WEBVTT

00:00:11.008 --> 00:00:12.515
Good evening, Salford.

00:00:12.515 --> 00:00:16.043
How thrilling to say that
and see my name so big up there.

00:00:16.043 --> 00:00:19.573
I hope you've had a great day.
I'm actually going to talk to you

00:00:19.573 --> 00:00:23.975
about fashion, and I've decided,
because you've taken in

00:00:23.975 --> 00:00:27.117
so much information today
and there's such a broad spectrum

00:00:27.117 --> 00:00:31.134
of opinion here, and you know all about
things like quantum physics

00:00:31.134 --> 00:00:34.909
and tech, and stuff like that,
I'm not speaking to a normal crowd

00:00:34.909 --> 00:00:39.305
of fashionistas -- I don't know,
maybe some of you are fashionistas --

00:00:39.305 --> 00:00:43.094
but I talk to you and
I do fashion by numbers.

00:00:43.094 --> 00:00:47.166
I'm saying fashion by numbers,
not the numbers,

00:00:47.166 --> 00:00:49.259
which I think
is more grammatically correct.

00:00:49.259 --> 00:00:51.456
Now, I'm going to talk to you about
fashion by numbers,

00:00:51.456 --> 00:00:56.358
because I love fashion
and I love style,

00:00:56.358 --> 00:00:59.059
and I think there's lots
of really absorbing things

00:00:59.059 --> 00:01:03.620
about the industry and about the idea
of expressing ourselves through clothes,

00:01:03.620 --> 00:01:07.436
but there are also some issues,
which we will get to in a minute,

00:01:07.436 --> 00:01:14.088
and I think some of the numbers are just
gigantic and they're quite illuminating.

00:01:14.088 --> 00:01:18.911
So, the first statistic,
when I was doing a lot of research

00:01:18.911 --> 00:01:23.805
on the contemporary fashion industry,
was one that I had to estimate

00:01:23.805 --> 00:01:26.884
by putting together
lots of different research.

00:01:26.884 --> 00:01:30.564
And I figured out that there are
about 80 billion new garments

00:01:30.564 --> 00:01:32.727
that are created every year.

00:01:32.727 --> 00:01:36.609
Some of you, like me, might feel that
most of those end up in your wardrobe,

00:01:36.609 --> 00:01:39.140
it depends how avaricious
a buyer you are.

00:01:39.140 --> 00:01:41.665
Some people might feel
that they all end up

00:01:41.665 --> 00:01:43.962
in your laundry basket,
which I also feel,

00:01:43.962 --> 00:01:45.582
having to do my family's laundry.

00:01:45.582 --> 00:01:47.918
So, that's an estimated number
of new garments

00:01:47.918 --> 00:01:49.897
produced worldwide every year.

00:01:49.897 --> 00:01:53.368
Now the weird thing is
that we still end up

00:01:53.368 --> 00:01:58.370
with 2 million tonnes of textiles,
mainly apparel, in landfill every year.

00:01:58.370 --> 00:02:02.186
So, we're slinging them away
almost as quickly as we can buy them.

00:02:02.186 --> 00:02:04.557
Which points to a certain disposability,

00:02:04.557 --> 00:02:09.476
a certain throwaway culture,
in fashion.

00:02:09.476 --> 00:02:14.943
19 is the number of jeans
that I found in my own wardrobe,

00:02:14.943 --> 00:02:16.833
when I did an inventory of my wardrobe.

00:02:16.833 --> 00:02:19.880
And I would recommend to anybody
that you do an inventory of your wardrobe,

00:02:19.880 --> 00:02:22.285
because it's
really, really illuminating.

00:02:22.285 --> 00:02:24.503
even if you think that
you're not a fashion addict,

00:02:24.503 --> 00:02:26.079
you're not a fashion victim,

00:02:26.079 --> 00:02:30.186
you will be surprised at
how many duplicates you have.

00:02:30.186 --> 00:02:33.506
So, I have 19 pairs of jeans
and that's significant

00:02:33.506 --> 00:02:35.948
because -- not because 19
is my lucky number,

00:02:35.948 --> 00:02:37.837
but it is, that's not why I bought them --

00:02:37.837 --> 00:02:42.013
I didn't realize I had 19, because I
just kept consuming without realizing,

00:02:42.013 --> 00:02:45.888
and when I thought about it,
the environmental footprint

00:02:45.888 --> 00:02:48.263
of fashion is absolutely enormous.

