1
00:00:01,598 --> 00:00:03,785
Narrator: We’re constantly
bombarded with media

2
00:00:03,785 --> 00:00:06,553
that puts pressure on us
to buy newer and trendier clothes.

3
00:00:06,764 --> 00:00:09,415
Just to throw them away
when they’re no longer in style.

4
00:00:09,892 --> 00:00:14,089
An estimated 93 million tons
go to landfill or are burned every year.

5
00:00:14,150 --> 00:00:19,328
Suki Dsanj-Lenz: And that’s roughly
about a garbage truckload of textiles,

6
00:00:19,328 --> 00:00:22,192
every second going to landfill.

7
00:00:22,192 --> 00:00:23,332
Every second.

8
00:00:23,449 --> 00:00:26,792
N: Producing clothes also pollutes
our water and churns out CO2.

9
00:00:26,859 --> 00:00:29,186
The fast fashion model pioneered by Zara

10
00:00:29,186 --> 00:00:32,619
means that brands are churning out
double the amount of clothing per year

11
00:00:32,619 --> 00:00:34,093
as they did in the early 2000s.

12
00:00:34,093 --> 00:00:35,995
But companies say that’s about to change

13
00:00:35,995 --> 00:00:38,362
because we can now
buy eco-friendly fast fashion.

14
00:00:38,431 --> 00:00:41,288
And also recycle our clothes
when we don’t want them anymore.

15
00:00:41,543 --> 00:00:43,020
But can we believe them?

16
00:00:50,057 --> 00:00:51,921
Inditex, Zara’s parent company,

17
00:00:51,921 --> 00:00:52,928
and H&M Group

18
00:00:52,928 --> 00:00:55,452
are two of the biggest
fashion retailers in the world,

19
00:00:55,452 --> 00:00:57,599
and both have collections
that claim to reduce

20
00:00:57,599 --> 00:00:59,628
the environmental impact
of making clothes.

21
00:00:59,628 --> 00:01:01,576
Not only that, but the two fashion giants

22
00:01:01,576 --> 00:01:04,246
say they are making
their entire brands more sustainable.

23
00:01:05,518 --> 00:01:08,685
Let’s take a look at these promises,
starting with the materials.

24
00:01:08,685 --> 00:01:10,309
[MATERIALS]

25
00:01:11,031 --> 00:01:15,159
Main materials at Zara & H&M,
as well as worldwide, are polyester,

26
00:01:15,159 --> 00:01:18,761
which accounts for around 52%
of total fiber production,

27
00:01:18,761 --> 00:01:21,374
and cotton, which is around 24%.

28
00:01:21,500 --> 00:01:23,929
PET is a different name for polyester

29
00:01:23,929 --> 00:01:26,839
and is the same type of plastic
that's found in water bottles.

30
00:01:27,109 --> 00:01:28,887
Actually,

31
00:01:28,887 --> 00:01:31,718
60% of PET production goes to textiles,

32
00:01:31,718 --> 00:01:33,906
and only 30% to water bottles.

33
00:01:35,313 --> 00:01:37,355
The material is produced from petroleum,

34
00:01:37,355 --> 00:01:39,167
and the process uses lots of energy

35
00:01:39,167 --> 00:01:40,517
and releases CO2,

36
00:01:40,517 --> 00:01:43,670
as well as acids and ammonia
into the water supply.

37
00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:48,968
Recycled polyester uses up to 60%
less energy than virgin material

38
00:01:48,968 --> 00:01:51,070
and can be made from textile scraps

39
00:01:51,070 --> 00:01:52,336
or plastic trash.

40
00:01:52,758 --> 00:01:56,873
But inconsistencies in the threads
can make it require more dye,

41
00:01:56,873 --> 00:01:57,876
and experts say

42
00:01:57,876 --> 00:02:01,699
that polyester fabrics can shed
700,000 microplastic fibers

43
00:02:01,699 --> 00:02:03,062
with every wash,

44
00:02:03,062 --> 00:02:04,764
which end up in the ocean,

45
00:02:04,764 --> 00:02:06,226
and also in our food.

