WEBVTT 00:00:11.801 --> 00:00:14.414 College Algebra students, Dillon here. 00:00:14.414 --> 00:00:17.333 We are continuing on with Section 3.2. 00:00:17.333 --> 00:00:21.033 Yes, it's a long one. Let's get started. 00:00:27.481 --> 00:00:35.957 We've learned that there's a connection between the x-intercepts, also called zeros, 00:00:35.957 --> 00:00:42.816 and the factors that make up a particular polynomial. 00:00:42.816 --> 00:00:46.999 We've learned that if the 00:00:48.249 --> 00:00:51.614 polynomial has the factor, there's a corresponding zero. 00:00:51.614 --> 00:00:53.879 Here's the last example we did. 00:00:53.879 --> 00:00:59.679 We started with this fourth-degree polynomial. 00:01:00.980 --> 00:01:05.175 We factored it; we factored out a negative x squared. 00:01:05.175 --> 00:01:08.479 We're left with a quadratic, which we then factored. 00:01:08.479 --> 00:01:10.329 We end up with four factors. 00:01:10.329 --> 00:01:15.543 Two factors of x: 2x plus 3 and x minus 1. 00:01:15.543 --> 00:01:20.626 Each one of these contributed a zero (an x-intercept), 00:01:20.626 --> 00:01:24.301 and we learned that the zero— 00:01:26.021 --> 00:01:29.435 that the factor to the second degree has some interesting behavior. 00:01:29.435 --> 00:01:31.359 That's the last thing we finish up here. 00:01:31.359 --> 00:01:37.706 We're going to study how these polynomials behave around their zeros. 00:01:38.672 --> 00:01:41.023 There are two types of behavior: 00:01:41.023 --> 00:01:45.089 one where it actually goes through the zero, one where it's tangent. 00:01:45.089 --> 00:01:51.739 I think it'll be instructive to just look at this in Desmos. 00:01:53.722 --> 00:01:56.772 Not that my graph is not— 00:01:57.007 --> 00:01:59.956 it shows all the important details, but it looks a little nicer in Desmos. 00:01:59.956 --> 00:02:04.674 Here we go: y equals negative 2x to the fourth power. 00:02:06.107 --> 00:02:09.882 That's our leading term, our leading coefficient is negative 2. 00:02:09.882 --> 00:02:14.715 And remember, these monomial terms, these monomial leading terms, 00:02:14.715 --> 00:02:19.898 they determine the end behavior of the polynomial. 00:02:21.416 --> 00:02:24.116 They dominate the end behavior. 00:02:27.932 --> 00:02:32.682 Okay, there it is, a slightly more attractive version of the graph. 00:02:32.682 --> 00:02:36.665 We can see that the two types of behavior here 00:02:36.665 --> 00:02:39.615 that we're going to study a bit more to finish up this section. 00:02:39.615 --> 00:02:42.934 Where it goes— the graph— 00:02:42.934 --> 00:02:49.165 Excuse me, the polynomial goes through the x-intercept (the zero), 00:02:49.165 --> 00:02:52.748 if the degree of that factor is odd. 00:02:52.748 --> 00:02:58.132 So, in this case the degree of 2x plus 3 is 1. 00:02:58.132 --> 00:02:59.616 That's an odd number. 00:02:59.616 --> 00:03:03.998 The degree of x minus 1 is to the first power. 00:03:03.998 --> 00:03:11.476 So, notice for both of those zeros, the graph goes through the points. 00:03:11.725 --> 00:03:16.108 The zero that had an even degree (second degree), 00:03:16.108 --> 00:03:19.025 we call this multiplicity two. 00:03:19.025 --> 00:03:22.175 The other two factors have multiplicity one. 00:03:22.175 --> 00:03:25.642 This factor x has multiplicity two. 00:03:25.642 --> 00:03:28.909 And you'll notice that the graph is tangent at that point, 00:03:28.909 --> 00:03:35.775 so the degree of the factor, also called the multiplicity, 00:03:35.775 --> 00:03:39.130 is going to determine how it behaves. 