00:02:48.263 --> 00:02:53.292
So, for example, it takes between
11,000 and 20,000 litres of water

00:02:53.292 --> 00:02:57.616
to produce enough cotton
for a single pair of jeans.

00:02:57.616 --> 00:03:01.221
And then I started to look at
the impact of fashion generally.

00:03:01.221 --> 00:03:04.026
Now, fashion is a full spectrum industry,

00:03:04.026 --> 00:03:05.907
and with the exception
of the food industry,

00:03:05.907 --> 00:03:11.071
and perhaps the energy industry,
it's hard to think of any other sector

00:03:11.071 --> 00:03:15.698
that owes quite as much
to the planet as fashion does.

00:03:17.013 --> 00:03:20.082
We're all a nation of fashion addicts,
that's how we've become,

00:03:20.082 --> 00:03:22.682
and that's been enabled really
over the last twenty years

00:03:22.682 --> 00:03:25.606
by a phenomenon known as fast fashion.

00:03:25.606 --> 00:03:28.771
Now, sometimes,
it's quite difficult to imagine

00:03:28.771 --> 00:03:31.956
how people got dressed 20 years ago,

00:03:31.956 --> 00:03:35.460
before fast fashion really kicked in,
but we know they did,

00:03:35.460 --> 00:03:38.771
but did they all just wear
the same pair of Dralon flares?

00:03:38.771 --> 00:03:40.311
How did they actually manage it?

00:03:40.311 --> 00:03:43.524
Because what we've done is
we've developed a whole new system

00:03:43.524 --> 00:03:46.228
of getting dressed,
which revolves around

00:03:46.228 --> 00:03:51.889
very, very quick microtrends
that can very quickly translate

00:03:51.889 --> 00:03:55.979
from the catwalk into our wardrobes
and onto the high street.

00:03:55.979 --> 00:03:59.021
And the UK is
one of the world leaders in this trend.

00:03:59.021 --> 00:04:02.231
We have some of the biggest retailers,
some of the biggest brands,

00:04:02.231 --> 00:04:05.362
and it has to be said,
that we interpret fast fashion

00:04:05.362 --> 00:04:07.461
quite successfully.

00:04:11.182 --> 00:04:14.465
So, we think about how fashion
actually presents itself.

00:04:14.465 --> 00:04:16.625
What it doesn't really do, is tell you

00:04:16.625 --> 00:04:19.322
how much it's changed
over the last 20 years.

00:04:19.322 --> 00:04:22.444
So, there will be people here
who've never known anything else.

00:04:22.444 --> 00:04:24.720
Lucky them, because
they're nice and young,

00:04:24.720 --> 00:04:30.099
but, there has been
a completely revolutionized system

00:04:30.099 --> 00:04:35.428
to the way apparel
is produced and sold.

00:04:35.428 --> 00:04:39.354
But we really don't get this idea
from the fashion weeks that we have.

00:04:39.354 --> 00:04:43.212
It presents a very traditional face.
So, we have the two seasons,

00:04:43.212 --> 00:04:46.261
we have autumn/winter
and spring/summer,

00:04:46.261 --> 00:04:51.711
and then these are when we trickle
things down from the catwalk into store,

00:04:51.711 --> 00:04:54.510
and they set the trend
of what we're going to be wearing.

00:04:54.510 --> 00:04:58.179
In actual fact, those seasons
have got as much in common

00:04:58.179 --> 00:05:00.538
with the contemporary fashion industry

00:05:00.538 --> 00:05:04.947
as Gregorian plainsong has with the
contemporary music industry.

00:05:04.947 --> 00:05:07.220
Absolutely nothing to do with it.

00:05:07.220 --> 00:05:09.820
What really happens
is that we're now looking at,

00:05:09.820 --> 00:05:15.539
rather than two or four seasons a year,
we're really looking at 52 seasons a year.

00:05:15.539 --> 00:05:19.525
Every week there are new styles,
there is new stock in shops,

00:05:19.525 --> 00:05:23.877
new stock online, and it's become
a very, very quick process.

00:05:23.877 --> 00:05:26.137
Some people would call it a churn.