46
00:02:08,658 --> 00:02:10,329
Cotton doesn't have these problems,

47
00:02:10,329 --> 00:02:12,780
but is still a chemical
and water intensive crop.

48
00:02:12,910 --> 00:02:15,237
According to the World Wide
Fund for Nature,

49
00:02:15,237 --> 00:02:19,141
it takes 20,000 liters of water
to make one kilo of cotton,

50
00:02:19,141 --> 00:02:21,861
which is enough for one T-shirt
and a pair of jeans.

51
00:02:22,630 --> 00:02:27,239
Also, around 11% of the world’s pesticides
are used on cotton fields.

52
00:02:27,415 --> 00:02:28,800
So is organic cotton better?

53
00:02:28,800 --> 00:02:30,896
SDL: Essentially there's
a massive difference

54
00:02:30,896 --> 00:02:32,733
between organic cotton and cotton.

55
00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:36,079
N: This is Suki, a representative
of Fashion Revolution,

56
00:02:36,079 --> 00:02:38,395
which is an organization
that advocates worldwide

57
00:02:38,395 --> 00:02:41,501
for transparency and sustainability
in the fashion industry.

58
00:02:42,418 --> 00:02:48,019
SDL: Organic cotton is, in the long term,
much better for the farmer that grows it

59
00:02:48,019 --> 00:02:51,158
and the environment
and the soil that produces it,

60
00:02:51,158 --> 00:02:54,001
and it's less water intensive

61
00:02:54,001 --> 00:02:56,801
and doesn't require
as much irrigation as such.

62
00:02:57,243 --> 00:02:59,003
N: We requested an interview with H&M

63
00:02:59,003 --> 00:03:01,007
about the sustainability
of their products,

64
00:03:01,007 --> 00:03:02,008
but they declined.

65
00:03:02,008 --> 00:03:03,063
Over email, they said,

66
00:03:03,063 --> 00:03:05,397
"We are happy to say
that by the end of this year,

67
00:03:05,397 --> 00:03:07,933
all cotton we use will come
from sustainable sources."

68
00:03:07,933 --> 00:03:10,862
Zara also responded
only through email, saying,

69
00:03:10,862 --> 00:03:14,888
"In 2019, the Group [Inditex,
Zara's parent company]

70
00:03:14,888 --> 00:03:18,450
used over 38,000 tonnes
of sustainable cotton in its clothing,

71
00:03:18,450 --> 00:03:20,851
up 105% from 2018."

72
00:03:21,842 --> 00:03:23,996
But what does sustainable actually mean?

73
00:03:24,386 --> 00:03:27,434
There’s no standard definition,
and it doesn’t equal organic.

74
00:03:27,660 --> 00:03:30,975
H&M says that sustainable cotton
can also mean recycled

75
00:03:30,975 --> 00:03:34,280
or cotton that uses
less pesticides and GMOs.

76
00:03:37,540 --> 00:03:39,484
Zara portrays its cotton as sustainable,

77
00:03:39,484 --> 00:03:42,452
but calls it ecologically grown
instead of organic.

78
00:03:42,452 --> 00:03:46,084
It claims the cotton uses
natural fertilizers and pesticides,

79
00:03:46,084 --> 00:03:49,220
and is certified
by the Organic Content Standard

80
00:03:49,220 --> 00:03:51,946
and the Global Organic Textile Standard,

81
00:03:51,946 --> 00:03:54,265
which say they control
for chemical and water use

82
00:03:54,265 --> 00:03:55,979
in the whole production process.

83
00:03:59,041 --> 00:04:01,648
Terms like "conscious"
and "ecologically grown"

84
00:04:01,648 --> 00:04:02,935
are hard to fact-check,

85
00:04:02,935 --> 00:04:05,103
as well as confusing for the consumer.

86
00:04:05,383 --> 00:04:08,142
But according to the non-profit
Textile Exchange,

87
00:04:08,142 --> 00:04:12,917
in 2016, H&M was the second largest
user of organic cotton in the world.

