0:00:01.598,0:00:03.785 Narrator: We’re constantly[br]bombarded with media 0:00:03.785,0:00:06.553 that puts pressure on us[br]to buy newer and trendier clothes. 0:00:06.764,0:00:09.415 Just to throw them away[br]when they’re no longer in style. 0:00:09.892,0:00:14.089 An estimated 93 million tons[br]go to landfill or are burned every year. 0:00:14.150,0:00:19.328 Suki Dsanj-Lenz: And that’s roughly[br]about a garbage truckload of textiles, 0:00:19.328,0:00:22.192 every second going to landfill. 0:00:22.192,0:00:23.332 Every second. 0:00:23.449,0:00:26.792 N: Producing clothes also pollutes[br]our water and churns out CO2. 0:00:26.859,0:00:29.186 The fast fashion model pioneered by Zara 0:00:29.186,0:00:32.619 means that brands are churning out[br]double the amount of clothing per year 0:00:32.619,0:00:34.093 as they did in the early 2000s. 0:00:34.093,0:00:35.995 But companies say that’s about to change 0:00:35.995,0:00:38.362 because we can now[br]buy eco-friendly fast fashion. 0:00:38.431,0:00:41.288 And also recycle our clothes[br]when we don’t want them anymore. 0:00:41.543,0:00:43.020 But can we believe them? 0:00:50.057,0:00:51.921 Inditex, Zara’s parent company, 0:00:51.921,0:00:52.928 and H&M Group 0:00:52.928,0:00:55.452 are two of the biggest[br]fashion retailers in the world, 0:00:55.452,0:00:57.599 and both have collections[br]that claim to reduce 0:00:57.599,0:00:59.628 the environmental impact[br]of making clothes. 0:00:59.628,0:01:01.576 Not only that, but the two fashion giants 0:01:01.576,0:01:04.246 say they are making[br]their entire brands more sustainable. 0:01:05.518,0:01:08.685 Let’s take a look at these promises,[br]starting with the materials. 0:01:08.685,0:01:10.309 [MATERIALS] 0:01:11.031,0:01:15.159 Main materials at Zara & H&M,[br]as well as worldwide, are polyester, 0:01:15.159,0:01:18.761 which accounts for around 52%[br]of total fiber production, 0:01:18.761,0:01:21.374 and cotton, which is around 24%. 0:01:21.500,0:01:23.929 PET is a different name for polyester 0:01:23.929,0:01:26.839 and is the same type of plastic[br]that's found in water bottles. 0:01:27.109,0:01:28.887 Actually, 0:01:28.887,0:01:31.718 60% of PET production goes to textiles, 0:01:31.718,0:01:33.906 and only 30% to water bottles. 0:01:35.313,0:01:37.355 The material is produced from petroleum, 0:01:37.355,0:01:39.167 and the process uses lots of energy 0:01:39.167,0:01:40.517 and releases CO2, 0:01:40.517,0:01:43.670 as well as acids and ammonia[br]into the water supply. 0:01:44.360,0:01:48.968 Recycled polyester uses up to 60%[br]less energy than virgin material 0:01:48.968,0:01:51.070 and can be made from textile scraps 0:01:51.070,0:01:52.336 or plastic trash. 0:01:52.758,0:01:56.873 But inconsistencies in the threads[br]can make it require more dye, 0:01:56.873,0:01:57.876 and experts say 0:01:57.876,0:02:01.699 that polyester fabrics can shed[br]700,000 microplastic fibers 0:02:01.699,0:02:03.062 with every wash, 0:02:03.062,0:02:04.764 which end up in the ocean, 0:02:04.764,0:02:06.226 and also in our food. 0:02:08.658,0:02:10.329 Cotton doesn't have these problems, 0:02:10.329,0:02:12.780 but is still a chemical[br]and water intensive crop. 0:02:12.910,0:02:15.237 According to the World Wide[br]Fund for Nature, 0:02:15.237,0:02:19.141 it takes 20,000 liters of water[br]to make one kilo of cotton, 0:02:19.141,0:02:21.861 which is enough for one T-shirt[br]and a pair of jeans. 0:02:22.630,0:02:27.239 Also, around 11% of the world’s pesticides[br]are used on cotton fields. 0:02:27.415,0:02:28.800 So is organic cotton better? 0:02:28.800,0:02:30.896 SDL: Essentially there's[br]a massive difference 0:02:30.896,0:02:32.733 between organic cotton and cotton. 