0:00:12.429,0:00:17.329 Yes, I am the mathematician[br]who's going to get you so laid. 0:00:17.329,0:00:19.314 (Laughter) 0:00:19.314,0:00:23.931 And to begin I need you[br]to stare at this equation. 0:00:23.931,0:00:27.204 I mean, there's your first orgasm[br]right there, I know it. 0:00:27.204,0:00:30.763 But these are very sophisticated equations 0:00:30.763,0:00:33.502 that model a successful marriage. 0:00:33.502,0:00:35.532 And they're ground breaking equations 0:00:35.532,0:00:39.108 because it was the first time [br]that truly sophisticated mathematics 0:00:39.108,0:00:41.420 was used in the field of romance. 0:00:41.420,0:00:44.940 And they predict with 95% accuracy rate 0:00:44.940,0:00:47.983 whether newlyweds will be together[br]in six years time. 0:00:47.983,0:00:50.138 And you can see there's the "W" for wife 0:00:50.138,0:00:51.950 and the "H" for husband. 0:00:51.950,0:00:56.171 So, they modeled newlyweds[br]talking about areas of contention 0:00:56.171,0:00:58.038 like the in-laws or money. 0:00:58.038,0:01:00.039 And then they modeled the responses 0:01:00.039,0:01:03.429 according to how each partner[br]was responding to the other. 0:01:03.429,0:01:05.113 Body language as well. 0:01:05.113,0:01:08.265 And what came out[br]was this interesting influence factor [br] 0:01:08.265,0:01:09.477 at the end there, 0:01:09.477,0:01:11.867 which actually revealed that couples[br] 0:01:11.867,0:01:14.387 that responded the least to each other 0:01:14.387,0:01:16.819 had a better chance[br]of a successful marriage. 0:01:16.819,0:01:18.389 So that means --[br](Laughter) 0:01:18.389,0:01:21.579 I see some people are like,[br]"We knew that." 0:01:21.579,0:01:24.489 So, couples that compromised the least[br] 0:01:24.489,0:01:26.879 ended up being together the most. 0:01:26.879,0:01:28.255 This was very interesting 0:01:28.255,0:01:30.841 because a lot of therapy[br]has been based on empathy. 0:01:30.841,0:01:32.203 And you laughed before, 0:01:32.203,0:01:34.925 so maybe you don't say [br]when you partner comes home, 0:01:34.925,0:01:38.239 "Yes darling, I know. Let me rub your feet[br]and fix you a martini." 0:01:38.239,0:01:42.305 Because what they've actually found[br]is that might not be the best way forward. 0:01:42.311,0:01:44.539 Maybe the best way,[br]or the mathematics revealed, 0:01:44.539,0:01:47.360 that having high standards[br]and finding ways to reach 0:01:47.360,0:01:50.318 for those standards[br]is in fact the way to go. 0:01:50.318,0:01:52.918 So mathematics is the study of patterns. 0:01:52.918,0:01:56.167 All the symbols that you see[br]are in fact patterns. 0:01:56.167,0:01:58.248 You know, encapsulating patterns. 0:01:58.248,0:02:00.935 And we're very used to seeing 0:02:00.935,0:02:04.112 mathematics being used [br]in physics and engineering. 0:02:04.112,0:02:06.600 That's just because[br]it's been there the most. 0:02:06.600,0:02:09.642 You know, E equals mc squared.[br]That's so early 1900's. 0:02:09.642,0:02:12.198 There's actually been an evolution. 0:02:12.198,0:02:15.334 Since the 80's [br]we've seen mathematics venture 0:02:15.334,0:02:18.886 into stock market analysis,[br]risk analysis that was new. 0:02:18.886,0:02:22.259 And then since the 1990's or 2000's even 0:02:22.259,0:02:26.160 we're seeing mathematics enter[br]into the sometimes called Softer Sciences 0:02:26.160,0:02:29.530 like psychology, sociology,[br]anthropology, biology. 0:02:29.530,0:02:32.181 New mathematics appears every day. 0:02:32.181,0:02:36.022 I brought in a few[br]just to remind you of how that works. 