0:00:00.000,0:00:04.905 >> In this video, we're going to introduce[br]the concept of complex impedance, 0:00:04.905,0:00:08.370 and then also derive the[br]impedance of a resistor. 0:00:08.370,0:00:11.880 Earlier in the semester, we learned[br]how to analyze circuits that 0:00:11.880,0:00:16.364 involved resistors only that[br]were driven by DC sources. 0:00:16.364,0:00:18.045 To do that analysis, 0:00:18.045,0:00:20.745 we used Ohm's law which said that V, 0:00:20.745,0:00:23.940 the voltage across the resistor 0:00:23.940,0:00:28.440 is related to the current[br]through that resistor. 0:00:28.440,0:00:38.399 By Ohm's law which says[br]V is equal to I times R, 0:00:38.399,0:00:42.230 where I is defined flowing from 0:00:42.230,0:00:46.145 the positive voltage terminal to[br]the negatively referenced terminal. 0:00:46.145,0:00:48.230 In fact, we define the R, 0:00:48.230,0:00:54.400 the resistance of the device as being[br]the ratio of the voltage to the current. 0:00:54.400,0:00:56.630 When we did this, we saw that the nature of 0:00:56.630,0:00:59.180 the voltage and current was the[br]same as the nature of the source. 0:00:59.180,0:01:01.370 The source was DC or constant, 0:01:01.370,0:01:03.005 and the voltages and currents 0:01:03.005,0:01:06.335 associated with each of[br]these devices were also constant, 0:01:06.335,0:01:09.095 meaning that they weren't varying in time. 0:01:09.095,0:01:11.750 Our job in that analysis[br]was to then determine 0:01:11.750,0:01:14.060 what the currents and voltages[br]were in each of those devices. 0:01:14.060,0:01:18.815 To do so, we used Ohm's law and[br]we also used Kirchhoff's Laws. 0:01:18.815,0:01:22.630 Summing the voltage drops around a loop, 0:01:22.630,0:01:25.100 and the currents leaving a node. 0:01:25.100,0:01:26.810 We were able to write equations that 0:01:26.810,0:01:29.360 establish the relationships[br]between the different currents, 0:01:29.360,0:01:31.910 and voltages flowing through the circuit. 0:01:31.910,0:01:36.260 We're now going to turn our attention[br]to circuits that are driven not by DC 0:01:36.260,0:01:41.000 constant sources rather driven[br]by sinusoidally varying sources. 0:01:41.000,0:01:45.080 We're also going to be analyzing circuits[br]that have in addition two resistors, 0:01:45.080,0:01:48.245 they will also have[br]capacitors and inductors. 0:01:48.245,0:01:50.780 The analysis that we're[br]doing as I mentioned before, 0:01:50.780,0:01:54.290 is going to be valid for the steady-state. 0:01:54.290,0:01:58.850 What that means is that the source[br]will have been applied to 0:01:58.850,0:02:03.830 the circuit for a long enough time that[br]any transients will have died out, 0:02:03.830,0:02:11.645 and we have simply the circuit operating[br]in its sinusoidal steady-state mode. 0:02:11.645,0:02:13.310 To analyze these circuits, 0:02:13.310,0:02:15.115 we're going to find it useful to define 0:02:15.115,0:02:18.620 a quantity that is analogous to resistance. 0:02:18.620,0:02:21.390 We're going to call[br]that quantity impedance, 0:02:21.390,0:02:24.500 and generally refer to it[br]with a variable name Z. 0:02:24.500,0:02:26.285 We're going to define. 0:02:26.285,0:02:29.825 We are now defining impedance as being 0:02:29.825,0:02:36.755 the ratio of the phasor voltage to[br]the phasor current of a device. 0:02:36.755,0:02:44.805 So once again, we'll define voltages[br]and currents in this circuit, 0:02:44.805,0:02:49.580 and we're going to recognize or[br]realize that these voltages and 0:02:49.580,0:02:54.650 currents are oscillating at the same[br]frequency that the source is oscillating. 