00:03:39.130 --> 00:03:44.609 Okay, so just to practice this sketching the graph one more time, 00:03:44.609 --> 00:03:46.109 let's do another one. 00:03:46.109 --> 00:03:49.292 And I like this one because the factoring is a little different. 00:03:49.292 --> 00:03:52.508 Something we haven't seen yet in this section. 00:03:53.994 --> 00:03:57.225 Okay, right off the bat, 00:03:57.760 --> 00:04:03.109 you notice there's no greatest common factor to take out here. 00:04:03.109 --> 00:04:09.812 And you have to go back to the polynomial factoring methods 00:04:09.812 --> 00:04:12.710 that we learned probably in the previous class 00:04:12.710 --> 00:04:16.043 and realize that you have four terms here. 00:04:16.043 --> 00:04:19.094 You'll notice that there's a common term in each. 00:04:19.094 --> 00:04:22.040 If we group these two together, 00:04:22.040 --> 00:04:23.809 and group these two together, 00:04:23.809 --> 00:04:25.865 there's a common term you can take out. 00:04:25.865 --> 00:04:27.171 Let's take that out. 00:04:27.171 --> 00:04:29.643 I'm going to take an x squared out of the first two terms. 00:04:29.643 --> 00:04:32.143 This is called factoring by grouping, by the way. 00:04:32.143 --> 00:04:36.192 Then what's left in just the first two terms? 00:04:36.192 --> 00:04:38.026 I'm ignoring these last two. 00:04:38.026 --> 00:04:40.576 I pull that out and I get x minus 2. 00:04:40.576 --> 00:04:43.693 Notice that there's a common factor we can pull out here. 00:04:43.693 --> 00:04:46.759 When the leading coefficient is negative, you should always pull out a negative. 00:04:46.759 --> 00:04:49.503 So we're going to pull out a negative four. 00:04:49.503 --> 00:04:52.409 What's left? X minus 2. 00:04:52.910 --> 00:04:54.709 And that's what we're looking for. 00:04:54.709 --> 00:04:58.517 We needed a common factor, a common binomial factor 00:04:58.517 --> 00:05:02.617 that we can now take out of both of those, so take out the x minus 2 00:05:02.617 --> 00:05:05.634 and we're left with x squared minus 4. 00:05:05.634 --> 00:05:08.417 I hope you recognize that the second term here 00:05:08.417 --> 00:05:10.851 is actually the difference of two squares. 00:05:10.851 --> 00:05:13.184 We're going to have this x minus 2 00:05:13.184 --> 00:05:20.000 and then the difference of two squares factors to x plus 2 and x minus 2. 00:05:20.833 --> 00:05:22.733 We're going to rewrite it like this 00:05:22.733 --> 00:05:26.566 because we're going to talk more about this idea of multiplicity. 00:05:26.566 --> 00:05:29.767 The x minus 2 is actually to the second power. 00:05:29.767 --> 00:05:32.091 This— 00:05:33.999 --> 00:05:36.403 The x-intercept has multiplicity two. 00:05:36.403 --> 00:05:39.265 We just learned how that's going to behave. 00:05:39.265 --> 00:05:41.932 It's going to be tangent at the point x equals 2. 00:05:41.932 --> 00:05:45.361 And then we have the second zero here: x plus 2. 00:05:46.132 --> 00:05:49.874 Okay, Let's draw a graph, sketch a graph, 00:05:51.041 --> 00:05:52.858 somewhat accurate. 00:05:58.575 --> 00:06:00.661 Then we'll do it in Desmos, also. 00:06:00.661 --> 00:06:07.775 Okay, so the interesting points are— from this factor, we get x equals 2. 00:06:07.775 --> 00:06:11.475 We know it's going to be tangent there; we'll figure that out in a second. 