00:07:56,637 because he puts his big foot on the rope, 159 00:07:56,661 --> 00:07:58,979 stands on the rope and waits there for the other, 160 00:07:59,003 --> 00:08:01,586 and then the other is going to do all the work for him. 161 00:08:01,610 --> 00:08:04,176 So it's what we call freeloading. 162 00:08:04,200 --> 00:08:07,215 (Laughter) 163 00:08:07,239 --> 00:08:10,055 But it shows the intelligence that the elephants have. 164 00:08:10,079 --> 00:08:12,652 They developed several of these alternative techniques 165 00:08:12,676 --> 00:08:14,634 that we did not approve of, necessarily. 166 00:08:14,658 --> 00:08:15,881 (Laughter) 167 00:08:15,905 --> 00:08:17,888 So the other elephant is now coming... 168 00:08:21,246 --> 00:08:22,705 and is going to pull it in. 169 00:08:40,538 --> 00:08:43,655 Now look at the other; it doesn't forget to eat, of course. 170 00:08:43,679 --> 00:08:45,942 (Laughter) 171 00:08:46,877 --> 00:08:49,693 This was the cooperation and reciprocity part. 172 00:08:49,718 --> 00:08:50,931 Now something on empathy. 173 00:08:51,161 --> 00:08:53,665 Empathy is my main topic at the moment, of research. 174 00:08:53,689 --> 00:08:55,137 And empathy has two qualities: 175 00:08:55,161 --> 00:08:57,180 One is the understanding part of it. 176 00:08:57,204 --> 00:08:58,835 This is just a regular definition: 177 00:08:58,859 --> 00:09:01,671 the ability to understand and share the feelings of another. 178 00:09:01,695 --> 00:09:02,904 And the emotional part. 179 00:09:02,929 --> 00:09:06,538 Empathy has basically two channels: One is the body channel, 180 00:09:06,563 --> 00:09:08,820 If you talk with a sad person, 181 00:09:08,845 --> 00:09:12,497 you're going to adopt a sad expression and a sad posture, 182 00:09:12,522 --> 00:09:14,284 and before you know it, you feel sad. 183 00:09:14,308 --> 00:09:18,526 And that's sort of the body channel of emotional empathy, 184 00:09:18,550 --> 00:09:19,829 which many animals have. 185 00:09:19,853 --> 00:09:21,408 Your average dog has that also. 186 00:09:21,432 --> 00:09:23,432 That's why people keep mammals in the home 187 00:09:23,456 --> 00:09:25,763 and not turtles or snakes or something like that, 188 00:09:25,787 --> 00:09:27,576 who don't have that kind of empathy. 189 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:29,372 And then there's a cognitive channel, 190 00:09:29,396 --> 00:09:32,460 which is more that you can take the perspective of somebody else. 191 00:09:32,484 --> 00:09:33,642 And that's more limited. 192 00:09:33,666 --> 00:09:37,912 Very few animals, I think elephants and apes, can do that kind of thing. 193 00:09:39,311 --> 00:09:40,673 So synchronization, 194 00:09:40,697 --> 00:09:42,840 which is part of that whole empathy mechanism, 195 00:09:42,864 --> 00:09:45,119 is a very old one in the animal kingdom. 196 00:09:45,143 --> 00:09:48,384 In humans, of course, we can study that with yawn contagion. 197 00:09:48,408 --> 00:09:50,226 Humans yawn when others yawn. 198 00:09:50,250 --> 00:09:52,033 And it's related to empathy. 199 00:09:52,057 --> 00:09:54,192 It activates the same areas in the brain. 200 00:09:54,216 --> 00:09:56,937 Also, we know that people who have a lot of yawn contagion 201 00:09:56,961 --> 00:09:58,114 are highly empathic. 202 00:09:58,138 --> 00:10:01,313 People who have problems with empathy, such as autistic children, 203 00:10:01,337 --> 00:10:02,829 they don't have yawn contagion. 204 00:10:02,853 --> 00:10:04,008 So it is connected. 205 00:10:04,032 --> 00:10:07,755 And we study that in our chimpanzees by presenting them with an animated head. 206 00:10:07,779 --> 00:10:11,770 So that's what you see on the upper-left, an animated head that yawns. 207 00:10:11,794 --> 00:10:13,414 And there's a chimpanzee watching, 208 00:10:13,438 --> 00:10:15,880 an actual real chimpanzee watching a computer screen 209 00:10:15,904 --> 00:10:17,852 on which we play these animations. 