0:02:33.200,0:02:36.079 N: This is Suki, a representative[br]of Fashion Revolution, 0:02:36.079,0:02:38.395 which is an organization[br]that advocates worldwide 0:02:38.395,0:02:41.501 for transparency and sustainability[br]in the fashion industry. 0:02:42.418,0:02:48.019 SDL: Organic cotton is, in the long term,[br]much better for the farmer that grows it 0:02:48.019,0:02:51.158 and the environment[br]and the soil that produces it, 0:02:51.158,0:02:54.001 and it's less water intensive 0:02:54.001,0:02:56.801 and doesn't require[br]as much irrigation as such. 0:02:57.243,0:02:59.003 N: We requested an interview with H&M 0:02:59.003,0:03:01.007 about the sustainability[br]of their products, 0:03:01.007,0:03:02.008 but they declined. 0:03:02.008,0:03:03.063 Over email, they said, 0:03:03.063,0:03:05.397 "We are happy to say[br]that by the end of this year, 0:03:05.397,0:03:07.933 all cotton we use will come[br]from sustainable sources." 0:03:07.933,0:03:10.862 Zara also responded[br]only through email, saying, 0:03:10.862,0:03:14.888 "In 2019, the Group [Inditex,[br]Zara's parent company] 0:03:14.888,0:03:18.450 used over 38,000 tonnes[br]of sustainable cotton in its clothing, 0:03:18.450,0:03:20.851 up 105% from 2018." 0:03:21.842,0:03:23.996 But what does sustainable actually mean? 0:03:24.386,0:03:27.434 There’s no standard definition,[br]and it doesn’t equal organic. 0:03:27.660,0:03:30.975 H&M says that sustainable cotton[br]can also mean recycled 0:03:30.975,0:03:34.280 or cotton that uses[br]less pesticides and GMOs. 0:03:37.540,0:03:39.484 Zara portrays its cotton as sustainable, 0:03:39.484,0:03:42.452 but calls it ecologically grown[br]instead of organic. 0:03:42.452,0:03:46.084 It claims the cotton uses[br]natural fertilizers and pesticides, 0:03:46.084,0:03:49.220 and is certified[br]by the Organic Content Standard 0:03:49.220,0:03:51.946 and the Global Organic Textile Standard, 0:03:51.946,0:03:54.265 which say they control[br]for chemical and water use 0:03:54.265,0:03:55.979 in the whole production process. 0:03:59.041,0:04:01.648 Terms like "conscious"[br]and "ecologically grown" 0:04:01.648,0:04:02.935 are hard to fact-check, 0:04:02.935,0:04:05.103 as well as confusing for the consumer. 0:04:05.383,0:04:08.142 But according to the non-profit[br]Textile Exchange, 0:04:08.142,0:04:12.917 in 2016, H&M was the second largest[br]user of organic cotton in the world. 0:04:13.127,0:04:14.469 Zara was the fourth. 0:04:16.253,0:04:17.742 Let’s focus on synthetics. 0:04:18.202,0:04:20.122 In H&M's sustainable collection, 0:04:20.122,0:04:23.124 the synthetic clothing has to be[br]at least 50% recycled. 0:04:23.578,0:04:27.498 Zara doesn’t specify their percentage,[br]and their labeling can be confusing. 0:04:27.692,0:04:30.778 This jacket says[br]it’s 100% recycled polyamide, 0:04:30.778,0:04:33.261 which makes it seem like[br]it’s completely recycled. 0:04:33.441,0:04:35.091 But the filling is polyester. 0:04:35.091,0:04:36.552 That’s a different material. 0:04:37.246,0:04:39.489 And this isn’t the only time this happens. 0:04:39.489,0:04:43.390 The percentage recycled statement[br]often doesn’t refer to the whole garment, 0:04:43.390,0:04:46.748 making it look like the item[br]is more recycled than it actually is. 0:04:47.538,0:04:49.600 On the subject of transparent labeling, 0:04:49.600,0:04:52.242 the Join Life tags[br]are also on the Zara website 0:04:52.242,0:04:54.970 and are stamped by[br]the Forest Stewardship Council. 0:04:54.970,0:04:58.390 This would seem to imply the clothing[br]is certified by this organization. 