00:05:26.137 --> 00:05:30.026
Now, when I look at the bright young hopes
of British fashion,

00:05:30.026 --> 00:05:32.684
and we see these brilliant designers
have got something.

00:05:32.684 --> 00:05:36.122
Up here we've got Alice Temperley,
we've got Jonathan Saunders,

00:05:36.122 --> 00:05:38.155
Roksanda Ilincic.

00:05:38.155 --> 00:05:41.045
So, these are great names,
great hopes for the future.

00:05:41.045 --> 00:05:43.064
And then we hear about the people

00:05:43.064 --> 00:05:46.624
who basically succeed
to the big luxury conglomerates

00:05:46.624 --> 00:05:48.361
and take over those brands.

00:05:48.361 --> 00:05:50.744
And these are big, big names,
going out there

00:05:50.744 --> 00:05:53.077
into this multi-billion pound sector

00:05:53.077 --> 00:05:56.237
and representing British style.
But often I think,

00:05:56.237 --> 00:05:59.803
'Will they be OK?'
Because, actually, it's not just

00:05:59.803 --> 00:06:03.416
fast fashion or high street fashion
that's become super fast,

00:06:03.416 --> 00:06:06.694
but also the luxury industry.

00:06:08.367 --> 00:06:10.612
This is the way
that we really, really shop;

00:06:10.612 --> 00:06:14.964
we shop in a mob, we shop in bulk
and we buy very cheap.

00:06:14.964 --> 00:06:17.079
Now, one of the things
I really like to do

00:06:17.079 --> 00:06:20.410
is to hang around outside shops,
maybe not as crowded as this,

00:06:20.410 --> 00:06:23.606
and actually go through people's bags,
with their consent,

00:06:23.606 --> 00:06:27.785
as they come out -- I do ask first --
and it's amazing

00:06:27.785 --> 00:06:32.002
how many people buy in bulk
and buy duplicates these days.

00:06:32.002 --> 00:06:34.438
And one of my favourite observations,

00:06:34.438 --> 00:06:37.206
although it does not say
particularly good things,

00:06:37.206 --> 00:06:41.814
is that a colleague of mine was watching
outside Primark one day,

00:06:41.814 --> 00:06:43.911
or just kind of loitering nearby,

00:06:43.911 --> 00:06:46.946
and a girl came out
with four of these bags.

00:06:46.946 --> 00:06:49.746
Now, it could have happened
in lots of different stores,

00:06:49.746 --> 00:06:52.318
but Primark use these paper bags,
and it was raining,

00:06:52.318 --> 00:06:55.374
it was really, really raining,
the bag got completely soaked,

00:06:55.374 --> 00:06:58.725
while she was waiting for a bus,
or whatever, and it fell apart.

00:06:58.725 --> 00:07:01.827
And she just left these clothes,
these brand new clothes,

00:07:01.827 --> 00:07:04.704
she just left them on the pavement
and walked off.

00:07:04.704 --> 00:07:09.287
Now, my contention is that if we produce,
if we design for landfill,

00:07:09.287 --> 00:07:12.751
if we produce clothes that are
effectively disposable,

00:07:12.751 --> 00:07:16.056
we will all start to treat them
like litter.

00:07:16.056 --> 00:07:18.909
Now, I'm not saying that this also
happens for luxury goods,

00:07:18.909 --> 00:07:21.556
because I think if you're spending
a grand on a handbag,

00:07:21.556 --> 00:07:24.012
you're probably going to be
a little bit more careful,

00:07:24.012 --> 00:07:26.019
but the same cycle and the same churn

00:07:26.019 --> 00:07:29.145
is starting to happen
throughout the fashion landscape.

00:07:29.145 --> 00:07:32.549
So, effectively,
these designers that we saw,

00:07:32.549 --> 00:07:36.343
those shiny-faced, hopeful, big prospects
of British fashion

00:07:36.343 --> 00:07:40.730
and all round the world in fact,
actually are in a similar churn.

00:07:40.730 --> 00:07:43.758
So, they're not just doing 
the autumn/winter, the spring/summer,

00:07:43.758 --> 00:07:47.715
they're also having to work
on pre-fall/fall collections,

00:07:47.715 --> 00:07:50.156
resort-wear, yacht-wear,

00:07:50.156 --> 00:07:53.520
getting on a yacht, getting off a yacht,
post-yacht, pre-yacht,

00:07:53.520 --> 00:07:56.386
who are all these people
that they are designing for?