88
00:04:13,127 --> 00:04:14,469
Zara was the fourth.

89
00:04:16,253 --> 00:04:17,742
Let’s focus on synthetics.

90
00:04:18,202 --> 00:04:20,122
In H&M's sustainable collection,

91
00:04:20,122 --> 00:04:23,124
the synthetic clothing has to be
at least 50% recycled.

92
00:04:23,578 --> 00:04:27,498
Zara doesn’t specify their percentage,
and their labeling can be confusing.

93
00:04:27,692 --> 00:04:30,778
This jacket says
it’s 100% recycled polyamide,

94
00:04:30,778 --> 00:04:33,261
which makes it seem like
it’s completely recycled.

95
00:04:33,441 --> 00:04:35,091
But the filling is polyester.

96
00:04:35,091 --> 00:04:36,552
That’s a different material.

97
00:04:37,246 --> 00:04:39,489
And this isn’t the only time this happens.

98
00:04:39,489 --> 00:04:43,390
The percentage recycled statement
often doesn’t refer to the whole garment,

99
00:04:43,390 --> 00:04:46,748
making it look like the item
is more recycled than it actually is.

100
00:04:47,538 --> 00:04:49,600
On the subject of transparent labeling,

101
00:04:49,600 --> 00:04:52,242
the Join Life tags
are also on the Zara website

102
00:04:52,242 --> 00:04:54,970
and are stamped by
the Forest Stewardship Council.

103
00:04:54,970 --> 00:04:58,390
This would seem to imply the clothing
is certified by this organization.

104
00:04:58,650 --> 00:05:01,735
The stamp, however,
is only referring to the tag,

105
00:05:01,735 --> 00:05:03,550
not to the whole clothing item.

106
00:05:03,991 --> 00:05:05,510
Talk about misleading.

107
00:05:07,339 --> 00:05:11,846
Zara has committed to sustainable cotton
and polyester by 2025.

108
00:05:11,956 --> 00:05:15,841
H&M says all of their materials
to be sustainable by 2030,

109
00:05:15,841 --> 00:05:19,313
and for 2019, that figure
was already at 57%.

110
00:05:19,470 --> 00:05:21,141
If they stick to these commitments,

111
00:05:21,141 --> 00:05:23,150
it could mean big changes
for the industry.

112
00:05:23,560 --> 00:05:25,532
But material is only part of the story.

113
00:05:27,008 --> 00:05:28,522
[SUPPLY CHAIN TRANSPARENCY]

114
00:05:29,283 --> 00:05:31,538
To find out if that cotton
is actually organic,

115
00:05:31,538 --> 00:05:33,893
or that polyester is actually recycled,

116
00:05:33,893 --> 00:05:36,790
consumers need to be able
to check the production process.

117
00:05:37,437 --> 00:05:39,328
With an H&M Conscious T-shirt,

118
00:05:39,328 --> 00:05:42,283
you can find out in which
specific factory it was made.

119
00:05:42,283 --> 00:05:45,809
So it’s theoretically possible
to check the factory’s sustainability.

120
00:05:46,090 --> 00:05:49,057
Zara only lists how many suppliers
it has in one city,

121
00:05:49,057 --> 00:05:50,880
but not their names and addresses.

122
00:05:51,402 --> 00:05:53,926
They were both evaluated
by Fashion Revolution,

123
00:05:53,926 --> 00:05:56,064
an organization advocating
for transparency

124
00:05:56,064 --> 00:05:57,918
and sustainability in fashion.

125
00:05:58,310 --> 00:06:02,021
None of the 250 large brands
scored over 80%,

126
00:06:02,021 --> 00:06:06,152
but for 2020, H&M was the highest
scoring brand, with 73%,

127
00:06:06,152 --> 00:06:07,566
so quite transparent.

128
00:06:07,566 --> 00:06:09,651
Zara scored a 43%.

129
00:06:09,651 --> 00:06:10,682
Not so much.