00:06:11.475 --> 00:06:14.258 The second factor gives us x minus 2. 00:06:14.258 --> 00:06:16.626 And then let's look at this leading term. 00:06:16.626 --> 00:06:19.125 It’s an odd degree. 00:06:19.125 --> 00:06:21.260 The leading coefficient is positive. 00:06:21.260 --> 00:06:26.791 So, you know, the end behavior is like this, in this direction, 00:06:26.791 --> 00:06:29.735 and like this in this direction. 00:06:29.735 --> 00:06:34.025 As x goes to positive infinity, we know y goes to positive infinity. 00:06:34.025 --> 00:06:37.843 As x goes to negative infinity, because it's odd degree, 00:06:37.843 --> 00:06:40.558 the y value is going to go to negative infinity. 00:06:40.558 --> 00:06:42.527 That's the end behavior. 00:06:42.527 --> 00:06:44.409 Then what happens in between these two? 00:06:44.409 --> 00:06:46.792 Now remember, these are the only two x-intercepts. 00:06:46.792 --> 00:06:47.846 That's important. 00:06:47.846 --> 00:06:50.509 We know the graph must come up and go through this one 00:06:50.509 --> 00:06:55.325 (this has odd multiplicity: x plus 2 to the first power), 00:06:55.325 --> 00:06:57.395 and then it's going to come up; 00:06:57.395 --> 00:07:00.278 we know it has to go through this point, but it doesn't actually go through. 00:07:00.278 --> 00:07:02.960 It's going to come down here and it's tangent, 00:07:02.960 --> 00:07:05.077 and then it takes off in that direction. 00:07:05.077 --> 00:07:08.242 It's going to look something like that. 00:07:08.494 --> 00:07:09.977 Let's just graph it in a Desmos, 00:07:09.977 --> 00:07:13.359 so we have a slightly more attractive version of it. 00:07:17.969 --> 00:07:21.730 Let's see… we're going to get rid of this. 00:07:22.805 --> 00:07:24.623 Change that to the third power, 00:07:24.623 --> 00:07:34.522 so minus 2x to the second power minus 4x plus 8. 00:07:40.054 --> 00:07:42.938 Our scale is a little bit off here. 00:07:42.938 --> 00:07:44.671 Let's just fix this. 00:07:44.671 --> 00:07:49.985 We’re going to fix this maximum y value to something a little bigger. 00:07:49.985 --> 00:07:51.432 I don't really know where it is. 00:07:51.432 --> 00:07:53.414 I'm going to try 50 and see. That's too big. 00:07:53.414 --> 00:07:55.798 How about 20? There we go. 00:07:57.598 --> 00:08:01.477 Okay, so that's similar to what we sketched here. 00:08:03.165 --> 00:08:07.331 All right, a little prettier in Desmos. 00:08:07.331 --> 00:08:14.164 And we can see that the zero that has multiplicity two— 00:08:14.164 --> 00:08:15.647 that's our vocabulary: 00:08:15.647 --> 00:08:19.208 "multiplicity two" because that factor is raised to the second power— 00:08:19.208 --> 00:08:22.228 the polynomial is tangent at that point. 00:08:22.228 --> 00:08:25.969 Whereas the zero with multiplicity one (an odd number), 00:08:25.969 --> 00:08:28.702 it actually goes through the x-intercept. 00:08:29.067 --> 00:08:31.920 Okay, we're going to do a few more examples of that 00:08:31.920 --> 00:08:33.468 to finish up the section here. 00:08:33.468 --> 00:08:34.901 Here we go. 00:08:39.435 --> 00:08:41.652 Everything I just said is summarized in this box. 00:08:41.652 --> 00:08:44.134 You might want to pause the video and take a closer look. 00:08:44.134 --> 00:08:46.235 If the multiplicity— 00:08:46.235 --> 00:08:50.268 and the multiplicity is determined by the power of the factor. 00:08:50.268 --> 00:08:53.034 Each factor has a power one or greater. 