0:02:54.650,0:02:57.620 What that means is that you have[br]currents going back and forth at 0:02:57.620,0:03:00.665 the same frequency that the source[br]is driving them back and forth, 0:03:00.665,0:03:03.125 and the voltages will also be 0:03:03.125,0:03:08.420 oscillating plus to minus[br]at that same frequency. 0:03:08.420,0:03:11.960 So the nature of each of these voltages and 0:03:11.960,0:03:17.675 currents will be the same as[br]the nature of the source, sinusoidal. 0:03:17.675,0:03:20.510 Thus each one of these voltages[br]and currents can be 0:03:20.510,0:03:24.275 represented in terms of its phasor. 0:03:24.275,0:03:28.610 Impedance then is the ratio[br]of the phasor representation 0:03:28.610,0:03:30.260 of the voltage of the device divided by 0:03:30.260,0:03:33.480 the phasor representation of the current. 0:03:34.300,0:03:40.280 We will find that all of our circuit[br]analysis techniques that we developed for 0:03:40.280,0:03:43.205 resistive networks driven by DC sources 0:03:43.205,0:03:47.375 using a resistance to represent the device. 0:03:47.375,0:03:49.160 All of those techniques are going to 0:03:49.160,0:03:52.910 apply to our analysis, the[br]sinusoidal steady-state. 0:03:52.910,0:03:55.280 So node analysis, mesh[br]analysis, voltage division, 0:03:55.280,0:03:58.840 current division, Thevenin equivalency, 0:03:58.840,0:04:01.430 parallel and series equivalence. 0:04:01.430,0:04:04.610 All of those tools that we[br]developed for this type of 0:04:04.610,0:04:08.255 a sinusoidal are also going[br]to apply for the RLC circuit. 0:04:08.255,0:04:18.390 Now let's start by developing or[br]deriving the impedance for a resistor. 0:04:18.390,0:04:22.490 To do so, we'll reference[br]the voltage V with a current 0:04:22.490,0:04:26.465 defined flowing from higher voltage[br]to lower voltage reference, 0:04:26.465,0:04:34.460 and we know from Ohm's law that[br]V is equal to I times R. Now, 0:04:34.460,0:04:38.620 let's just assume that I,[br]we know its sinusoidal. 0:04:38.620,0:04:42.105 So let's say that I is[br]of the form, I sub m, 0:04:42.105,0:04:47.355 cosine of Omega t plus some Theta sub I. 0:04:47.355,0:04:48.850 Once again, Omega is 0:04:48.850,0:04:52.835 the frequency at which the source[br]is driving this circuit. 0:04:52.835,0:04:57.420 From Ohm's law then we[br]can say that V of t is 0:04:57.420,0:05:02.415 equal to R times I or R times I sub m, 0:05:02.415,0:05:07.490 cosine of Omega t plus Theta sub I. 0:05:07.490,0:05:11.605 Now let's represent both of[br]these in their phasor form. 0:05:11.605,0:05:14.905 This then would be just I sub m, 0:05:14.905,0:05:18.265 e to the j, Theta sub I, 0:05:18.265,0:05:24.900 and this would be then R times I sub m, 0:05:24.900,0:05:27.855 e to the j Theta sub I. 0:05:27.855,0:05:30.300 With those two phaser representations, 0:05:30.300,0:05:31.845 we then can say that, 0:05:31.845,0:05:41.210 Z for a resistor is equal[br]to phasor V over phasor I, 0:05:41.210,0:05:45.980 which is equal to RI sub M, E to the J, 0:05:45.980,0:05:51.555 theta sub I, divided by[br]phasor I which is I sub m, 0:05:51.555,0:05:54.300 e to the j Theta sub I. 0:05:54.300,0:05:57.510 We notice that these terms cancel, 0:05:57.510,0:06:00.980 and we're left with the impedance of 0:06:00.980,0:06:05.900 a resistor being simply equal[br]to the value of the resistance. 0:06:05.900,0:06:10.190 In other words, in this phasor domain[br]or this impedance that 0:06:10.190,0:06:15.535 represent a ratio of phasors, 0:06:15.535,0:06:19.215 that ratio for resistors is just 0:06:19.215,0:06:24.800 R. The impedance of[br]a 10 Ohm resistor is 10 Ohms. 0:06:24.800,0:06:29.700 We'll see that it's not quite that[br]simple for inductors and capacitors.