0:04:58.650,0:05:01.735 The stamp, however,[br]is only referring to the tag, 0:05:01.735,0:05:03.550 not to the whole clothing item. 0:05:03.991,0:05:05.510 Talk about misleading. 0:05:07.339,0:05:11.846 Zara has committed to sustainable cotton[br]and polyester by 2025. 0:05:11.956,0:05:15.841 H&M says all of their materials[br]to be sustainable by 2030, 0:05:15.841,0:05:19.313 and for 2019, that figure[br]was already at 57%. 0:05:19.470,0:05:21.141 If they stick to these commitments, 0:05:21.141,0:05:23.150 it could mean big changes[br]for the industry. 0:05:23.560,0:05:25.532 But material is only part of the story. 0:05:27.008,0:05:28.522 [SUPPLY CHAIN TRANSPARENCY] 0:05:29.283,0:05:31.538 To find out if that cotton[br]is actually organic, 0:05:31.538,0:05:33.893 or that polyester is actually recycled, 0:05:33.893,0:05:36.790 consumers need to be able[br]to check the production process. 0:05:37.437,0:05:39.328 With an H&M Conscious T-shirt, 0:05:39.328,0:05:42.283 you can find out in which[br]specific factory it was made. 0:05:42.283,0:05:45.809 So it’s theoretically possible[br]to check the factory’s sustainability. 0:05:46.090,0:05:49.057 Zara only lists how many suppliers[br]it has in one city, 0:05:49.057,0:05:50.880 but not their names and addresses. 0:05:51.402,0:05:53.926 They were both evaluated[br]by Fashion Revolution, 0:05:53.926,0:05:56.064 an organization advocating[br]for transparency 0:05:56.064,0:05:57.918 and sustainability in fashion. 0:05:58.310,0:06:02.021 None of the 250 large brands[br]scored over 80%, 0:06:02.021,0:06:06.152 but for 2020, H&M was the highest[br]scoring brand, with 73%, 0:06:06.152,0:06:07.566 so quite transparent. 0:06:07.566,0:06:09.651 Zara scored a 43%. 0:06:09.651,0:06:10.682 Not so much. 0:06:10.782,0:06:12.418 This is important because: 0:06:13.475,0:06:15.905 Kim Weerd: Suppliers[br]are one of the few stakeholders 0:06:15.905,0:06:18.193 with a front row seat[br]to brands' inner workings. 0:06:18.320,0:06:20.180 N: Kim has a background in human rights 0:06:20.180,0:06:22.582 and was a garment[br]factory manager in Cambodia. 0:06:22.951,0:06:26.990 KW: They uniquely have access[br]to the information that consumers 0:06:26.990,0:06:31.051 need to be able to crosscheck[br]brands' actions against their words. 0:06:31.459,0:06:33.383 N: So being able to research suppliers 0:06:33.383,0:06:37.246 allows people to hold brands accountable[br]to their sustainability claims, but - 0:06:37.246,0:06:40.721 SDJ: Just because you're transparent,[br]it does not mean you're sustainable, 0:06:40.830,0:06:42.616 It does not mean that at all. 0:06:42.616,0:06:44.468 And that's really, really important. 0:06:44.872,0:06:47.494 N: Even for brands [that] know[br]their whole supply chain, 0:06:47.494,0:06:49.827 making an eco-friendly garment is hard. 0:06:50.620,0:06:52.418 Jessie Li: Let's pick up a denim. 0:06:52.418,0:06:56.117 You can see the dyeing is done[br]in a more environmentally responsible way, 0:06:56.117,0:06:58.319 but the cotton is not produced the same. 0:06:58.613,0:07:00.660 N: Jessie has worked[br]in different industries 0:07:00.660,0:07:02.617 from product inspection to purchasing, 0:07:02.617,0:07:05.475 to product development,[br]in both China and Cambodia. 0:07:06.136,0:07:07.900 JL: Or take another example. 0:07:07.900,0:07:11.588 The whole piece of the clothes[br]is made out of the waste, 0:07:11.588,0:07:14.181 but not dyed in a responsible way. 0:07:14.181,0:07:15.899 So, they're green, 0:07:15.899,0:07:18.518 but it's different degrees of green 0:07:18.518,0:07:20.365 or different degrees of less bad. 0:07:20.661,0:07:23.942 N: Because an item of clothing[br]is made up of many different materials, 0:07:23.942,0:07:25.736 all manufactured in different ways, 0:07:25.736,0:07:28.880 it’s hard to make each piece[br]less harmful to the environment. 