0:00:00.000,0:00:05.178
♪ [music] ♪

0:00:09.214,0:00:11.193
- [Alex] In our final talk[br]in monopoly,

0:00:11.193,0:00:13.509
we're going to discuss[br]the costs of monopoly,

0:00:13.509,0:00:16.458
but also the potential benefits.

0:00:21.201,0:00:24.633
The major costs of monopoly[br]is that compared to competition,

0:00:24.633,0:00:26.494
monopoly is inefficient.

0:00:26.494,0:00:30.367
It leads to a loss in the gains[br]from trade or a deadweight loss.

0:00:30.367,0:00:32.762
Let's remind ourselves[br]about the gains from trade

0:00:32.762,0:00:35.352
under competition[br]and then we can compare

0:00:35.352,0:00:36.765
with monopoly.

0:00:36.765,0:00:39.232
Here we'll simplify[br]with a flat supply curve,

0:00:39.232,0:00:41.409
a constant cost industry.

0:00:41.409,0:00:44.684
In this case the total gains[br]from trade go to consumers

0:00:44.684,0:00:46.923
in this blue area right here.

0:00:46.923,0:00:49.873
Now let's see what the total gains[br]from trade or total welfare

0:00:49.873,0:00:51.476
is under monopoly.

0:00:51.476,0:00:54.006
We choose exactly[br]the same demand curve

0:00:54.006,0:00:56.691
and the same constant cost curve.

0:00:56.691,0:01:00.891
We find the profit maximizing price[br]and quantity in the usual way.

0:01:01.674,0:01:05.669
Consumers, not surprisingly,[br]get less under monopoly

0:01:05.669,0:01:07.677
since the price is higher.

0:01:08.004,0:01:13.276
Now some of what the consumers lose[br]is transferred to the monopolist

0:01:13.276,0:01:16.917
in terms of profit, and as far[br]as an economist is concerned,

0:01:16.917,0:01:19.738
at least someone is getting[br]these gains from trade.

0:01:19.754,0:01:21.848
So the transfer is neutral.

0:01:22.780,0:01:26.581
What's bad however,[br]is that total welfare falls

0:01:26.581,0:01:30.362
under monopoly[br]because no one gets this area,

0:01:30.362,0:01:32.303
the deadweight loss.

0:01:32.303,0:01:36.562
These are trades that from a social[br]point of view are beneficial.

0:01:36.562,0:01:41.562
The demanders are willing to pay[br]more than what would be the cost

0:01:41.562,0:01:43.503
of producing these goods.

0:01:44.291,0:01:47.227
These trades, however,[br]don't happen.

0:01:47.970,0:01:50.892
Even though they're socially[br]beneficial they don't happen

0:01:50.892,0:01:55.193
because they aren't profitable,[br]they aren't privately beneficial.

0:01:55.570,0:01:57.718
Think of a movie theater[br]that is half empty.

0:01:58.107,0:02:00.577
Surely there are some people[br]out there who would value

0:02:00.577,0:02:04.816
watching the movie at more[br]than its marginal cost, about zero.

0:02:05.244,0:02:08.411
So why doesn't the movie theater[br]lower the price to these people?

0:02:09.091,0:02:13.446
Because to do so it would have[br]to lower the price to everyone

0:02:13.446,0:02:15.964
and that would reduce[br]total profits.

0:02:16.815,0:02:18.841
So the basic lesson is this.

0:02:20.437,0:02:23.440
Consumers buy a good[br]so long as the value to them

0:02:23.440,0:02:25.168
exceeds the price.

0:02:25.422,0:02:28.542
Under competition, price[br]is equal to marginal cost,

0:02:28.975,0:02:33.006
so consumers will buy every unit[br]such that the value to them

0:02:33.006,0:02:35.741
is a greater[br]than the marginal cost.

0:02:36.198,0:02:37.894
That's efficient.

0:02:37.894,0:02:41.423
Under monopoly, consumers[br]also buy so long as the value

0:02:41.423,0:02:45.478
to them is greater than the price,[br]but since price is greater

0:02:45.478,0:02:49.964
than marginal cost,[br]we get too few units produced.

0:02:50.379,0:02:52.742
We get a loss[br]in the gains from trade.

0:02:53.757,0:02:55.658
Let's remind ourselves[br]what deadweight loss

0:02:55.658,0:02:57.406
looks like in practice.

0:02:57.406,0:03:00.828
GSK prices Combivir[br]at $12.50 per pill.

0:03:01.150,0:03:03.764
The marginal cost is 50 cents.

