1 00:00:03,310 --> 00:00:06,230 Hi my name is Tony and this is Every Frame a Painting. 2 00:00:08,450 --> 00:00:10,229 There are some filmmakers who are so influential 3 00:00:10,460 --> 00:00:13,540 that no matter where you look, you see traces of them everywhere. 4 00:00:16,619 --> 00:00:19,560 I see this filmmaker's framing in the works of Wes Anderson. 5 00:00:23,460 --> 00:00:25,760 His acrobatics and stunts in Jackie Chan. 6 00:00:28,460 --> 00:00:30,760 And his deadpan posture in Bill Murray. 7 00:00:34,760 --> 00:00:38,430 He, of course, is Buster Keaton, one of the three great silent comedians 8 00:00:38,649 --> 00:00:42,490 "He was, as we’re now beginning to realize... 9 00:00:42,890 --> 00:00:47,449 ...the greatest of all the clowns in the history of the cinema." 10 00:00:47,900 --> 00:00:49,300 And nearly a hundred years later 11 00:00:49,400 --> 00:00:52,120 I think he still has plenty to teach us about visual comedy. 12 00:00:52,990 --> 00:00:56,320 So today, let’s take a look at how the master builds a gag. 13 00:00:56,890 --> 00:00:57,440 Ready? 14 00:01:00,230 --> 00:01:00,739 Let's go. 15 00:01:07,900 --> 00:01:10,700 The first thing you need to know about visual comedy 16 00:01:10,200 --> 00:01:12,370 is that you have to tell your story through action. 17 00:01:12,570 --> 00:01:15,350 Keaton was a visual storyteller and he never liked it 18 00:01:15,350 --> 00:01:18,460 when other directors told their story through the title cards. 19 00:01:18,660 --> 00:01:21,780 -"The average picture used 240 titles... 20 00:01:21,800 --> 00:01:23,380 "...that was about the average." 21 00:01:23,700 --> 00:01:27,310 -"240 was the average?" -"Yes. And the most I ever used was 56" 22 00:01:28,100 --> 00:01:31,190 He avoided title cards by focusing on gesture and pantomime. 23 00:01:31,300 --> 00:01:34,550 In this shot, you never find out what these two are talking about. 24 00:01:34,850 --> 00:01:38,419 Everything you need to know is conveyed through the table & their body language 25 00:01:38,720 --> 00:01:40,900 "But what you had to say... 26 00:01:40,190 --> 00:01:43,490 "You had to communicate to the audience in only one way..." 27 00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:48,219 -"Through action" -"Right. We eliminated subtitles..." 28 00:01:48,219 --> 00:01:51,610 "...just as fast as we could if we could possibly tell it in action" 29 00:01:52,100 --> 00:01:54,420 Keaton believed that each gesture you did should be unique. 30 00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:56,300 Never do the same thing twice. 31 00:02:00,420 --> 00:02:01,700 Every single fall... 32 00:02:02,820 --> 00:02:04,100 is an opportunity… 33 00:02:05,660 --> 00:02:06,800 for creativity. 34 00:02:08,199 --> 00:02:10,590 But once you know the action we come to the second problem: 35 00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:12,550 Where do you put the camera? 36 00:02:18,290 --> 00:02:21,549 Visual gags generally work best from one particular angle. 37 00:02:22,500 --> 00:02:23,350 And if you change the angle... 38 00:02:24,150 --> 00:02:26,769 then you’re changing the gag and it might not work as well. 39 00:02:27,769 --> 00:02:29,750 Finding the right angle is a matter of trial and error. 40 00:02:30,000 --> 00:02:33,380 So let’s take a look at two possible camera placements for the same joke. 41 00:02:33,500 --> 00:02:35,000 Here’s the first one. 42 00:02:42,880 --> 00:02:44,000 And here’s the second. 43 00:02:52,240 --> 00:02:54,730 You’ll notice in first angle, the car takes up most of the frame 44 00:02:54,830 --> 00:02:57,240 and we don’t get a clear look at Buster until he turns around. 