00:07:56.386 --> 00:07:58.448
Who has all these yachts?

00:07:58.448 --> 00:07:59.860
(Laughter)

00:07:59.860 --> 00:08:04.568
So, let's just unravel fast fashion
just a little bit.

00:08:04.568 --> 00:08:07.716
So, there are some very good points
about fast fashion by the way.

00:08:07.716 --> 00:08:12.664
First of all, it breeds life into
a rather stagnant British high street.

00:08:12.664 --> 00:08:15.044
Those of you who are
old enough to remember

00:08:15.044 --> 00:08:17.366
will remember there was
a certain lack of choice,

00:08:17.366 --> 00:08:21.012
a certain sort of look
that the high street had,

00:08:21.012 --> 00:08:25.902
maybe 20-25 years ago, which wasn't
that appealing, wasn't that aspirational.

00:08:25.902 --> 00:08:29.192
So, the high street brands
have really democratized style,

00:08:29.192 --> 00:08:31.020
you're able to get hold of it.

00:08:31.020 --> 00:08:34.767
I remember moving to London
and coming back to the North West,

00:08:34.767 --> 00:08:38.503
and people used to come up to me and say,
'Oh, did you get that in London?'

00:08:38.503 --> 00:08:41.219
I mean that doesn't happen now,
it happens in the reverse.

00:08:41.219 --> 00:08:44.413
You know, that's how democratize
style has become.

00:08:44.413 --> 00:08:47.479
So, 814 million garments a year,

00:08:47.479 --> 00:08:52.736
this is also an estimate, are produced
by Zara/Inditex, the Spanish brand.

00:08:52.736 --> 00:08:54.188
That's a lot of clothes.

00:08:54.188 --> 00:08:57.738
And they have 45,000 designs,
so their designers

00:08:57.738 --> 00:09:00.652
are constantly coming up with trends,
every single year.

00:09:00.652 --> 00:09:04.193
Not all of those will get into store,
but a large proportion of them will,

00:09:04.193 --> 00:09:08.720
which shows you where this engine
is coming from, all these micro-trends.

00:09:08.720 --> 00:09:11.528
When Zara started in the UK,
nobody understood it,

00:09:11.528 --> 00:09:14.523
because you'd go in there,
and the consumer would say,

00:09:14.523 --> 00:09:17.206
'Well, this is nice,
maybe a little bit expensive.'

00:09:17.206 --> 00:09:20.376
And then they'll say,
'I'll think about it, I'll come back.'

00:09:20.376 --> 00:09:22.945
They'll come back
and it wouldn't be there,

00:09:22.945 --> 00:09:25.969
because shops these days don't re-stock,
they don't need to,

00:09:25.969 --> 00:09:28.143
because they've moved
on to the next trend.

00:09:28.143 --> 00:09:31.314
If you blink, you miss it.

00:09:31.314 --> 00:09:34.795
Number 3 -- I'm still doing
the fashion in numbers thing.

00:09:34.795 --> 00:09:38.491
This is the position of Amancio Ortega
who owns Zara,

00:09:38.491 --> 00:09:43.073
on the international rich list.
He's the 3rd richest man in the world.

00:09:43.073 --> 00:09:46.676
There's a lot of money
in this fast fashion business.

00:09:46.676 --> 00:09:50.353
Here's Philip Green, maybe this is where
all the resort yacht wear is going to,

00:09:50.353 --> 00:09:52.725
because he has a yacht.

00:09:52.725 --> 00:09:56.796
And this is the little picture
of a village, somewhere in England,

00:09:56.796 --> 00:10:00.238
a whole village, that has been bought
by Stefan Persson,

00:10:00.238 --> 00:10:02.923
who is the CEO of H&M.

00:10:02.923 --> 00:10:06.594
So, that gives you some idea of the riches
that we're talking about.

00:10:06.594 --> 00:10:11.163
I mention that, not because it's illegal
to make money, because it's not,

00:10:11.163 --> 00:10:13.549
but just to show you
a little bit of disparity,

00:10:13.549 --> 00:10:19.631
because who is the real engine
of this fashion churn, this fashion cycle?

00:10:19.631 --> 00:10:23.420
It happens in Bangladesh.

