WEBVTT

00:00:01.607 --> 00:00:05.189
I'd like to start with a simple question.

00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:10.125
Why do the poor make
so many poor decisions?

00:00:11.852 --> 00:00:13.551
I know it's a harsh question,

00:00:13.551 --> 00:00:15.244
but take a look at the data.

00:00:15.416 --> 00:00:17.374
The poor borrow more, save less,

00:00:17.374 --> 00:00:20.153
smoke more, exercise less, drink more

00:00:20.153 --> 00:00:21.982
and eat less healthfully.

00:00:22.483 --> 00:00:23.644
Why?

00:00:24.651 --> 00:00:26.202
Well, the standard explanation

00:00:26.202 --> 00:00:29.440
was once summed up by the British
Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher.

00:00:29.440 --> 00:00:32.824
And she called poverty
"a personality defect."

00:00:33.196 --> 00:00:34.198
(Laughter)

00:00:34.713 --> 00:00:36.935
A lack of character, basically.

00:00:37.617 --> 00:00:41.901
Now, I'm sure not many of you
would be so blunt.

00:00:42.647 --> 00:00:46.521
But the idea that there's something
wrong with the poor themselves

00:00:46.521 --> 00:00:49.038
is not restricted to Mrs. Thatcher.

00:00:49.435 --> 00:00:52.662
Some of you may believe that the poor
should be held responsible

00:00:52.662 --> 00:00:54.555
for their own mistakes.

00:00:54.555 --> 00:00:58.641
And others may argue that we should
help them to make better decisions.

00:00:59.004 --> 00:01:02.800
But the underlying assumption is the same:

00:01:02.800 --> 00:01:05.680
there's something wrong with them.

00:01:06.100 --> 00:01:08.089
If we could just change them,

00:01:08.089 --> 00:01:10.521
if we could just teach them
how to live their lives,

00:01:10.521 --> 00:01:12.406
if they would only listen.

00:01:13.258 --> 00:01:14.979
And to be honest,

00:01:14.979 --> 00:01:18.688
this was what I thought for a long time.

00:01:19.103 --> 00:01:21.241
It was only a few years ago
that I discovered

00:01:21.241 --> 00:01:25.251
that everything I thought I knew
about poverty was wrong.

00:01:26.415 --> 00:01:29.061
It all started when I accidentally
stumbled upon a paper

00:01:29.061 --> 00:01:30.793
by a few American psychologists.

00:01:30.793 --> 00:01:32.233
They had traveled 8,000 miles,

00:01:32.233 --> 00:01:33.370
all the way to India,

00:01:33.370 --> 00:01:35.223
for a fascinating study.

00:01:35.223 --> 00:01:38.452
And it was an experiment
with sugar cane farmers.

00:01:38.848 --> 00:01:42.410
You should know that these farmers
collect about 60 percent

00:01:42.410 --> 00:01:44.567
of their annual income all at once --

00:01:44.567 --> 00:01:46.299
right after the harvest.

00:01:46.299 --> 00:01:49.863
This means that they're relatively
poor one part of the year

00:01:49.863 --> 00:01:51.844
and rich the other.

00:01:52.763 --> 00:01:57.070
The researchers asked them to do
an IQ test before and after the harvest.

00:01:58.102 --> 00:02:02.777
What they subsequently discovered
completely blew my mind.

00:02:03.359 --> 00:02:07.967
The farmers scored much worse
on the test before the harvest.

00:02:08.455 --> 00:02:10.024
The effects of living in poverty,

00:02:10.024 --> 00:02:11.018
it turns out,

00:02:11.018 --> 00:02:14.373
correspond to losing 40 points of IQ.

00:02:14.373 --> 00:02:16.266
Now, to give you an idea,

00:02:16.266 --> 00:02:18.791
that's comparable
to losing a night's sleep,

00:02:18.791 --> 00:02:21.573
or the effects of alcoholism.

00:02:22.735 --> 00:02:23.847
A few months later,

00:02:23.847 --> 00:02:25.286
I heard that Eldar Shafir,

00:02:25.286 --> 00:02:28.725
a professor at Princeton University
and one of the authors of this study,

00:02:28.725 --> 00:02:30.066
was coming over to Holland,

00:02:30.066 --> 00:02:31.220
where I live.

00:02:31.220 --> 00:02:32.508
So we met up in Amersterdam

00:02:32.508 --> 00:02:36.411
to talk about his revolutionary
new theory of poverty.

00:02:36.590 --> 00:02:39.624
And I can sum it up in just two words:

00:02:39.624 --> 00:02:41.977
scarcity mentality.