210 00:10:24,131 --> 00:10:25,812 (Laughter) 211 00:10:25,836 --> 00:10:28,775 So yawn contagion that you're probably all familiar with... 212 00:10:29,236 --> 00:10:31,915 And maybe you're going to start yawning soon now... 213 00:10:32,539 --> 00:10:35,755 Is something that we share with other animals. 214 00:10:35,779 --> 00:10:38,780 And that's related to that whole body channel of synchronization 215 00:10:38,804 --> 00:10:40,524 that underlies empathy, 216 00:10:40,548 --> 00:10:43,651 and that is universal in the mammals, basically. 217 00:10:44,775 --> 00:10:47,886 We also study more complex expressions... This is consolation. 218 00:10:47,910 --> 00:10:51,010 This is a male chimpanzee who has lost a fight and he's screaming, 219 00:10:51,034 --> 00:10:53,745 and a juvenile comes over and puts an arm around him 220 00:10:53,769 --> 00:10:54,934 and calms him down. 221 00:10:54,958 --> 00:10:56,132 That's consolation. 222 00:10:56,156 --> 00:10:58,020 It's very similar to human consolation. 223 00:10:58,044 --> 00:11:00,203 And consolation behavior... 224 00:11:00,227 --> 00:11:01,377 (Laughter) 225 00:11:01,401 --> 00:11:03,086 it's empathy driven. 226 00:11:03,110 --> 00:11:05,927 Actually, the way to study empathy in human children 227 00:11:05,951 --> 00:11:08,525 is to instruct a family member to act distressed, 228 00:11:08,549 --> 00:11:10,512 and then to see what young children do. 229 00:11:10,736 --> 00:11:12,750 And so it is related to empathy, 230 00:11:12,774 --> 00:11:15,007 and that's the kind of expressions we look at. 231 00:11:15,031 --> 00:11:18,129 We also recently published an experiment you may have heard about. 232 00:11:18,153 --> 00:11:20,136 It's on altruism and chimpanzees, 233 00:11:20,160 --> 00:11:24,576 where the question is: Do chimpanzees care about the welfare of somebody else? 234 00:11:24,600 --> 00:11:29,051 And for decades it had been assumed that only humans can do that, 235 00:11:29,075 --> 00:11:32,334 that only humans worry about the welfare of somebody else. 236 00:11:32,358 --> 00:11:34,795 Now we did a very simple experiment. 237 00:11:34,819 --> 00:11:37,446 We do that on chimpanzees that live in Lawrenceville, 238 00:11:37,470 --> 00:11:39,212 in the field station of Yerkes. 239 00:11:39,236 --> 00:11:40,573 And so that's how they live. 240 00:11:40,597 --> 00:11:43,807 And we call them into a room and do experiments with them. 241 00:11:43,831 --> 00:11:46,168 In this case, we put two chimpanzees side-by-side, 242 00:11:46,192 --> 00:11:49,769 and one has a bucket full of tokens, and the tokens have different meanings. 243 00:11:49,793 --> 00:11:52,366 One kind of token feeds only the partner who chooses, 244 00:11:52,390 --> 00:11:54,215 the other one feeds both of them. 245 00:11:54,922 --> 00:11:56,716 You will see a little video of this. 246 00:11:58,139 --> 00:12:00,484 So this is a study we did with Vicki Horner. 247 00:12:02,156 --> 00:12:04,425 And here, you have the two color tokens. 248 00:12:04,449 --> 00:12:06,408 So they have a whole bucket full of them. 249 00:12:06,832 --> 00:12:09,605 And they have to pick one of the two colors. 250 00:12:10,153 --> 00:12:11,613 You will see how that goes. 251 00:12:12,841 --> 00:12:15,269 So if this chimp makes the selfish choice, 252 00:12:16,173 --> 00:12:18,834 which is the red token in this case, 253 00:12:18,858 --> 00:12:20,488 he needs to give it to us, 254 00:12:20,512 --> 00:12:23,849 we pick it up, we put it on a table where there's two food rewards, 255 00:12:23,873 --> 00:12:26,408 but in this case, only the one on the right gets food. 256 00:12:26,432 --> 00:12:29,213 The one on the left walks away because she knows already 257 00:12:29,237 --> 00:12:31,307 that this is not a good test for her. 258 00:12:31,331 --> 00:12:34,016 Then the next one is the pro-social token. 259 00:12:34,040 --> 00:12:37,384 So the one who makes the choices... That's the interesting part here... 260 00:12:37,408 --> 00:12:40,228 For the one who makes the choices, it doesn't really matter. 261 00:12:40,252 --> 00:12:43,225 So she gives us now a pro-social token and both chimps get fed. 262 00:12:43,249 --> 00:12:45,976 So the one who makes the choices always gets a reward. 