0:07:29.090,0:07:30.192 This is also the reason 0:07:30.192,0:07:33.983 why recycling clothing is much harder[br]than H&M and Zara would seem to claim. 0:07:33.983,0:07:36.320 [RECYCLING] 0:07:36.890,0:07:38.138 N: H&M’s advertisements 0:07:38.138,0:07:41.467 say that the company is working[br]towards a circular future for clothing. 0:07:42.259,0:07:43.469 According to the website, 0:07:43.469,0:07:45.421 you can bring your clothing to any store, 0:07:45.421,0:07:47.559 and it will be resold[br]as second-hand clothing, 0:07:47.559,0:07:49.966 reused as other textiles, or recycled. 0:07:54.923,0:07:56.832 Zara has a similar campaign. 0:07:56.832,0:07:59.414 It says it partners[br]with different local organizations, 0:07:59.414,0:08:01.752 which then take over[br]what happens to the clothing. 0:08:01.752,0:08:03.918 [REUSED FOR INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS] 0:08:05.091,0:08:06.456 So what does happen? 0:08:06.673,0:08:09.687 They are resold, reused, and recycled, 0:08:09.687,0:08:11.684 but not in the proportions[br]you might think. 0:08:11.941,0:08:14.712 Over half of donated clothing[br]is sold overseas. 0:08:15.206,0:08:18.233 The rest is mostly turned[br]into industrial material, 0:08:18.233,0:08:20.440 burned, or goes to landfill. 0:08:22.290,0:08:25.490 Less than 1% of the material[br]in used clothing 0:08:25.490,0:08:27.339 is recycled into new clothing. 0:08:27.339,0:08:29.271 A big reason is lack of technology. 0:08:29.791,0:08:32.202 Remember how many materials[br]were in the jacket? 0:08:32.202,0:08:34.785 Well, they need to come out[br]again to recycle it. 0:08:35.479,0:08:39.566 Maxi Bohn: "Garments[br]that are made from mono materials, 0:08:39.566,0:08:43.872 or can easily be taken apart into pieces, 0:08:44.912,0:08:48.179 can be recycled. 0:08:48.737,0:08:51.256 N: Maxi started her career[br]as a certified dressmaker 0:08:51.256,0:08:52.608 over ten years ago 0:08:52.608,0:08:56.358 and has headed product development[br]for Hugo Boss and major online retailers. 0:08:56.915,0:08:58.626 MB: But think about your wardrobe. 0:08:58.626,0:09:02.455 How many pieces would fulfill[br]these requirements? 0:09:03.191,0:09:06.098 N: So giving back clothing[br]is better than throwing it away, 0:09:06.098,0:09:08.422 but the chances of it[br]actually getting recycled 0:09:08.422,0:09:09.711 are very low. 0:09:11.508,0:09:14.207 H&M and Zara are investing[br]in recycling research, 0:09:14.207,0:09:16.021 but we looked at their annual reports, 0:09:16.021,0:09:20.106 and the amount is 0.5% and 0.02%[br]of their profits, respectively. 0:09:20.260,0:09:23.262 They say returning clothes is circular,[br]which isn’t really true. 0:09:23.262,0:09:24.353 And even if it were - 0:09:24.353,0:09:27.402 SDL: That's not the solution[br]to our overconsumption. 0:09:28.455,0:09:29.995 Or our overproduction. 0:09:30.740,0:09:33.790 N: The problem is that too much clothing[br]is produced, and bought, 0:09:33.790,0:09:35.898 whether the clothing[br]is eco-friendly or not. 0:09:36.391,0:09:39.272 MB: Let's just say you're putting[br]one person here who says, 0:09:39.272,0:09:44.399 "You know what? I don't give a (bleep)[br]about anything recycled or organic. 0:09:45.550,0:09:49.360 I will, once a year,[br]buy a nice pair of pants, 0:09:49.360,0:09:51.398 and I don't care about anything," 0:09:51.398,0:09:53.587 and then there are[br]these people who are saying, 0:09:53.587,0:09:58.313 "Yes, I'm really aware, I want to do that.[br]I want to commit to the environment. 