45 00:02:58,740 --> 00:03:01,480 But in the second angle, the car’s placed in the background 46 00:03:01,480 --> 00:03:03,560 and we always have a clear view of his face. 47 00:03:04,180 --> 00:03:07,600 This split second, where he doesn’t know what’s happening but we do... 48 00:03:07,360 --> 00:03:09,550 ...that’s much better from over here. 49 00:03:10,750 --> 00:03:12,800 And in the first angle, the framing splits our attention. 50 00:03:13,200 --> 00:03:16,510 Our eyes want to look at his face and the sign at the same time. 51 00:03:17,100 --> 00:03:18,700 But after reframing the scene... 52 00:03:19,100 --> 00:03:20,489 Our eyes naturally look at him... 53 00:03:21,290 --> 00:03:22,500 then the sign 54 00:03:22,890 --> 00:03:25,529 then back to him. Much better. 55 00:03:28,690 --> 00:03:30,130 Now we come to the third question... 56 00:03:31,490 --> 00:03:33,730 What are the rules of this particular world? 57 00:03:35,130 --> 00:03:38,190 Buster’s world is flat and governed by one law. 58 00:03:43,320 --> 00:03:46,000 If the camera can’t see it, then the characters can’t see it either. 59 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:49,500 In Buster’s world, the characters are limited by the sides of the frame 60 00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:52,000 and by what’s visible to us, the audience. 61 00:03:53,990 --> 00:03:56,200 And this allows him to do jokes that make sense visually 62 00:03:58,230 --> 00:03:59,230 but not logically. 63 00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:02,620 A lot of his gags are about human movement in the flat world. 64 00:04:03,620 --> 00:04:04,600 He can go to the right... 65 00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:06,500 to the left... 66 00:04:07,400 --> 00:04:08,400 up... 67 00:04:09,200 --> 00:04:10,200 down... 68 00:04:11,300 --> 00:04:12,200 away from the lens... 69 00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:14,500 or towards it. 70 00:04:15,400 --> 00:04:16,000 Look familiar? 71 00:04:16,339 --> 00:04:20,000 -"She’s been murdered. And you think I did it." 72 00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:22,100 -"Hey!" 73 00:04:24,360 --> 00:04:27,210 Like Wes Anderson, Buster Keaton found humor in geometry. 74 00:04:31,260 --> 00:04:34,510 He often placed the camera further back so you could see the shape of a joke. 75 00:04:34,810 --> 00:04:35,960 There are circles... 76 00:04:37,000 --> 00:04:38,000 triangles... 77 00:04:39,100 --> 00:04:40,260 parallel lines... 78 00:04:40,710 --> 00:04:43,560 and of course, the shape of the frame itself: the rectangle. 79 00:04:45,760 --> 00:04:49,159 I think staging like this is great because it encourages the audience 80 00:04:49,160 --> 00:04:52,700 to look around the frame and see the humor for themselves. 81 00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:54,500 In this shot, think about where your eyes are looking. 82 00:04:59,120 --> 00:05:00,320 Now where’s he? 83 00:05:02,520 --> 00:05:04,229 Some of these gags have their roots in vaudeville 84 00:05:04,520 --> 00:05:06,639 and are designed to play like magic tricks. 85 00:05:11,839 --> 00:05:13,100 And like all great magic tricks 86 00:05:13,439 --> 00:05:15,800 part of the fun is trying to guess how it was done. 87 00:05:19,450 --> 00:05:23,250 Keaton had a name for gags like these. He called them “impossible gags.” 88 00:05:26,500 --> 00:05:28,350 They're some of his most inventive and surreal jokes. 89 00:05:30,650 --> 00:05:32,669 But as a storyteller, he found them tricky 90 00:05:32,669 --> 00:05:34,200 because they broke the rules of his world. 91 00:05:34,669 --> 00:05:39,109 -"We had to stop doing impossible gags, what we call cartoon gags." 92 00:05:40,210 --> 00:05:42,599 -"We lost all of that when we started making feature pictures." 