263 00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:47,578 So it doesn't matter whatsoever. 264 00:12:47,602 --> 00:12:50,096 And she should actually be choosing blindly. 265 00:12:50,922 --> 00:12:54,281 But what we find is that they prefer the pro-social token. 266 00:12:54,305 --> 00:12:57,299 So this is the 50 percent line, that's the random expectation. 267 00:12:57,323 --> 00:13:01,272 And especially if the partner draws attention to itself, they choose more. 268 00:13:01,296 --> 00:13:03,304 And if the partner puts pressure on them... 269 00:13:03,328 --> 00:13:06,467 So if the partner starts spitting water and intimidating them... 270 00:13:06,491 --> 00:13:08,019 Then the choices go down. 271 00:13:08,043 --> 00:13:09,082 (Laughter) 272 00:13:10,406 --> 00:13:12,276 It's as if they're saying, 273 00:13:12,300 --> 00:13:15,287 "If you're not behaving, I'm not going to be pro-social today." 274 00:13:15,311 --> 00:13:17,315 And this is what happens without a partner, 275 00:13:17,339 --> 00:13:19,153 when there's no partner sitting there. 276 00:13:19,177 --> 00:13:22,996 So we found that the chimpanzees do care about the well-being of somebody else... 277 00:13:23,020 --> 00:13:25,643 Especially, these are other members of their own group. 278 00:13:25,675 --> 00:13:28,444 So the final experiment that I want to mention to you 279 00:13:28,468 --> 00:13:30,115 is our fairness study. 280 00:13:30,139 --> 00:13:33,029 And so this became a very famous study. 281 00:13:33,053 --> 00:13:34,476 And there are now many more, 282 00:13:34,500 --> 00:13:36,643 because after we did this about 10 years ago, 283 00:13:36,667 --> 00:13:38,476 it became very well-known. 284 00:13:39,024 --> 00:13:41,317 And we did that originally with Capuchin monkeys. 285 00:13:41,341 --> 00:13:44,131 And I'm going to show you the first experiment that we did. 286 00:13:44,155 --> 00:13:46,967 It has now been done with dogs and with birds 287 00:13:46,991 --> 00:13:48,476 and with chimpanzees. 288 00:13:49,645 --> 00:13:53,076 But with Sarah Brosnan, we started out with Capuchin monkeys. 289 00:13:53,618 --> 00:13:56,823 So what we did is we put two Capuchin monkeys side-by-side. 290 00:13:56,847 --> 00:13:59,676 Again, these animals, live in a group, they know each other. 291 00:13:59,700 --> 00:14:02,454 We take them out of the group, put them in a test chamber. 292 00:14:02,995 --> 00:14:06,090 And there's a very simple task that they need to do. 293 00:14:06,565 --> 00:14:09,945 And if you give both of them cucumber for the task, 294 00:14:09,969 --> 00:14:11,399 the two monkeys side-by-side, 295 00:14:11,423 --> 00:14:14,253 they're perfectly willing to do this 25 times in a row. 296 00:14:14,277 --> 00:14:17,724 So cucumber, even though it's only really water in my opinion, 297 00:14:17,748 --> 00:14:20,986 but cucumber is perfectly fine for them. 298 00:14:21,010 --> 00:14:23,293 Now if you give the partner grapes... 299 00:14:23,317 --> 00:14:25,464 The food preferences of my Capuchin monkeys 300 00:14:25,488 --> 00:14:28,528 correspond exactly with the prices in the supermarket... 301 00:14:28,552 --> 00:14:31,957 And so if you give them grapes... It's a far better food... 302 00:14:31,981 --> 00:14:34,184 Then you create inequity between them. 303 00:14:34,902 --> 00:14:36,748 So that's the experiment we did. 304 00:14:36,765 --> 00:14:39,812 And I'm going to show you a little videotape of this. 305 00:14:40,372 --> 00:14:42,453 Recently, we videotaped it with new monkeys 306 00:14:42,477 --> 00:14:43,814 who'd never done the task, 307 00:14:43,838 --> 00:14:46,470 thinking that maybe they would have a stronger reaction, 308 00:14:46,494 --> 00:14:48,033 and that turned out to be right. 309 00:14:48,057 --> 00:14:50,553 The one on the left is the monkey who gets cucumber. 310 00:14:50,577 --> 00:14:52,836 The one on the right is the one who gets grapes. 311 00:14:53,260 --> 00:14:54,607 The one who gets cucumber... 