0:09:58.313,0:10:01.913 And the pair of jeans[br]that I'm going to buy every four weeks 0:10:01.913,0:10:03.248 will always be sustainable." 0:10:03.248,0:10:04.283 So - 0:10:04.667,0:10:07.218 still this person is "better?" 0:10:07.973,0:10:10.817 N: Buying clothing every four weeks[br]is relatively new. 0:10:10.817,0:10:15.117 Before the 90s, designers made clothes[br]for two fashion seasons per year, 0:10:15.117,0:10:18.742 and now fashion retailers put out clothes[br]in as little as two weeks. 0:10:18.940,0:10:22.068 More clothes mean[br]cheaper prices, lower quality, 0:10:22.068,0:10:24.683 and more ending up[br]in the landfill or burned. 0:10:25.890,0:10:28.000 But it’s not just big fast fashion brands; 0:10:28.000,0:10:29.760 it’s the fashion industry in general, 0:10:29.760,0:10:33.308 and our desire for constantly changing[br]outfits that need to hit pause. 0:10:35.321,0:10:40.560 SDL: We need to think about how we shop[br]and what we're really calling for. 0:10:42.121,0:10:45.810 But there is a bold step 0:10:45.810,0:10:51.478 in a number of notable fashion brands[br]and fashion houses now 0:10:51.478,0:10:52.604 going seasonless, 0:10:52.604,0:10:55.886 and hats off to them[br]it's an important thing to do. 0:10:56.534,0:10:58.943 N: The concept doesn’t mean[br]sacrificing style, 0:10:58.943,0:11:02.306 but instead making clothing to last[br]rather than be thrown away. 0:11:03.350,0:11:05.820 Karishma Khan: So all in all,[br]what we're trying to do 0:11:05.820,0:11:09.482 is working with clothing[br]that is not very seasonal, so to say. 0:11:09.482,0:11:12.365 It should be something[br]that you can wear year after year. 0:11:12.365,0:11:13.968 We want to focus in quality. 0:11:14.126,0:11:15.886 N: Karishma is the founder of Ka-Sha, 0:11:15.886,0:11:18.976 an Indian brand featured in magazines[br]like Forbes and Vogue 0:11:18.976,0:11:21.024 for championing eco-friendly fashion. 0:11:21.302,0:11:22.737 KK: So we try to make products 0:11:22.737,0:11:26.252 that try to fit into different places 0:11:26.252,0:11:28.486 depending on who's wearing it[br]and how it's worn. 0:11:28.486,0:11:31.012 So we have a lot of different[br]aspects to our clothing. 0:11:31.012,0:11:33.536 N: So what do you do[br]when you want to buy new clothes? 0:11:33.536,0:11:36.822 H&M and Zara say their eco-collections[br]are better for the environment, 0:11:36.822,0:11:37.869 and they actually are. 0:11:38.499,0:11:41.620 If you want to make sure[br]the whole supply chain is sustainable, 0:11:41.620,0:11:43.007 there are many smaller brands 0:11:43.007,0:11:45.817 that can account for every step[br]of their production process. 0:11:47.825,0:11:50.259 And buying seasonless[br]instead of trendy clothing 0:11:50.259,0:11:53.092 means it won’t go out of fashion[br]and end up in the trash. 0:11:53.676,0:11:55.642 Because this is a rare industry 0:11:55.642,0:11:58.613 where consumers actually[br]have a real influence. 0:12:00.270,0:12:02.029 JL: When I look at the whole picture, 0:12:02.029,0:12:07.009 I realize maybe only end consumer[br]is the power [that] can balance brands 0:12:07.009,0:12:09.195 and can push them, 0:12:09.195,0:12:13.362 give them pressure to make some changes. 0:12:14.107,0:12:17.954 N: So ask yourself not only who made[br]your clothes and what they are made of, 0:12:17.954,0:12:20.366 but also, "Do I need these new clothes?" 0:12:20.676,0:12:22.258 And go from there instead. 0:12:23.599,0:12:25.693 And if you want to see[br]more videos like this, 0:12:25.693,0:12:27.970 we post about environmental[br]topics every Friday. 0:12:28.060,0:12:30.010 Like and subscribe so you don’t miss out. 0:12:30.010,0:12:31.673 Subtitles by Maurício Kakuei Tanaka