130
00:06:10,782 --> 00:06:12,418
This is important because:

131
00:06:13,475 --> 00:06:15,905
Kim Weerd: Suppliers
are one of the few stakeholders

132
00:06:15,905 --> 00:06:18,193
with a front row seat
to brands' inner workings.

133
00:06:18,320 --> 00:06:20,180
N: Kim has a background in human rights

134
00:06:20,180 --> 00:06:22,582
and was a garment
factory manager in Cambodia.

135
00:06:22,951 --> 00:06:26,990
KW: They uniquely have access
to the information that consumers

136
00:06:26,990 --> 00:06:31,051
need to be able to crosscheck
brands' actions against their words.

137
00:06:31,459 --> 00:06:33,383
N: So being able to research suppliers

138
00:06:33,383 --> 00:06:37,246
allows people to hold brands accountable
to their sustainability claims, but -

139
00:06:37,246 --> 00:06:40,721
SDJ: Just because you're transparent,
it does not mean you're sustainable,

140
00:06:40,830 --> 00:06:42,616
It does not mean that at all.

141
00:06:42,616 --> 00:06:44,468
And that's really, really important.

142
00:06:44,872 --> 00:06:47,494
N: Even for brands [that] know
their whole supply chain,

143
00:06:47,494 --> 00:06:49,827
making an eco-friendly garment is hard.

144
00:06:50,620 --> 00:06:52,418
Jessie Li: Let's pick up a denim.

145
00:06:52,418 --> 00:06:56,117
You can see the dyeing is done
in a more environmentally responsible way,

146
00:06:56,117 --> 00:06:58,319
but the cotton is not produced the same.

147
00:06:58,613 --> 00:07:00,660
N: Jessie has worked
in different industries

148
00:07:00,660 --> 00:07:02,617
from product inspection to purchasing,

149
00:07:02,617 --> 00:07:05,475
to product development,
in both China and Cambodia.

150
00:07:06,136 --> 00:07:07,900
JL: Or take another example.

151
00:07:07,900 --> 00:07:11,588
The whole piece of the clothes
is made out of the waste,

152
00:07:11,588 --> 00:07:14,181
but not dyed in a responsible way.

153
00:07:14,181 --> 00:07:15,899
So, they're green,

154
00:07:15,899 --> 00:07:18,518
but it's different degrees of green

155
00:07:18,518 --> 00:07:20,365
or different degrees of less bad.

156
00:07:20,661 --> 00:07:23,942
N: Because an item of clothing
is made up of many different materials,

157
00:07:23,942 --> 00:07:25,736
all manufactured in different ways,

158
00:07:25,736 --> 00:07:28,880
it’s hard to make each piece
less harmful to the environment.

159
00:07:29,090 --> 00:07:30,192
This is also the reason

160
00:07:30,192 --> 00:07:33,983
why recycling clothing is much harder
than H&M and Zara would seem to claim.

161
00:07:33,983 --> 00:07:36,320
[RECYCLING]

162
00:07:36,890 --> 00:07:38,138
N: H&M’s advertisements

163
00:07:38,138 --> 00:07:41,467
say that the company is working
towards a circular future for clothing.

164
00:07:42,259 --> 00:07:43,469
According to the website,

165
00:07:43,469 --> 00:07:45,421
you can bring your clothing to any store,

166
00:07:45,421 --> 00:07:47,559
and it will be resold
as second-hand clothing,

167
00:07:47,559 --> 00:07:49,966
reused as other textiles, or recycled.

168
00:07:54,923 --> 00:07:56,832
Zara has a similar campaign.

169
00:07:56,832 --> 00:07:59,414
It says it partners
with different local organizations,

170
00:07:59,414 --> 00:08:01,752
which then take over
what happens to the clothing.

171
00:08:01,752 --> 00:08:03,918
[REUSED FOR INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS]

172
00:08:05,091 --> 00:08:06,456
So what does happen?

173
00:08:06,673 --> 00:08:09,687
They are resold, reused, and recycled,

174
00:08:09,687 --> 00:08:11,684
but not in the proportions
you might think.

