WEBVTT 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I'd like to start with a simple question. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Why do the poor make so many poor decisions? 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I know it's a harsh question, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 but take a look at the data. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 ... ... save less, smoke more, exercise less, drink more 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and eat less healthfully. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Why? 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Well, the standard explanation 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 was once summed up by the British Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And she called poverty "a personality defect." 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 (Laughter) 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 A lack of character, basically. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Now, I'm sure not many of you would be so blunt. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 But the idea that there's something wrong with the poor themselves 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 is not restricted to Mrs. Thatcher. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 So of you may believe that the poor should be held responsible 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 for their own mistakes. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And others may argue that we should help them to make better decisions. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 But the underlying assumption is the same: 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 there's something wrong with them. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 If we could just change them, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 if we could just teach them how to live their lives, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 if they would only listen. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And to be honest, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 this was what I thought for a long time. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 It was only a few years ago that I discovered 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 that everything I thought I knew about poverty was wrong. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 It all started when I accidentally stumbled on a paper 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 by a few American psychologists. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 They had traveled 8,000 miles all the way to India 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 for a fascinating study. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And it was an experiment with sugar cane farms. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 You should know that these farmers collect about 60 percent 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 of their annual income all at once -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 right after the harvest. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 This means that they're relatively poor one part of the year 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and rich the other. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 The researchers asked them to do an IQ test before and after the harvest. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 What they subsequently discovered completely blew my mind. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 The farmers scored much worse on the test before the harvest. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 The effects of living in poverty, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 it turns out, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 correspond to losing 40 points of IQ. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Now, to give you an idea, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 that's comparable to losing a night's sleep, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 or the effects of alcoholism. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 A few months later, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I heard that [Alder Shafir,] 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 a professor at Princeton University and one of the authors of this study, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 was coming over to Poland, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 where I live. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 So we met up in Amersterdam 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 to talk about his revolutionary theory of poverty. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And I can sum it up in just two words: 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 scarcity mentality. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 It turns out that people behave differently 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 when they perceive a thing to be scarce. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And what that thing is doesn't much matter -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 whether it's not enough time, money or food. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 You all know this feeling 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 when you've got too much to do, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 or you've put off breaking for lunch and your blood sugar takes a dive. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 This narrows your focus to your immediate lack -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 to the sandwich you've got to have now, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 the meeting that's starting in five minutes, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 or the bills that have to be paid tomorrow. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 So the long-term perspective goes out the window. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 You could compare it to a new computer that's running 10 heavy programs at once. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 It gets slower and slower, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 making errors. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Eventually it freezes, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 not because it's a bad computer, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 but because it has too many things to do at once. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And the poor have the same problem. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 They're not making dumb decisions because they are dumb, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 but because they're living in a context in which anyone would make dumb decisions. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 So suddenly I understood 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 why so many of our anti-poverty programs don't work. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Investments in education for example 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 are often completely ineffective. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Poverty is not a lack of knowledge. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 A recent analysis of 201 studies 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 on the effectiveness of money management training 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 came to the conclusion that is has almost know effect at all. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Don't get me wrong, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 this is not to say that the poor don't learn anything -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 they can come out wiser for sure, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 but it's not enough. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Or as Professor Shafir told me, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 "It's like teaching someone to swim 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and then throwing them in a stormy sea." 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I still remember sitting there, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 perplexed. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And it struck me that we could have figured this all out decades ago. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I mean these psychologists didn't need any complicated brain scans, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 they only had to measure the farmers' IQ, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and IQ tests were invented more that 100 year ago. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Actually, I realized I had read about the psychology of poverty before. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 George Orwell, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 one of the greatest writers who ever lived, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 experienced poverty firsthand in the 1920s. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 "The essence of poverty," 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 he wrote back then, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 is that it "annihilates the future." 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And he marveled at quote, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 "How people take it for granted 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 they have the right to preach at you 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and pray over you 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 as soon as your income falls below a certain level." 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Now, those words are every bit as resonant today. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 The big question is of course, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 what can be done? 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Modern economists have a few solutions up their sleeves. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 We could help the poor with their paperwork, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 or send them a test message to remind them to pay their bills. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 This type of solution is hugely popular with modern politicians. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Mostly because, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 well, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 they cost next to nothing. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 These solutions are, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I think, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 a symbol of this era 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 in which we so often treat the symptoms, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 but ignore the underlying cause. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 So I wonder, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 why don't we just change the context in which the poor live? 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Or, going back to our computer analogy, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 why keep tinkering around with the software 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 when we can easily solve the problem by installing some extra memory instead? 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 At that point, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Professor Shafir responded with a blank look. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And after a few seconds, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 he said, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 "Uh, I get it, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 you mean you want to just hand out more money to the poor 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 to eradicate poverty." 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 "Uh, sure, that'd be great." 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 "But I'm afraid the brand of left-wing politics 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 you've got in Amsterdam ... 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 it doesn't exist in the States." 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 But is this really an old-fashioned, leftist idea? 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I remembered reading about old plan -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 something that has been proposed by some of history's leading thinkers. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 The philosopher Thomas More hinted at it in his book, "Utopia," 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 more than 500 years ago. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And its proponents have [spent] the spectrum from the left to the right, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 from the civil rights campaigner Martin Luther King, Jr., 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 to the economist Milton Friedman. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And it's an incredibly simple idea: 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 basic income guarantee. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 What it is? 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Well, that's easy. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 It's a monthly grant, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 enough to pay for your basic needs: 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 food, shelter, education. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 It's completely unconditional, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 so no one's going to tell you what you have to do for it, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and no one's going to tell you what you have to do with it. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 The basic income is not a favor, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 but a right. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 There's absolutely no stigma attached. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 So as I learned about the true nature of poverty, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I couldn't stop wondering -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 is this the idea we've all been waiting for? 