00:02:42.644 --> 00:02:45.025
It turns out that people
behave differently

00:02:45.025 --> 00:02:47.217
when they perceive a thing to be scarce.

00:02:47.535 --> 00:02:49.774
And what that thing is
doesn't much matter --

00:02:49.774 --> 00:02:52.787
whether it's not enough time,
money or food.

00:02:53.280 --> 00:02:55.041
You all know this feeling

00:02:55.041 --> 00:02:57.079
when you've got too much to do,

00:02:57.079 --> 00:03:00.648
or when you've put off breaking for lunch
and your blood sugar takes a dive.

00:03:00.648 --> 00:03:03.528
This narrows your focus
to your immediate lack --

00:03:03.528 --> 00:03:05.562
to the sandwich you've got to have now,

00:03:05.562 --> 00:03:07.848
the meeting that's starting
in five minutes,

00:03:07.848 --> 00:03:10.978
or the bills that have
to be paid tomorrow.

00:03:11.122 --> 00:03:14.949
So the long-term perspective
goes out the window.

00:03:15.905 --> 00:03:20.753
You could compare it to a new computer
that's running 10 heavy programs at once.

00:03:21.271 --> 00:03:23.182
It gets slower and slower,

00:03:23.182 --> 00:03:24.198
making errors.

00:03:24.198 --> 00:03:26.044
Eventually it freezes

00:03:26.044 --> 00:03:28.174
not because it's a bad computer,

00:03:28.174 --> 00:03:31.073
but because it has too much to do at once.

00:03:31.522 --> 00:03:35.035
The poor have the same problem.

00:03:35.035 --> 00:03:37.848
They're not making dumb decisions
because they are dumb,

00:03:37.848 --> 00:03:42.260
but because they're living in a context
in which anyone would make dumb decisions.

00:03:42.594 --> 00:03:45.714
So suddenly I understood

00:03:45.714 --> 00:03:49.805
why so many of our anti-poverty
programs don't work.

00:03:50.748 --> 00:03:52.943
Investments in education for example

00:03:52.943 --> 00:03:55.476
are often completely ineffective.

00:03:55.476 --> 00:03:58.432
Poverty is not a lack of knowledge.

00:03:58.886 --> 00:04:01.539
A recent analysis of 201 studies

00:04:01.539 --> 00:04:03.875
on the effectiveness
of money management training

00:04:03.875 --> 00:04:07.648
came to the conclusion that is has
almost know effect at all.

00:04:07.648 --> 00:04:09.117
Don't get me wrong.

00:04:09.117 --> 00:04:11.736
This is not to say that the poor
don't learn anything --

00:04:11.736 --> 00:04:14.355
they can come out wiser for sure,

00:04:14.355 --> 00:04:15.874
but it's not enough.

00:04:15.874 --> 00:04:18.900
Or as Professor Shafir told me,

00:04:18.900 --> 00:04:21.028
"It's like teaching someone to swim

00:04:21.028 --> 00:04:24.315
and then throwing them in a stormy sea."

00:04:24.888 --> 00:04:27.403
I still remember sitting there,

00:04:27.403 --> 00:04:29.098
perplexed.

00:04:29.298 --> 00:04:32.598
And it struck me that we could
have figured this all out decades ago.

00:04:32.598 --> 00:04:36.058
I mean these psychologists
didn't need any complicated brain scans;

00:04:36.058 --> 00:04:38.014
they only had to measure the farmers' IQ,

00:04:38.014 --> 00:04:41.118
and IQ tests were invented
more that 100 years ago.

00:04:41.349 --> 00:04:45.398
Actually, I realized I had read about
the psychology of poverty before.

00:04:45.658 --> 00:04:47.239
George Orwell,

00:04:47.239 --> 00:04:49.522
one of the greatest writers
who ever lived,

00:04:49.522 --> 00:04:52.425
experienced poverty firsthand
in the 1920s.

00:04:52.922 --> 00:04:54.293
"The essence of poverty,"

00:04:54.293 --> 00:04:55.305
he wrote back then,

00:04:55.305 --> 00:04:58.810
is that it "annihilates the future."

00:04:59.347 --> 00:05:02.126
And he marveled at quote,

00:05:02.126 --> 00:05:03.610
"How people take it for granted

00:05:03.610 --> 00:05:05.329
they have the right to preach at you

00:05:05.329 --> 00:05:06.328
and pray over you

00:05:06.328 --> 00:05:08.831
as soon as your income falls
below a certain level."

00:05:08.831 --> 00:05:13.151
Now, those words are every bit
as resonant today.