93 00:05:43,210 --> 00:05:47,400 -"They had to be believable or your story wouldn’t hold up." 94 00:05:48,210 --> 00:05:51,479 So instead, he focused on what he called the natural gag. 95 00:05:52,280 --> 00:05:55,650 The joke that emerges organically from the character and the situation. 96 00:05:56,800 --> 00:05:58,000 Consider what he does with this door. 97 00:06:04,170 --> 00:06:05,600 Keaton claimed that for visual comedy... 98 00:06:05,700 --> 00:06:08,300 you had to keep yourself open to improvisation. 99 00:06:08,650 --> 00:06:11,900 -"How much of it was planned and how much came out in the actual doing?" 100 00:06:11,900 --> 00:06:13,700 -"How much was improvised, you know?" 101 00:06:13,900 --> 00:06:16,200 -"Well as a rule, about 50 percent…" 102 00:06:18,990 --> 00:06:20,550 -"...you have in your mind before you start the picture..." 103 00:06:20,650 --> 00:06:23,549 -"...and the rest you develop as you’re making it." 104 00:06:24,990 --> 00:06:26,500 Sometimes he would find a joke he liked so much 105 00:06:26,150 --> 00:06:28,000 that he would do a callback to it later. 106 00:06:30,270 --> 00:06:33,479 But other times, jokes that he’d planned beforehand wouldn’t work on the day. 107 00:06:33,780 --> 00:06:35,590 So he would just get rid of them... 108 00:06:36,900 --> 00:06:38,270 -"...because they don’t stand up and they don’t work well." 109 00:06:38,800 --> 00:06:40,700 -"And then the accidental ones come." 110 00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:43,400 He was supposed to make this jump. 111 00:06:43,600 --> 00:06:44,800 But since he missed... 112 00:06:45,400 --> 00:06:47,300 He decided to keep the mistake and build on it. 113 00:06:49,240 --> 00:06:52,300 -"So you seldom got a scene like that good the second time." 114 00:06:52,300 --> 00:06:54,520 -"You generally got em that first one." 115 00:06:54,520 --> 00:06:55,870 -"Maybe that’s one of the reasons..." 116 00:06:55,900 --> 00:06:58,500 -"...there was so much laughter in the house the other night." 117 00:06:58,800 --> 00:07:00,360 -"I mean, the younger people and I had this feeling..." 118 00:07:00,660 --> 00:07:02,850 -"...that what we were seeing was happening now." 119 00:07:05,750 --> 00:07:07,000 -"That it had happened only once..." 120 00:07:07,100 --> 00:07:09,300 -"...It was not something that was pre-done and done and done." 121 00:07:09,700 --> 00:07:11,320 And that brings us to the last thing about Buster Keaton 122 00:07:11,500 --> 00:07:13,000 and his most famous rule. 123 00:07:16,510 --> 00:07:17,700 Never fake a gag. 124 00:07:18,300 --> 00:07:21,000 For Keaton, there was only one way to convince the audience... 125 00:07:21,220 --> 00:07:22,550 ...that what they were seeing was real. 126 00:07:23,220 --> 00:07:24,350 He had to actually do it… 127 00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:29,500 ...without cutting. 128 00:07:29,780 --> 00:07:31,780 He was so strict about this that he once said... 129 00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:33,780 “Either we get this in one shot… 130 00:07:37,780 --> 00:07:39,760 ...or we throw out the gag." 131 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:43,480 And it’s why he remains vital nearly 100 years later. 132 00:07:43,980 --> 00:07:46,290 Not just for his skill but for his integrity. 133 00:07:46,980 --> 00:07:48,290 That’s really him. 134 00:07:50,290 --> 00:07:52,700 And no advancement in technology can mimic this. 135 00:07:53,500 --> 00:07:56,540 Even now, we’re amazed when filmmakers actually do it for real. 136 00:07:57,500 --> 00:08:00,400 But I think he did it better 95 years ago. 137 00:08:01,350 --> 00:08:02,350 So no matter how many times... 138 00:08:02,550 --> 00:08:04,200 you’ve seen someone else pay homage to him… 139 00:08:13,689 --> 00:08:18,379 Nothing beats the real thing.