00:08:53.034 --> 00:08:59.833 If it's an odd multiplicity, then the x-intercept is 00:08:59.833 --> 00:09:02.568 going to behave like this for the polynomial. 00:09:02.568 --> 00:09:04.761 If it's even multiplicity it behaves like this: 00:09:04.761 --> 00:09:08.095 either tangent from the top or tangent from the bottom. 00:09:09.978 --> 00:09:15.416 Then you might ask, “Well how do you decide?” Well, look up here. 00:09:15.416 --> 00:09:18.952 We knew what the end behavior of the polynomial was, okay? 00:09:18.952 --> 00:09:20.534 We knew it was coming up here. 00:09:20.534 --> 00:09:27.055 It has to go through this intercept, and then we're above the x-axis here. 00:09:27.055 --> 00:09:29.007 And we know it's got to be tangent at that point. 00:09:29.007 --> 00:09:32.656 This is the only option, we know it doesn't have any other x-intercepts, 00:09:32.656 --> 00:09:35.154 so it can't go through the x-axis. 00:09:35.154 --> 00:09:37.750 You just use a little bit of logic. 00:09:38.617 --> 00:09:40.399 Okay, let's graph this one. 00:09:40.399 --> 00:09:42.302 I think these are kinda fun. 00:09:42.302 --> 00:09:47.223 The first thing we usually do is— so notice this is factored for us. 00:09:47.223 --> 00:09:48.857 That's nice, right? 00:09:48.857 --> 00:09:58.756 We're going to list the zero and the multiplicity, then we'll graph it. 00:09:59.122 --> 00:10:05.272 The first zero is x equals zero, multiplicity four. 00:10:05.272 --> 00:10:07.539 And notice that that's an even number. 00:10:07.539 --> 00:10:12.906 The second zero from this factor, we get x equals two, multiplicity three. 00:10:12.906 --> 00:10:16.372 That's odd, so it's going to go through that point. 00:10:16.372 --> 00:10:19.572 Then x equals negative 1. 00:10:20.659 --> 00:10:25.010 Again, even multiplicity, so we know it's going to be tangent at that point. 00:10:25.010 --> 00:10:26.928 This is a pretty funky graph. 00:10:26.928 --> 00:10:32.743 Now, what is the leading term going to look like here? 00:10:32.743 --> 00:10:34.694 Well, if you multiply this out— 00:10:34.694 --> 00:10:37.809 this is kind of a crazy polynomial, but we can do it. 00:10:37.809 --> 00:10:42.059 If you multiply this out, it's going to be a third-degree polynomial 00:10:42.059 --> 00:10:46.225 times the fourth-degree term is going to be seventh degree. 00:10:47.395 --> 00:10:51.704 Multiply this out, it's going to be a second degree, 00:10:51.704 --> 00:10:53.950 so seventh degree times second degree. 00:10:53.950 --> 00:10:56.636 We're going to have x to the ninth. 00:10:56.636 --> 00:10:59.467 Yikes, that's crazy, right? 00:10:59.917 --> 00:11:04.793 This is a third-degree polynomial times the fourth-degree term. 00:11:04.793 --> 00:11:06.984 That gives us x to the seventh. 00:11:06.984 --> 00:11:09.620 Then if this is multiplied out, it's going to be squared. 00:11:09.620 --> 00:11:12.023 So we have x to the ninth. 00:11:12.023 --> 00:11:14.337 Notice the leading coefficient is going to be 1, 00:11:14.337 --> 00:11:17.644 because all of the leading coefficients here are 1. 00:11:17.644 --> 00:11:23.543 And we know if this is odd degree, it's going to behave like this, 00:11:23.543 --> 00:11:25.776 and like this with stuff in the middle. 00:11:25.776 --> 00:11:31.859 Odd degree, just like x to the third, x to the ninth behaves like x to the third. 