00:05:15.225 --> 00:05:17.251
The big question is of course,

00:05:17.251 --> 00:05:18.714
what can be done?

00:05:18.714 --> 00:05:21.533
Modern economists have a few
solutions up their sleeves.

00:05:21.533 --> 00:05:23.616
We could help the poor
with their paperwork,

00:05:23.616 --> 00:05:26.549
or send them a text message
to remind them to pay their bills.

00:05:26.549 --> 00:05:30.711
This type of solution is hugely
popular with modern politicians.

00:05:31.353 --> 00:05:33.080
Mostly because,

00:05:33.080 --> 00:05:34.078
well,

00:05:34.078 --> 00:05:35.790
they cost next to nothing.

00:05:36.264 --> 00:05:37.716
These solutions are,

00:05:37.716 --> 00:05:38.746
I think,

00:05:38.746 --> 00:05:40.439
a symbol of this era

00:05:40.439 --> 00:05:42.639
in which we so often treat the symptoms,

00:05:42.639 --> 00:05:44.931
but ignore the underlying cause.

00:05:45.651 --> 00:05:48.082
So I wonder,

00:05:48.082 --> 00:05:51.847
why don't we just change the context
in which the poor live?

00:05:51.847 --> 00:05:54.162
Or, going back to our computer analogy,

00:05:54.162 --> 00:05:56.288
why keep tinkering around
with the software

00:05:56.288 --> 00:06:00.116
when we can easily solve the problem
by installing some extra memory instead?

00:06:00.376 --> 00:06:01.381
At that point,

00:06:01.381 --> 00:06:04.110
Professor Shafir responded
with a blank look.

00:06:04.409 --> 00:06:05.596
And after a few seconds,

00:06:05.596 --> 00:06:07.122
he said,

00:06:07.122 --> 00:06:09.969
"Oh, I get it,

00:06:09.969 --> 00:06:14.400
you mean you want to just
hand out more money to the poor

00:06:14.400 --> 00:06:16.274
to eradicate poverty.

00:06:16.274 --> 00:06:19.992
Uh, sure, that'd be great ...

00:06:19.992 --> 00:06:22.406
but I'm afraid that brand
of left-wing politics

00:06:22.406 --> 00:06:24.307
you've got in Amsterdam ...

00:06:24.307 --> 00:06:26.454
it doesn't exist in the States."

00:06:26.707 --> 00:06:31.074
But is this really
an old-fashioned, leftist idea?

00:06:31.526 --> 00:06:33.243
I remembered reading about old plan --

00:06:33.307 --> 00:06:36.533
something that has been proposed
by some of history's leading thinkers.

00:06:37.193 --> 00:06:40.863
The philosopher Thomas More
hinted at it in his book, "Utopia,"

00:06:41.062 --> 00:06:43.022
more than 500 years ago.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And its proponents have [spent]
the spectrum from the left to the right,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
from the civil rights campaigner
Martin Luther King, Jr.,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to the economist Milton Friedman.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And it's an incredibly simple idea:

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
basic income guarantee.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
What it is?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Well, that's easy.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It's a monthly grant,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
enough to pay for your basic needs:

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
food, shelter, education.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It's completely unconditional,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
so no one's going to tell you
what you have to do for it,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and no one's going to tell you
what you have to do with it.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The basic income is not a favor,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but a right.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
There's absolutely no stigma attached.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So as I learned about the true
nature of poverty,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I couldn't stop wondering --

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is this the idea
we've all been waiting for?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Could it really be that simple?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And in the three years that followed,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I read everything I could find
about basic income.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I researched the dozens of experiments

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that have been conducted
all over the globe,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and it didn't take long

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
before I stumbled upon a story
of a town that had done it --

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
had actually eradicated poverty --

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but then,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
nearly everyone forgot about it.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
This story starts in Dauphin, Canada.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
In 1974, everybody in this small town
was guaranteed a basic income,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
insuring that no one fell
below the poverty line.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And at the start of the experiment,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
an army of researchers
descended on the town.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
For four years all went well.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But then a new government
was voted into power,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and the new Canadian cabinet saw
little point to the expensive experiment.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So when it became clear there was
no money left to analyze the results,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the researchers decided to back
their files away in some 2,000 boxes.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
25 years went by,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and then Evelyn F....,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a Canadian professor,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
found the records.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And for three years she subjected the data
to all manner of statistical analysis,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and no matter what she tried,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the results were the same every time.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The experiment had been
a resounding success.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
[Evelyn Frije] discovered