00:10:23.420 --> 00:10:28.008
It happens in other countries too,
but Bangladesh, 80% of the GDP

00:10:28.008 --> 00:10:30.889
is constituted by
the ready-made garment industry,

00:10:30.889 --> 00:10:33.656
and that's the equivalent of $20 billion.

00:10:33.656 --> 00:10:35.552
So, when we talk
about problems there,

00:10:35.552 --> 00:10:40.086
it is not feasible for companies to cut
and run, because, as you can see,

00:10:40.086 --> 00:10:44.099
that economy is dependent on this trade.

00:10:44.099 --> 00:10:48.681
Now, I put this in, because there was
a recent power list of fashion,

00:10:48.681 --> 00:10:53.607
and I counted 4 muses in the top 30.

00:10:53.607 --> 00:10:56.578
Now, I'm not really sure
what a muse does,

00:10:56.578 --> 00:10:59.552
but there were four muses and there was
no mention of the people

00:10:59.552 --> 00:11:01.397
that actually make the clothes,

00:11:01.397 --> 00:11:03.389
which I thought was
really, really interesting,

00:11:03.389 --> 00:11:07.554
and I think this really shines a light
on a problem in the whole industry.

00:11:07.554 --> 00:11:12.024
So, there's 101 processes
to making a garment.

00:11:12.024 --> 00:11:17.314
Just 6 to 8 of those are done
in factories like the ones in Bangladesh.

00:11:17.314 --> 00:11:24.244
And these are basically
what the cut, make and trim army do.

00:11:24.244 --> 00:11:29.418
And by conservative estimate,
there's 3 million, mainly young women,

00:11:29.418 --> 00:11:31.664
who work in this cut, make and trim army,

00:11:31.664 --> 00:11:34.880
and these are the core part
of the supply chain,

00:11:34.880 --> 00:11:40.595
when they're actually
putting the piece together.

00:11:40.595 --> 00:11:44.455
These are vast factories,
vast, vast production lines.

00:11:44.455 --> 00:11:50.053
Now, 48.5 seconds is the time
that it's estimated it should take

00:11:50.053 --> 00:11:55.699
one of the people on this production stage
to actually sew a seam.

00:11:55.699 --> 00:11:59.064
It's relentless, relentless work.
This is a quote from Ali Hewson,

00:11:59.064 --> 00:12:02.796
who set up the EDUN brand,
'We carry the story of the people

00:12:02.796 --> 00:12:05.165
who make our clothes around with us.'

00:12:05.165 --> 00:12:07.172
And we do,
but we don't acknowledge it,

00:12:07.172 --> 00:12:09.349
which is why I showed
that picture of the muse

00:12:09.349 --> 00:12:10.916
and I point to that power list.

00:12:10.916 --> 00:12:15.578
These are the unseen, the hidden people
in the supply chain.

00:12:15.985 --> 00:12:19.572
5,600 -- that's the number
of garment factories

00:12:19.572 --> 00:12:23.361
that Bangladesh has,
mainly centred around Dhaka.

00:12:23.361 --> 00:12:26.051
At last count,
when this report came out,

00:12:26.051 --> 00:12:28.534
there were less than 200 inspectors --

00:12:28.534 --> 00:12:32.326
I think that should be fewer,
but I'm just being pedantic.

00:12:32.326 --> 00:12:38.252
Now, in 1911 we have the biggest tragedy
in the garment sector to date.

00:12:38.252 --> 00:12:41.202
And that was the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire;

00:12:41.202 --> 00:12:44.550
and that was
in New York's garment district.

00:12:44.550 --> 00:12:49.860
146 people died in 18 minutes,
and this was the worst disaster

00:12:49.860 --> 00:12:53.020
that we'd ever seen in this sector.

00:12:53.020 --> 00:12:55.367
And that prompted,
not a revolution,

00:12:55.367 --> 00:12:58.503
but a lot of picketing,
a big labour movement,

00:12:58.503 --> 00:12:59.980
and it's still acknowledged.

00:12:59.980 --> 00:13:03.453
Every year on the anniversary,

00:13:03.453 --> 00:13:06.713
people will go and acknowledge,
the trade unions will acknowledge,

00:13:06.713 --> 00:13:08.871
that that disaster happened.

00:13:08.871 --> 00:13:11.709
And what really struck me was
that we never acknowledge.

