1
00:00:07,092 --> 00:00:10,192
Are you as good at things 
as you think you are?

2
00:00:10,192 --> 00:00:13,902
How good are you at managing money?

3
00:00:13,902 --> 00:00:16,732
What about reading people's emotions?

4
00:00:16,732 --> 00:00:20,172
How healthy are you 
compared to other people you know?

5
00:00:20,172 --> 00:00:23,114
Are you better than average at grammar?

6
00:00:23,114 --> 00:00:24,701
Knowing how competent we are

7
00:00:24,701 --> 00:00:27,993
and how are skill stack up 
against other people's

8
00:00:27,993 --> 00:00:30,172
is more than a self-esteem boost.

9
00:00:30,172 --> 00:00:34,714
It helps us figure out when we can forge
ahead on our decisions and instincts

10
00:00:34,714 --> 00:00:39,393
and when we need, instead, 
to seek out advice.

11
00:00:39,393 --> 00:00:42,705
But psychological research suggests
that we're not very good

12
00:00:42,705 --> 00:00:45,664
at evaluating ourselves accurately.

13
00:00:45,664 --> 00:00:50,001
In fact, we frequently over estimate
our own abilities.

14
00:00:50,001 --> 00:00:52,293
Researchers have a name 
for this phenomena,

15
00:00:52,293 --> 00:00:55,626
the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

16
00:00:55,626 --> 00:00:58,204
This effect explains 
why more than 100 studies

17
00:00:58,204 --> 00:01:02,465
have shown that people display 
elusory superiority.

18
00:01:02,465 --> 00:01:04,544
We judge ourselves as better than others

19
00:01:04,544 --> 00:01:08,134
to a degree that violates 
the laws of math.

20
00:01:08,134 --> 00:01:12,665
When software engineers at two companies
were asked to rate their performance,

21
00:01:12,665 --> 00:01:17,637
32% of the engineers at one company
and 42% at the other

22
00:01:17,637 --> 00:01:21,224
put themselves in the top 5%.

23
00:01:21,224 --> 00:01:25,195
In another study, 88% of American drivers

24
00:01:25,195 --> 00:01:29,465
described themselves 
as having above average driving skills.

25
00:01:29,465 --> 00:01:31,606
These aren't isolated findings.

26
00:01:31,606 --> 00:01:34,945
On average, people tend to rate
themselves better than most

27
00:01:34,945 --> 00:01:40,875
in disciplines ranging from health,
leadership skills, ethics, and beyond.

28
00:01:40,875 --> 00:01:45,756
What's particularly interesting
is that those with the least ability

29
00:01:45,756 --> 00:01:50,636
are often the most likely to overrate
their skills to the greatest extent.

30
00:01:50,636 --> 00:01:53,367
People measurably poor 
at logical reasoning,

31
00:01:53,367 --> 00:01:54,070
grammar,

32
00:01:54,070 --> 00:01:55,117
financial knowledge,

33
00:01:55,117 --> 00:01:55,983
math,

34
00:01:55,983 --> 00:01:57,361
emotional intelligence,

35
00:01:57,361 --> 00:01:59,357
running medical lab tests,

36
00:01:59,357 --> 00:02:00,637
and chess

37
00:02:00,637 --> 00:02:08,238
all tend to rate their expertise almost
as favorably as actual experts do.

38
00:02:08,238 --> 00:02:11,397
So who's most vulnerable to this delusion?

39
00:02:11,397 --> 00:02:15,718
Sadly, all of us because we all have
pockets of incompetence

40
00:02:15,718 --> 00:02:17,218
we don't recognize.

41
00:02:17,218 --> 00:02:19,820
But why?

42
00:02:19,820 --> 00:02:24,719
When psychologists Dunning and Kruger
first described the effect in 1999,

43
00:02:24,719 --> 00:02:28,873
they argued that people lacking
knowledge and skill in particular areas

44
00:02:28,873 --> 00:02:31,329
suffer a double curse.

45
00:02:31,329 --> 00:02:35,148
First, they make mistakes
and reach poor decisions.

46
00:02:35,148 --> 00:02:40,581
But second, those same knowledge gaps also
prevent them from catching their errors.

47
00:02:40,581 --> 00:02:44,449
In other words, poor performers lack
the very expertise needed

48
00:02:44,449 --> 00:02:47,419
to recognize how badly they're doing.

49
00:02:47,419 --> 00:02:49,419
For example, when the researchers studied

50
00:02:49,419 --> 00:02:51,979
participants in 
a college debate tournament,

51
00:02:51,979 --> 00:02:55,569
the bottom 25% of teams 
in preliminary rounds

52
00:02:55,569 --> 00:02:59,623
lost nearly four 
out of every five matches.

53
00:02:59,623 --> 00:03:03,229
But they thought they were winning
almost 60%.

54
00:03:03,229 --> 00:03:06,001
WIthout a strong grasp 
of the rules of debate,

55
00:03:06,001 --> 00:03:09,550
the students simply couldn't recognize
when or how often

56
00:03:09,550 --> 00:03:12,491
their arguments broke down.

57
00:03:12,491 --> 00:03:17,440
The Dunning-Kruger Effect isn't a question
of ego blinding us to our weaknesses.

58
00:03:17,440 --> 00:03:21,541
People usually do admit their deficits
once they can spot them.

59
00:03:21,541 --> 00:03:25,651
In one study, students who had initially
done badly on a logic quiz

60
00:03:25,651 --> 00:03:28,040
and then took a mini-course on logic

61
00:03:28,040 --> 00:03:34,081
were quite willing to label
their original performances as awful.

62
00:03:34,081 --> 00:03:38,071
That may be why people with a moderate
amount of experience or expertise

63
00:03:38,071 --> 00:03:41,291
often have less confidence
in their abilities.

64
00:03:41,291 --> 00:03:44,691
They know enough to know that 
there's a lot they don't know.

65
00:03:44,691 --> 00:03:49,241
Meanwhile, experts tend to be aware
of just how knowledgeable they are.

66
00:03:49,241 --> 00:03:51,201
But they often make a different mistake:

67
00:03:51,201 --> 00:03:56,432
they assume that everyone else 
is knowledgeable, too.

68
00:03:56,432 --> 00:04:00,083
The result is that people, 
whether they're inept or highly skilled,

69
00:04:00,083 --> 00:04:04,352
are often caught in a bubble
of inaccurate self-perception.

70
00:04:04,352 --> 00:04:07,673
When they're unskilled, 
they can't see their own faults.

71
00:04:07,673 --> 00:04:09,461
When they're exceptionally competent,


72
00:04:09,461 --> 00:04:14,303
they don't perceive how unusual 
their abilities are.

73
00:04:14,303 --> 00:04:18,493
So if the Dunning-Kruger Effect 
is invisible to those experiencing it,

74
00:04:18,493 --> 00:04:24,873
what can you do to find out how good
you actually are at various things?

75
00:04:24,873 --> 00:04:27,524
First, ask for feedback from other people,


76
00:04:27,524 --> 00:04:30,584
and consider it, 
even if it's hard to hear.

77
00:04:30,584 --> 00:04:33,235
Second, and more important, keep learning.

78
00:04:33,235 --> 00:04:34,935
The more knowledgeable we become,

79
00:04:34,935 --> 00:04:40,454
the less likely we are to have
invisible holes in our competence.

80
00:04:40,454 --> 00:04:43,333
Perhaps it all boils down 
to that old proverb:

81
00:04:43,333 --> 00:04:44,835
When arguing with a fool,

82
00:04:44,835 --> 00:04:49,115
first make sure the other person
isn't doing the same thing.