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that the people in Dauphin
had not only become richer,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but also smarter and healthier.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The school performance of kids
improved substantially.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The hospitalization rate decreased
by as much as 8.5 percent.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Domestic violence incidents were down,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
as we mental health complaints.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And people didn't quit their jobs.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The only ones who worked a little less
were new mothers and students --

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who stayed in school longer.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Similar results have since been found

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in countless other experiments
around the globe,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
from the US to India.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
here's what I've learned.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
When it comes to poverty,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we the rich should stop
pretending we know best.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We should stop sending
shoes and teddy bears to the poor,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to people we have never met.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And we should get rid of the vast
industry of paternalistic beaureaucrats

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
when we could simply
hand over their salaries

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to the poor they're supposed to help.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
(Applause)

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Because, I mean, the great
thing about money

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is that people can use it
to buy things they need

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
instead of things that self-appointed
experts think they need.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Just imagine how many brilliant scientists
and entrepreneurs and writers,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
like George Orwell,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
are now withering away in scarcity.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Imagine how much energy
and talent we would unleash

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
if we got rid of poverty once and for all.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I believe that a basic income would
work like venture capital for the people.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And we can't afford not to do it,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because poverty is hugely expensive.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Just look at the cost of child poverty
in the US for example.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It's estimated at 500
billion dollars each year,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in terms of higher health care spending,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
higher dropout rates,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and more crime.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Now this is an incredible waste
of human potential.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But let's talk about
the elephant in the room.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
How could we ever afford
a basic income guarantee?

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Well, it's actually a lot cheaper
than you may think.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
What they did in Dauphin is they
financed it with a negative income tax.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
This means that your income
is [stacked up]

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
as soon as you fall
below the poverty line.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And in that scenario,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
according to our economist's
best estimates,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
for a net cost of 175 billion --

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a quarter of US military spending,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
one percent of GDP --

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you could lift all impoverished Americans
above the poverty line.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You could actually eradicate poverty.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Now that should be our goal.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The time for small thoughts
and little nudges is past.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I really believe the time has come
for radical new ideas,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and basic income is so much more
than just another policy.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It is also a complete rethink
of what work actually is.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And in that sense,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it will not only free the poor ...

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but also the rest of us.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Nowadays, millions of people feel

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that their jobs have little
meaning or significance.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
A recent poll among 230,000 employees,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in 143 countries,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
found that only 30 percent of workers
actually like their job.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And another poll found that as much
as 37 percent of British workers

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
have a job that they think
doesn't even need to exist.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It's like Brad Pitt says in "Fight Club,"

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Too often we're working jobs we hate
so we can buy shit we don't need."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
(Laughter)

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Now don't get me wrong --

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I'm not talking about the teachers
and garbagemen

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and the care workers here.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If they stopped working,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we'd be in trouble.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I'm talking about all those well-paid
professionals with excellent resumes

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who earn their money doing ...

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
strategic transactor peer-to-peer meetings

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
while brainstorming the value add
on all disruptive co-creation

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in the network society.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
(Laughter)

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
(Applause)

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Or something like that.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Just imagine again how much
talent we're wasting,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
simply because we tell our kids
they'll have to "earn a living."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Or think of what a math whiz
working at Facebook lamented

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a few years ago:

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"The best minds of my generation

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
are thinking about how
to make people click ads."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I'm an historian.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And if history teaches us anything,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it is that things could be different.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
There is nothing inevitable

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
about the way we structured our society
and economy right now.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Ideas can and do change the world.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And I think that especially
in the past few years,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it has become abundantly clear

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that we cannot stick to the status quo --

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that we need new ideas.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I know that many of you
may feel pessimistic

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
about a future of rising inequality,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
xenophobia,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and climate change.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But it's not enough
to know what we're against.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We also need be for something.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Martin Luther King did not say,
"I have a nightmare."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
(Laughter)

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
He had a dream.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
(Applause)

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So here's my dream.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I believe in a future

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
where the value of your work is not
determined by the size of your paycheck,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but by the amount of happiness you spread

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and the amount of meaning you give.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I believe in a future

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
where the point of education

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is not to prepare you
for another useless job,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but for a life well lived.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I believe in a future

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
where an existence
without poverty is not a privilege

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but a right we all deserve.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So here we are.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Here we are.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We've got the research,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we've got the evidence

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and we've got the means.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Now, more than 500 years after
Thomas More wrote about basic income,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and 100 years after George Orwell
discovered the true nature of poverty,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we all need to change our worldview,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because poverty
is not a lack of character.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Poverty is a lack of cash.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Thank you.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
(Applause)