0:03:03.764,0:03:08.312
The deadweight loss is the value[br]of the trades that do not occur

0:03:08.312,0:03:11.226
because price is greater[br]than marginal cost.

0:03:11.226,0:03:14.770
Some people would be willing[br]and able to pay $10 per pill

0:03:14.770,0:03:19.086
or $4, or even $1 per pill[br]and those prices

0:03:19.086,0:03:23.104
would more than cover[br]the cost of producing those pills.

0:03:23.799,0:03:25.902
But those trades don't occur

0:03:25.902,0:03:29.108
because they aren't[br]profitable to GSK.

0:03:29.479,0:03:33.648
Many monopolies around the world[br]are born of government corruption.

0:03:33.648,0:03:37.034
In Indonesia, Tommy Suharto,[br]the president's son,

0:03:37.034,0:03:40.643
was given the highly profitable[br]clove monopoly.

0:03:40.643,0:03:42.263
He used the profits[br]from that monopoly

0:03:42.263,0:03:43.852
to buy Lamborghini.

0:03:43.852,0:03:47.460
Not a Lamborghini --[br]he bought the entire company.

0:03:47.951,0:03:50.805
These kinds of monopolies[br]are unredeemed.

0:03:50.805,0:03:53.674
They have costs[br]and no social benefits at all.

0:03:54.722,0:03:58.557
Some monopolies however,[br]do have countervailing benefits.

0:03:59.025,0:04:01.881
Consider what would happen[br]if the U.S. eliminated patents

0:04:01.881,0:04:03.628
for pharmaceuticals.

0:04:03.628,0:04:06.349
Competition, it's true,[br]would drive down the price

0:04:06.349,0:04:10.932
of existing drugs to marginal cost,[br]as happens today

0:04:10.932,0:04:14.691
as soon as patents expire,[br]usually within 10 to 15 years

0:04:14.691,0:04:17.142
after the drug first enters[br]the market.

0:04:17.699,0:04:20.841
But it costs about[br]a billion dollars

0:04:20.841,0:04:24.822
to bring the average new drug[br]to market in the United States,

0:04:24.822,0:04:29.269
and R&D costs are not included[br]in marginal cost.

0:04:29.902,0:04:33.477
As the saying goes,[br]it costs about a billion dollars

0:04:33.477,0:04:38.331
to create the first pill,[br]50 cents to create the second pill.

0:04:39.066,0:04:42.813
50 cents is the marginal cost,[br]the cost of an additional pill,

0:04:42.813,0:04:45.121
but to bring that first pill[br]to market costs

0:04:45.121,0:04:47.355
about a billion dollars.

0:04:47.741,0:04:52.096
If price were quickly pushed[br]down to marginal cost,

0:04:52.096,0:04:56.062
firms would not be able[br]to recover their R&D costs,

0:04:56.397,0:04:59.278
and the result would be[br]fewer new drugs.

0:05:00.469,0:05:03.611
Once the drug is created,[br]the patent, the monopoly,

0:05:03.611,0:05:06.896
creates inefficiency,[br]we get too few units produced.

0:05:07.353,0:05:10.816
But the patent increases[br]the incentive to produce

0:05:10.816,0:05:12.988
the new drugs in the first place.

0:05:13.474,0:05:14.937
So there's a trade-off.

0:05:15.163,0:05:17.876
More monopoly[br]reduces static efficiency,

0:05:17.876,0:05:20.415
the quantity produced,[br]but can increase

0:05:20.415,0:05:25.057
dynamic efficiency, the incentive[br]to do research and development.

0:05:26.908,0:05:29.327
This trade-off applies[br]to other goods

0:05:29.327,0:05:32.087
with high development cost,[br]not just pharmaceuticals.

0:05:32.464,0:05:35.385
Information goods,[br]goods like music, movies,

0:05:35.385,0:05:37.953
computer programs,[br]new chemicals, new materials,

0:05:37.953,0:05:39.450
new technologies.

0:05:39.450,0:05:42.254
These typically have high[br]development costs

0:05:42.254,0:05:44.852
and low marginal cost[br]of production.

0:05:44.852,0:05:48.179
And that suggests there may be[br]possible benefits to patent

0:05:48.179,0:05:50.260
or copyright protection.

0:05:50.666,0:05:54.353
More generally for these types[br]of goods there's a policy trade-off

0:05:54.353,0:05:56.797
which we always want[br]to keep in mind.

0:05:56.797,0:06:01.657
That is lower prices today[br]may generate fewer new ideas

0:06:01.657,0:06:03.390
in the future.