00:13:11.709 --> 00:13:15.938
There were lots and lots of factory deaths
and fire deaths and stampedes

00:13:15.938 --> 00:13:19.578
in factories, lots of fatalities,
that were happening in the supply chain.

00:13:19.578 --> 00:13:23.747
Probably one or two a month
that we learn about through our era,

00:13:23.747 --> 00:13:25.790
and we never really said
anything about it.

00:13:25.790 --> 00:13:30.147
But this number, we can't really
make it go away, and we can't ignore.

00:13:30.147 --> 00:13:35.878
This is 1,133 -- which is the number
of people who died on the 24th April

00:13:35.878 --> 00:13:38.898
at Rana Plaza.

00:13:38.898 --> 00:13:42.239
Rana Plaza basically collapsed like
a house of cards.

00:13:42.239 --> 00:13:45.916
There were 2,000 people working in it,
it was a mixed-use complex,

00:13:45.916 --> 00:13:48.368
but, it was the garment workers that died,

00:13:48.368 --> 00:13:51.854
because the garment workers were
the only workers that were sent back in,

00:13:51.854 --> 00:14:00.614
and unfortunately that is a common story,
the garment workers are always in there.

00:14:00.614 --> 00:14:03.968
These images are probably not unfamiliar,
because they were broadcast

00:14:03.968 --> 00:14:07.648
around the world, and, for the first time,
we had news agencies

00:14:07.648 --> 00:14:10.389
actually interviewing
these garment workers,

00:14:10.389 --> 00:14:12.445
and actually getting their testimonies.

00:14:12.445 --> 00:14:15.575
The difference was that
they were actually under rubble.

00:14:15.575 --> 00:14:18.041
So, they're the statistics, well,
the bold statistics,

00:14:18.041 --> 00:14:22.786
2,500 injured, 700 children left,

00:14:22.786 --> 00:14:26.195
and the Rana Plaza battle
for compensation continues.

00:14:26.195 --> 00:14:30.978
But it did make a stink. Who makes
our clothes? Where do they come from?

00:14:30.978 --> 00:14:33.210
It's not the only thing
in the supply chain.

00:14:33.210 --> 00:14:35.471
This is just about
Uzbekistan's cotton industry;

00:14:35.471 --> 00:14:40.076
1.5 million children, who are alleged
to be involved in the harvest.

00:14:40.076 --> 00:14:41.865
And this happens every year.

00:14:41.865 --> 00:14:44.422
They're sent out into the fields
around September time,

00:14:44.422 --> 00:14:50.471
and they will pick the harvest, which is
then sold in the international market.

00:14:50.471 --> 00:14:53.273
And this is Gulnara,
this is the dictator's daughter,

00:14:53.273 --> 00:14:55.825
and I put this in,
because this is her at fashion week

00:14:55.825 --> 00:14:57.236
showing her own collection.

00:14:57.236 --> 00:14:59.302
So, you see this terrible dichotomy,

00:14:59.302 --> 00:15:04.635
of how we're hiding this kind
of slave labour in the fashion industry.

00:15:04.635 --> 00:15:07.572
Can we do it better?
Yes, we can.

00:15:07.572 --> 00:15:10.851
Now, I think
the whole sustainable style movement

00:15:10.851 --> 00:15:14.975
has been slightly typified, and held back,
because people fear tie-dye.

00:15:14.975 --> 00:15:16.934
They fear that we're going to have to wear

00:15:16.934 --> 00:15:19.686
this kind of
knit-your-own tofu hat aesthetic,

00:15:19.686 --> 00:15:21.710
and they're really, really not up for it.

00:15:21.710 --> 00:15:24.238
So, what I did was get together
with some friends,

00:15:24.238 --> 00:15:27.332
and we launched something,
we didn't call it granola chic,

00:15:27.332 --> 00:15:30.256
we called it the Green Carpet Challenge.

00:15:30.256 --> 00:15:33.185
Now, we're just trying
to play around with some ideas.

00:15:33.185 --> 00:15:36.558
I love this. This is a photograph 
by a seminal fashion photographer

00:15:36.558 --> 00:15:38.055
called Lillian Bassman.

00:15:38.055 --> 00:15:40.792
And she didn't mean anything
sustainable when she did it,

00:15:40.792 --> 00:15:43.574
but I love the idea of
more fashion mileage per dress.