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Could it really be that simple? 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And in the three years that followed, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I read everything I could find about basic income. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I researched the dozens of experiments 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 that have been conducted all over the globe, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and it didn't take long 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 before I stumbled upon a story of a town that had done it -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 had actually eradicated poverty -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 but then, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 nearly everyone forgot about it. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 This story starts in Dauphin, Canada. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 In 1974, everybody in this small town was guaranteed a basic income, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 insuring that no one fell below the poverty line. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And at the start of the experiment, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 an army of researchers descended on the town. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 For four years all went well. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 But then a new government was voted into power, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and the new Canadian cabinet saw little point to the expensive experiment. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 So when it became clear there was no money left to analyze the results, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 the researchers decided to back their files away in some 2,000 boxes. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 25 years went by, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and then Evelyn F...., 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 a Canadian professor, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 found the records. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And for three years she subjected the data to all manner of statistical analysis, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and no matter what she tried, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 the results were the same every time. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 The experiment had been a resounding success. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 [Evelyn Frije] discovered 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 that the people in Dauphin had not only become richer, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 but also smarter and healthier. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 The school performance of kids improved substantially. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 The hospitalization rate decreased by as much as 8.5 percent. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Domestic violence incidents were down, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 as we mental health complaints. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And people didn't quit their jobs. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 The only ones who worked a little less were new mothers and students -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 who stayed in school longer. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Similar results have since been found 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 in countless other experiments around the globe, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 from the US to India. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 So, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 here's what I've learned. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 When it comes to poverty, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 we the rich should stop pretending we know best. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 We should stop sending shoes and teddy bears to the poor, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 to people we have never met. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And we should get rid of the vast industry of paternalistic beaureaucrats 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 when we could simply hand over their salaries 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 to the poor they're supposed to help. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 (Applause) 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Because, I mean, the great thing about money 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 is that people can use it to buy things they need 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 instead of things that self-appointed experts think they need. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Just imagine how many brilliant scientists and entrepreneurs and writers, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 like George Orwell, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 are now withering away in scarcity. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Imagine how much energy and talent we would unleash 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 if we got rid of poverty once and for all. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I believe that a basic income would work like venture capital for the people. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And we can't afford not to do it, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 because poverty is hugely expensive. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Just look at the cost of child poverty in the US for example. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 It's estimated at 500 billion dollars each year, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 in terms of higher health care spending, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 higher dropout rates, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and more crime. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Now this is an incredible waste of human potential. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 But let's talk about the elephant in the room. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 How could we ever afford a basic income guarantee? 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Well, it's actually a lot cheaper than you may think. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 What they did in Dauphin is they financed it with a negative income tax. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 This means that your income is [stacked up] 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 as soon as you fall below the poverty line. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And in that scenario, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 according to our economist's best estimates, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 for a net cost of 175 billion -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 a quarter of US military spending, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 one percent of GDP -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 you could lift all impoverished Americans above the poverty line. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 You could actually eradicate poverty. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Now that should be our goal. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 The time for small thoughts and little nudges is past. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I really believe the time has come for radical new ideas, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and basic income is so much more than just another policy. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 It is also a complete rethink of what work actually is. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And in that sense, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 it will not only free the poor ... 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 but also the rest of us. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Nowadays, millions of people feel 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 that their jobs have little meaning or significance. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 A recent poll among 230,000 employees, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 in 143 countries, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 found that only 30 percent of workers actually like their job. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And another poll found that as much as 37 percent of British workers 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 have a job that they think doesn't even need to exist. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 It's like Brad Pitt says in "Fight Club," 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 "Too often we're working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don't need." 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 (Laughter) 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Now don't get me wrong -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I'm not talking about the teachers and garbagemen 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and the care workers here. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 If they stopped working, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 we'd be in trouble. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I'm talking about all those well-paid professionals with excellent resumes 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 who earn their money doing ... 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 strategic transactor peer-to-peer meetings 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 while brainstorming the value add on all disruptive co-creation 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 in the network society. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 (Laughter) 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 (Applause) 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Or something like that. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Just imagine again how much talent we're wasting, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 simply because we tell our kids they'll have to "earn a living." 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Or think of what a math whiz working at Facebook lamented 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 a few years ago: 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 "The best minds of my generation 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 are thinking about how to make people click ads." 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I'm an historian. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And if history teaches us anything, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 it is that things could be different. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 There is nothing inevitable 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 about the way we structured our society and economy right now. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Ideas can and do change the world. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 And I think that especially in the past few years, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 it has become abundantly clear 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 that we cannot stick to the status quo -- 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 that we need new ideas. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I know that many of you may feel pessimistic 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 about a future of rising inequality, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 xenophobia, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and climate change. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 But it's not enough to know what we're against. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 We also need be for something. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Martin Luther King did not say, "I have a nightmare." 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 (Laughter) 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 He had a dream. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 (Applause) 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 So here's my dream. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I believe in a future 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 where the value of your work is not determined by the size of your paycheck, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 but by the amount of happiness you spread 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and the amount of meaning you give. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I believe in a future 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 where the point of education 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 is not to prepare you for another useless job, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 but for a life well lived. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 I believe in a future 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 where an existence without poverty is not a privilege 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 but a right we all deserve. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 So here we are. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Here we are. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 We've got the research, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 we've got the evidence 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and we've got the means. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Now, more than 500 years after Thomas More wrote about basic income, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 and 100 years after George Orwell discovered the true nature of poverty, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 we all need to change our worldview, 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 because poverty is not a lack of character. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Poverty is a lack of cash. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 Thank you. 99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 (Applause)