175
00:08:11,941 --> 00:08:14,712
Over half of donated clothing
is sold overseas.

176
00:08:15,206 --> 00:08:18,233
The rest is mostly turned
into industrial material,

177
00:08:18,233 --> 00:08:20,440
burned, or goes to landfill.

178
00:08:22,290 --> 00:08:25,490
Less than 1% of the material
in used clothing

179
00:08:25,490 --> 00:08:27,339
is recycled into new clothing.

180
00:08:27,339 --> 00:08:29,271
A big reason is lack of technology.

181
00:08:29,791 --> 00:08:32,202
Remember how many materials
were in the jacket?

182
00:08:32,202 --> 00:08:34,785
Well, they need to come out
again to recycle it.

183
00:08:35,479 --> 00:08:39,566
Maxi Bohn: "Garments
that are made from mono materials,

184
00:08:39,566 --> 00:08:43,872
or can easily be taken apart into pieces,

185
00:08:44,912 --> 00:08:48,179
can be recycled.

186
00:08:48,737 --> 00:08:51,256
N: Maxi started her career
as a certified dressmaker

187
00:08:51,256 --> 00:08:52,608
over ten years ago

188
00:08:52,608 --> 00:08:56,358
and has headed product development
for Hugo Boss and major online retailers.

189
00:08:56,915 --> 00:08:58,626
MB: But think about your wardrobe.

190
00:08:58,626 --> 00:09:02,455
How many pieces would fulfill
these requirements?

191
00:09:03,191 --> 00:09:06,098
N: So giving back clothing
is better than throwing it away,

192
00:09:06,098 --> 00:09:08,422
but the chances of it
actually getting recycled

193
00:09:08,422 --> 00:09:09,711
are very low.

194
00:09:11,508 --> 00:09:14,207
H&M and Zara are investing
in recycling research,

195
00:09:14,207 --> 00:09:16,021
but we looked at their annual reports,

196
00:09:16,021 --> 00:09:20,106
and the amount is 0.5% and 0.02%
of their profits, respectively.

197
00:09:20,260 --> 00:09:23,262
They say returning clothes is circular,
which isn’t really true.

198
00:09:23,262 --> 00:09:24,353
And even if it were -

199
00:09:24,353 --> 00:09:27,402
SDL: That's not the solution
to our overconsumption.

200
00:09:28,455 --> 00:09:29,995
Or our overproduction.

201
00:09:30,740 --> 00:09:33,790
N: The problem is that too much clothing
is produced, and bought,

202
00:09:33,790 --> 00:09:35,898
whether the clothing
is eco-friendly or not.

203
00:09:36,391 --> 00:09:39,272
MB: Let's just say you're putting
one person here who says,

204
00:09:39,272 --> 00:09:44,399
"You know what? I don't give a (bleep)
about anything recycled or organic.

205
00:09:45,550 --> 00:09:49,360
I will, once a year,
buy a nice pair of pants,

206
00:09:49,360 --> 00:09:51,398
and I don't care about anything,"

207
00:09:51,398 --> 00:09:53,587
and then there are
these people who are saying,

208
00:09:53,587 --> 00:09:58,313
"Yes, I'm really aware, I want to do that.
I want to commit to the environment.

209
00:09:58,313 --> 00:10:01,913
And the pair of jeans
that I'm going to buy every four weeks

210
00:10:01,913 --> 00:10:03,248
will always be sustainable."

211
00:10:03,248 --> 00:10:04,283
So -

212
00:10:04,667 --> 00:10:07,218
still this person is "better?"

213
00:10:07,973 --> 00:10:10,817
N: Buying clothing every four weeks
is relatively new.

214
00:10:10,817 --> 00:10:15,117
Before the 90s, designers made clothes
for two fashion seasons per year,

215
00:10:15,117 --> 00:10:18,742
and now fashion retailers put out clothes
in as little as two weeks.

216
00:10:18,940 --> 00:10:22,068
More clothes mean
cheaper prices, lower quality,

217
00:10:22,068 --> 00:10:24,683
and more ending up
in the landfill or burned.