00:15:43.574 --> 00:15:47.083
So, here's another figure I'd love you
to remember, which is 30.

00:15:47.083 --> 00:15:50.369
Don't buy anything unless
you can guarantee to yourself

00:15:50.369 --> 00:15:55.472
that you're going to wear it 30 times.
That's a really good marker.

00:15:55.472 --> 00:15:57.453
So, we started the Green Carpet Challenge,

00:15:57.453 --> 00:16:01.814
and we charged designers with
making us something sustainable.

00:16:01.814 --> 00:16:04.029
This is an Armani dress.

00:16:04.029 --> 00:16:08.850
And 40, that's the number of A-Listers
that we've sent down red carpets

00:16:08.850 --> 00:16:11.336
from the Oscars, to the Globes,
to the whatever

00:16:11.336 --> 00:16:13.198
all in these sustainable outfits.

00:16:13.198 --> 00:16:16.216
We wanted to prove
to the fashion industry, to the editors,

00:16:16.216 --> 00:16:18.390
to everybody watching,
that it could be done,

00:16:18.390 --> 00:16:22.075
and it could be desirable.

00:16:22.075 --> 00:16:25.959
There's more of them.

00:16:25.959 --> 00:16:27.933
And we wanted to work
in the supply chain,

00:16:27.933 --> 00:16:30.991
so, we started looking at things
like the leather chain.

00:16:30.991 --> 00:16:33.986
11 billion pairs of shoes
are made every year.

00:16:33.986 --> 00:16:36.970
60% of the leather goes to shoes.

00:16:36.970 --> 00:16:39.858
Now, when you see a shoe
and it says made in Italy,

00:16:39.858 --> 00:16:43.217
you think, 'OK, great.'
And then you ask the people in the shop,

00:16:43.217 --> 00:16:45.316
and they say,
'Yeah, the leather's Italian.'

00:16:45.316 --> 00:16:48.982
It can't be, because if it were, the whole
of Italy would be covered in cows.

00:16:48.982 --> 00:16:51.657
There'd be cows round the Trevi Fountain,
it can't be.

00:16:51.657 --> 00:16:54.255
No, they're often from Brazil or China,

00:16:54.255 --> 00:16:57.626
and in Brazil,
deforestation is being driven

00:16:57.626 --> 00:16:59.296
by the meat and leather industry.

00:16:59.296 --> 00:17:02.340
So, we wanted to make a market
for clean leather.

00:17:02.340 --> 00:17:06.416
Leather that we could prove
was zero deforestation.

00:17:06.416 --> 00:17:09.021
So, we went to Gucci,
who came up with this little bag,

00:17:09.021 --> 00:17:11.194
and I don't think
this looks sustainable at all.

00:17:11.194 --> 00:17:13.892
It's not made of hemp,
it's not very granola,

00:17:13.892 --> 00:17:15.969
it just looks like a bag.

00:17:17.630 --> 00:17:22.240
100+ companies have now signed
the Bangladesh Fire Safety Accord.

00:17:22.240 --> 00:17:25.417
Now, I'm not going to explain why,
because I'm running out of time,

00:17:25.417 --> 00:17:28.125
but it is, I think,
a very, very important marker,

00:17:28.125 --> 00:17:31.848
and I think, given time, it could make
a real, real difference.

00:17:31.848 --> 00:17:34.414
What I would urge you to do
is keep an eye,

00:17:34.414 --> 00:17:36.832
just keep abreast
of what's happening in fashion,

00:17:36.832 --> 00:17:42.397
and where you buy and who signed what;
it's really, really important.

00:17:42.397 --> 00:17:45.342
2p, add that onto a £6 T-shirt,

00:17:45.342 --> 00:17:49.297
that would double the wages
of a garment worker in Bangladesh.

00:17:49.297 --> 00:17:52.082
Now, I think that's a cost
that we can probably absorb.

00:17:52.082 --> 00:17:54.961
24th April, that's the other date
I want you to remember.

00:17:54.961 --> 00:17:58.523
24, remember that number,
it's the anniversary

00:17:58.523 --> 00:18:02.741
of Rana Plaza,
and it's Fashion Revolution Day.

00:18:02.746 --> 00:18:04.469
Thank you.

00:18:04.469 --> 00:18:07.865
(Applause)