0:02:36.022,0:02:37.699 Here's some latest research. 0:02:37.699,0:02:40.239 This is looking at antibiotic use 0:02:40.239,0:02:44.349 and how to implement antibiotics[br]for tuberculosis 0:02:44.349,0:02:46.183 while getting the patient healthy, 0:02:46.183,0:02:48.717 but making sure[br]that we avoid antibiotic resistance. 0:02:48.717,0:02:50.633 That came out a couple of weeks ago. 0:02:50.633,0:02:55.368 And this is looking at how an opinion[br]spreads through a population. 0:02:55.368,0:03:00.911 And when will you have the coexistence[br]of several opinions, or one big consensus. 0:03:00.911,0:03:03.457 One of my favorites,[br]it's older but I couldn't resist. 0:03:03.457,0:03:07.723 This one's from 2009 and this is[br]how to create the perfect chocolate. 0:03:07.723,0:03:10.728 One that melts in your mouth[br]but not in your hand. 0:03:10.728,0:03:15.178 And yes, these are very sexy equations,[br]I'm sure you'll agree. 0:03:15.178,0:03:19.698 Mathematics is absolutely everywhere[br]these days; it's being used everywhere. 0:03:19.698,0:03:21.269 It really is no surprise 0:03:21.269,0:03:23.870 that now we're seeing[br]the equations for love. 0:03:23.870,0:03:26.813 Now, love sucks.[br]I know you all know that. 0:03:26.813,0:03:29.912 Because, yes, you're excited at first. 0:03:29.912,0:03:32.780 But then you're scared.[br]Oh, my god. I haven't eaten. 0:03:32.780,0:03:35.157 You're sitting looking at your phone,[br]"Please ring!" 0:03:35.157,0:03:37.170 Then they send you a two-word text. 0:03:37.170,0:03:40.191 And you're like, "Whoo-hoo![br]It's on like Donkey Kong." 0:03:40.191,0:03:42.363 (Laughter) 0:03:44.223,0:03:47.654 And so these equations[br]look at which personality traits 0:03:47.654,0:03:50.422 are more likely to come together 0:03:50.422,0:03:52.830 to have a more stable [br]companionship type love 0:03:52.830,0:03:54.137 because some people 0:03:54.137,0:03:56.124 they just end up being[br]up and down continuously. 0:03:56.124,0:03:58.612 Imagine being in a relationship[br]with Charlie Sheen. 0:03:58.612,0:04:00.673 That would be like[br]well, unlike Donkey Kong 0:04:00.673,0:04:02.735 and also like this.[br](Laughter) 0:04:02.735,0:04:05.976 It gets a bit out of control --[br]mathematically quite fast. 0:04:05.976,0:04:08.727 So just to tell you, it's about 0:04:08.727,0:04:11.310 one thing to look out for[br]is if your partner -- 0:04:11.310,0:04:13.484 if you overestimate[br]your partner's qualities. 0:04:13.484,0:04:16.547 So with partners we can behave[br]a bit like proud parents. 0:04:16.547,0:04:19.667 "He's so smart. He's so sexy."[br]Everyone's just staring at this guy like 0:04:19.680,0:04:21.025 (mumbling) 0:04:21.025,0:04:23.768 Anyway, (Laughter) 0:04:23.768,0:04:25.918 here's some more mathematics. 0:04:25.918,0:04:31.288 Now, men report, on average,[br]having had sex with two to four times 0:04:31.288,0:04:34.606 as many women than women do men. 0:04:34.606,0:04:36.571 And this does not make sense. 0:04:36.571,0:04:37.661 (Laughter) 0:04:37.661,0:04:39.901 It doesn't. (Laughter) 0:04:39.901,0:04:43.522 I know you're all thinking,[br]"But what about prostitutes?" 0:04:43.522,0:04:46.221 "But what about my ex?[br]He's slept with everybody." 0:04:46.221,0:04:50.124 No, every time a man[br]has sex with a woman -- 0:04:50.124,0:04:51.847 there are averages for other things -- 0:04:51.847,0:04:53.977 But in a large enough sample space 0:04:53.977,0:04:56.430 it's going to be about the same,[br]not off like this. 0:04:56.430,0:04:57.755 So here's an example. 0:04:57.755,0:05:00.406 Here's Charlie Sheen.