0:06:05.166,0:06:08.301
Nobel prize winning[br]economic historian, Douglas North,

0:06:08.301,0:06:11.916
for example, has argued,[br]"The failure to develop

0:06:11.916,0:06:14.407
systematic property rights[br]in innovation

0:06:14.407,0:06:17.654
up until fairly modern times[br]was a major source

0:06:17.654,0:06:20.726
of the slow pace[br]of technological change."

0:06:21.726,0:06:24.889
Is there a better way[br]of navigating this trade-off?

0:06:24.965,0:06:26.462
Perhaps.

0:06:26.462,0:06:29.877
Suppose that the government[br]bought up a pharmaceutical patent

0:06:29.877,0:06:34.423
for its total monopoly profits[br]and then they ripped the patent up.

0:06:34.985,0:06:38.568
Competitors would enter[br]and drive the price of the drug

0:06:38.568,0:06:40.951
down to marginal cost,[br]thus we would have

0:06:40.951,0:06:42.676
static efficiency.

0:06:42.676,0:06:44.625
At the same time,[br]since the government

0:06:44.625,0:06:47.841
was paying firms[br]their monopoly profits,

0:06:47.841,0:06:50.658
we would still have lots[br]of incentive to do research

0:06:50.658,0:06:53.425
and development --[br]dynamic efficiency.

0:06:53.425,0:06:55.887
Thus we could have[br]the best of all worlds.

0:06:55.887,0:06:58.923
Of course, there may be[br]some downsides as well.

0:06:58.923,0:07:01.441
Higher taxes to pay[br]for the patent also have

0:07:01.441,0:07:03.890
their own deadweight loss,[br]and it might be difficult

0:07:03.890,0:07:06.840
to say exactly[br]how much a patent is worth.

0:07:07.113,0:07:09.346
And there could be[br]possible corruption.

0:07:09.346,0:07:11.964
Nevertheless, this is an idea[br]we're thinking about,

0:07:11.964,0:07:14.240
and perhaps worth[br]experimenting with.

0:07:15.277,0:07:18.172
Prizes are another way[br]of navigating the trade-off.

0:07:18.500,0:07:21.086
As with patent buyouts,[br]the idea is that a firm

0:07:21.086,0:07:24.227
is offered up front its R&D costs.

0:07:24.330,0:07:27.129
But the government[br]only pays the firm

0:07:27.129,0:07:29.270
if it achieves a certain goal.

0:07:29.270,0:07:31.894
And if that goal is achieved,[br]the technology goes

0:07:31.894,0:07:35.017
into the public domain[br]and could be used by anyone.

0:07:35.512,0:07:38.055
SpaceShipOne, for example,[br]won $10 million

0:07:38.055,0:07:41.741
for being the first privately[br]developed manned rocket

0:07:41.741,0:07:43.660
capable of reaching space[br]and returning

0:07:43.660,0:07:45.573
in a short period of time.

0:07:45.573,0:07:47.908
And prizes are being used[br]more often.

0:07:47.908,0:07:50.187
The government set up a prize[br]for better light bulbs,

0:07:50.187,0:07:53.014
for example,[br]and that worked quite well.

0:07:53.680,0:07:56.556
There's also a third way[br]of navigating the trade-off.

0:07:57.103,0:08:01.036
You may have noticed, for example,[br]that so far we've assumed

0:08:01.036,0:08:03.553
that the monopolist[br]must charge the same price

0:08:03.553,0:08:05.016
to everyone.

0:08:05.016,0:08:07.207
Is this necessarily true?

0:08:07.207,0:08:09.151
In some cases,[br]the monopolist can charge

0:08:09.151,0:08:11.321
different prices[br]to different people --

0:08:11.321,0:08:13.378
price discrimination.

0:08:13.378,0:08:16.406
As we'll see in the next chapter[br]and set of lectures,

0:08:16.406,0:08:20.138
price discrimination explains a lot[br]about how products are priced

0:08:20.138,0:08:22.884
and it also has some costs[br]and some benefits

0:08:22.884,0:08:24.842
which we'll be discussing.

0:08:24.842,0:08:26.455
See you then, thanks.

0:08:27.587,0:08:29.252
- [Narrator] If you want[br]to test yourself,

0:08:29.252,0:08:31.389
click "Practice Questions."

0:08:31.389,0:08:34.794
Or if you're ready to move on,[br]just click "Next Video."

0:08:34.794,0:08:38.733
♪ [music] ♪