00:11:31.859 --> 00:11:33.493 Okay, here we go. 00:11:33.493 --> 00:11:38.576 This is a pretty fancy polynomial. 00:11:38.576 --> 00:11:41.260 I'm not sure why I'm using blue here all of a sudden. 00:11:41.260 --> 00:11:44.027 Should’ve changed color. 00:11:45.532 --> 00:11:46.659 Okay. 00:11:46.659 --> 00:11:55.235 So here are intercepts: zero, positive 2 and negative 1. 00:11:56.351 --> 00:11:58.785 Okay, and then we know the end behavior 00:11:58.785 --> 00:12:02.770 because we know the leading term and the leading coefficient. 00:12:02.770 --> 00:12:05.654 End behavior has to be like this 00:12:07.336 --> 00:12:09.320 and like this. 00:12:10.435 --> 00:12:14.885 Okay, so what happens at this leftmost zero? 00:12:14.885 --> 00:12:18.253 Well, it's got to be tangent there because it's even multiplicity. 00:12:18.253 --> 00:12:22.486 So it has to come up and touch here and then come back down. 00:12:22.486 --> 00:12:24.286 What happens at zero? 00:12:24.286 --> 00:12:28.485 Well, it's also even multiplicity. 00:12:28.485 --> 00:12:32.218 It's going to come down and be like this. 00:12:32.218 --> 00:12:35.246 It's got to be tangent here, and we're below the x-axis. 00:12:35.246 --> 00:12:36.862 And we know it's tangent there. 00:12:36.862 --> 00:12:39.087 So it can't go through and come back down and touch, 00:12:39.087 --> 00:12:40.836 it’s gotta be something like that. 00:12:40.836 --> 00:12:44.637 And then the zero of multiplicity three is at 2. 00:12:44.637 --> 00:12:48.663 Then we know this has to come down and go back up and out. 00:12:48.663 --> 00:12:50.836 It's going to look something like that. 00:12:50.836 --> 00:12:52.528 We don't know how big this loop is here, 00:12:52.528 --> 00:12:54.860 but let's put it in Desmos. 00:12:58.794 --> 00:13:01.826 Should be quite interesting, I would think. 00:13:03.392 --> 00:13:06.893 If you're looking for an idea for a tattoo, here it is. 00:13:07.309 --> 00:13:09.893 This is a pretty cool polynomial. 00:13:11.378 --> 00:13:14.411 Just trying to get both on the screen. 00:13:22.909 --> 00:13:27.942 Okay, so x minus 2 raised to the third power. 00:13:29.393 --> 00:13:31.976 It's a pretty fancy polynomial. 00:13:31.976 --> 00:13:36.760 X plus 1 is to the second power. 00:13:37.025 --> 00:13:39.394 Ooh, all right, so… 00:13:41.043 --> 00:13:44.062 Our graph, it's close. 00:13:44.245 --> 00:13:45.708 Okay, let's see. 00:13:45.708 --> 00:13:49.428 We didn't know how— we knew— Let's see if we can— 00:13:50.110 --> 00:13:53.077 I'm going to change the scale a little bit so we can see this detail a little better. 00:13:53.077 --> 00:13:54.860 Negative 2 to 3. 00:13:54.860 --> 00:13:57.358 That's not going to change it much. 00:14:01.358 --> 00:14:03.275 Then we're going to change the y scale. 00:14:03.275 --> 00:14:04.894 Let's make this… 00:14:06.254 --> 00:14:08.530 Let's see, on the negative side, 00:14:08.530 --> 00:14:15.188 we could go to negative 6 maybe, and let's go with 2. 00:14:15.382 --> 00:14:16.606 Yeah, there we go. 00:14:16.606 --> 00:14:17.608 Okay. 00:14:17.608 --> 00:14:23.429 It's different but it has the same features. 00:14:23.429 --> 00:14:25.913 It’s doing the same things we expected. 00:14:25.913 --> 00:14:28.762 We come up here, we’re tangent at negative 1; 00:14:28.762 --> 00:14:31.462 we come back down, we’re tangent at zero. 00:14:31.462 --> 00:14:32.560 If we click on the graph, 00:14:32.560 --> 00:14:35.180 we can prove that what we have is accurate. 