218
00:10:25,890 --> 00:10:28,000
But it’s not just big fast fashion brands;

219
00:10:28,000 --> 00:10:29,760
it’s the fashion industry in general,

220
00:10:29,760 --> 00:10:33,308
and our desire for constantly changing
outfits that need to hit pause.

221
00:10:35,321 --> 00:10:40,560
SDL: We need to think about how we shop
and what we're really calling for.

222
00:10:42,121 --> 00:10:45,810
But there is a bold step

223
00:10:45,810 --> 00:10:51,478
in a number of notable fashion brands
and fashion houses now

224
00:10:51,478 --> 00:10:52,604
going seasonless,

225
00:10:52,604 --> 00:10:55,886
and hats off to them
it's an important thing to do.

226
00:10:56,534 --> 00:10:58,943
N: The concept doesn’t mean
sacrificing style,

227
00:10:58,943 --> 00:11:02,306
but instead making clothing to last
rather than be thrown away.

228
00:11:03,350 --> 00:11:05,820
Karishma Khan: So all in all,
what we're trying to do

229
00:11:05,820 --> 00:11:09,482
is working with clothing
that is not very seasonal, so to say.

230
00:11:09,482 --> 00:11:12,365
It should be something
that you can wear year after year.

231
00:11:12,365 --> 00:11:13,968
We want to focus in quality.

232
00:11:14,126 --> 00:11:15,886
N: Karishma is the founder of Ka-Sha,

233
00:11:15,886 --> 00:11:18,976
an Indian brand featured in magazines
like Forbes and Vogue

234
00:11:18,976 --> 00:11:21,024
for championing eco-friendly fashion.

235
00:11:21,302 --> 00:11:22,737
KK: So we try to make products

236
00:11:22,737 --> 00:11:26,252
that try to fit into different places

237
00:11:26,252 --> 00:11:28,486
depending on who's wearing it
and how it's worn.

238
00:11:28,486 --> 00:11:31,012
So we have a lot of different
aspects to our clothing.

239
00:11:31,012 --> 00:11:33,536
N: So what do you do
when you want to buy new clothes?

240
00:11:33,536 --> 00:11:36,822
H&M and Zara say their eco-collections
are better for the environment,

241
00:11:36,822 --> 00:11:37,869
and they actually are.

242
00:11:38,499 --> 00:11:41,620
If you want to make sure
the whole supply chain is sustainable,

243
00:11:41,620 --> 00:11:43,007
there are many smaller brands

244
00:11:43,007 --> 00:11:45,817
that can account for every step
of their production process.

245
00:11:47,825 --> 00:11:50,259
And buying seasonless
instead of trendy clothing

246
00:11:50,259 --> 00:11:53,092
means it won’t go out of fashion
and end up in the trash.

247
00:11:53,676 --> 00:11:55,642
Because this is a rare industry

248
00:11:55,642 --> 00:11:58,613
where consumers actually
have a real influence.

249
00:12:00,270 --> 00:12:02,029
JL: When I look at the whole picture,

250
00:12:02,029 --> 00:12:07,009
I realize maybe only end consumer
is the power [that] can balance brands

251
00:12:07,009 --> 00:12:09,195
and can push them,

252
00:12:09,195 --> 00:12:13,362
give them pressure to make some changes.

253
00:12:14,107 --> 00:12:17,954
N: So ask yourself not only who made
your clothes and what they are made of,

254
00:12:17,954 --> 00:12:20,366
but also, "Do I need these new clothes?"

255
00:12:20,676 --> 00:12:22,258
And go from there instead.

256
00:12:23,599 --> 00:12:25,693
And if you want to see
more videos like this,

257
00:12:25,693 --> 00:12:27,970
we post about environmental
topics every Friday.

258
00:12:28,060 --> 00:12:30,010
Like and subscribe so you don’t miss out.

259
00:12:30,010 --> 00:12:31,673
Subtitles by Maurício Kakuei Tanaka