[br]He's had sex with everyone. 0:05:00.406,0:05:01.550 (Laughter) 0:05:01.550,0:05:04.338 Then the next guy, only one.[br]One, one, one. 0:05:04.338,0:05:07.458 And that forces, you see,[br]the outcome for the women. 0:05:07.458,0:05:10.621 The first one's had one.[br]The others have had 2 partners each. 0:05:10.621,0:05:14.577 And 2, 4, 6, 8, 9.[br]9 divided by 5 0:05:14.577,0:05:17.817 and on the right 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.[br]9 divided by 5. 0:05:17.824,0:05:20.077 Every time a man has sex with a woman 0:05:20.077,0:05:22.810 it's adding to the general tally[br]of both sides. 0:05:22.810,0:05:25.305 Now, why is this discrepancy? 0:05:25.305,0:05:28.948 Because the surveys [br]are confidential and non-identifying, 0:05:28.948,0:05:32.586 it turns out, if you ask about kinky things,[br]people are very honest. 0:05:32.586,0:05:33.886 (Laughter) 0:05:33.886,0:05:37.141 What we've turned to[br]is we think it's counting strategy. 0:05:37.141,0:05:43.069 Because if you enumerate[br]you'll be prone to an underestimation. 0:05:43.069,0:05:47.015 If you approximate[br]you'll be prone to an overestimation. 0:05:47.015,0:05:50.091 So it seems women are going,[br]"Justin, Brad, 0:05:50.091,0:05:53.102 the guy with the sexy biceps. The end." 0:05:53.102,0:05:57.162 And men are going,[br]"20 a year for the last 5 years." 0:05:57.162,0:06:00.176 (Laughter) You know. 0:06:00.669,0:06:03.735 My favorite clue in all the data 0:06:03.735,0:06:07.381 was that 80% of men's results[br]were divisible by 5. 0:06:07.381,0:06:10.739 (Laughter) 0:06:10.739,0:06:15.196 So, of course the mathematicians are like,[br]"Yeah, no, you're lying." 0:06:15.196,0:06:17.806 (Laughter) 0:06:19.986,0:06:22.795 Back to some more waves. 0:06:22.795,0:06:26.505 Of course, there are waves[br]in women's hormones. 0:06:26.505,0:06:32.206 And these equations look at what kind[br]of mechanism is in a woman's body -- 0:06:32.206,0:06:35.566 how does your body know[br]28 days have gone by? 0:06:35.566,0:06:39.920 And it's based on understanding[br]why women have all their immature eggs 0:06:39.920,0:06:42.504 at birth ready to go. 0:06:42.504,0:06:45.649 We hear so much about women's hormones,[br] 0:06:45.649,0:06:48.444 so I've brought in men's as well. 0:06:48.444,0:06:52.099 These are ---[br](Laughter) 0:06:52.099,0:06:54.996 These are real.[br]I'm not making them up. 0:06:54.996,0:07:00.192 These model the relationship between[br]the brain and the testes 0:07:00.192,0:07:04.236 as the fluctuation happens during the day. 0:07:04.236,0:07:06.596 (Laughter) 0:07:07.976,0:07:09.507 I promise these are real. 0:07:09.507,0:07:12.668 Testosterone, for example,[br]has a peak in the morning. 0:07:12.668,0:07:15.076 And a slump in the evening. 0:07:15.076,0:07:18.010 But there's actually[br]a mini testosterone peak[br] 0:07:18.010,0:07:21.184 every 2 to 2.5 hours in between. 0:07:21.184,0:07:24.239 So, you know what that means.[br]Especially women. 0:07:24.239,0:07:26.649 If you ask a guy a favor[br]and he's not responding 0:07:26.649,0:07:29.239 just wait half an hour[br]and ask again, just try and -- 0:07:29.239,0:07:30.439 (Laughter) 0:07:30.439,0:07:33.924 just try and get that slump moment. 0:07:33.924,0:07:35.867 It's got its purposes. 0:07:35.867,0:07:38.200 Though the peak[br]has another purpose as well. 0:07:38.200,0:07:41.555 Yes, this is all great fun[br]and I could carry on with fun maths 0:07:41.555,0:07:43.047 and sex problems for hours. 