00:14:35.180 --> 00:14:37.767 Okay, tangent at negative 1, tangent at zero. 00:14:37.767 --> 00:14:39.130 We have little dip here, 00:14:39.130 --> 00:14:42.033 we didn't know how far that went, but that's what it looks like. 00:14:42.033 --> 00:14:43.415 And then we have another dip, 00:14:43.415 --> 00:14:48.981 and then it goes up through 2 (x equals 2). 00:14:49.816 --> 00:14:53.847 So, our sketch was pretty accurate, but not as pretty, of course. 00:14:59.581 --> 00:15:03.532 Okay, I would like you to pause the recording please, 00:15:03.532 --> 00:15:06.580 and try number 29. 00:15:07.838 --> 00:15:10.415 And then we'll do it together. 00:15:16.615 --> 00:15:17.332 All right. 00:15:17.332 --> 00:15:19.266 I hope you tried it. 00:15:19.266 --> 00:15:22.449 First of all, what's the leading term here? 00:15:22.668 --> 00:15:24.534 Let's figure that out. 00:15:24.921 --> 00:15:26.482 The leading term, let's see. 00:15:26.482 --> 00:15:30.233 This is going to be a second-degree polynomial times another first-degree 00:15:30.233 --> 00:15:34.016 (so that’s going to be third), multiplied by third, so this gonna be— 00:15:34.016 --> 00:15:39.368 The leading coefficient is 1; the leading term is x to the sixth. 00:15:39.668 --> 00:15:41.905 Let me just repeat that, you multiply this out, 00:15:41.905 --> 00:15:43.621 that's going to be second-degree, 00:15:43.621 --> 00:15:46.553 times another x is going to be third-degree, 00:15:46.553 --> 00:15:49.488 times x to the third is going to be x to the sixth. 00:15:49.488 --> 00:15:55.352 So, we know the end behavior of this stuff in the middle is 00:15:55.352 --> 00:15:58.903 going to look like that. It's going to go up: 00:15:58.903 --> 00:16:02.502 as x goes to positive infinity, y is going to go to positive infinity 00:16:02.502 --> 00:16:07.169 [and] as x goes to negative infinity, y is going to go to positive infinity, 00:16:07.169 --> 00:16:11.484 because this is a six-degree term and the leading coefficient is positive 1. 00:16:13.450 --> 00:16:15.751 Okay, what about the zeros? 00:16:15.751 --> 00:16:18.934 Just write those out, and the multiplicity. 00:16:22.600 --> 00:16:25.186 So, the first zero is zero. 00:16:27.217 --> 00:16:29.633 A multiplicity three, that's odd. 00:16:29.633 --> 00:16:35.832 The next one is x equals negative 2, multiplicity there is one, it's odd, 00:16:35.832 --> 00:16:39.017 so it's going to go through both of those points. 00:16:39.017 --> 00:16:43.357 And then x equals 3, and that's even. 00:16:43.357 --> 00:16:46.790 So, it's going to be tangent of x equals 3. 00:16:48.457 --> 00:16:50.682 Let's sketch a graph. 00:16:54.874 --> 00:16:56.906 All right, so let's see… 00:16:56.906 --> 00:17:01.106 how about at x equals zero, there's our point. 00:17:01.473 --> 00:17:05.809 Negative 2, there's our point, and positive 3. 00:17:06.575 --> 00:17:10.173 Then our end behavior, we know it's got to be 00:17:10.173 --> 00:17:14.239 something like this and something like this. 00:17:15.789 --> 00:17:20.190 Then what happens here at negative— let's take care of the leftmost one first— 00:17:20.190 --> 00:17:22.941 negative 2 is odd multiplicity, right? 00:17:22.941 --> 00:17:27.658 So we know it must come down and go through this point. 00:17:29.074 --> 00:17:30.691 What happens at zero? 00:17:30.691 --> 00:17:35.908 It's odd multiplicity, so it's going to come down and then go back up. 00:17:36.824 --> 00:17:40.487 I don't know what's going on with my Wacom board here. 00:17:40.487 --> 00:17:42.724 We might have to reboot. 