312 00:14:54,631 --> 00:14:57,341 Note that the first piece of cucumber is perfectly fine. 313 00:14:57,451 --> 00:14:59,176 The first piece she eats. 314 00:14:59,600 --> 00:15:03,205 Then she sees the other one getting grape, and you will see what happens. 315 00:15:04,694 --> 00:15:07,273 So she gives a rock to us. That's the task. 316 00:15:07,297 --> 00:15:10,355 And we give her a piece of cucumber and she eats it. 317 00:15:10,379 --> 00:15:12,376 The other one needs to give a rock to us. 318 00:15:13,788 --> 00:15:15,576 And that's what she does. 319 00:15:16,187 --> 00:15:17,799 And she gets a grape... 320 00:15:19,179 --> 00:15:20,342 and eats it. 321 00:15:20,366 --> 00:15:21,561 The other one sees that. 322 00:15:21,585 --> 00:15:22,901 She gives a rock to us now, 323 00:15:22,925 --> 00:15:24,497 gets, again, cucumber. 324 00:15:27,960 --> 00:15:34,960 (Laughter) 325 00:15:41,341 --> 00:15:43,342 (Laughter ends) 326 00:15:43,366 --> 00:15:46,341 She tests a rock now against the wall. 327 00:15:46,365 --> 00:15:47,721 She needs to give it to us. 328 00:15:48,584 --> 00:15:50,600 And she gets cucumber again. 329 00:15:52,943 --> 00:15:59,399 (Laughter) 330 00:16:02,051 --> 00:16:05,180 So this is basically the Wall Street protest that you see here. 331 00:16:05,204 --> 00:16:07,576 (Laughter) 332 00:16:07,600 --> 00:16:11,826 (Applause) 333 00:16:12,777 --> 00:16:14,563 I still have two minutes left... 334 00:16:14,587 --> 00:16:16,550 Let me tell you a funny story about this. 335 00:16:16,561 --> 00:16:20,171 This study became very famous and we got a lot of comments, 336 00:16:20,195 --> 00:16:23,801 especially anthropologists, economists, philosophers. 337 00:16:23,825 --> 00:16:25,233 They didn't like this at all. 338 00:16:25,257 --> 00:16:27,819 Because they had decided in their minds, I believe, 339 00:16:27,843 --> 00:16:31,887 that fairness is a very complex issue, and that animals cannot have it. 340 00:16:31,912 --> 00:16:34,375 And so one philosopher even wrote us 341 00:16:34,399 --> 00:16:37,173 that it was impossible that monkeys had a sense of fairness 342 00:16:37,197 --> 00:16:39,978 because fairness was invented during the French Revolution. 343 00:16:40,002 --> 00:16:42,419 (Laughter) 344 00:16:42,443 --> 00:16:45,125 And another one wrote a whole chapter 345 00:16:45,149 --> 00:16:48,676 saying that he would believe it had something to do with fairness, 346 00:16:48,700 --> 00:16:51,097 if the one who got grapes would refuse the grapes. 347 00:16:51,121 --> 00:16:54,993 Now the funny thing is that Sarah Brosnan, who's been doing this with chimpanzees, 348 00:16:55,017 --> 00:16:57,163 had a couple of combinations of chimpanzees 349 00:16:57,187 --> 00:16:59,543 where, indeed, the one who would get the grape 350 00:16:59,567 --> 00:17:02,473 would refuse the grape until the other guy also got a grape. 351 00:17:02,497 --> 00:17:05,263 So we're getting very close to the human sense of fairness. 352 00:17:05,288 --> 00:17:08,723 And I think philosophers need to rethink their philosophy for a while. 353 00:17:09,358 --> 00:17:10,675 So let me summarize. 354 00:17:11,291 --> 00:17:13,104 I believe there's an evolved morality. 355 00:17:13,127 --> 00:17:16,347 I think morality is much more than what I've been talking about, 356 00:17:16,371 --> 00:17:18,821 but it would be impossible without these ingredients 357 00:17:18,846 --> 00:17:20,344 that we find in other primates, 358 00:17:20,367 --> 00:17:22,204 which are empathy and consolation, 359 00:17:22,229 --> 00:17:25,935 pro-social tendencies and reciprocity and a sense of fairness. 360 00:17:25,959 --> 00:17:28,016 And so we work on these particular issues 361 00:17:28,040 --> 00:17:31,385 to see if we can create a morality from the bottom up, so to speak, 362 00:17:31,409 --> 00:17:33,842 without necessarily god and religion involved, 363 00:17:33,866 --> 00:17:36,332 and to see how we can get to an evolved morality. 364 00:17:36,766 --> 00:17:38,506 And I thank you for your attention. 365 00:17:38,530 --> 00:17:45,530 (Applause)