0:07:43.047,0:07:47.239 But ultimately, what I'm about[br]is our amazing brain 0:07:47.239,0:07:52.143 and the impact of abstract thinking[br]and the power of abstract thinking. 0:07:52.143,0:07:55.406 And so let me turn things[br]a little bit around on you and say, 0:07:55.406,0:07:58.202 What do you think happens[br]if you think about sex 0:07:58.202,0:07:59.774 before doing mathematics? 0:07:59.774,0:08:02.498 Because it's actually[br]not super distracting. 0:08:02.498,0:08:04.529 You'll actually become better 0:08:04.529,0:08:07.412 at doing certain types of brain processes. 0:08:07.412,0:08:10.869 It turns out there's two fundamental types[br]of brain processes. 0:08:10.869,0:08:12.952 You either think globally or locally.[br] 0:08:12.952,0:08:14.395 Forest or trees. 0:08:14.395,0:08:16.550 And when you're solving a problem, 0:08:16.550,0:08:20.899 you often start with the global[br]kind of analysis 0:08:20.899,0:08:24.419 and then you have to dig in deep[br]and follow leads to solutions. 0:08:24.419,0:08:27.596 It turns out that we're now seeing[br]with the latest research 0:08:27.596,0:08:31.646 that this is linked to creative[br]versus analytical thinking. 0:08:31.646,0:08:33.787 And more than that we're finding 0:08:33.787,0:08:36.278 that it's actually[br]very easily manipulated. 0:08:36.278,0:08:39.960 So, if you get people to think about love[br]and then solve problems 0:08:39.960,0:08:42.369 they'll be better at the globalization, 0:08:42.369,0:08:44.485 the beginning, the creative part. 0:08:44.485,0:08:47.278 And if you get people to think about sex 0:08:47.278,0:08:51.575 they get better at the process[br]part of the problem solving. 0:08:51.575,0:08:53.117 Easy as that. 0:08:53.117,0:08:56.464 And here's the bigger question[br]that interests me. 0:08:56.464,0:08:58.533 What is this thing called mathematics 0:08:58.533,0:09:01.082 that's only been going[br]for about 2,000 years 0:09:01.082,0:09:03.641 that popped up independently[br]across the world 0:09:03.641,0:09:06.029 that so many people swear they can't do? 0:09:06.029,0:09:09.057 See, there's something[br]that's not quite reconciling there. 0:09:09.057,0:09:11.979 You can't have something[br]that's developed so recently 0:09:11.979,0:09:14.517 with some people[br]just having an extra brain bit. 0:09:14.522,0:09:18.799 No, that doesn't make sense.[br]It's about finding those right triggers. 0:09:18.979,0:09:21.824 Here's a school report card of mine 0:09:21.824,0:09:24.029 in French. 0:09:24.029,0:09:27.846 My parents are these wild, wild travelers[br]always looking for wild parties. 0:09:27.846,0:09:32.837 I'm actually the conservative offspring[br]of some crazy wild people. 0:09:32.837,0:09:36.169 As you see, we lived in Cannes, whatever.[br]Great parties there. 0:09:36.169,0:09:39.941 But more importantly, you can see[br]two out of 20 for mathematics. 0:09:39.941,0:09:44.389 And my best result was 15[br]for Travaux Manuels et Technique. 0:09:44.389,0:09:45.796 which is woodwork. 0:09:45.796,0:09:47.780 (Laughter) 0:09:47.780,0:09:52.697 So it's very clear to me[br]what life is like without mathematics. 0:09:52.697,0:09:56.777 Once I found mathematics at 18[br]when I came to Australia, 0:09:56.777,0:09:59.943 it was the first time[br]that I was connecting to something pure, 0:09:59.943,0:10:02.507 to something that was so amazing. 0:10:02.507,0:10:05.650 You see, pattern recognition 0:10:05.650,0:10:09.393 is right at the core of the animal kingdom. 