00:17:43.173 --> 00:17:46.043 Okay, it’s misbehaving. 00:17:47.371 --> 00:17:49.405 Okay, so it's down and it's going to go up. 00:17:49.405 --> 00:17:51.625 Why? Because this is odd multiplicity. 00:17:51.625 --> 00:17:53.580 Then what about this zero? 00:17:53.580 --> 00:17:56.069 Well, there are no other zeros, okay? 00:17:56.069 --> 00:17:59.534 And at 3, it has multiplicity two. 00:17:59.534 --> 00:18:01.685 So, you know it must come down— 00:18:01.685 --> 00:18:06.718 excuse me, it must come down to this, touch, and then zoom back up. 00:18:07.133 --> 00:18:09.667 It's going to look something like that. 00:18:11.217 --> 00:18:13.118 Aren't these fun? 00:18:13.354 --> 00:18:19.168 Okay, let's try that in Desmos to see if we're close. 00:18:19.718 --> 00:18:30.700 So, x to the third, x plus 2— gotta get rid of this exponent here— 00:18:32.767 --> 00:18:36.228 and then x— gotta get rid of that exponent— I don't know, yeah, 00:18:36.228 --> 00:18:45.198 you shouldn't have that in there— x minus 3, that's to the second power. 00:18:46.980 --> 00:18:50.245 Okay, let's see what we have here. 00:18:50.652 --> 00:18:52.128 Do I have that typed in right? 00:18:52.128 --> 00:18:56.915 X to the third times x plus 2 times x minus 3 squared. 00:18:56.915 --> 00:19:00.681 Okay, let's see if we're in the ball park. 00:19:02.336 --> 00:19:05.568 Okay so, there appears to be something wrong. 00:19:05.568 --> 00:19:07.520 Oh, I just don’t— you can't see enough of it. 00:19:07.520 --> 00:19:10.510 We have to change the scale so we can see more of the graph, 00:19:10.510 --> 00:19:11.993 so let's fix this. 00:19:11.993 --> 00:19:13.584 The problem is we’re zoomed in too close. 00:19:13.584 --> 00:19:15.141 There we go. 00:19:15.141 --> 00:19:19.369 Okay, look, everything interesting happens between negative 3 and 4, 00:19:19.369 --> 00:19:22.078 so let's change that. 00:19:22.400 --> 00:19:26.431 Just trying to get this so we get a better picture. 00:19:27.965 --> 00:19:31.498 Then we need this y and x to be bigger. 00:19:31.498 --> 00:19:33.932 So, how about— again, I don't know how big— 00:19:33.932 --> 00:19:35.465 So, let’s go to negative— 00:19:35.465 --> 00:19:37.898 Nope, gotta go bigger than that, negative 40. 00:19:37.898 --> 00:19:39.300 There we go. 00:19:39.300 --> 00:19:42.907 See how you just gotta play around with it, so you can see what you need to see. 00:19:42.907 --> 00:19:45.716 Let's go 50 here. Oh, there we go. 00:19:45.716 --> 00:19:47.800 Look at that. Beautiful. 00:19:48.849 --> 00:19:49.483 Okay. 00:19:49.483 --> 00:19:52.015 Does that look like what we drew? 00:19:52.015 --> 00:19:53.614 Sure does. 00:19:53.614 --> 00:19:54.798 Pretty close. 00:19:54.798 --> 00:19:58.775 It comes down, odd multiplicity, 00:19:58.775 --> 00:20:00.430 odd multiplicity, 00:20:00.430 --> 00:20:04.003 and then even multiplicity, so it's tangent here. 00:20:04.118 --> 00:20:06.218 Isn’t it beautiful? 00:20:06.702 --> 00:20:10.899 Polynomials are beautiful because they're smooth and continuous. 00:20:15.398 --> 00:20:21.914 Okay, so believe it or not, there's 3.2 part F. 00:20:21.914 --> 00:20:23.615 There's another part to this. 00:20:23.615 --> 00:20:27.281 We're going to stop right there and we'll have one last part. 00:20:27.281 --> 00:20:29.598 Okay, bye, see you shortly.