0:10:09.393,0:10:11.394 You see, even reptiles recognize 0:10:11.394,0:10:14.655 whether it's something[br]to eat, fight or have sex with. 0:10:15.535,0:10:18.928 Even a jellyfish knows which way is up[br]and which way is down. 0:10:18.928,0:10:21.459 Now the seeds of the number concept[br] 0:10:21.459,0:10:24.170 are also very much part[br]of the animal kingdom. 0:10:24.170,0:10:26.452 A pack of animals will recognize 0:10:26.452,0:10:29.134 whether another pack[br]is greater than theirs. 0:10:29.134,0:10:31.947 And you can actually teach a rat[br]to press a lever 0:10:31.947,0:10:34.829 an approximate number of times[br]to get food. 0:10:34.829,0:10:37.226 Now, you see how I used[br]the word approximate. 0:10:37.226,0:10:42.987 That's because the rat doesn't have[br]self-awareness or a linguistic ability 0:10:42.987,0:10:46.877 to capture, tame those innate sensations. 0:10:46.877,0:10:51.558 So if the rat is just tapping three times[br]1, 2, 3 -- it will kind of get it right. 0:10:51.558,0:10:55.124 But once it gets to 16, [br]the poor little rat is tapping away 0:10:55.124,0:10:58.148 it doesn't know where it's reaching.[br]And it's the same with us. 0:10:58.148,0:11:00.710 If you do an experiment[br]where we can't count out 0:11:00.710,0:11:04.167 we'll make exactly the same[br]mistakes as the rat. 0:11:05.127,0:11:06.950 We went further. 0:11:06.950,0:11:10.387 We went to things like 2 + 5 = 5 + 2. 0:11:10.387,0:11:13.929 I can swap the order of things[br]and still reach the same result. 0:11:13.929,0:11:15.597 We went further still. 0:11:15.597,0:11:17.947 A + B = B + A 0:11:17.947,0:11:21.045 I can substitute[br]any of the infinite number of numbers 0:11:21.045,0:11:24.968 that I'm now aware of in that formula[br]and it means the same thing. 0:11:24.968,0:11:29.133 You see, language is more[br]than just naming things. 0:11:29.133,0:11:33.600 With it, we also got cause and effect[br]and temporal reasoning. 0:11:33.600,0:11:39.784 Mathematics is our most precise use[br]of this syntactical understanding. 0:11:39.784,0:11:43.758 Because with mathematics [br]at each step that you're creating 0:11:43.758,0:11:46.796 the pattern linking discovery,[br]there's no ambiguity. 0:11:46.796,0:11:49.427 It is very precise[br]what you're doing at each step, 0:11:49.427,0:11:53.027 what is in each classification.[br]True or false. That's it. 0:11:53.027,0:11:58.144 In the box or outside the box.[br]It's very clear, ultimate precision. 0:11:58.144,0:12:01.287 And that is why mathematics is so powerful 0:12:01.287,0:12:03.590 and being used more[br]often right through to sex. 0:12:03.590,0:12:06.396 And that's why it's so hard[br]because you're using 0:12:06.396,0:12:11.612 the limits of our evolution[br]right to their extreme. 0:12:11.612,0:12:14.469 We're using,[br]we're taming those innate sensations 0:12:14.469,0:12:17.427 with the most ultimate precision we can. 0:12:17.427,0:12:20.677 Mathematics as you can see, it's just --- 0:12:20.677,0:12:25.499 what's so breath taking is that it emerged[br]independently across the globe. 0:12:25.499,0:12:28.259 And when people came together[br]in peace or war 0:12:28.259,0:12:33.846 they may have clashed when it came [br]to religion, cultures, languages, 0:12:33.846,0:12:38.359 but their mathematics,[br]or pure pattern recognition just meshed. 0:12:38.359,0:12:42.417 You see, mathematics[br]lies right at the roots of humanity. 0:12:42.417,0:12:45.521 Like sex, it transcends human culture. 0:12:45.521,0:12:47.425 And now that I've shared that with you, 0:12:47.425,0:12:49.825 you are the sexiest ladies in town. 0:12:49.825,0:12:50.901 (Laughter) 0:12:50.901,0:12:52.177 Thank you very much. 0:12:52.177,0:12:54.667 (Applause)